Sustaining Penalty |
Sustaining Penalty |
Sep 16 2006, 04:22 AM
Post
#1
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 897 Joined: 26-February 02 From: TIME OUT Member No.: 1,989 |
Does the +2 TN modifier apply to all tests, magic tests, or just casting spells?
|
|
|
Sep 16 2006, 04:26 AM
Post
#2
|
|||
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,213 Joined: 10-March 02 From: Back from the abyss. Member No.: 2,316 |
|
||
|
|||
Sep 16 2006, 04:36 AM
Post
#3
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 109 Joined: 28-October 03 From: End of Earth 2mi. Home 4mi Member No.: 5,764 |
So this is a new definition of 'all' is it? :rotate: Damage resistance not really a test then or is 'all' a set that never includes damage resistance.
]note to self never type on so little sleep> |
|
|
Sep 16 2006, 04:56 AM
Post
#4
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,213 Joined: 10-March 02 From: Back from the abyss. Member No.: 2,316 |
Is that a poke at humor? The rule in the book was copied and pasted directly. The rule states all but normal damage tests. Would you like them to write down all the tests the +2 would apply? Take up valuable word count and the possiblilty of them missing one test and then having everyone bitch that doesnt make sense.
How much more clear can the rule be before people just accept it? |
|
|
Sep 16 2006, 05:00 AM
Post
#5
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 498 Joined: 31-May 02 From: All the way in the Back to the Left. Member No.: 2,800 |
So if its a spell cast above magic and does physical damage I dont get the +2, right?
|
|
|
Sep 16 2006, 05:04 AM
Post
#6
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,213 Joined: 10-March 02 From: Back from the abyss. Member No.: 2,316 |
You would get the plus 2 when you make the sorcery test, but for the drain, hmm, looks like a loophole to me. lol
|
|
|
Sep 16 2006, 05:37 AM
Post
#7
|
|
Immortal Elf Group: Members Posts: 11,410 Joined: 1-October 03 From: Pittsburgh Member No.: 5,670 |
what? no. taking physical damage from drain is still a drain resistance test.
|
|
|
Sep 16 2006, 05:54 AM
Post
#8
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,213 Joined: 10-March 02 From: Back from the abyss. Member No.: 2,316 |
Who knows, I wrenched my back and Im loaded on pain killers, free Shakespeare for everyone.
|
|
|
Sep 16 2006, 09:29 AM
Post
#9
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 106 Joined: 27-July 03 From: Mainz, Germany Member No.: 5,072 |
Why should a TN modifier that is added due to the mental strain of sustaining a magic spell be applied to a Damage Resistance Test, where it is about your body trying to resist the nasty after-effects of getting hit by flying lead? Is not like concentrating harder will make the holes get smaller or anything. :D
|
|
|
Sep 16 2006, 03:25 PM
Post
#10
|
|||
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 113 Joined: 16-October 03 Member No.: 5,725 |
How does one cast a spell "above magic"? ------------------------------- The general phrasing of the SR3 rule, "A on all cases of X, except when case Y," is a logical statement. |
||
|
|||
Sep 16 2006, 06:10 PM
Post
#11
|
|||||
Freelance Elf Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 7,324 Joined: 30-September 04 From: Texas Member No.: 6,714 |
By casting a spell with a force higher than one's magic rating, resulting in physical (rather than stun) Drain. |
||||
|
|||||
Sep 16 2006, 07:56 PM
Post
#12
|
|||
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 106 Joined: 27-July 03 From: Mainz, Germany Member No.: 5,072 |
You still get the +2 modifier on your Drain Resistance Test, you simply take Physical damage in contrast to Mental damage. Remember, Drain Resistance =! Damage Resistance. :) |
||
|
|||
Sep 16 2006, 08:12 PM
Post
#13
|
|||||
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 113 Joined: 16-October 03 Member No.: 5,725 |
Oh! Casting a spell with a Force above the Magic Attribute. Gotcha! |
||||
|
|||||
Sep 16 2006, 08:39 PM
Post
#14
|
|||
Immortal Elf Group: Members Posts: 11,410 Joined: 1-October 03 From: Pittsburgh Member No.: 5,670 |
it's not applied to normal damage resistance tests. it's applied to drain resistance tests, whether the drain is stun or physical damage. |
||
|
|||
Sep 16 2006, 08:51 PM
Post
#15
|
|||||
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 106 Joined: 27-July 03 From: Mainz, Germany Member No.: 5,072 |
You make it sound as if that should be something new to me...was my post so badly written that it appeared as if I don't know the difference? :? |
||||
|
|||||
Sep 16 2006, 08:54 PM
Post
#16
|
|
Immortal Elf Group: Members Posts: 11,410 Joined: 1-October 03 From: Pittsburgh Member No.: 5,670 |
it sounded like you thought people were saying that the sustaining penalty applied to regular damage resistance tests, yes. i'd missed the post after that, sorry.
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 25th April 2024 - 12:48 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.