IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Would you like cyberware and biotech to be real?
Would you like cyberware and biotech to be real?
You cannot see the results of the poll until you have voted. Please login and cast your vote to see the results of this poll.
Total Votes: 57
Guests cannot vote 
emo samurai
post Sep 26 2006, 09:41 PM
Post #1


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,589
Joined: 28-November 05
Member No.: 8,019



I'd like cyberware to be real so people with lost parts of their bodies could function well again, and I'd like organ transplants to be easy. Then again, people would need cyberware just to function in the workforce; market forces would make them get it even if they're completely against it. So what do you think, after you consider all the social ramifications?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shrike30
post Sep 26 2006, 09:46 PM
Post #2


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,556
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Seattle
Member No.: 98



What social ramifications? I can't imagine that many job fields that would be able to succesfully require hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of invasive surgery and implantation. People who got cyber might do so for an advantage, but I'm having a hard time imagining the days when Boosted Reflexes are required to practice law or do surgery. Minor cyber like datajacks and implant comms would be like the cel phones of today... not a requirement in most situations, but convenient.

And in the meantime, there's plenty of people out there who might really appreciate their osteoporosis being Laced away, their spinal injuries being Wired away, their lost arm from childhood being replaced...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nezumi
post Sep 26 2006, 09:59 PM
Post #3


Incertum est quo loco te mors expectet;
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,546
Joined: 24-October 03
From: DeeCee, U.S.
Member No.: 5,760



I want to be able to vote twice. Someone else vote for the 'yes yes sign me up for the pilot' option.

I'm tired of this meat bod. It's little, it gets beaten up too easily, and sometimes it smells strange. I want a body that sweats WD-40 and can make julian fries.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fresno Bob
post Sep 26 2006, 10:09 PM
Post #4


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,156
Joined: 15-March 03
From: Fresno, CalFree
Member No.: 4,252



I'd like a cyberarm, so I can crush the previously uncrushable.

And lung replacements, so I won't have to eventually quit smoking.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fistandantilus4....
post Sep 26 2006, 10:21 PM
Post #5


Uncle Fisty
**********

Group: Admin
Posts: 13,891
Joined: 3-January 05
From: Next To Her
Member No.: 6,928



I want the details of why someone voted no. Besides, not everything is for conveinance. The most 'cyber' these days is all being made to help people with disabilities. Look at Johhny Spinrad. He's like 70% cyber, but all because of a plane crash, not because he did it for kicks. Imagine what we could do if we could just re-grow someone's failing liver or kidneys.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Sep 26 2006, 11:53 PM
Post #6


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,008
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



Where are the "yes, replacing parts of my body is akin to selling my soul" and "no, it allows people to function again" options?

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Squinky
post Sep 26 2006, 11:57 PM
Post #7


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,479
Joined: 6-May 05
From: Idaho
Member No.: 7,377



Just think, with a datajack a guy could make tons of very similair polls with just a thought....
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
John Campbell
post Sep 27 2006, 12:04 AM
Post #8


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,028
Joined: 9-November 02
From: The Republic of Vermont
Member No.: 3,581



I see no evidence that there's any thought involved.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kyoto Kid
post Sep 27 2006, 01:01 AM
Post #9


Bushido Cowgirl
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,782
Joined: 8-July 05
From: On the Double K Ranch a half day's ride out of Phlogiston Flats
Member No.: 7,490



...hmmm, no more pain or stiff joints from arthritis (Enhanced Articulation)

being able to read street signs from 4 blocks away...in the night... (Vision Enhancement w/Low Light)

not having to worry about bone degradation...(Bone Density)

yeah, I think it is worth it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Frag-o Delux
post Sep 27 2006, 05:56 AM
Post #10


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,213
Joined: 10-March 02
From: Back from the abyss.
Member No.: 2,316



Sadly all the money in cyber and bio would be to make bigger and better boobs and fix broken penises. And the super bowl will have tons of commercials for it.

Besides all the cyber and bio will still be way out of reach of the average person once its availible. The med corps are going to make it exspensive, they have to make all that money back from R&D eventually some how. The people that are getting the prototype stuff now are only getting it because the med corps need test subjects to test ideas. Wait till something like a fully functional nearly natural cyber arm is created or a process for cloning a liver is perfected, itll be pretty damn exspensive.

I can also see insurance companies turning down the operations as they will call it elective surgery. I mean having a missing arm replaced? You can live with out it and if you didnt have that accidental dismembement insurance you can forget it.

Yeah I think all that stuff should be created, but I dont think everyone should have equal access to it either. If you take on dangerous bahavior I dont think you should be given the same options as the guy that didnt. Meaning if you have a genetic disease that destroys your liver then fine, let the med corps grow you a liver. But if you are an alcoholic and you destroy your liver I stand behind the insurance corps denying your liver transplant request.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Sep 27 2006, 02:04 PM
Post #11


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,008
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



If you're clinically depressed and attempt suicide, do you stand behind the insurance corps denying your emergency room charge?

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Squinky
post Sep 27 2006, 07:05 PM
Post #12


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,479
Joined: 6-May 05
From: Idaho
Member No.: 7,377



QUOTE (Frag-o Delux)


I can also see insurance companies turning down the operations as they will call it elective surgery. I mean having a missing arm replaced? You can live with out it and if you didnt have that accidental dismembement insurance you can forget it.


I disagree here. When a company has somebody lose a limb on their jobsite, they have to pay pretty much for that dood for the rest of his life. It would be much cheaper to just have him go down to the clinic and get a new arm under workers comp, and put him back to work.

Same goes for all the folks drawing disability benefits. I think the government would rather pay to get people cybernetically repaired that have them draw money until they die.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hyzmarca
post Sep 27 2006, 07:22 PM
Post #13


Midnight Toker
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,686
Joined: 4-July 04
From: Zombie Drop Bear Santa's Workshop
Member No.: 6,456



While this would be true in a holistic economy, we don't live in a communist state here. If the goverment is going to give you disability payments for life then why should the insurance companies bother paying for the new limb? It only costs them money.

Consider that current insurance companies cap the spending on artificial limbs to $10,000 in a lifetime; consider that the cheapest pegleg available commercially costs $30,000; and consider that a child with a missing limb will go through several prostesis because prostesis do not grow along with the body.

So the insurance companies will only pay for 1/3 of the most usless artificial limbs when reasonably an individual may need a dozen or more SOTA limbs, not including specialized limbs for work or athletics.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kyoto Kid
post Sep 27 2006, 08:20 PM
Post #14


Bushido Cowgirl
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,782
Joined: 8-July 05
From: On the Double K Ranch a half day's ride out of Phlogiston Flats
Member No.: 7,490



QUOTE (Frag-o Delux)
Besides all the cyber and bio will still be way out of reach of the average person once its availible. The med corps are going to make it exspensive, they have to make all that money back from R&D eventually some how.

...that's why there's Canada eh...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nezumi
post Sep 27 2006, 08:43 PM
Post #15


Incertum est quo loco te mors expectet;
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,546
Joined: 24-October 03
From: DeeCee, U.S.
Member No.: 5,760



I think Squinky's point isn't that the insurance company pays it up, but rather the place of employment. If the paper cutter balanced pecariously on my cubicle wall falls and cuts off my left arm, the government will likely pay disability for the rest of my life or pay for some sort of rehabilitive surgery.

Of course, if the paper cutter I've balanced on top of my fridge at home falls and chops off my arm, I'm getting whatever care my health insurance company feels is appropriate (and I have no idea how they decide that) plus about $5,000 from my death & dismemberment policy which I can spend as I please. Possibly something from my life insurance as well, since they sometimes cover dismemberment, but I'm not sure how much. Probably not the $30k requires for a cyberarm, unfortunately.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Dale
post Sep 27 2006, 08:51 PM
Post #16


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 126
Joined: 20-December 05
Member No.: 8,088



Cut this damned Essence from me and give me Chrome.
Metal is better than Meat.


Dale - woud-be cyberpsycho
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Frag-o Delux
post Sep 27 2006, 09:30 PM
Post #17


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,213
Joined: 10-March 02
From: Back from the abyss.
Member No.: 2,316



QUOTE (Squinky)
QUOTE (Frag-o Delux @ Sep 27 2006, 12:56 AM)


I can also see insurance companies turning down the operations as they will call it elective surgery. I mean having a missing arm replaced? You can live with out it and if you didnt have that accidental dismembement insurance you can forget it.


I disagree here. When a company has somebody lose a limb on their jobsite, they have to pay pretty much for that dood for the rest of his life. It would be much cheaper to just have him go down to the clinic and get a new arm under workers comp, and put him back to work.

Same goes for all the folks drawing disability benefits. I think the government would rather pay to get people cybernetically repaired that have them draw money until they die.

I said missing arm, not an arm cut off because of an accident. Of course companies pay if you are hurt at work, but only if they find that they are responsible and trust me theyll fight tooth and nail to prove it wasnt their fault. Dont forget companies dont pay your benefits directly, they are paid by their insurance companies, and insurance companies dont like to pay out.

And Yes kage, if you want to die so bad, GOODBYE. If you are sloppy enough to be found before you are gone for good you should have tried harder loser, try harder next time, but we all know you are a failer you cant do anything right.

That wasnt aimed at Kage, it was a joke trying to push that suicidle person to do it right next time. Hopefully theyll be good and check that organ donor box on their ID and do it in a way that they dont ruin anything worth while. But yes, I have no time for suicides, they are a waste of space and I dont care for them.

And I think the government paying you any money for being hurt is ludicris, all that shit needs to stop.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Squinky
post Sep 27 2006, 11:50 PM
Post #18


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,479
Joined: 6-May 05
From: Idaho
Member No.: 7,377



Thats my point really. Governments and companys (insurance or otherwise) pay it out the ass when someone gets a crippling injury. I really believe that the costs of running a cyber-replacement type clinic would save millions.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Frag-o Delux
post Sep 28 2006, 12:02 AM
Post #19


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,213
Joined: 10-March 02
From: Back from the abyss.
Member No.: 2,316



QUOTE (Squinky)
Thats my point really. Governments and companys (insurance or otherwise) pay it out the ass when someone gets a crippling injury. I really believe that the costs of running a cyber-replacement type clinic would save millions.

Save who millions?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Dale
post Sep 28 2006, 12:32 AM
Post #20


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 126
Joined: 20-December 05
Member No.: 8,088



Well Darpa just started funding for finding a way to make that mouse that regrows body parts that are cut off to help humans somehow. I hope the process is available on the Black Market in a couple years.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mistwalker
post Sep 28 2006, 12:38 AM
Post #21


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 668
Joined: 4-September 06
Member No.: 9,304



You guys are neglecting the biggest market for cyber and bioware.
The military
The would start with the special forces and go from there, depending on how things went from there.

If the spec forces soldier lives longer, is harder to kill, etc..., it costs less, in the long run that to train up a new spec forces soldier (or so I have been told).

Once the military got into it big time, the price would come down.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Squinky
post Sep 28 2006, 01:05 AM
Post #22


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,479
Joined: 6-May 05
From: Idaho
Member No.: 7,377



QUOTE (Frag-o Delux)
QUOTE (Squinky @ Sep 27 2006, 06:50 PM)
Thats my point really. Governments and companys (insurance or otherwise) pay it out the ass when someone gets a crippling injury. I really believe that the costs of running a cyber-replacement type clinic would save millions.

Save who millions?

Are you just being deliberately belligerent, or what? How much clearer can this be made?

At least in the U.S.A it is a common practice for people to get ongoing payments for disability. Many times for the rest of a persons life. If we are comparing to shadowrun prices of cyber, it costs 15k for a full limb, less for a hand/foot. Any decent company that was involved with paying compensation for injuries/disabilitys would have some way of getting a dramatic discount over that because of sheer volume of business.

So, wouldn't you pay less than 15k to take care of somebody that would normally have to be paid their normal salary for the remainder of their life? I'm pretty sure I've typed this out already, please don't make me break out the pie charts :)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Frag-o Delux
post Sep 28 2006, 01:24 AM
Post #23


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,213
Joined: 10-March 02
From: Back from the abyss.
Member No.: 2,316



No if the military gets into it the price will be what ever the government decides to pay, then if there becomes a civilian market for it the price will come down. But only to a level thats reasonable to the med and insurance companies. We are talking about medicine after all, you need it to live, TVs cost less because you can live with out one. Look at medications and surgeries, they are still highly exspensive. And I think you are highly over estimating the usefullness of cyberware in the military. As of July 31st 2006 the US has just under 1.4 million service men. That is nothing compared to the almost 296 million US citizens. Now what percentage do you think will be entitled to cyber ware that would make the price come down? Roughly 721,000 of those people are in the Navy and Air Force which I highly doubt would need wired reflexes, a few would get VCRs but even that number would be low with all the Riggers taking Pilot spots. One Rigger could do the job of a wing of pilots. The Army is a grab bag, they have a lot of rear area personel, like artillery and support units, but they do have tanks and helicopters so maybe theyll get VCRs, so that leaves marines so of the 179,000 marines how many do you think will get combat cyberware? Well If I could afford it, all of them.

Now lets get to practicality. Even if you say 50% of that number are combat personel or are in need of cyberware to make their jobs more effcient or even better you are still only looking at 700,000 people. Not a very large market. Then we get to enlisted men, a lot of people today join the service to get the GI bill benefits. Now Im not saying they arent good citizens and such, but they are looking to serve their tour, hopeing they dont get deployed and coming out on top with training and a degree to jump into the private sector to get a better job. They are not the people you want to put 500,000 worth of harware into, if not more depending on price.

And even more to the point. There are people doing god damn bake sales to raise money t pay for body armor and kevlar inserts for their Hummvees because the government cant afford it to put every soldier or marine in body armor and armored vehicles. So, where would you like the country that spends more on defense then the bulk of the countries in the world and more then like the next top three countries combined to get the money to equip even 100,000 hard core soldiers with the latest in cyberware?

Yeah the latest cutting edge tech in less then 100,00 people is really going to drive the market price down on very limited use ware.

Cheap poor quality cybernetics would be the parts that get cheap enough to make it to market for the average citizen, but then youll still have these people in the hospital constently having repairs and upkeep done to them. Youll get things like cheap limbs, and maybe some brain implants for parkensons and such, maybe some filters for kidney disease and things like that. But the price and availiblity of things like wired reflexes, VCRs, smartlinks, they are all going to stay exspensive and I highly doubt an insurance company is going to foot the bill for any of that. Even Datajacks, you dont need it to do your job and by 3rd edition you have trode nets which make you just as fast as a datajack user in tortoise mode. Any person higher up the food chain will have the money to have it installed on their own dime.

Where the real promising advances will be is in bio tech. With certain types in power the advances needed to be made are being hindered, well in this country anyway. So it seems a lot of amputees will be needing to go to Europe or Canada to get the needed surgeries. Which insurance companies wont pay for.

If you want you could add int eh roughly 664,000 Police officers to that list as well. Bu tthey have all the same problems the military faces, lack of funds, lack of security for the investment made on the officer, and really, if the cybrware isnt on the streets for criminals to have, why would th epolice need it?

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Frag-o Delux
post Sep 28 2006, 01:30 AM
Post #24


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,213
Joined: 10-March 02
From: Back from the abyss.
Member No.: 2,316



QUOTE (Squinky @ Sep 27 2006, 08:05 PM)
QUOTE (Frag-o Delux @ Sep 27 2006, 07:02 PM)
QUOTE (Squinky @ Sep 27 2006, 06:50 PM)
Thats my point really. Governments and companys (insurance or otherwise) pay it out the ass when someone gets a crippling injury. I really believe that the costs of running a cyber-replacement type clinic would save millions.

Save who millions?

Are you just being deliberately belligerent, or what? How much clearer can this be made?

At least in the U.S.A it is a common practice for people to get ongoing payments for disability. Many times for the rest of a persons life. If we are comparing to shadowrun prices of cyber, it costs 15k for a full limb, less for a hand/foot. Any decent company that was involved with paying compensation for injuries/disabilitys would have some way of getting a dramatic discount over that because of sheer volume of business.

So, wouldn't you pay less than 15k to take care of somebody that would normally have to be paid their normal salary for the remainder of their life? I'm pretty sure I've typed this out already, please don't make me break out the pie charts :)

Get the pie charts because Ill show you cases where the Insurance Companies make these injured people spend years without an income fighting the cases then later offers the person 10,000 as a settlement to call it off. So tell me where the savings for the insurance company comes in?

Insurance companies dont make that much money off of premiums, in fact its almost a loseing bet. What they do make their money on is stocks, bonds and other securities. See every month they rake in tons of money from those checks. They then invest that money into real money making deals. When some one files a claim, thats less money they can make money on. So theyll pay their lawyers that they already have on the payroll to keep filing papers till you die or give up. Then in the cases where you dont die or give up and they have to pay, they offer such a little amount of money to you thats its basically nothing. Most people at this point are looking to get anything at this point just to survive because by now they are flat broke and if they are so hurt that theyll get thousands of dollars from the insurance company they arent going to get meaningful work anywhere else, otherwise theyd still be working for the first company and getting paid.

When you see these huge pay offs is when the judges or juries finally get involved and the juries try to stick it to the insurance companies.

I dont see any savings even in a hypothetical world.

EDIT: Yeah lets use SRs prices as a basis for the real world. They same game that charges 1000 :nuyen: for a phone that does the same thing as most $150 phones today. And the same people that have a pistol weighting 15 pounds. Ywah 15,000 :nuyen: is a great bargin.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
KarmaInferno
post Sep 28 2006, 03:49 AM
Post #25


Old Man Jones
********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 4,415
Joined: 26-February 02
From: New York
Member No.: 1,699



QUOTE (Shrike30)
I can't imagine that many job fields that would be able to succesfully require hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of invasive surgery and implantation.

Porn.

:D


-karma
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 14th February 2025 - 02:16 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.