![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]()
Post
#26
|
|
Chrome to the Core ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 3,152 Joined: 14-October 03 From: ::1 Member No.: 5,715 ![]() |
Sounds like a plan! Oh, wait, you can't prove that you killed it. Only that a nuke went off and kill a few hundred/thousand people.
But, hey, you killed it! |
|
|
![]()
Post
#27
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 171 Joined: 6-October 03 From: Tempe, Arizona Member No.: 5,692 ![]() |
That's why I always like 'Detect Dragon' / 'Slay Dragon' anchored spells at sufficiently high Force, linked to an orichalcum-and-telesmatic-rowanwood arrow.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#28
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 280 Joined: 22-October 03 Member No.: 5,757 ![]() |
You can link spells to arrows? Interesting....
Can you ward an arrow to make spirit slaying arrows? tell me more of this magic arrows. I need something to bust up spirits since our mage is fairly useless... dam pacifist. Good Face, useless for anything else. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#29
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 171 Joined: 6-October 03 From: Tempe, Arizona Member No.: 5,692 ![]() |
It's called Anchoring, and only an Initiate can do it - and you've got to learn how.
Anchoring has two mechanics - the SR3 system, and the (in my opinion) infinitely superior SR2 system. In SR3, you create a special type of focus, and anchor a detection spell or 'trigger' (which could also be a simple 'touch activation' or 'command word spoken, not just a detection spell), followed by a payload spell. When the detection spell/trigger activates, the payload spell goes off, targeting whatever 'triggered' it (i.e., whatever was detected by the detection spell, or whatever issued the command word). Then the magician, wherever he is in the world, takes Drain and knows that his Anchor went off. In SR2, you took the drain when you made the anchor, so you could make true 'magic items' that had sustained spells linked into them, that could be turned on/off by specific conditions. You could also daisy-chain anchors in SR2, so you pretty much had a Turing-complete 'magical programming language' to build magic items with. It rocked. Now you can just do 'magic potions' and other such one-shot effects, which isn't nearly as cool. But yeah, you can anchor a pretty hefty combat spell into an arrow, and then a detection spell so that the arrow only targets what you want it to (but if it's an area-effect spell, be careful walking too close to what you're targeting!). I've created a specific spell called 'detect impact' for just these occasions, that lets you make anchors that deliver their payload only when they hit something with sufficient force. If you're going after meat targets, and are sure you're going to be able to penetrate, 'detect blood' might be useful too. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#30
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 280 Joined: 22-October 03 Member No.: 5,757 ![]() |
ialdabaoth, you are a mad genius before your times.
*jots notes* is it possible to Anchor a seeking spell? so your Arrow can alter direction if lets say your target is running for his dear life. Detect Target Force 1 Change direction Force 1? |
|
|
![]()
Post
#31
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 171 Joined: 6-October 03 From: Tempe, Arizona Member No.: 5,692 ![]() |
That's a very interesting idea. Canonically, it doesn't appear so... let me think about it for a minute, though.
Postulate: A modified version of 'Magic Fingers', in the same vein as 'Fling' - but it's sustained, and it just causes objects of a certain type (say, arrows) to be attracted to the target, and the target to be similarly attracted to those targets, by a given force. We'll call it 'Attraction'. Now, you can make a specifically targeted version of this spell: For example, you could make each arrow a stacked focus (with a Force 1 sustaining focus, with 'Attract Dragon' linked to it.) Then you put in a dual anchored spell, linked to 'Attract Arrow' and 'Slay Dragon'. So, what happens is, you get an extra number of dice to hit the dragon, equal to the number of successes in the 'Attract Dragon' spell. Then, when the Dragon gets hit, the 'Detect Dragon' spell goes off, and the Dragon gets hit with two spells: Attract Arrow, and Slay Dragon. Slay Dragon hurts the dragon, badly, and Attract Arrow means that all FURTHER arrows shot at the dragon will get the successes on this spell added to their attack roll, too - after the fourth or fifth arrow hits, you're pretty much guaranteed a hit on any further arrows. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#32
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 171 Joined: 6-October 03 From: Tempe, Arizona Member No.: 5,692 ![]() |
Of course, keep in mind that EACH arrow is going to cost your caster around 5-10 Karma, and will be pretty much gone once it's used.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#33
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 280 Joined: 22-October 03 Member No.: 5,757 ![]() |
Hrm 5-10 karma per would be a problem. Dam... is it just my opinion of is that just rediculuos that expendable anchorings cost karma?
I mean you spent karma learning the skill to make it, spent karma learning the metamagic, Spent karma learning the spells. Spent hours creathing the foci, spent more hours binding the spells. Spent who knows how much money on materials. Just to then cost Karma? I mean if it were reusable I could understand the karma need since its permenant. P.S. I can't spell or type well today. I have no idea why. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#34
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 171 Joined: 6-October 03 From: Tempe, Arizona Member No.: 5,692 ![]() |
Expendable anchorings cost karma because you've got to imbue a bit of your life-force into the spell to make it work.
I would agree that it's excessive, but only because the magician must resist drain when the spell goes off. I would argue that the drain happens when you cast the spell into the item (as in SR2); this would rebalance the game significantly. It would also mean that anchors would still work after the caster dies. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#35
|
|
Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,065 Joined: 16-January 03 From: Fayetteville, NC Member No.: 3,916 ![]() |
Well, if you had enough material you could make a mother-length of chain and put a harpoon/spike/spear.
That'll get you a certain amount of range. Granted, with that much magical material, you could retire quite happily... -Siege |
|
|
![]()
Post
#36
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 171 Joined: 6-October 03 From: Tempe, Arizona Member No.: 5,692 ![]() |
Heh. That IS an idea, isn't it?
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#37
|
|||||
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,889 Joined: 3-August 03 From: A CPI rank 1 country Member No.: 5,222 ![]() |
Since this was the last msg along this thread in this topic, I thought I'd wrap it up. Explosives in general (including all military explosives I'm aware of, and certainly including C4) are set off by other explosives. They are NOT set off by electric charges. Some very unstable explosives might (as, I suppose, is the situation with the powder in an electric blasting cap), but these are not used as primary explosives. This doesn't mean C-12 isn't set off by an electric charge, though. It sounds really silly that it would be, but then this is SR. If there's magic and dragons and Suppressed Non-penetrating Heavy Machine Guns, there might as well be primary explosives that can be set off by electric currents. |
||||
|
|||||
![]() ![]()
Post
#38
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 280 Joined: 22-October 03 Member No.: 5,757 ![]() |
I suppose... But you can get expendable spell foci that add to your magic, and help you do some really spectacular spells. I mean if you had the money for it you could burn off 10 of the expendable force 10 foci and cast a spell strong enough to nuke a city.
Just because something casts a spell by itself or actually in essence just delayed for as long as it takes for the trigger to go off, why would that cost Karma? *mutters* I'll probalby regret getting into this but... Casting a spell doesn't cost karma. Sustaining a spell doesn't cost karma waiting and then casting doesn't cost karma Casting and then having the spell wait for you to trigger it costs karma? Feh.... nevermind me I just don't get it, nor am I going to try to change the game or make a house rule. I wonder if it costs a demolisionist karma if he sets a bomb on a triggered delay when the image recoginition software identifies it's target... Oh wait right he paid cash for it. BLAH. I'm going to go smoke up and come back, thanks for the help though. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#39
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 171 Joined: 6-October 03 From: Tempe, Arizona Member No.: 5,692 ![]() |
Locking a spell to an item so it can be cast or sustained outside of your presence costs Karma.
Sustaining foci, Quickening, and Anchoring all have this principle in common. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#40
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 280 Joined: 22-October 03 Member No.: 5,757 ![]() |
Yes I suppose so.
Sustaining = Permenant untill foci is removed from you, dispelled, passes thruogh ward, or actively turned off Quickening= permenant, untill dispelled or passed through strong enough ward. expendable Anchoring = Temporarily permenant untill triggered, untill dispelled, passes through ward, or physicall destroyed. one time use. permenant anchor = temporarily permenant untill triggered, untill dispelled, passed through ward physically destroyed, and reusable. eh hell I wish there were expendable sustaining Foci. It would hold Force X 10 minutes worth of spells Force 1 foci would hold a force 1 spell for 10 mins. force 6 foci would hold a force 1 spell for 60 mins. force 4 foci would hold a force 2 spell for 20 mins I really should stop smoking, I'm coming up with crap huh? |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 11th August 2025 - 05:56 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.