IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> The Fichetti Sterility Inducer?, The warning label on the pain inducer.
hyzmarca
post May 17 2006, 10:38 AM
Post #1


Midnight Toker
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,686
Joined: 4-July 04
From: Zombie Drop Bear Santa's Workshop
Member No.: 6,456



I just noticed something quite interesting. On the art of a Fichetti Pain inducer in SR4 there is a warning label. It is very tiny. You can only read it if you blow up the image about thirty-two times.

The fine print warning reads "May cause pain, cancer, and sterility."

Now, fichetti is certainly using the label to cover their rear ends from potential lawsuits but it seems that they wouldn't have specificly listed cancer and sterility if these things havn't happened before, possibly during testing. After all, there are so many potential problems with any product that listing them all preemptivly would be impossible.

It makes for some interesting flavor to have characters who were sterilized or given cancer by a pain inducer it it gives a reason for shadowrunners to actually be scared of a two-cent rent-a-cop carrying one. Sure, the pain is only momentary but the swim team may never be the same again.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CONAN9845
post May 17 2006, 10:53 AM
Post #2


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 65
Joined: 30-May 02
From: South Jersey
Member No.: 2,798



That's what happens when you bombard living tissue with microwaves.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
The Jopp
post May 17 2006, 10:56 AM
Post #3


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,925
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 948



I wonder if there's a chance to overcharge it so that it actually cooks people...

Anyone needs a meltagun? :grinbig:
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ancient History
post May 17 2006, 10:57 AM
Post #4


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 6,748
Joined: 5-July 02
Member No.: 2,935



I'll see your meltagun and raise you a choppa.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Witness
post May 17 2006, 11:39 AM
Post #5


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 681
Joined: 28-February 06
From: UK
Member No.: 8,319



Can "an inexpensive, effective, non-lethal stun technology accurate at 100 meters" be far behind?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cray74
post May 17 2006, 11:40 AM
Post #6


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,428
Joined: 9-June 02
Member No.: 2,860



QUOTE (CONAN9845)
That's what happens when you bombard living tissue with microwaves.

Microwaves aren't exactly big cancer-causing sources. Microwave photons don't pack the punch to rip up DNA like UV or x-ray light.

By the time you actually pump enough microwaves into a target to start worrying about cancer, that roast pork smell will tell you the target has more immediate concerns.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
The Jopp
post May 17 2006, 11:46 AM
Post #7


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,925
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 948



The Fichetti pain inducer has one big drawback though, it is only good when used by at least three people. Two who subdue the target with inducers and one to cuff the subject.

As soon as you drop the beam they are a-ok, and how much is one "charge"? Is it one shot that can be centered on the target for eternity or is it one shot per combat turn?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Witness
post May 17 2006, 12:21 PM
Post #8


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 681
Joined: 28-February 06
From: UK
Member No.: 8,319



I'd assumed that cancer was probably quite treatable by 2070. Of course cancer is an umbrella term for a wide variety of cellular misfunctions, so there might well be some cancers that are still a problem, but generally speaking maybe cancer isn't quite the nightmare that is used to be in 2006. (If you can afford the treatments).
What do the rest of you think on this issue?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fistandantilus4....
post May 17 2006, 12:27 PM
Post #9


Uncle Fisty
**********

Group: Admin
Posts: 13,891
Joined: 3-January 05
From: Next To Her
Member No.: 6,928



treatable or not, any kind of cancer is bad (mm-kay?). I don't tink people are going to be jumping right back up from the microwaves BTW>

IIRC, the U.S. army is currently looking at using a much larger version (or was at least) for crowd dispersal in the middle east .As in , on the back of a truck large. Makes you feel like your skin is on fire, so you run the hell a way. I don't really see people just bouncing back form that.

Hell ,look what happens to popcorn. ;)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Witness
post May 17 2006, 12:53 PM
Post #10


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 681
Joined: 28-February 06
From: UK
Member No.: 8,319



My point on cancer was a general one. I had an NPC who'd developed cancer. Then I wondered if that was necessarily as bad in 2070 as it would be in 2006.

There're microwaves and there're microwaves. Sticking your head in a microwave oven = bad, but mobile phones also use microwaves and despite what the scaremongers say there is no solid scientific evidence that mobile phone microwaves cause health problems beyond psychosomatic ones. All depends on frequency, amplitude, intensity etc I guess.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Moon-Hawk
post May 17 2006, 02:42 PM
Post #11


Genuine Artificial Intelligence
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,019
Joined: 12-June 03
Member No.: 4,715



Hyzmarca, is your warning label different from mine, or are you just not quoting the entire message?
"WARNING! Microwave Radiation Emitter. May cause pain, cancer and sterility. The Fichetti Corporation is not liable for any harm that results from this products use."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
NightHaunter
post May 17 2006, 04:23 PM
Post #12


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 360
Joined: 18-March 02
From: Plymouth UK.
Member No.: 2,408



This I gotta see!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
blakkie
post May 17 2006, 05:37 PM
Post #13


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,718
Joined: 14-September 02
Member No.: 3,263



That pic is from the same artist that put the "Troll Penis" spam on goggle's HUD. :)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jklst14
post May 17 2006, 06:34 PM
Post #14


CosaNostra Deliverator
**

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 346
Joined: 29-January 05
From: Philadelphia, PA
Member No.: 7,034



QUOTE (blakkie)
That pic is from the same artist that put the "Troll Penis" spam on goggle's HUD. :)

Where's this? I gotta find that pic.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Aaron
post May 17 2006, 06:43 PM
Post #15


Mr. Johnson
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 3,148
Joined: 27-February 06
From: UCAS
Member No.: 8,314



QUOTE (jklst14 @ May 17 2006, 01:34 PM)
QUOTE (blakkie)
That pic is from the same artist that put the "Troll Penis" spam on goggle's HUD. :)

Where's this? I gotta find that pic.

...

uh ...

... why?

[edit] Never mind, I don't want to know.

This post has been edited by Aaron: May 17 2006, 06:43 PM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nezumi
post May 17 2006, 06:45 PM
Post #16


Incertum est quo loco te mors expectet;
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,548
Joined: 24-October 03
From: DeeCee, U.S.
Member No.: 5,760



QUOTE (jklst14)
QUOTE (blakkie)
That pic is from the same artist that put the "Troll Penis" spam on goggle's HUD. :)

Where's this? I gotta find that pic.

Well, now that we've deciphered YOUR preferences... (I'm surprised you haven't posted in the 'where are pictures of trolls' thread yet ;P )

(I'm sorry, I just couldn't resist)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
blakkie
post May 17 2006, 06:49 PM
Post #17


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,718
Joined: 14-September 02
Member No.: 3,263



Bottom right page 323, middle set of eyeware.....because i'm not going to judge you. ;)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Moon-Hawk
post May 17 2006, 06:53 PM
Post #18


Genuine Artificial Intelligence
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,019
Joined: 12-June 03
Member No.: 4,715



HAHAHAHA!
Are there any more "easter eggs" like these in the book?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Squinky
post May 17 2006, 07:07 PM
Post #19


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,479
Joined: 6-May 05
From: Idaho
Member No.: 7,377



I think those are the only two. Which means to me, that is more of a joke thing than anything that should be analized.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Geekkake
post May 17 2006, 07:36 PM
Post #20


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 475
Joined: 13-March 06
From: dusty Mexican borderlands
Member No.: 8,372



QUOTE (Squinky)
I think those are the only two. Which means to me, that is more of a joke thing than anything that should be analized.

...As it were.

Also, I once had a character who ran a very successful troll porn distribution business (ah, Day Job flaw, you are missed...) in addition to his running activities. Maybe I should bring him back as an NPC spammer...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jklst14
post May 17 2006, 08:53 PM
Post #21


CosaNostra Deliverator
**

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 346
Joined: 29-January 05
From: Philadelphia, PA
Member No.: 7,034



*Removes foot from mouth*

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hyzmarca
post May 17 2006, 10:07 PM
Post #22


Midnight Toker
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,686
Joined: 4-July 04
From: Zombie Drop Bear Santa's Workshop
Member No.: 6,456



QUOTE (Moon-Hawk)
Hyzmarca, is your warning label different from mine, or are you just not quoting the entire message?
"WARNING! Microwave Radiation Emitter. May cause pain, cancer and sterility. The Fichetti Corporation is not liable for any harm that results from this products use."

Quoting the whole thing when a single sentence would do pushes the limits of fair use. :D
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
KB12
post May 18 2006, 04:09 AM
Post #23


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 20
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 1,986



I've found 3 so far, including the two previously mentioned. The third isn't quite as amusing but I could totally see it happening...

Page 309, the Fichetti Pain Inducer, zoom in on label to 1200%
Page 323, the Goggles, zoom in to 600%
Page 329, the Medkit, zoom in on medkit-screen to 1600%

It looks like any of those sharp pictures were added digitally, instead of scanned, so you can zoom in really close and still have a sharp image. So if you want to find others, look for that kind of image...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kanada Ten
post May 18 2006, 04:16 AM
Post #24


Beetle Eater
********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 4,797
Joined: 3-June 02
From: Oblivion City
Member No.: 2,826



Hell, I laughed just seeing Speed Coma mentioned.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Vaevictis
post May 18 2006, 09:06 AM
Post #25


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 530
Joined: 11-June 05
Member No.: 7,441



QUOTE (Squinky @ May 17 2006, 02:07 PM)
I think those are the only two. Which means to me, that is more of a joke thing than anything that should be analized.

*blink*

I can't tell if you meant that as a joke or not :/

(analized!=analyzed)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 27th September 2025 - 09:23 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.