IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Smartlink Blind-Firing, using the gun cam
IvanTank
post May 19 2007, 11:28 PM
Post #1


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 179
Joined: 15-November 06
Member No.: 9,866



So, it says that cares can point there guns around cameras and shoot, aiming with the smartlinks gun camera. What types of modifiers would apply for a test like this?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jaid
post May 20 2007, 12:10 AM
Post #2


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,089
Joined: 4-October 05
Member No.: 7,813



i think the general consensus that was agreed on was that it worked like firing from full cover, because that's basically what it is.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Red Fox
post May 20 2007, 02:39 AM
Post #3


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 20
Joined: 12-December 06
From: Salish-Shidhe territory, near Seattle
Member No.: 10,346



cool because I've got a candy-raver orc on a rampage that's causing lonestar nightmares right now - this'll help put this into balance a bit more. They'll still need to corner her enough to get some officers into a flanking position though (which tends to prove hard due to the sniper rifle toting partner the orc has).

preciate the public opinion Jaid.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mfb
post May 20 2007, 03:00 AM
Post #4


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



*sob*
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Crusher Bob
post May 20 2007, 04:11 AM
Post #5


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,598
Joined: 15-March 03
From: Hong Kong
Member No.: 4,253



Remember that airborne drones are a Lone Star favorite. They don't have to send out the officers when a bunch of armed rotor-drones can get there faster and with less insurance risk.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Demon_Bob
post May 20 2007, 04:17 AM
Post #6


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 511
Joined: 24-March 05
From: On a ledge between Heaven and Hell
Member No.: 7,226



QUOTE (Turtleboy)
cool because I've got a candy-raver orc on a rampage that's causing lonestar nightmares right now - this'll help put this into balance a bit more. They'll still need to corner her enough to get some officers into a flanking position though (which tends to prove hard due to the sniper rifle toting partner the orc has).

Don't forget that lonestar has more resourses than just guns. An Air Spirit or 2 could surprise the sniper. They would have snipers of thier own. Swat teams with military grade armor and ballistic shields. Armed attack vehicles. Smoke grenades. Mages with invisibility spells.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
psychophipps
post May 20 2007, 04:27 AM
Post #7


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,192
Joined: 6-May 07
From: Texas - The RGV
Member No.: 11,613



And my personal favorite...puke gas. ;)
Just mix it with hot smoke, so the sniper can't see anything to shoot, and ultrasound your way to an easy arrest. Can't be a deathmachine if you're spraying your lunch all over the alleyway.

Mark(psycho)Phipps( HAHAHA! )

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
kzt
post May 20 2007, 07:10 AM
Post #8


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,537
Joined: 27-August 06
From: Albuquerque NM
Member No.: 9,234



QUOTE (Turtleboy)
They'll still need to corner her enough to get some officers into a flanking position though (which tends to prove hard due to the sniper rifle toting partner the orc has).

Why bother? Use a pair of roto drones with MMGs from 1000 meters away. There is a reason why Lone Star has them.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
IvanTank
post May 20 2007, 07:17 AM
Post #9


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 179
Joined: 15-November 06
Member No.: 9,866



QUOTE (kzt)
QUOTE (Turtleboy @ May 19 2007, 07:39 PM)
They'll still need to corner her enough to get some officers into a flanking position though (which tends to prove hard due to the sniper rifle toting partner the orc has).

Why bother? Use a pair of roto drones with MMGs from 1000 meters away. There is a reason why Lone Star has them.

They would need to use LMGs, MMGs are to big for the weapon mount that you can get with 3 body.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
kzt
post May 20 2007, 08:01 AM
Post #10


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,537
Joined: 27-August 06
From: Albuquerque NM
Member No.: 9,234



QUOTE (IvanTank)
They would need to use LMGs, MMGs are to big for the weapon mount that you can get with 3 body.

Yeah, but the Lone Star Strato-9 that carries an MMG was both totally legal to buy over the counter and the entire armed drone cost less than the MMG IIRC. . . SR3 had some interesting quirks.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BGMFH
post May 20 2007, 07:58 PM
Post #11


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 403
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Kill Em All
Member No.: 2,018



Yeah, but the general consensus was that they were stolen goods at that price, just readily available... In my meory at least of the rampaging arguments that particular drone always evoked.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Demon_Bob
post May 21 2007, 04:46 AM
Post #12


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 511
Joined: 24-March 05
From: On a ledge between Heaven and Hell
Member No.: 7,226



I would have any recoil modifiers not compensated for doubled.
It would involve sticking just your arm to the elbow around the corner, so practically full cover. This could really only be done with firearms that can be shot with just one hand.

Yes I have seen Future Weapons with the Rifle that can shoot around corners. So specialized equipment would be possible. The "Rifle" in the show looks like a specialized pistol, with a bunch of nifty equipment behind it. The firearm showcased does keep all body parts behind cover though.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Edward
post May 21 2007, 09:01 AM
Post #13


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,073
Joined: 23-August 04
Member No.: 6,587



I see no reason to restrict it to weapons that can be used in one hand.

Take your long arm that is built to be used with one had on the trigger, one on the horizontal grip under the barrel (e.g. shotgun slide). It may or may not have a shoulder stock.

With your left hand palm up in front of you place the for grip (or shotgun slide) in your palm and hold, your right hand will grip the handle with your thumb under the trigger guard (if present) and your fingers reaching over where the ball of your palm would normally go. while standing with full cover behind a wall with the enemy around the corner and to your left you extend your arms so the gun points around the corner.

I would defiantly double uncompensated recoil and the shoulder stock provides no advantage.

Another nasty piece of equipment is the smart firing platform, I can se them being pushed around the corner in groups of 3 or more.

Edward
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Red Fox
post May 21 2007, 10:05 AM
Post #14


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 20
Joined: 12-December 06
From: Salish-Shidhe territory, near Seattle
Member No.: 10,346



QUOTE (Jaid)
i think the general consensus that was agreed on was that it worked like firing from full cover, because that's basically what it is.

wait - full cover? I looked it up and it only has 'firing from cover: -1' in the ranged modifiers chart. nothing about firing from full cover.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jaid
post May 21 2007, 05:18 PM
Post #15


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,089
Joined: 4-October 05
Member No.: 7,813



you sure? i thought it was -1 to attacking from it, and -3 or so to attack someone who has it...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ravor
post May 21 2007, 05:25 PM
Post #16


Cybernetic Blood Mage
******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,472
Joined: 11-March 06
From: Northeastern Wyoming
Member No.: 8,361



Well I'm feeling too lazy to double check after writing up a bunch of House-Rules for a new campaign very loosely based on Bleach (I kept the same basic concept but stripped away as much of the Japanese Anama feeling as I could), but if I remember correctly in order to shoot back at someone with Full Cover you have to shoot through the Barrier Rating of whatever he's hiding behind plus you get modifiers for not knowing exactly where to aim. (I wouldn't hand out the full 'Blind Fire' Modifier since you basically know where he is since he's got to be holding the fragging gun, but its still got to be worth something.)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MaxHunter
post May 21 2007, 06:02 PM
Post #17


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 718
Joined: 10-September 05
From: Montevideo, in the elusive shadows of Latin America
Member No.: 7,727



so... -4 instead of -6 maybe?

Cheers,

Max
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Demon_Bob
post May 21 2007, 06:13 PM
Post #18


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 511
Joined: 24-March 05
From: On a ledge between Heaven and Hell
Member No.: 7,226



QUOTE (kzt @ May 20 2007, 02:01 AM)
Yeah, but the Lone Star Strato-9 that carries an MMG was both totally legal to buy over the counter and the entire armed drone cost less than the MMG IIRC. . .  SR3 had some interesting quirks.

Although certian drones came with weapons we never played that the cost of the weapon was included in the cost of the drone.

QUOTE
I see no reason to restrict it to weapons that can be used in one hand.

Finding it hard to imagine a stable firing platform as such. Ok, perhaps 2 handed firearms, but with double range mods.

QUOTE
Another nasty piece of equipment is the smart firing platform, I can se them being pushed around the corner in groups of 3 or more.


Oh ya! :) Those are great! They don't really need to be manned.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Red Fox
post May 21 2007, 08:39 PM
Post #19


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 20
Joined: 12-December 06
From: Salish-Shidhe territory, near Seattle
Member No.: 10,346



QUOTE (Jaid)
you sure? i thought it was -1 to attacking from it, and -3 or so to attack someone who has it...

right, so if you're firing a smartlinked gun around a corner relying on the guncams in the smartgun system to sight and aim, giving you full cover then you're at -1 dice pool modifier if no other conditions exist (like enemy in cover, etc). is that correct?

thanks for clarifying for me :)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Edward
post May 22 2007, 02:52 AM
Post #20


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,073
Joined: 23-August 04
Member No.: 6,587



QUOTE (Demon_Bob)

QUOTE
I see no reason to restrict it to weapons that can be used in one hand.

Finding it hard to imagine a stable firing platform as such. Ok, perhaps 2 handed firearms, but with double range mods.

If your doing this at any range that would inflict penalties on a 2 handed weapon you shouldn’t be trying it. At least not for anything other than suppressive fire.

The other trick is to have a age with magic fingers hold the gun from 5 meters back.

Of cause the tricks a skilled mage can pull against a low number of opponents are scary, alternating real and illusionary opponents, never offering a real target forcing the enemy to burn ammunition until its all gone, I will have to do that some time.

Edward
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Demon_Bob
post May 22 2007, 03:20 AM
Post #21


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 511
Joined: 24-March 05
From: On a ledge between Heaven and Hell
Member No.: 7,226



QUOTE (Edward)
The other trick is to have a mage with magic fingers hold the gun from 5 meters back.

Of cause the tricks a skilled mage can pull against a low number of opponents are scary, alternating real and illusionary opponents, never offering a real target forcing the enemy to burn ammunition until its all gone, I will have to do that some time.

Edward

:)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
OSUMacbeth
post May 23 2007, 01:06 AM
Post #22


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 98
Joined: 26-July 05
Member No.: 7,517



In my games, I assess a penalty of -4, and agility applies normally. Still far better than blind fire.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
psychophipps
post May 23 2007, 03:14 AM
Post #23


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,192
Joined: 6-May 07
From: Texas - The RGV
Member No.: 11,613



My issue is that you can aim fine with a recticle from a remote location. I mean, look at how cool you are with a mouse. You're not touching the screen itself but the mouse seems to find it's way to the target just fine. Why is it suddenly different with a firearm when it's held from around a corner?
Recoil would suck but I find this "fire around cover" ability to be the number one reason why the Future Warrior system, which also includes this technology, is going to totally rock people's socks. I've seen plenty of videos from the US Army training center with accurate shooting from behind cover by holding the weapon overhead and/or around a corner. It's single shots because of clumsy recoil, but it still gets the job done just fine.

Mark(psycho)Phipps( HAHAHA! )
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BGMFH
post May 24 2007, 03:05 AM
Post #24


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 403
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Kill Em All
Member No.: 2,018



Single shots I would bet Phipps.

Im infantry myself, USMC, and RECOIL would kill in a corner shot like that.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Wounded Ronin
post May 24 2007, 03:14 AM
Post #25


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 6,640
Joined: 6-June 04
Member No.: 6,383



Well I think there's footage from the Vietnam War showing people using spray and pray tactics by holding their rifles up above cover and not looking. I don't think that's considered a viable strategy anymore, though.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 29th April 2024 - 03:09 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.