IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Real Life PAN, ... sort of
ludomastro
post Jan 30 2007, 03:03 AM
Post #1


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,382
Joined: 22-February 06
From: Shadowland
Member No.: 8,297



If you haven't seen this then read these articles about what the inventors are calling a BAN - Body Area Network.

Article I
Article II - You don't have to install Chinese characters and can still read the article.

Just thought that you might be interested.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
cetiah
post Jan 30 2007, 03:10 AM
Post #2


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 745
Joined: 2-January 07
From: Los Angeles, CA
Member No.: 10,510



You know, after reading these I've discovered there's very few things you could do that wouldn't creep me out if you describe what it is and then add the words "using the human body". "Transfer data" doesn't seem that icky until you add "using the human body" and then it just gives me shivers.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Draug
post Jan 30 2007, 03:12 AM
Post #3


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 223
Joined: 6-December 06
Member No.: 10,259



Cool and freaky at the same time. Fear and awe, a powerful combination.

As long as I'm in control of it, I don't mind weak currents moving across the surface of my body. As soon as others do it though...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ShadowDragon
post Jan 30 2007, 08:02 AM
Post #4


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 393
Joined: 20-June 06
Member No.: 8,754



Skinlink anyone? It even lists the same advantages.

QUOTE
You usually want to communicate with one particular thing, but in a busy place there could be hundreds of Bluetooth devices within range."

Furthermore, humans apparently make poor aerials, something which is "good for security because even if you encrypt data it is still possible that it could be decoded, but if you can't pick it up it can't be cracked," as Zimmerman explains.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hobgoblin
post Jan 30 2007, 01:06 PM
Post #5


panda!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,331
Joined: 8-March 02
From: north of central europe
Member No.: 2,242



i could have sworn i read about a patent application from microsoft for something similar some years back. i wonder what happened to it.

in a way this is a inevitable invention as we know the body can be used to transport electrical energy. its just a question about how much juice you have to pump into the signal to make sure it gets to every part of the body as i think human flesh have a somewhat high resistance.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
cetiah
post Jan 30 2007, 01:37 PM
Post #6


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 745
Joined: 2-January 07
From: Los Angeles, CA
Member No.: 10,510



QUOTE (hobgoblin)
i could have sworn i read about a patent application from microsoft for something similar some years back. i wonder what happened to it.

As far as I know its still in development.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jrayjoker
post Jan 30 2007, 03:09 PM
Post #7


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,453
Joined: 17-September 04
From: St. Paul
Member No.: 6,675



QUOTE (hobgoblin)
i could have sworn i read about a patent application from microsoft for something similar some years back. i wonder what happened to it.

in a way this is a inevitable invention as we know the body can be used to transport electrical energy. its just a question about how much juice you have to pump into the signal to make sure it gets to every part of the body as i think human flesh have a somewhat high resistance.

As long as the Amps are super low, who cares?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
eidolon
post Jan 30 2007, 03:51 PM
Post #8


ghostrider
********

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 4,196
Joined: 16-May 04
Member No.: 6,333



Me. ;) (They'd have to be super low in milliamps, not amps.)

According to a PDF from the CDC:

1.2 Milliamps is the Perception Threshold (you can tell you're being shocked)
10-20 Milliamps is Painful; Let-Go Threshold; Can kill in time.
100 Milliamps can kill in a second; Can't let go
200 Milliamps kills; causes heart fibrillation, burns human flesh

Full PDF (looks like a port of a slide show) can be found here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
eidolon
post Jan 30 2007, 03:54 PM
Post #9


ghostrider
********

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 4,196
Joined: 16-May 04
Member No.: 6,333



Corrected thread title.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kyoto Kid
post Jan 30 2007, 03:54 PM
Post #10


Bushido Cowgirl
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,782
Joined: 8-July 05
From: On the Double K Ranch a half day's ride out of Phlogiston Flats
Member No.: 7,490



...hmmm 20 CM is about 7 3/4 inches. That means on a crowded transit vehicle, crowded street (such as are very prevalent in places like Tokyo, London, New York), there could still be the potential for signal overlap if something like this ever went wide market.

This brings up the old "Handshake" scenario mentioned in a Skinlink thread here on DS a few months past. The way this is described merely brushing up against someone could be enough to "hack" into their system.

[getting on a crowded bus, on person bumps into another then stands next to them. Both have a RedTaction type system]

Person 1: "Excuse me, sorry"

Person # 2: [after getting off checks pockets] "Hmm...wallet & keys are still there..."

Person # 2: [later on at the cash machine] "...I knew I had more than that in my account"
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Demerzel
post Jan 30 2007, 04:17 PM
Post #11


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,206
Joined: 9-July 06
From: Fresno, CA
Member No.: 8,856



QUOTE (eidolon @ Jan 30 2007, 07:51 AM)
1.2 Milliamps is the Perception Threshold (you can tell you're being shocked)

Frequency counts too. At high frequencies you can't tell, so a blanket statement like that isn't true unless your talking about a specific frequency. My guess would be that the CDC is talking about 60Hz household frequencies which is well within the range of what you can feel.

Electrosurgery uses high frequencies that can't be felt as anything other than burning. The linked wiki article has some good information about current densities and power.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
eidolon
post Jan 30 2007, 04:19 PM
Post #12


ghostrider
********

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 4,196
Joined: 16-May 04
Member No.: 6,333



No idea. I just remembered that a lethal shock was usually measured in milliamps, rather than amps. The other stuff was just random "check this out".
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lorechaser
post Jan 30 2007, 04:24 PM
Post #13


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,333
Joined: 19-August 06
From: Austin
Member No.: 9,168



QUOTE (cetiah)
QUOTE (hobgoblin @ Jan 30 2007, 08:06 AM)
i could have sworn i read about a patent application from microsoft for something similar some years back. i wonder what happened to it.

As far as I know its still in development.

Yeah, they're gonna add it to the Zune, so when the three guys that still use it meet, they can shake hands, and find out that they can't share 2/3rds of their music....

Sorry, I couldn't resist.

Given the number of random contacts I have with people daily, I *don't* think I'll be picking this idea up. I don't even enable my bluetooth 95% of the time, because it's so easy to hack. If someone just had to touch me? Nuh uh.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mistwalker
post Jan 30 2007, 04:49 PM
Post #14


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 668
Joined: 4-September 06
Member No.: 9,304



Add in Intel's announcement about nanite sized transistors(?), and we are seeing SR being turned into reality.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hobgoblin
post Jan 30 2007, 05:11 PM
Post #15


panda!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,331
Joined: 8-March 02
From: north of central europe
Member No.: 2,242



the hardest part is still the DNI and simsense...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ShadowDragon
post Jan 30 2007, 05:56 PM
Post #16


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 393
Joined: 20-June 06
Member No.: 8,754



QUOTE (cetiah)
QUOTE (hobgoblin @ Jan 30 2007, 08:06 AM)
i could have sworn i read about a patent application from microsoft for something similar some years back. i wonder what happened to it.

As far as I know its still in development.

It's actually mentioned in the articles. The difference between the two is that MS's patent is for transferring power with direct skin contact and this thing transfers data within 20cm.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ShadowDragon
post Jan 30 2007, 05:59 PM
Post #17


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 393
Joined: 20-June 06
Member No.: 8,754



QUOTE (lorechaser)
Given the number of random contacts I have with people daily, I *don't* think I'll be picking this idea up. I don't even enable my bluetooth 95% of the time, because it's so easy to hack. If someone just had to touch me? Nuh uh.

Can people really hack an account in about 5 seconds? Because that's as much time as they'd have if they bump into you. Either that or they'd have to sit uncomfortably close to you (in which case you can turn it off).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lorechaser
post Jan 30 2007, 06:08 PM
Post #18


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,333
Joined: 19-August 06
From: Austin
Member No.: 9,168



Currently? Probably not. Pretty soon? Probably so. I always give the hacker more credit than the security. I suspect you can simply add a receptor in those 5 seconds, and then figure out what to do.

I mean, you can use a game boy to grab wireless signals transmitted by car remotes. There's wierd stuff out there.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ShadowDragon8685
post Jan 30 2007, 06:32 PM
Post #19


Horror
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,322
Joined: 15-June 05
From: BumFuck, New Jersey
Member No.: 7,445



QUOTE (ShadowDragon)
QUOTE (lorechaser @ Jan 30 2007, 11:24 AM)
Given the number of random contacts I have with people daily, I *don't* think I'll be picking this idea up.  I don't even enable my bluetooth 95% of the time, because it's so easy to hack.  If someone just had to touch me?  Nuh uh.

Can people really hack an account in about 5 seconds? Because that's as much time as they'd have if they bump into you. Either that or they'd have to sit uncomfortably close to you (in which case you can turn it off).

That depends on how many initiative passes he gets and how imbalanced your defenses versus his hacking programs are.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 4th July 2025 - 09:04 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.