IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

3 Pages V   1 2 3 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> If You Lived in Seattle in 2070 ..., What issue would be most important?
If you lived in 2070 Seattle, which issue would be most important to you?
You cannot see the results of the poll until you have voted. Please login and cast your vote to see the results of this poll.
Total Votes: 91
Guests cannot vote 
Aaron
post Jan 8 2007, 08:01 PM
Post #1


Mr. Johnson
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 3,148
Joined: 27-February 06
From: UCAS
Member No.: 8,314



Well, my campaign's gotten past November, and my players want to know who the new governor of Seattle is going to be. So, of course, I turn to Dumpshock for its ... special brand of wisdom.

Pick an issue. Any issue.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kyoto Kid
post Jan 8 2007, 08:07 PM
Post #2


Bushido Cowgirl
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,782
Joined: 8-July 05
From: On the Double K Ranch a half day's ride out of Phlogiston Flats
Member No.: 7,490



...I would have added one more...

Surviving the day.

I would think that is on a lot of Metroplex citizens' minds.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Aaron
post Jan 8 2007, 08:42 PM
Post #3


Mr. Johnson
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 3,148
Joined: 27-February 06
From: UCAS
Member No.: 8,314



Crap, I forgot Public Safety.

Geez, I feel like Slashdot now ...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BrianL03
post Jan 8 2007, 09:56 PM
Post #4


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 101
Joined: 27-October 02
From: Chicago Containment Zone
Member No.: 3,504



Looks like there's some carryover from the 2006 US midterms into Seattle's election system.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Draug
post Jan 8 2007, 09:59 PM
Post #5


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 223
Joined: 6-December 06
Member No.: 10,259



Can't you edit the poll and add in Public Safety?

Or ask a mod to do it. Who knows, maybe one will...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Adam
post Jan 8 2007, 10:18 PM
Post #6


Prime Runner
*******

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 3,929
Joined: 26-February 02
From: .ca
Member No.: 51



Poll edited. happy monday!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ShadowDragon
post Jan 8 2007, 10:19 PM
Post #7


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 393
Joined: 20-June 06
Member No.: 8,754



I voted unemployment. In an age where corporate profit is king, layoffs to protect the bottom line are sure to be on the forefront of the average SINer's mind. And no one wants to live in the barrens.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fistandantilus4....
post Jan 8 2007, 10:34 PM
Post #8


Uncle Fisty
**********

Group: Admin
Posts: 13,891
Joined: 3-January 05
From: Next To Her
Member No.: 6,928



I went for succession form the UCAS becuase the trickle down form that sort of change can effect so much.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ShadowDragon8685
post Jan 8 2007, 10:39 PM
Post #9


Horror
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,322
Joined: 15-June 05
From: BumFuck, New Jersey
Member No.: 7,445



"Ethics in public officials"

There's only one way to ensure that, and that's to have public officials mind-probed continiously to ensure all their dealings are aboveboard.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kyoto Kid
post Jan 8 2007, 10:55 PM
Post #10


Bushido Cowgirl
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,782
Joined: 8-July 05
From: On the Double K Ranch a half day's ride out of Phlogiston Flats
Member No.: 7,490



QUOTE (Adam)
Poll edited. happy monday!

...thanks, now I can vote.

Yeah, with the various threats in the 6th world & the fact the police are privatised, I'd constantly be looking over my shoulder even on the way down to the corner Stuffer Shack.

Don't know who you can trust.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Banaticus
post Jan 8 2007, 11:16 PM
Post #11


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 510
Joined: 19-May 06
From: Southern CA
Member No.: 8,574



How often do public shootouts occur? That would have a direct bearing on whether or not most people would pick public safety as the primary campaign issue. What's the general rate of unemployment? That would directly affect whether or not most people would pick unemployement as the primary campaign issue. Without knowing these things, how can we make an informed decision?

The honesty of elected officials would likely be important, but to most people I don't think it would matter as much as unemployment would.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SL James
post Jan 8 2007, 11:33 PM
Post #12


Shadowrun Setting Nerd
*******

Group: Banned
Posts: 3,632
Joined: 28-June 05
From: Pissing on pedestrians from my electronic ivory tower.
Member No.: 7,473



Damn you for making us choose between the economy and unemployment like they aren't related.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Thane36425
post Jan 8 2007, 11:51 PM
Post #13


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 548
Joined: 21-December 06
Member No.: 10,416



QUOTE (ShadowDragon8685)
"Ethics in public officials"

There's only one way to ensure that, and that's to have public officials mind-probed continiously to ensure all their dealings are aboveboard.

There is such as thing as political ethics, but they are a far cry from traditional ethics. Political ethics would read something like: Do unto others before they do unto you, if it increases personal (and maybe party) power it is good, loudly accuse others of doing what you yourself are doing and hope no one notices, blackmail isn't a crime: it is a way of life, kick an opponent when he's down, etc.

Basically take standard ethics and turn them aroun 180 degrees and you have political ethics.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Thane36425
post Jan 8 2007, 11:57 PM
Post #14


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 548
Joined: 21-December 06
Member No.: 10,416



QUOTE (Banaticus)
How often do public shootouts occur? That would have a direct bearing on whether or not most people would pick public safety as the primary campaign issue. What's the general rate of unemployment? That would directly affect whether or not most people would pick unemployement as the primary campaign issue. Without knowing these things, how can we make an informed decision?

The honesty of elected officials would likely be important, but to most people I don't think it would matter as much as unemployment would.

That would depend on where the shootouts happen. In the Barrens, no one would really care. If they happen in Downtown, then there would be a major outcry. Just look at the real world. As long as the violence stayed in the slums or certain crime ridden cities, no one cared. But once it started happening in the merchant districts, then there was a crack down, at least in the commercial areas. This would probably be even more true in SR given that there are slums there that are worse than anything currently in the US.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Faelan
post Jan 9 2007, 12:05 AM
Post #15


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 584
Joined: 15-April 06
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 8,466



I don't know, Baltimore always struck me as straight out of Shadowrun. Nice little outlying suburbs. Heroin ravaged inner city with a nice quiet corporate center. Businesses move in, areas gentrify, and the little war zones get even worse because you have more competition. Not a very fun place, but the money was good.

I voted for the economy. If things are booming, unemployment drops, taxes don't seem so bad, street violence tends to drop because you can get a job, corporations make nice with the local government, and on the shadowrunner side of things business increases as corporate greed takes off (not that a shadowrunner would be voting). All around good for the sheep and the wolves. I would have to say that the candidates all seem pretty week, so you might wind up with an incumbent victory, after all the bastard you know is better than the one you don't.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kyoto Kid
post Jan 9 2007, 12:44 AM
Post #16


Bushido Cowgirl
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,782
Joined: 8-July 05
From: On the Double K Ranch a half day's ride out of Phlogiston Flats
Member No.: 7,490



QUOTE (Banaticus)
How often do public shootouts occur?  That would have a direct bearing on whether or not most people would pick public safety as the primary campaign issue.  What's the general rate of unemployment?  That would directly affect whether or not most people would pick unemployement as the primary campaign issue.  Without knowing these things, how can we make an informed decision?

The honesty of elected officials would likely be important, but to most people I don't think it would matter as much as unemployment would.

...it's not just gunplay.

...There's spellcasting (which is a lot more subtle, for instance, you could be doing something right now that the mage wants
...Terrorism and Sabotage via the Matrix (no longer do terrorists need to physically take over the flight deck of a plane to fly it into a building or the switch house to switch that express train to the wrong track)
...gangs and gang violence appear to be more prevalent in the future (unless you are one of the lucky ones who live in an A rated neighbourhood).
...and again, law enforcement is managed by a "for profit" corporation which only has to worry about the shareholders' interests (see the thread Shadowrun Police, there are some very interesting observations posted).

Given my current income level, I most likely would find myself living in a C rated neighbourhood at best. Only if something fairly big happened (like a gang rumble, a firefight, or some wacko peppering the area with grenades) would the Star even consider checking things out. The random mugging? not worth the trouble.

Now, make that a random mugging by a Troll against a human.

Yeah, you gotta watch your own back.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SL James
post Jan 9 2007, 01:12 AM
Post #17


Shadowrun Setting Nerd
*******

Group: Banned
Posts: 3,632
Joined: 28-June 05
From: Pissing on pedestrians from my electronic ivory tower.
Member No.: 7,473



QUOTE (Thane36425)
QUOTE (ShadowDragon8685 @ Jan 8 2007, 05:39 PM)
"Ethics in public officials"

There's only one way to ensure that, and that's to have public officials mind-probed continiously to ensure all their dealings are aboveboard.

There is such as thing as political ethics, but they are a far cry from traditional ethics. Political ethics would read something like: Do unto others before they do unto you, if it increases personal (and maybe party) power it is good, loudly accuse others of doing what you yourself are doing and hope no one notices, blackmail isn't a crime: it is a way of life, kick an opponent when he's down, etc.

Basically take standard ethics and turn them aroun 180 degrees and you have political ethics.

...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fortune
post Jan 9 2007, 01:15 AM
Post #18


Immoral Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 15,247
Joined: 29-March 02
From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat
Member No.: 2,486



QUOTE (SL James)
...

I have been waiting just for your response to that post. I was really expecting a bit more ... :(
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fistandantilus4....
post Jan 9 2007, 01:15 AM
Post #19


Uncle Fisty
**********

Group: Admin
Posts: 13,891
Joined: 3-January 05
From: Next To Her
Member No.: 6,928



Maybe James is taking the "If you can't say anything nice.." approach
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kyrn
post Jan 9 2007, 01:23 AM
Post #20


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 249
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Orlando
Member No.: 815



Money money money...MONEY!

Erk, my voice just cracked trying to hit that high note. Stupid cancer sticks...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Thane36425
post Jan 9 2007, 01:34 AM
Post #21


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 548
Joined: 21-December 06
Member No.: 10,416



QUOTE (Fortune)
QUOTE (SL James @ Jan 9 2007, 12:12 PM)
...

I have been waiting just for your response to that post. I was really expecting a bit more ... :(

Not keen on my cyncial take take on politics? Seems to me that is pretty much how they operate.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SL James
post Jan 9 2007, 02:28 AM
Post #22


Shadowrun Setting Nerd
*******

Group: Banned
Posts: 3,632
Joined: 28-June 05
From: Pissing on pedestrians from my electronic ivory tower.
Member No.: 7,473



QUOTE (Thane36425)
Seems to me that is pretty much how they operate.

Of course it seems that way.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hyzmarca
post Jan 9 2007, 02:35 AM
Post #23


Midnight Toker
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,686
Joined: 4-July 04
From: Zombie Drop Bear Santa's Workshop
Member No.: 6,456



QUOTE (Thane36425 @ Jan 8 2007, 06:57 PM)
QUOTE (Banaticus @ Jan 8 2007, 06:16 PM)
How often do public shootouts occur?  That would have a direct bearing on whether or not most people would pick public safety as the primary campaign issue.  What's the general rate of unemployment?  That would directly affect whether or not most people would pick unemployement as the primary campaign issue.  Without knowing these things, how can we make an informed decision?

The honesty of elected officials would likely be important, but to most people I don't think it would matter as much as unemployment would.

That would depend on where the shootouts happen. In the Barrens, no one would really care. If they happen in Downtown, then there would be a major outcry. Just look at the real world. As long as the violence stayed in the slums or certain crime ridden cities, no one cared. But once it started happening in the merchant districts, then there was a crack down, at least in the commercial areas. This would probably be even more true in SR given that there are slums there that are worse than anything currently in the US.

Given the random encounter rate in the Genesis/Megadrive SR game, I'd say two dozen a day throughout Seatle, give or take a few, with three deaths per shootout, give or take one or two.

That adds up to about 73 murders per day or 26,645 murders per year, which is pretty good for a city the size of Seattle.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ShadowDragon8685
post Jan 9 2007, 03:56 AM
Post #24


Horror
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,322
Joined: 15-June 05
From: BumFuck, New Jersey
Member No.: 7,445



Of course, remember that that's 2053.

It's 2070 now, a lot has changed. For one thing, that 2053 adventure is probably a bestselling AR/VR game in 2070.

For another, simsense entertainment has never been so accessable, and after years of basically being ignored by Lone Star, the people have probably voted in a politician who made it very clear that if Lone Star didn't do a better job in the D, C and B zones, Knight-Errant was going to be policing Seattle within a year.

It's probably safe to walk through a C and up zone at night - not exactly a good idea, but unless you turn down a dark alley you stand no sigifnicant risk of getting mugged. D-zones you're still going to want to not stop rolling in, and have all the windows up.

Z-zones, of course, are still warzones.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Aaron
post Jan 9 2007, 04:21 AM
Post #25


Mr. Johnson
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 3,148
Joined: 27-February 06
From: UCAS
Member No.: 8,314



QUOTE (BrianL03 @ Jan 8 2007, 04:56 PM)
Looks like there's some carryover from the 2006 US midterms into Seattle's election system.

And why not? I built the poll from the information about the election given in Runner Havens. If science fiction is supposed to be a reflection of our own times, I think RH does a pretty good job.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

3 Pages V   1 2 3 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 21st June 2026 - 08:47 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.