IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

4 Pages V  « < 2 3 4  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Navy equivalent of a Supply Sergeant?, for a contact
Thain
post Feb 14 2007, 01:53 PM
Post #76


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 208
Joined: 15-January 07
Member No.: 10,652



Aparently, back in Dubya-Dubya-Two they trainned the gun crews of bombers by handing them a shotgun, putting them in the back of a pickup, and hightailing it down a dirt road. Off to one side, guys hiding behind piles of dirt would launch clays.

I don't care who you are, that sounds like a fun weekend!

"I embarked from the CONUS for a DHS USCG MOS with DNIF. I became an Admin Warefare Specialist, YN3 FYI. At the HAWC in HA, I was just another haole. I processed P&R for TRICARE, with an awful lot of PGI. SOP was to send the DRUNKS to a SAC, PDQ."

God, I love acronyms!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ancient History
post Feb 14 2007, 02:07 PM
Post #77


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 6,748
Joined: 5-July 02
Member No.: 2,935



Even in milspeak you're FUBAR. Reminds me of the first lieutenant that thought CYA stood for Catholic Youth Association.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Thain
post Feb 14 2007, 02:58 PM
Post #78


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 208
Joined: 15-January 07
Member No.: 10,652



To be fair, it has been a long while. I'm learning Lawyerese now, which has the whole "subject-noun-verb" section of my brain completely rewired.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ancient History
post Feb 14 2007, 03:19 PM
Post #79


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 6,748
Joined: 5-July 02
Member No.: 2,935



Hooah.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Marmot
post Feb 14 2007, 05:04 PM
Post #80


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 84
Joined: 6-December 06
Member No.: 10,248



QUOTE (Crakkerjakk)
We watched the Navy pistol qual once. They threw a fifty-five gallon drum off the side of the ship, then gave everyone ammo, stood them in a line on the flight deck elevator, and told em to shoot the barrel. We couldn't fricken believe it.

Believe it. Though we never actually did it that way, our qual was about roughly the same in principle.

The only thing more surreal than watching it was, of course, actually doing it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Thain
post Feb 14 2007, 10:49 PM
Post #81


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 208
Joined: 15-January 07
Member No.: 10,652



I get the feeling, that for some reason, the Navy doesn't need to worry about pistols much.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Crakkerjakk
post Feb 15 2007, 01:01 AM
Post #82


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 238
Joined: 24-January 07
Member No.: 10,756



They also have these
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Spike
post Feb 15 2007, 01:45 AM
Post #83


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 941
Joined: 25-January 07
Member No.: 10,765



I can tell by scrolling over the link that you are talking about battleships. Might I remind you of the fact that it has since been proven that battleships are dead when confronted by crop dusters and rowboats armed with antiship missles?

One of your own proved that...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Butterblume
post Feb 15 2007, 11:00 AM
Post #84


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,150
Joined: 19-December 05
From: Rhein-Ruhr Megaplex
Member No.: 8,081



It has been proven shortly after WW I, and it only took a few decades until everyone got the message. Like it has been proven that aircraft carriers are too vulnerable, but I think it will also need a few decades...

Todays anti ship missiles couldn't sink a battleship. This Statement is true and at the same time utterly useless :D. If there were battleships around, there would also be missiles around that could harm them.

It's similar to the russian submarines known as alfa class, when they were built they could outrun every torpedo in the western arsenal. Of course, it didn't took that long to build faster torpedos.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Thain
post Feb 15 2007, 01:22 PM
Post #85


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 208
Joined: 15-January 07
Member No.: 10,652



Yes, battleships have their weaknesses... what doesn't?

Nonetheless, big honkin' guns going Boom! are always fun.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kyoto Kid
post Feb 15 2007, 03:39 PM
Post #86


Bushido Cowgirl
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,782
Joined: 8-July 05
From: On the Double K Ranch a half day's ride out of Phlogiston Flats
Member No.: 7,490



QUOTE (Thain)
I get the feeling, that for some reason, the Navy doesn't need to worry about pistols much.

...great pic. Love the shockwave on the water beneath the guns. Had the "Mo" put in an appearance here in Portland back in the early 90s for Rose Festival "Fleet Week". Definitely most impressive to see one of these battlewagons up close & personal.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Thain
post Feb 15 2007, 10:52 PM
Post #87


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 208
Joined: 15-January 07
Member No.: 10,652



Yeah, they've got the WWII-era Alambama down near my (late) grandparents place on the gulf coast. Much of the place is closed off to tourists, but you can still crawl around a pretty fair portion of her. Good times.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

4 Pages V  « < 2 3 4
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 1st July 2025 - 03:04 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.