IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

4 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Best Munchkin Type
What is the most broken runner type?
You cannot see the results of the poll until you have voted. Please login and cast your vote to see the results of this poll.
Total Votes: 89
Guests cannot vote 
Lindt
post Jun 19 2007, 03:37 AM
Post #26


Man In The Machine
*****

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 2,264
Joined: 26-February 02
From: I-495 S
Member No.: 1,105



QUOTE (djinni)
QUOTE (Kagetenshi @ Jun 18 2007, 05:57 PM)
QUOTE (Darkest Angel @ Jun 18 2007, 05:54 PM)
None are inherently broken, they can all be horribly abused, but it always makes them a one trick pony.

No, it really, really doesn't. You can do some significantly overpowering things without overspecializing.

~J

then prove it.

Social adepts.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Eyeless Blond
post Jun 19 2007, 03:45 AM
Post #27


Decker on the Threshold
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 2,922
Joined: 14-March 04
Member No.: 6,156



I think what really breaks them is the million Y option. It's kinda unfortunate that decks and wired reflexes are so GD expensive; otherwise you could pretty easily balance riggers by simply eliminating the million Y.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nezumi
post Jun 19 2007, 05:32 PM
Post #28


Incertum est quo loco te mors expectet;
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,546
Joined: 24-October 03
From: DeeCee, U.S.
Member No.: 5,760



Like Kage said, Riggers definitely can, with their steel lynx and weird hardened armor rules.

Mages do explode the most games, however. The nice thing about riggers are the rules are so complex, and there are easy ways to limit their use, so most people never get into it. Mages are easy to overpower without much understanding of the rules, and are a little more versatile, so you get more crazy super-powered mages.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Darkest Angel
post Jun 19 2007, 06:56 PM
Post #29


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 546
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Manchester, England
Member No.: 1,062



Kage, that's illegal, not more than 6pts gained from flaws - you have 8, and no more than 5 edges or 5 flaws, you have 6 flaws.

Anyway, take him out of his roadmaster; and with no essence even with the edge he's going to suck socially and he has no combat skills either. So, not only is he illegal, he's still a one trick pony.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Jun 19 2007, 07:36 PM
Post #30


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,008
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



Reread your book. That's a suggestion, not a rule. If you want to enforce it, just drop both B/Rs--you pay more for repairs, but can pick the skills up post-chargen for less than what the flaws cost me in retrospect.

As for "take out of Roadmaster", how? Why? Look at all the roles the character can fill while inside.

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Darkest Angel
post Jun 19 2007, 07:49 PM
Post #31


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 546
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Manchester, England
Member No.: 1,062



So your dwarf is going to spend his entire life in the van then? Maybe during a planned run sure, but the rest of the time? In meets? Places you can't take the van? I don't think so. Sometimes - very often in fact - you need that personal touch. Don't tell me all your players go round in together everywhere in groups to ensure the munchkin face always does all the talking and the munchkin sammie always does all the fighting.

Like I said. One trick pony anyway, even if you do ignore the "suggestion".

Edit: Those roles from the van are decking (not that he has a deck), rigging (surveilance/fighting) and what else? Conference calling? :please:
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Jun 19 2007, 07:52 PM
Post #32


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,008
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



Dude, ever hear of a difference between "overpowered" and "invulnerable at all times"? I played through a year of gameplay where a decidedly disproportionate amount of the things that needed to be done were done by that character.

The character isn't a Dwarf, either.

Roles from the van: heavy fire support, transportation, surveillance, reconnaissance, tracking (the sensor rules are insane), coordination, electronic warfare, and there was a deck in the group (and the character picked one up pretty soon after chargen).

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Darkest Angel
post Jun 19 2007, 08:05 PM
Post #33


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 546
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Manchester, England
Member No.: 1,062



Dunno where I got the dwarf from.

Anyway, my point was that he was a one trick pony, and that still stands. In his element he probably is overpowered, but for a hell of a lot of the game he's going to be sat twiddling his thumbs, which substantially reduces his usefulness overall. You have only proven my point.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kyoto Kid
post Jun 19 2007, 08:10 PM
Post #34


Bushido Cowgirl
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,782
Joined: 8-July 05
From: On the Double K Ranch a half day's ride out of Phlogiston Flats
Member No.: 7,490



QUOTE (Nezumi)
Mages do explode the most games, however. The nice thing about riggers are the rules are so complex, and there are easy ways to limit their use, so most people never get into it. Mages are easy to overpower without much understanding of the rules, and are a little more versatile, so you get more crazy super-powered mages.

...this is especially true with Elf hermetics who can have their own private little army of Elementals & Watchers. In one campaign, I had to deal with a trio Elf Hermetics each who had the full Charisma complement of Elementals in waiting. Talk about some manic dice rolling when combat...er warfare...broke out.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Jun 19 2007, 08:19 PM
Post #35


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,008
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



QUOTE (Darkest Angel @ Jun 19 2007, 03:05 PM)
Anyway, my point was that he was a one trick pony, and that still stands.  In his element he probably is overpowered, but for a hell of a lot of the game he's going to be sat twiddling his thumbs, which substantially reduces his usefulness overall.  You have only proven my point.

We clearly have vastly different definitions of "one-trick pony"--like I said, there was a minimum of a year in which this character did a significantly disproportionate amount of the stuff that needed doing. Any thumb-twiddling I've done has been almost entirely due to wound mods.

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Darkest Angel
post Jun 19 2007, 08:23 PM
Post #36


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 546
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Manchester, England
Member No.: 1,062



You clearly didn't have me as a GM then. :)

One trick pony is to me, doing what is expected of the archetype at the expense of any ability to do anything else. For a Rigger that's scouting, shooting and EW - I expect a Rigger to be good at that, I even expect comms/coordination to be taken care of by the Rigger. However, I expect a character to be good at what his archetype does, but to have some semblance of ability to do other things, particularly combat-in-person and legwork. That character cannot do either of those, so would be severely hampered in any campaign I ran.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mfb
post Jun 19 2007, 09:20 PM
Post #37


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



i know of any non-contrived way to force a character to work outside their specialty (eg, getting a rigger out of his van) frequently enough to make it a big problem for that character, and i'm not sure i'd enjoy playing in a game where the GM decides to frequently contrive such situations. in any campaign that i would call reasonable, Kage's character would be a jack-of-all-trades, not a one-trick pony.

i mean, sure, once in a while? for spice? absolutely pull the rigger out of the van. but doing it enough that the character becomes a 'one-trick pony' is like making your team do lots of jobs in space, so that the mage is a 'one-trick pony'.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Darkest Angel
post Jun 19 2007, 10:13 PM
Post #38


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 546
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Manchester, England
Member No.: 1,062



I'm not sure what you mean? Are you saying face to face meets and legwork are contrived?

Because I'm saying the run as a whole is going to involve that particular Rigger sat with his thumb up his ass in a van until the action starts. Hell, even after the action starts he's not going to be doing much more than passing on directions and watching everyone else. Sure, if the drek hits the fan he's unbeatable, but until that happens he's a support man and nothing else. It's not game breaking.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mfb
post Jun 19 2007, 10:16 PM
Post #39


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



i'm saying it's contrived to force the rigger to do it. why should the rigger--or anyone who isn't the team's designated face--have to say anything at all to the Johnson, much less roll a social skill? heck, why shouldn't the rigger be sitting in the van during every meet, providing overwatch and countersurveillance?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Darkest Angel
post Jun 19 2007, 10:39 PM
Post #40


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 546
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Manchester, England
Member No.: 1,062



QUOTE (mfb @ Jun 19 2007, 11:16 PM)
i'm saying it's contrived to force the rigger to do it. why should the rigger--or anyone who isn't the team's designated face--have to say anything at all to the Johnson, much less roll a social skill? heck, why shouldn't the rigger be sitting in the van during every meet, providing overwatch and countersurveillance?

Well so what if he does decide to provide overwatch and countersurveilance, how does that make him break the game? It doesn't, it's just something that falls into his remit. More fool him for sitting with his thumb up his arse. I have no problem with "munchkins" who choose to sit quietly until they can shine because they get bored of sitting quietly doing frag all while everyone else is rolling and making themselves useful.

Edit: It's not contrived if the player gets bored because he can't do anything and decides he wants to get in on the action. The very fact they end up sat doing nothing is because they are a one trick pony. Suggesting they surveil rather than meet simply emphasises rather than contradicts my point.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mfb
post Jun 19 2007, 11:03 PM
Post #41


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



i'm not saying a rigger is game-breaking, i'm saying that a rigger can participate meaningfully in just about everything the team does without ever leaving his van. he's not going to have enough free hands to stick his thumb up his butt; he'll be elbow-deep in work pretty much all the time. while the face is talking with the Johnson, the rigger (if he's smart enough to've picked up a deck) will be on the Matrix checking out all the information that the Johnson provides the team with, checking into the Johnson's background, and providing physical overwatch for the meet in case it's some kind of setup. same goes for while the team is doing legwork. and if the rigger is powerful enough to be game-breaking (which is 100% the GM's fault for giving the rigger too much money and too much access to gear), trying to drag the rigger out of his van is going to either a) not work, or b) be contrived.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Jun 19 2007, 11:19 PM
Post #42


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,008
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



I'm going to agree with mfb, and I would point out that I've played a Rigger for the last… three years, I think? Mostly from the safety of my van.

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Wounded Ronin
post Jun 19 2007, 11:26 PM
Post #43


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 6,640
Joined: 6-June 04
Member No.: 6,383



If I were a rigger I would try to never leave my van since that's the only place where I'm good at surviving and accomplishing goals. In fact, I would have a mobile home toilet installed, a small electrical range, a little cot, AND I would have generic RV artwork from the 80s on the walls as well. I'd grow flabby and pale and the inside of the van would probably smell like ass. But why would you ever leave if you've got such an affinity for machines?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Darkest Angel
post Jun 19 2007, 11:35 PM
Post #44


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 546
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Manchester, England
Member No.: 1,062



Well we'll have to agree to disagree. For me, the meet is too important for any character to miss out on, it's a prime opportunity to ask questions - and those role specific questions are probably going to be missed by the Face, no matter how good he thinks he is, he doesn't know everyone elses job the way they know them.

Same goes for legwork, the supposedly munchkin rigger Kage suggested has no deck, and no informant contacts, so wont be able to do much other than take a few sureptitious pictures as you'd expect him to. That rigger is a one trick pony. That is and was what I've said all along, and as such isn't munchkin, because such focus can easily become a huge weakness. Once he diversifies and ceases to be a one trick pony, those around him who are already rounded will have caught up with their specialisations, so overall the power level isn't really effected.

I suggested getting him out of the van, because img that's not contrived, it's normal that he should leave the van, it's also normal that he should probably end up in a brawl or three as well. It's normal that all the characters all ask around for information on a job they're about to do. This guy can do none of those so would end up pretty bored, and quite likely injured and embarrased after a barfight.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mfb
post Jun 19 2007, 11:56 PM
Post #45


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



the face isn't going to miss any questions, because the rigger will be in radio contact with everyone on the team. if the rigger thinks of something the face hasn't asked, all he has to do is tell the face to ask it. and even if the rigger does decide to show up in the meat, how is he contributing less than the street sam who took the Uncouth flaw?

Kage has mentioned several times that his rigger acquired a deck fairly soon after chargen. they're not all that expensive, after all. and for what i'm talking about, you don't even need a deck, per se. dropping a thousand bucks on a pocsec is plenty--you're not hacking anything, you're just doing searches. as for informant contacts, so what? getting information from people isn't the rigger's job. helping the rest of his team get information from people is the rigger's job.

the rigger is not a one-trick pony at all, because he can use his skills to help the team do all of the things you're talking about. yes, he will occasionally be at a disadvantage because he's not much use in the meat--he'll get his ass kicked in a brawl, he'll stumble and stammer when he has to talk to someone for some reason. but if he's creative and clever, he won't subject himself to those situations very often, and he won't be bored.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kyoto Kid
post Jun 20 2007, 12:42 AM
Post #46


Bushido Cowgirl
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,782
Joined: 8-July 05
From: On the Double K Ranch a half day's ride out of Phlogiston Flats
Member No.: 7,490



...hmmm, My Rigger Dynamo Jo didn't seem to have much trouble "on foot" so to speak. Yeah, she started with a decked out Ford Canada Bison which lasted all of I think three missions when it got hulled by an autocannon. This particular campaign was extremely rough on vehicles soe in the end, when she needed wheels or wings (she was a better pilot than a driver), she usually "borrowed" them and focused more on her drones.

Along with her VCR 2 she also had a Synaptic Accelerator along a few other implants and skills that allowed her to function pretty well when she was not in the "left seat".
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Jun 20 2007, 12:45 AM
Post #47


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,008
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



With a VCR-2, you can generally float a decent presence outside of the vehicle. VCR-3 pretty much demands a certain level of purity to take full advantage of it.

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Taran
post Jun 20 2007, 01:29 AM
Post #48


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 164
Joined: 7-July 03
Member No.: 4,891



Darkest Angel: One thing you can do as a rigger is invest in some sort of telepresence rig. Even something as simple as a radio hooked up to a pocsec gives you a two-way mode of communication at the meet. You want the radio link to be encrypted, of course, but that isn't hard to arrange. And as mfb points out you're also simultaneously doing overwatch for the meet, making sure that the team isn't trapped and killed while they're immobilized. I don't understand why you're so quick to dismiss that; it's a profound contribution, and it's one that riggers can make better than anybody else.

As for legwork, I think you're underrating the power of the long-term stakeout. If your target is a local building (as it so often is), you get to see who comes and who goes, and when. If you have a particular target in mind you can follow them home from a mile up. If you need to get inside, you send in one of your little walkers. If the target's remote you're even better off, since you can send your drones miles from your physical position.

I'm not claiming they're unbeatable. The best tactic I'm familiar with involves magic use: spirits can sneak up invisibly and go corporeal inside the van. If the rigger doesn't have an eye inside, her first sign that anything's up is when she takes damage. Even if she knows about it, she then has to jack out and fight it somehow. This is why the van should contain at least two preteens at all times. The only totally unstoppable rigger strategy that I'm familiar with is the long-range drone with a sniper rifle, and that can easily be held in check with the threat of mutually assured destruction, much like the famous Watcher Attack Pack.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mfb
post Jun 20 2007, 01:32 AM
Post #49


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



QUOTE (Taran)
This is why the van should contain at least two preteens at all times.

contrary to popular believe, not all riggers are pedophiles.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Jun 20 2007, 01:38 AM
Post #50


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,008
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



QUOTE (Taran @ Jun 19 2007, 08:29 PM)
The only totally unstoppable rigger strategy that I'm familiar with is the long-range drone with a sniper rifle, and that can easily be held in check with the threat of mutually assured destruction, much like the famous Watcher Attack Pack.

I haven't actually designed the drone to do it, but there's the Tiny Missiles of Doom strategy. It's less viable because of the expense involved, but any time you don't need to deal the full 20+D without armor you can probably avoid expending the drone.

MAD applies to this as well, of course. The only really asymmetric killer strategies I can think of off the top of my head are the Decker tricks (because they're against a Host—you can't hack a Decker for paydata, or Validate yourself an account on him) and, the way most people play, the Social Adept of Doom (since most groups have issues with having an NPC roll dice and nonmagically force a PC to do something).

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

4 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th February 2025 - 01:58 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.