IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

3 Pages V   1 2 3 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> How do you get a Meta Link or CMT Clip to function, RAW they crash with 1 program running.
A Meta Link or CMT Clip autocrash when a program is run. What do you do?
You cannot see the results of the poll until you have voted. Please login and cast your vote to see the results of this poll.
Total Votes: 58
Guests cannot vote 
Da9iel
post Oct 24 2006, 04:12 AM
Post #1


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 556
Joined: 28-May 04
From: Moorhead, MN, USA
Member No.: 6,367



Forgive me if this has been covered before (my search-foo is weak), but let's go through this. They both have a Response rating of 1.
QUOTE (SR4 p.213)
A System program is limited by the Response rating of the device it is on; a System run on a device with a lower Response rating functions at the Resonse rating instead.

So System also = 1
QUOTE (SR4 p.212)
For every x number of programs you have actively running, where x = System rating, your Response is reduced by 1.

Run one program (rating 1 of course) and the response decreases by 1 to zero and the comlink crashes. Did someone not think this through? Is it possible to run a comlink with zero response? The fact that they sell the things sort of disproves the death spiral theory. System must not be limited to current response, but unmodified response. Do you house rule this?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
starkebn
post Oct 24 2006, 04:48 AM
Post #2


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 14
Joined: 21-September 06
Member No.: 9,443



I guess those commlinks aren't meant to run programs - just send recieve calls / sms and browse the web. Just like your basic mobile phone these days.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hobgoblin
post Oct 24 2006, 08:42 AM
Post #3


panda!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,331
Joined: 8-March 02
From: north of central europe
Member No.: 2,242



ugh, not that debate again...

do a search, you will find that yes the rules can be interpreted that way but we don't know if its the correct interpretation.

hell, that interpretation have a nasty feedback loop in it that makes almost any comlink below rating 4 on both (as one limits the other) will spiral to a crash the moment you load the system rating in programs.

its as if one was trying to model the behavior of a windows ME box or something...

(hmm, firefox 2.0 with inline spellchecker is nice ;) )
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kev
post Oct 24 2006, 12:46 PM
Post #4


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 113
Joined: 11-December 05
From: Philadelphia, UCAS
Member No.: 8,063



Eh, houserule it. It can run System x 2 programs, and response can't drop below 1. So it can run 2 rating 1 programs.

FIXED!

Heh.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fortune
post Oct 24 2006, 01:59 PM
Post #5


Immoral Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 15,247
Joined: 29-March 02
From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat
Member No.: 2,486



QUOTE (Kev)
Eh, houserule it. It can run System x 2 programs, and response can't drop below 1. So it can run 2 rating 1 programs.

FIXED!

That could get obnoxious at the upper end of the spectrum though. I suggest just letting a Commlink run up to it's System rating in Programs before degradation sets in. That way, a MetaLink could still run one Program at a time, while it only increases the capacity of the high-end gear by one.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lorechaser
post Oct 24 2006, 02:50 PM
Post #6


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,333
Joined: 19-August 06
From: Austin
Member No.: 9,168



But again, the key to me is that you assume the commlink is used to run programs.

I would assume those can send and receive transmissions, and maybe store a gig or so of data, and that's it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Lagomorph
post Oct 24 2006, 03:40 PM
Post #7


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 834
Joined: 30-June 03
Member No.: 4,832



I ignore the rules that don't make sense, it worked wonders for cyberlimbs, shaped charge explosions, and TMs, it'll work wonders for commlinks!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kev
post Oct 24 2006, 10:13 PM
Post #8


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 113
Joined: 11-December 05
From: Philadelphia, UCAS
Member No.: 8,063



QUOTE (Lagomorph)
I ignore the rules that don't make sense, it worked wonders for cyberlimbs, shaped charge explosions, and TMs, it'll work wonders for commlinks!

Ahhh, so true. Especially TMs....
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
kzt
post Oct 24 2006, 10:42 PM
Post #9


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,537
Joined: 27-August 06
From: Albuquerque NM
Member No.: 9,234



QUOTE (Kev)

Ahhh, so true. Especially TMs....

So you think what he should have said was "I ignore TMs"? That's my current stance.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fortune
post Oct 24 2006, 11:27 PM
Post #10


Immoral Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 15,247
Joined: 29-March 02
From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat
Member No.: 2,486



Works for me! :D

Technomancers and SURGE are the two things I really dislike in Shadowrun canon.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
GrinderTheTroll
post Oct 24 2006, 11:40 PM
Post #11


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,754
Joined: 9-July 04
From: Modesto, CA
Member No.: 6,465



QUOTE (Da9iel @ Oct 23 2006, 09:12 PM)
Forgive me if this has been covered before (my search-foo is weak), but let's go through this. They both have a Response rating of 1.
QUOTE (SR4 p.213)
A System program is limited by the Response rating of the device it is on; a System run on a device with a lower Response rating functions at the Resonse rating instead.

So System also = 1
QUOTE (SR4 p.212)
For every x number of programs you have actively running, where x = System rating, your Response is reduced by 1.

Run one program (rating 1 of course) and the response decreases by 1 to zero and the comlink crashes. Did someone not think this through? Is it possible to run a comlink with zero response? The fact that they sell the things sort of disproves the death spiral theory. System must not be limited to current response, but unmodified response. Do you house rule this?

Simplest change would be that Device Ratings can't go below 1.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fortune
post Oct 25 2006, 12:44 AM
Post #12


Immoral Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 15,247
Joined: 29-March 02
From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat
Member No.: 2,486



QUOTE (GrinderTheTroll)
Simplest change would be that Device Ratings can't go below 1.

And if you make that change, you get people loading 17 Programs onto a MetaLink with no degradation.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jaid
post Oct 25 2006, 01:49 AM
Post #13


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,089
Joined: 4-October 05
Member No.: 7,813



QUOTE (Fortune)
QUOTE (GrinderTheTroll @ Oct 25 2006, 09:40 AM)
Simplest change would be that Device Ratings can't go below 1.

And if you make that change, you get people loading 17 Programs onto a MetaLink with no degradation.

yes, 17 crappy programs that no one really cares about anyways. what's the problem again?

(my personal solution is to allow you to run up to system rating in programs with no degradation, though).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Slash_Thompson
post Oct 25 2006, 01:49 AM
Post #14


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 94
Joined: 27-March 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 4,341



I've just ruled that the program limit goes to system rating; otherwise as written the Vector Xim operating system is functionally useless from a game mechanics standpoint (ok, so firewall 1 isn't functionally useless but the system 1 sure would be)

alternately just discourage anyone from actually *buying* it and handwave away the death-spiral effect on higher rated systems.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fortune
post Oct 25 2006, 02:00 AM
Post #15


Immoral Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 15,247
Joined: 29-March 02
From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat
Member No.: 2,486



QUOTE (Jaid)
what's the problem again?

The problem would be when a person moves up to a System 2 Commlink, he could then only run 2 Programs on it before it degrades. Not really a problem I guess, but not very elegant either.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
OneTrikPony
post Oct 25 2006, 02:58 AM
Post #16


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 500
Joined: 4-September 06
From: Salt Lake UT
Member No.: 9,299



I voted other, just doing a little thinking outside the box.

responce = max system rating.
system rating = max rating for programs
system x 2 = max # of subscriptions
system -1 = max # of active programs before responce is effected
system /2) + 8 = boxes in the persona condition monitor
system = max firewall rating.
Responce + System = Matrix iniciative

Where do the rules say that the device crashes if responce is reduced to 0? What I've read says that a user with a MetaLink running Edit 1

makes tests to change or erase a file with (computer + zero) dice
Cannot be subscribed to
cannot run another program
has a condition monitor with 8 boxes
has no operative firewall
has a matrix iniciative of zero when in full VR thus cannot run full VR

posibly there is such a thing as a rating 0 system? I say this because most die pools are made up of two things; body+armor, Skill + atribute, Skill + device/program rating. you can make a test with a skill of zero. You can resist damage with no armor. The only program that is paired with responce is Reality filter.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
GrinderTheTroll
post Oct 25 2006, 03:24 AM
Post #17


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,754
Joined: 9-July 04
From: Modesto, CA
Member No.: 6,465



QUOTE (OneTrikPony)
I voted other, just doing a little thinking outside the box.

responce = max system rating.
system rating = max rating for programs
system x 2 = max # of subscriptions
system -1 = max # of active programs before responce is effected
system /2) + 8 = boxes in the persona condition monitor
system = max firewall rating.
Responce + System = Matrix iniciative

Where do the rules say that the device crashes if responce is reduced to 0? What I've read says that a user with a MetaLink running Edit 1

makes tests to change or erase a file with (computer + zero) dice
Cannot be subscribed to
cannot run another program
has a condition monitor with 8 boxes
has no operative firewall
has a matrix iniciative of zero when in full VR thus cannot run full VR

posibly there is such a thing as a rating 0 system? I say this because most die pools are made up of two things; body+armor, Skill + atribute, Skill + device/program rating. you can make a test with a skill of zero. You can resist damage with no armor. The only program that is paired with responce is Reality filter.

I think part of the problem is Response=0 isn't explicitly defined. Does a zero rating imply no function? Signal=0 yields a very small radius, but it still functions. Firewall=0 would mean you'd be wide open to most anything that comes your way. Maybe part of the problem is we try to explain an abstract attribute like "System=0" or "Response=0" with tangilbe real-world results.

I like OneTrikPony's line of thinking here as well as SR4's non-comment on zero Device ratings.

As for running 17 crappy programs, the odds of generating a glitch or critical glitch gets pretty nasty (1 or 2 dice).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
OneTrikPony
post Oct 25 2006, 03:33 AM
Post #18


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 500
Joined: 4-September 06
From: Salt Lake UT
Member No.: 9,299



Ah Ha! The n00bie gets a cudo, my very first. :) Thanx Grinder
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fortune
post Oct 25 2006, 06:25 AM
Post #19


Immoral Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 15,247
Joined: 29-March 02
From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat
Member No.: 2,486



QUOTE (OneTrikPony)
... has no operative firewall ...

I didn't think Firewall was dependent on the System rating.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fortune
post Oct 25 2006, 06:27 AM
Post #20


Immoral Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 15,247
Joined: 29-March 02
From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat
Member No.: 2,486



QUOTE (GrinderTheTroll)
As for running 17 crappy programs, the odds of generating a glitch or critical glitch gets pretty nasty (1 or 2 dice).

Why would you assume a Computer Skill of 1 or less?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
starkebn
post Oct 25 2006, 12:26 PM
Post #21


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 14
Joined: 21-September 06
Member No.: 9,443



QUOTE (Fortune)
QUOTE (OneTrikPony @ Oct 25 2006, 12:58 PM)
... has no operative firewall ...

I didn't think Firewall was dependent on the System rating.

p 213:

System serves as the limiter for the maximum rating a program can be run on that node (a higher rating program functions at the System rating instead)

p 321:

Matrix Programs
  • Common Use
  • Hacking
  • Agents/IC/Pilot
  • System
  • Firewall
  • Autosofts
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fortune
post Oct 25 2006, 02:25 PM
Post #22


Immoral Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 15,247
Joined: 29-March 02
From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat
Member No.: 2,486



Interesting.

I seem to recall reading something about being able to install (any level of?) Firewall on any kind of Device, no matter what the Rating (which equates to System/Response). This, along with several references to this very thing on these Forums somewhere led me to believe that Firewalls are an exception to that restriction.

Not much in the way of hard evidence at the moment though. :(
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
GrinderTheTroll
post Oct 25 2006, 04:49 PM
Post #23


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,754
Joined: 9-July 04
From: Modesto, CA
Member No.: 6,465



QUOTE (Fortune)
QUOTE (GrinderTheTroll @ Oct 25 2006, 01:24 PM)
As for running 17 crappy programs, the odds of generating a glitch or critical glitch gets pretty nasty (1 or 2 dice).

Why would you assume a Computer Skill of 1 or less?

Yeah I neglected the Computer skill, but assuming 4, throwing 5-6 dice doesn't makes the odds much better. :(
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nikoli
post Oct 25 2006, 05:25 PM
Post #24


Chicago Survivor
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 5,079
Joined: 28-January 04
From: Canton, GA
Member No.: 6,033



Firewall isn't a program. It's a statistic for the device, like signal. It is independent of the device rating unless no firewall is given, then it is assumed to be the device rating.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
De Badd Ass
post Oct 25 2006, 05:33 PM
Post #25


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 619
Joined: 18-April 03
From: The UV Nexus
Member No.: 4,474



QUOTE (hobgoblin)
ugh, not that debate again...

No worries, mate! Common sense received 50% of the vote.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

3 Pages V   1 2 3 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th April 2024 - 10:55 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.