IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

7 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Is Shadowrun an unequal world?, Discrimination, and not just metahuman.
Well...?
You cannot see the results of the poll until you have voted. Please login and cast your vote to see the results of this poll.
Total Votes: 54
Guests cannot vote 
Arethusa
post Sep 12 2006, 05:09 AM
Post #26


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,901
Joined: 19-June 03
Member No.: 4,775



I would say the same sort of comic, facile simplicity characterizes much of the game beyond its handling of racism.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mfb
post Sep 12 2006, 05:10 AM
Post #27


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



i agree with the poster. his point isn't that there's no discrimination against metahumans, it's that there's no meaningful discrimination against metahumans. playing someone with anti-metahuman attitudes is not presented as a desirable character option. 99% of the in-character personas display no metahuman bias at all, and the ones that do are written in such a way that they come off as ignorant redneck assholes or stiff-necked traditionalists--caricatures, not living, breathing personalities.

when was the last time one of you saw a Humanis member played as anything but a Humanis member first and foremost? in other words, have you run into many PCs or NPCs who are card-carrying members of an anti-metahuman group, but whose entire personality doesn't revolve around their anti-meta attitudes? when was the last time a human PC was able to buy a piece of gear, but a troll PC was stonewalled? when was the last time only the elf PC was allowed into the elf-only bar where the team's contact was supposed to meet them? when was the last time metatype mattered, in your game, in any capacity beyond their statblocks?

and this isn't really your fault, per se. it's the way the game is presented. Captain Chaos, Fastjack, Findler-Man, Connie Connoisseur, Picador, SPD--find me one poster in any of the sourcebooks who displays any level of bigotry against metahumans, but isn't presented as being a shitstain.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
eidolon
post Sep 12 2006, 05:16 AM
Post #28


ghostrider
********

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 4,196
Joined: 16-May 04
Member No.: 6,333



I had a longer post ready, and I may post it later, but first I wanted to ask:

Am I the only one that sees the 400 pound white gorilla in the room?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mfb
post Sep 12 2006, 05:18 AM
Post #29


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



hey, it's a glandular problem!

edit: i see a few of them, assuming that gorilla = elephant. which one are you talking about?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
eidolon
post Sep 12 2006, 05:41 AM
Post #30


ghostrider
********

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 4,196
Joined: 16-May 04
Member No.: 6,333



The one with its arm sticking out at about a 45 degree angle to the floor, palm downward, wearing that funny cross on its sleeve.

And if you mix the animals, they're harder to miss.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mfb
post Sep 12 2006, 05:43 AM
Post #31


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



nazis? nazis are 99% of the problem. they make things too simple; nazis take things straight from bigotry to genocide. do not pass go, do not collect complex social issues. they're bad guys, pure and simple--kinda the way caricatures are pure and simple. as soon as you equate anti-metahuman bigotry with nazis, you lose any chance of having an interesting character flaw.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Critias
post Sep 12 2006, 05:47 AM
Post #32


Freelance Elf
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 7,324
Joined: 30-September 04
From: Texas
Member No.: 6,714



Eidolon -- do you actually have something to say, or are you just going to keep dancing around talking about pale monkey Nazis, or something? I'm curious as to exactly what it is you think you're hinting at so cleverly.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
eidolon
post Sep 12 2006, 05:47 AM
Post #33


ghostrider
********

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 4,196
Joined: 16-May 04
Member No.: 6,333



Not my point. A good point, but not my point.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mfb
post Sep 12 2006, 05:48 AM
Post #34


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



then... what is? you can't say "that's not my point" without going on to describe what your point actually is. being all obscure does nothing to aid conversation.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
eidolon
post Sep 12 2006, 05:57 AM
Post #35


ghostrider
********

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 4,196
Joined: 16-May 04
Member No.: 6,333



Apologies, but I'm not sure I want to take the overall conversation in that direction if it wasn't going to end up there anyway. Also, there's the possibility that I'm reading more than what is there. It's late and I'm tired.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mfb
post Sep 12 2006, 06:08 AM
Post #36


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



a'ight.

so, yeah. i agree with the guys who say that racism in SR is trite and one-dimensional. trite and one-dimensional racism isn't racism at all, in the context of presenting a game world. racism is, by definition, a divisive issue. how divisive is it to have five hundred shadowposters over more than a decade standing arm-in-arm, singing En Vogue's Free Your Mind? (yeah, En Vogue, suckers, i went there!)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Critias
post Sep 12 2006, 06:14 AM
Post #37


Freelance Elf
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 7,324
Joined: 30-September 04
From: Texas
Member No.: 6,714



Upon reflection, it might seem like there are some of us in the conversation who are arguing racism is good, or it's healthy to be a racist, or, "man, I sure wish more SR characters were racists because it's cool," or what have you. Speaking purely for myself, I can understand where you might get that notion, but it is untrue. I just would prefer to see racism done well than done poorly -- when the only racism this gritty street-level game sees is the comedy hour hah-hah pathetic redneck racism (or the stick-up-his-ass Elven superiority hah-hah pathetic caricature racism), it detracts from the seriousness of an ongoing human problem.

When people are told racism is pathetic, funny, and nothing to really worry about except for a few fringe wacko's (who you can spot a mile away), people might start to believe that. Now, I understand that for some people and some people's games, that's as much as they want of it -- they might not like serious issues, they might like a more light hearted game, they don't care about racism in their action movie die-rolling contests.

But if you're in a game that's run a little more darkly, a little more dirtily, and that's a little more likely to roll up it's sleeves and run into shit like organlegging, kidnapping/prostitution/bunraku rings, terrorism, drug and BTL peddling... well, racism is another one of those ugly things that might come up, and might just be a little more serious (and prevalent) than the cartoonish redneck Humanis with the chewing tobacco and the pick-up truck.

So, well, yeah. The reason some I'm calling out for more (or at least more serious) racism in your average game isn't because, y'know, I dig racism or whatever. It's that I think it should be presented in such a manner so as to allow it to be taken seriously, handled realistically, and to give us one more tool to show us that the Shadowrun future sucks donkey balls to live in, instead of being presented to us as a cool place to be. As written, the only racists you ever run into are the black-wearing moustache-twirling villain types, that everyone can see from a mile away, and everyone (even the most hard-hearted professional killers) laughs at behind their back. That's kind of silly.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
eidolon
post Sep 12 2006, 06:16 AM
Post #38


ghostrider
********

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 4,196
Joined: 16-May 04
Member No.: 6,333



QUOTE (SL James)
Looking at books like Loose Alliances and the way Humanis, etc. is always treated, I'd say that it is in fact the exact opposite--that racists are actively discouraged.


Quite true. Perhaps that has something to do with generally intelligent people writing the source material?

QUOTE (SL James)
But they are tolerated.


Quite so. As would a racist character, in a game in which it was appropriate/acceptable/etc.

QUOTE (SL James)
When was the last time in any sourcebook did you see a racist not treated like either an inbred redneck idiot, or a Brackhaven-like manipulative, scheming asshole who is otherwise completely evil.


Well, I'd say the idiot part is apropos. :D

QUOTE (SL James)
Right. And we all know no criminals anywhere are racist, sexist, or otherwise prejudiced. They're all liberal progressives.


Right. And we know no criminals are liberal progressives. They're all racist, sexist, or otherwise prejudiced.

Edited to get rid of personal attacks. Suffice to say that I find real life racism repugnant, ignorant, insupportable, and silly. It doesn't surprise me that an otherwise intelligent person can hold such views, it saddens and disgusts me. Yay free speech going both ways.

edit**
Excellently explained, Critias. Yes, I do see some in this thread as arguing that, no you were/are not one of them.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mfb
post Sep 12 2006, 06:22 AM
Post #39


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



QUOTE (eidolon)
Quite true. Perhaps that has something to do with generally intelligent people writing the source material?

racism has nothing to do with intelligence, and the idea that it does is part of why SR racism is such a cartoon. there are lots and lots and lots of intelligent racists. am i allowed to be amused that the anti-rascist rants often come off as sounding pretty bigoted? replace "redneck" with "black"...

QUOTE (eidolon)
Right. And we know no criminals are liberal progressives. They're all racist, sexist, or otherwise prejudiced.

of course not. that would be just as unrealistic as the current situation, in which there are no racist, sexist, or otherwise prejudiced SR criminals. at least, none that aren't cardboard cutout bad guys for the "heroes" to fight against.

not to pick on you, eidolon. you're just the only one responding at this unholy hour.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mfb
post Sep 12 2006, 06:49 AM
Post #40


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



i'm gonna double-post, which i don't normally do, because this post is in a bit of a different vein from the previous one. i'm going to show an example of a point at which SR could have shown some real gritty, dirty racism, and chose instead to avoid the issue in favor of more black-and-white, cut-and-dried cartoon comedy: SURGE.

for once, i'm not talking about that stupid catgirl. i'm talking about the part where they show the anti-SURGE hysteria that's supposed to have sprung up around this phenomenon. let's see: on page 27, Cap deletes 0.8Mp of an anti-SURGEling rant; the portion that remained packs more stereotypes (stupidity, herdthink, Tourettes-like inability to speak without spewing epithets) into one and a half sentences than most actual bigots find it seemly to fit into a paragraph. on page 31, Cap introduces the opposition view as "loathsome and despicable", and the only people who post in that section do so with an obvious anti-Humanis bent.

after that, we've got SURGE clubs and catgirls. the entire section presents only two possible views of SURGE: you either embrace it, and associate yourself with intelligent, modern people; or you reject it, and associate yourself with either uneducated morons or stiff-necked, intractable traditionalists.

who picked the stiff-necked, intractable traditionalists in their character designs? raise your hands. nobody? none? color me surprised.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
knasser
post Sep 12 2006, 10:15 AM
Post #41


Shadow Cartographer
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,737
Joined: 2-June 06
From: Secret Tunnels under the UK (South West)
Member No.: 8,636



QUOTE (Apathy @ Sep 11 2006, 11:22 PM)
Has anyone else become uncomfortable in a gaming session when one of the players really makes a big deal of playing up his character's racist (anti-troll/ork/whatever) tendancies, and you worried that it was alienating other [in RL minority] players?


Some racists may be intelligent* and some may be stupid, but I don't think many would be quite so dumbfoundlingly stupid as to be noticeably prejudiced in my game. So it's not been a problem, here at least. It's the duty of a GM to ensure that all of his or her players have a good time and to avoid any bias too. The GM should crack down on any sort of -ism or behaviour that makes players uncomfortable.

Regarding the portrayal of racists being ignorant and stupid in SR source materials, it's understandable. While cartooning racists doesn't quite prepare you for a confrontation with the BNP (British Nationalist Party - you don't want to meet them), it is an attack on the whole belief system of racists. It's a mild ridiculing and that's a way of non-racists (the game writers) putting down the idiocy of racism. I understand Hyzmarca's point about it being misleading and sort of agree with him. But it is spreading a point of view that racism is dumb.

And to be honest, to people that don't share the racists' misconceptions, a lot of the ranting does sound like mindless hate and is very easy to charicature. This does seem to have changed in 4th Edition though. Just skimming through Runner Havens for Humanis references, you find some very sinister things going on. Humanis headquarters in posh golf-club ridden Renton where it says a lot of Brackhaven's funding comes from, and more detail on how Humanis runs charities, schools and other community programs, keeping its ties to groups like Alamos 20,000 always just below the radar of proof.

Racism is dumb and misguided and therefore very much a part of the dystopian background of Shadowrun in my mind. But in the same way as megacorporate oppression and exploitation - something that players have to deal with but isn't natural in a Shadowrunning team. After all, it's hard to be racist when the Troll samurai just saved your life.

================

* When I say a racist may be intelligent, it's a recognition that people can be smart about some things whilst dumb about others at the same time.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
knasser
post Sep 12 2006, 10:51 AM
Post #42


Shadow Cartographer
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,737
Joined: 2-June 06
From: Secret Tunnels under the UK (South West)
Member No.: 8,636



QUOTE (eidolon @ Sep 12 2006, 12:41 AM)
I had a longer post ready, and I may post it later, but first I wanted to ask:

Am I the only one that sees the 400 pound white gorilla in the room?


Ah, you mean SLJames' comment about him being a racist asshole and running a Black Sun cell? (Don't know what that is exactly, but I googled Black Sun and came up with an Aryan supremacy cult).

Or did you mean SlitheryD's comment that real world ethnic groups have different potentials for intellectual accomplishment?

Yeah, there might be a couple of white elephants in the room - I'm not sure if it's just trolling or not. But happily our love for Shadowrun can overcome all of our differences and bring everyone together from muslims to nazis and even (to quote Mel Brooks) the Irish. ;)

Whatever our creed and colour, we all like pretending to be elves, right?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Critias
post Sep 12 2006, 11:37 AM
Post #43


Freelance Elf
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 7,324
Joined: 30-September 04
From: Texas
Member No.: 6,714



I've known James long enough to be convinced he's not really much of a racist, no matter what he says -- he hates everyone, equally. Also, "running a Black Sun cell" isn't some crazy "I'm a skinhead terrorist" brag. He's running a game for a Black Sun (SR4 elven supremacist group) terrorist, is all. No need for google; it's a Shadowrun thing, not a RL thing.

Also, SlitheryD never said anything about intellectual potential, only "average mental ability," a statement that's purely factual truth. Certain racial/ethnic groups score higher (or, rather, lower) than other certain racial/ethnic groups on tests designed to measure that sort of thing. It's not a racist statement, it's just a statement; people still get antsy when you point it out, but the statement in and of itself isn't offensive, merely factual. Conskill explained it in a bit more detail.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Sep 12 2006, 12:04 PM
Post #44


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,013
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



QUOTE (eidolon @ Sep 11 2006, 09:53 PM)
So you don't think that leaving the level of racism in a game up to the end user, the players that want a game that they can enjoy, which may or may not mean racism plays a major part, is the best way to handle it?  I don't mean to sound as though I'm putting words in your mouth, but that's what I'm getting.

Define "in the game". If you mean "in the canon gameworld", the answer is obviously no. If you mean "in a specific instance of the game, played around a certain table (possibly a virtual or imaginary table)", then I absolutely think that's up to the end user. However, so is the choice to play a Shadowrunner—there's a difference between recommending something and enforcing it.

If I were going to add this to the SR3 character creation rules, right now, I'd add a short paragraph. Probably not much longer than "Gamemaster's Approval". It would quickly review the state of racism in the 2050s and its prevalence, and then say something like "While many players may not want to play their character as racist, the widespread nature of racism in the 2050s and its importance to the world of Shadowrun means that it should be given serious consideration when creating a character's personality."

That's it. No "this is the part where you decide how much your character hates trogs", no random rules for determining just how much your character thinks dandelion-eaters all have magical powers and are happy all the time, nothing enforced. Just a quiet reminder that racist characters are valid options, and that including that dimension can increase the depth of the game if done in a reasonable and respectful manner.

QUOTE
I have a feeling that there are probably players out there that, even though they're playing "seasoned criminals" would be uncomfortable playing with racism.  It's precisely the fact that there are people out there that aren't really comfortable touching it without some prompting that makes me think that it is handled well in the game material.  

Now, you may think that people need to confront these kinds of issues head on, and I tend to agree on that.  But in a game, where the point is for everyone to have fun, I don't think shoving such a heady topic down anyone's throats is the right answer.

Would you still consider presenting it as above to be shoving it down people's throats?

QUOTE
QUOTE (Kagetenshi)
So do you think it's appropriate that the players are encouraged to play criminals for hire?


Yes, in that it's arguably the central theme of the game. I don't think that playing out the racism that exists in the world should be a major focus within the rules. All I'm saying is that I think that the way it's currently handled is the best all-around solution, making room for both the gamers that want to and can handle having such things as major elements of their game, the gamers that want it as an aspect of the world but don't really want to tackle it in character as much, and the gamers that would prefer not to use that aspect of the world in their games.

I would argue the central theme of the game is even more, at least ostensibly, "world gone to shit". I've seen a few people use the Shadowrun rules for totally different settings, but overall it's been much more common in my experience for people to play a DocWagon/Lone Star/military/whatever non-shadowrunner campaign than to up and play in a world that isn't, ostensibly, meaningfully dystopic. Racism is absolutely in line with that theme.

Not that there isn't a fair bit of "say one thing, do another". I've seen a number of games (and, when I started playing, ran a number of games) where from the PC's vantage point everything was strawberries and chrome-coloured cream. Nevertheless, in all of those games there was lip service paid to the dystopian world, and I don't think it was really clear to the participants at the time that that was all it was—dystopia was the goal, it's just that no one participating knew the way.

QUOTE
It comes back to there being no real "true" way to run a role playing game, I guess.  The "right" way is the way that's right for the group/players/etc.  I think the current setup allows for that.

Right, but many setups allow for that. There's not a whole lot you have to do to allow for it (not that it isn't difficult—there have been many games that have failed at it), and in my opinion a setup that makes racism a more integral part of the world could easily do the same job.

Switching tracks, this isn't so much a response as a continuation of the thought:
QUOTE (Critias)
They make a point of showing racism, sure. But it's always out in the open, the racists are always ridiculous, everyone knows who the racists are, they're always bumbling idiots, etc. Racisms exists, but it exists in the same way racisms was real in Oh Brother, Where Art Thou, or something. It's a bumbling, hapless, almost-comic racism, as written. You've got to work to make it scary, or realistic, or dark, or violent.

Beyond being a disservice to the gameworld, presenting racism in this half-assed way is dangerous. Has anyone here met people who are genuinely racist? I'm sure some have. I'm sure some have even met the kind of caricatures we see in the books. Those caricatures exist in the real world because during their lifetime that was acceptable behaviour, usually. Still, that's just the tip of the iceberg—someone who has only ever been exposed to that version of racism, and who has had it hammered into them again and again that all racists are nazis or white-sheeted lynch mobs, can completely fail to see more subtle racism—stereotypes like "asians are good at math", "black people are unreliable", the "white man's burden", so on and soforth—and then go on to believe that it's all "solved" or something, that racism is "something that used to happen". Worse yet, overlooking subtle racism doesn't just let it breed elsewhere, it may well let it grow in the individual whose capacity to recognize it has been destroyed.

QUOTE (mfb)
nazis? nazis are 99% of the problem. they make things too simple; nazis take things straight from bigotry to genocide. do not pass go, do not collect complex social issues. they're bad guys, pure and simple

You know better than that. The National Socialist movement is probably the single largest victim of stereotyping the modern world has ever seen. Talk about pushing complex social issues under the rug—did the Third Wave and the Milgram experiment teach you nothing?

(For the record, I believe very firmly that there's a difference between a venomous, harmful political ideology and an evil one. The first can actually be possessed by real people who are otherwise rational. I'm a staunch defender of National Socialist Germany, but not because I think it was good—simply because I think it's ridiculous and dangerous to dismiss it as evil and then nod knowingly and say to ourselves "that'll never happen here")

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
knasser
post Sep 12 2006, 12:29 PM
Post #45


Shadow Cartographer
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,737
Joined: 2-June 06
From: Secret Tunnels under the UK (South West)
Member No.: 8,636




EDIT
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Demonseed Elite
post Sep 12 2006, 02:24 PM
Post #46


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,078
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 67



I'm surprised Saito hasn't been mentioned at all.

I do agree on some aspects and disagree on others. On one hand, there absolutely has been a leveling of the playing field a bit over time in SR. Afterall, if you look at the early editions of SR, how many metahuman Big Ten executives were there? Aside from Lofwyr. Now we have ork CEOs, dwarven major shareholders, free spirit executives, etc. This isn't really indicative of there being less racism, but more metahumans are breaking through the glass ceiling.

On the other hand, I dealt specifically with issues of racism when I wrote Hong Kong for Runner Havens. Hong Kong's racism definitely exists, though not down the normal human vs. metahuman lines familiar in other places. In Hong Kong it is natives vs. foreigners, encouraged by the refugee/immigrant crisis.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Witness
post Sep 12 2006, 02:40 PM
Post #47


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 681
Joined: 28-February 06
From: UK
Member No.: 8,319



QUOTE (Shadowrun Official Fiction Guidelines)
DON'T: Forget about prejudice and intolerance. Bigotry exists against metahumans, ethnicities, genders, classes of society, sexual preferences, (non)religious adherents, various (sub)cultures and more. While bigotry may be lessened in some respects in Shadowrun compared to present life, it is greatly heightened and worse in others.


SR's treatment of racism is much like that of other Sci-Fi like Star Trek, i.e. it explores the issues but in a fictionalised context. Nothing wrong with that IMO. There's plenty of racism out there in the SR world- but yes, maybe not quite enough. As I've said before: one form of discrimination, that ought to be much stronger than it apparently is, is discrimination against magicians. It does tend to surface out of fear, after all.

Of course in shadowrun teams, well, they've generally got other things on their minds. I did once play an African-American character [EDIT: actually more than once, but this one occasion is what I'm talking about], and was a little shocked when one of my fellow player characters called mine a 'black bastard'. I know the player isn't a racist, but he was playing a character who was such a shit in every other way that it fit things perfectly. I still battered him [EDIT: ..in game, that is. Although I confess I couldn't help looking at him slightly differently out of game for a while afterward, which might be why people avoid this sort of thing in SR games.]
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Apathy
post Sep 12 2006, 03:37 PM
Post #48


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,408
Joined: 31-January 04
From: Reston VA, USA
Member No.: 6,046



QUOTE (Critias)
Certain racial/ethnic groups score higher (or, rather, lower) than other certain racial/ethnic groups on tests designed to measure that sort of thing.

While it is true that some ethnicities have lower average scores on IQ tests, there are plenty of arguments that the differences are environmental (cultural, socioeconomic, etc.) instead of genetic. Poor people have lower average scores than affluent people as well - it doesn't necessarily mean that they're dumber; it could just as easily be interpreted that they're (on average) exposed to less mentally stimulating environments.

Also, there's a strong argument that IQ tests are a measure of mental skills (which can be developed over time) rather than mental capacity (reading comprehension, pattern recognition, vocabulary, math, etc). If IQ were entirely genetic, than people's scores wouldn't change over time (which they often do). The questions are also created by educators/researchers from a particular background, and are therefore biased to be more easily interpreted/understood by others with similar backgrounds.

Take two identical babies, with equal potential. Raise one with minimal interaction with its parents. Have it get minimal education, be undernourished, exposed to damaging pollutants, and discourage it from developing it's intellect. Raise the other child in a supportive, nurturing environment with exposure to the best nutrition, schools, and an emphasis on learning. After 18 years, test them both by having them interpret passages from classical literature, and what do you think will happen?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Witness
post Sep 12 2006, 04:00 PM
Post #49


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 681
Joined: 28-February 06
From: UK
Member No.: 8,319



Stephen J Gould's argument was that intelligent tests themselves were culturally biased: structured to test only certain culturally preconceived notions of certain kinds of intelligence. Indeed I guess the whole concept of IQ tests may seem strange to many- dare I say it more enlightened- cultures. But this is straying off topic.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mfb
post Sep 12 2006, 04:21 PM
Post #50


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



QUOTE (Kagetenshi)
You know better than that. The National Socialist movement is probably the single largest victim of stereotyping the modern world has ever seen.

the fact that nazis are dismissed as evil is exactly why they're a problem when one is trying to present real racism. i, personally, know better than that, though it's not a point i'm generally going to argue over.

QUOTE (Witness)
There's plenty of racism out there in the SR world- but yes, maybe not quite enough.

i'm not sure it's an issue of enough versus not enough. taken at face value, there's definitely 'enough' racism in SR. every time SR mentions racism, it's quick to point out that, man, there's a lot of racists out there! and once in a great while, someone in an SR book will mention that not all racists are ignorant hicks or stiff-necked traditionalists (think SR Japan, in addition to the elven superiority complex that has already been brought up). but every racist they actually show, with a single notable exception, is either an ignorant hick or a stiff-necked traditionalist.

that notable exception is the guy who wrote the pro-Humanis article in Loose Alliances.that was a good piece, if you allow yourself to read it without prejudice. it asks some very interesting questions about racism and equality in SR. but you know what it was missing--what every single reference to racism in SR is missing? sympathetic voices.

where are the posts that say "you know, i lost my arm to Lord Torgo and his gang. those bastards are going to pay." or the posts that say "hey... you know, elves do outlive humans, what is going to happen a hundred years from now when everyone above them in the corporate/military/government/whatever power structure has died off?" or the posts that actually debate the scientific findings regarding the intelligence and impulse control of orks and trolls? where are the racist shadowposters, if racism is so prevalent? excuse me, i misspoke: where are the intelligent, knowledgeable, well-liked shadowposters who are racist?

DE, Saito is a good story, but it doesn't offer the kind of conflict that SR lacks. Saito is the bad guy. the resistance movement are the good guys. there's no moral leeway there, y'know? there's no grey area.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

7 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 15th August 2025 - 10:26 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.