![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 8 Joined: 27-April 02 Member No.: 2,654 ![]() |
Hi everyone !!!!
Well , this is the deal , i am currently running a SR4 Missions Campaign and one of my player runs a Mafia Soldier ( wich tons of cyberware our good old local don pid for ... ) , but since there is one technomancer in our group he was concerned about his "cyberware soft integrity". Now , i was thinking i could make his commlink a good router for his cyberware , giving him some extra peace. Now , is there any "official rules" proxy program for this stuff ? . The Mad Pirate |
|
|
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,288 Joined: 4-September 06 From: The Scandinavian Federation Member No.: 9,300 ![]() |
Well he COULD do that but the techie could still hack the commlink and then control all the cyber... no better the skinlink it all. With no wireless it should be fine.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#3
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 8 Joined: 27-April 02 Member No.: 2,654 ![]() |
yeah , it could be fine , anyway i am running an "I Robot" concept in this campaign. That means i take like every single piece of new cyberware is matrix-related , most of all , for check-ups and firmware upgrade purposes.
The Mad Pirate |
|
|
![]()
Post
#4
|
|
Hoppelhäschen 5000 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,807 Joined: 3-January 04 Member No.: 5,951 ![]() |
Not really. It can be, but usually is healthier to turn it off.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#5
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 8 Joined: 27-April 02 Member No.: 2,654 ![]() |
hehehehehehehe , thanks for the data then , anyway , i gonna make him look out for a hacker who can shut down the upgrade system ( Evil Master Grin )....
:cyber: The Mad Pirate |
|
|
![]()
Post
#6
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 8 Joined: 27-April 02 Member No.: 2,654 ![]() |
anyway , i had just remeber that he has cyberwares with smartlink features , now , shutting down the matrix connection , wouldn't make his smarlink usless ?
The Mad Pirate |
|
|
![]()
Post
#7
|
|
Hoppelhäschen 5000 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,807 Joined: 3-January 04 Member No.: 5,951 ![]() |
No.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#8
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 8 Joined: 27-April 02 Member No.: 2,654 ![]() |
now there is another possibility .. he could make his cybeware go permanently in "hiden mode". What i was wondering is, wouldn't be a problem for him in case he enters a "dont-ever-think-about-hiding-your-comm-connection" zone , since most of the droids would detect him as running a hidden connection ?
The Mad Pirate |
|
|
![]()
Post
#9
|
|
Cybernetic Blood Mage ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,472 Joined: 11-March 06 From: Northeastern Wyoming Member No.: 8,361 ![]() |
As long as he was also running an Active PAN at the same time why would the Drones keep looking for a second Hidden PAN?
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#10
|
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,246 Joined: 8-June 07 Member No.: 11,869 ![]() |
This is what I do, if anyone is interested in ideas:
I expose a "fake" cheapo earpiece commlink that has my "walking around" forged SIN (rating at least 3) that runs in exposed mode. Then I have a second very expensive commlink (high rating firewall, IC, etc) running in hidden mode in my cyberarm with my "runner" forged SIN. All my contacts reach me on my runner commlink, never on my cheapo commlink. After a run that may have dangerous consequences (i.e. all high-paying runs), I ditch both SINs and buy new ones. Expensive but worth the peaceful sleep. I don't want anyone brushing up against me on the street or at a club and be able to hack all my systems, so I don't even use skinlinks. All my cyberware have only direct datajack link for maintenance access. My ultrasound sensor in my arm is connected to my cybereyes via an internal nanowire link. If I want to upload data from my cybereyes, I connect my commlink to my cybersystem via a physical switch in my hand. Even though my "runner" commlink is hidden in my cyberarm, I still have to make a physical connection to allow them to talk to each other. I have no wireless links or skinlinks for any of my cyberware. This way no one can hack me remotely or just brush up against me on the street and hack my systems. The only downside is if I want to start to discreetly uploading data, I have to make a small movement with my fingers to activate the connection. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#11
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 125 Joined: 22-June 07 Member No.: 11,979 ![]() |
Let's just hope that you never get knocked out long enough for someone to stick a wifi transmitter into some crevise to start accessing those files.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#12
|
|
Cybernetic Blood Mage ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,472 Joined: 11-March 06 From: Northeastern Wyoming Member No.: 8,361 ![]() |
If that were to ever happen Samantha he'd have alot bigger worries then whether or not his network was accessed. :cyber:
Still, personally even I think that his solution is a bit overkill, because someone merely brushing up against you on the street or in a club isn't really long enough to be a real danger of a Decker being able to hack your systems. But then again, my characters also tend to run with 2 PANs, including 2 Datajacks in order to provide some sense of security for my gear. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#13
|
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,246 Joined: 8-June 07 Member No.: 11,869 ![]() |
Well, bumping into someone on the street isn't going to be long enough for a hacker to get you, but brushing up against someone while sitting or standing next to them in a club or in a bar is definitely going to give them enough time for hacking.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#14
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 125 Joined: 22-June 07 Member No.: 11,979 ![]() |
Especially if that hacker is a technomancer.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#15
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,711 Joined: 15-June 06 Member No.: 8,716 ![]() |
skin hacking....
Ok since you guys brought it up can you give some worse case example of what a hacker/tm could do by touching someone with skinlinked gear?? Im thinking the worse they could do is shoot your gun? eyes/ears/limbs would all be DNI so no need for skinlinks there. Your datajack would most likely be skinned. What could they do turn it off or access all the files you have on it? (where do you guys say audio/video files from cyber is stored? in the device that records it?). Anything else besides maybe your external normal comm gear. Glasses/contacts, earbuds, sub vocal mic, commlink... which you dont care about anyways since thats its purpose. Well maybe not the commslink. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#16
|
|
Cybernetic Blood Mage ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,472 Joined: 11-March 06 From: Northeastern Wyoming Member No.: 8,361 ![]() |
Abbandon
In theory a Decker could do anything to your gear that they could do while connected to your PAN through a Wireless Link, the only difference would be if a Runner was running multiple PANs. <><><><><> Samantha You should read FrankTrollman's take on Technomancer vs Decker hacking abilities, basically unless you are using House Rules Technomancers aren't really any better then a Decker, because without a butt-load of Karma there is no way a Technomancer can get the same versality that a good Decker can through Nuyen alone. (Although they can rack up some really impressive Dicepools in their area of Focus and Sprites are awesome, they aren't the Kings of the Matrix anymore.) <><><><><> Buster Ok, I see where you are coming from now, I guess I don't believe that a Runner would allow someone to remain in that type of casual contact with their body for any length of time. But then again, I'm of the opinion that trying to shake hands with Mr Johnson at the meet is a good way to get iced as well. :cyber: |
|
|
![]()
Post
#17
|
|||
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,537 Joined: 27-August 06 From: Albuquerque NM Member No.: 9,234 ![]() |
leave a small device that can access their skinlink. And listen to all the RF traffic and find their "hidden" commlink. If the hacker is willing to remain close, the device can be a really low powered and tiny. |
||
|
|||
![]()
Post
#18
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 125 Joined: 22-June 07 Member No.: 11,979 ![]() |
I love RFID tags! Nothing says jerkwad like putting one on the back of a large troll that says "I like pink fluffy pillows."
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#19
|
|||
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,537 Joined: 27-August 06 From: Albuquerque NM Member No.: 9,234 ![]() |
In theory you could do AR spam to everyone but the toll. . . |
||
|
|||
![]()
Post
#20
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 125 Joined: 22-June 07 Member No.: 11,979 ![]() |
My point exactly. Although the next time someone used a RFID scanner near him, he'd find out about it.
Unless that person had a great sense of humor. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#21
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 8 Joined: 27-April 02 Member No.: 2,654 ![]() |
Hmmm .. i didnt thougth about the multiple PANs stuff. That should be giving my player a little bit more security although... . Anyway i decide to stick to the original idea.
The Mad pirate |
|
|
![]()
Post
#22
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 107 Joined: 21-December 06 Member No.: 10,413 ![]() |
Multiple PANs provide no security, all it does is make it harder to monitor and creates a larger footprint.
A better idea is get a trusted source to rig up the comlink with ICE, and use a datajack to connect his cyberware to it. ( Skin link is still wireless and theres more then one way to touch someone.) |
|
|
![]()
Post
#23
|
|
Neophyte Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,349 Joined: 31-December 06 Member No.: 10,502 ![]() |
There isn't any reason you couldn't use DNI to disconect/reconect cyberware to your datajack is there? Alowing you to decide what it can talk to/what has access to it.
Samantha in case you don't read the other thread technomancers are awsome at everything. Specialites(what they have CFs for) are only a matter of what they can do all the time without using up favors or risking fading. A TM can have resonance x2 for any program they want to use whether they have a CF for it or not. I'll leave it at that to avoid a derail. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#24
|
|
Cybernetic Blood Mage ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,472 Joined: 11-March 06 From: Northeastern Wyoming Member No.: 8,361 ![]() |
Excuse me bait. Exactly how does running multiple PANs not provide extra security when set as as follows?
PAN I: Betagrade Datajack; skinlinked and loaded with as many ( Rating 4-5 ) ICE as you can fit onto it to create the nastiest chokepoint possible. PAN II: DNI network of your cyberware, can be Subscribed to PAN I if you need to receive or send data but otherwise Wireless is disabled by default. PAN III: Skinlinked network consisting of your gear which doesn't really need to recieve data from the outside world, such as your smartlinked weapons, ect. Can either include a skinlinked Trodenet or be subscribed through PAN I if DNI control is wanted. PAN IV: This is your communications PAN running in Hidden Mode by default, and with the exception of PAN I the only "real PAN" with wireless active by default, although if your DM allows it, the indivadual equipment making up this PAN may be skinlinked to each other but not to PAN III. PAN V: This is your 'Dummy' PAN running in Active Mode and trying to look like John Wageslave's PAN. Now granted, this setup isn't perfect and it is more complex then many Runners would want to setup and mantain (In fact, my characters usually only run three PANs if you count the DNI cyberware connections as a PAN.), but how can you say that its less secure then only running one PAN? Also am I missing something because its my understanding that skinlink is not Wireless in any way shape or form short of shooting someone with a skinlinked wireless transmitter dart... And good luck actually getting something liek that to work in combat. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#25
|
|||
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,246 Joined: 8-June 07 Member No.: 11,869 ![]() |
And if he's shaking your hand for a little too long, he may not be trying to hack you...he might be coming on to you... :eek: After some thought, most of my paranoia about skinlinks could be solved with a long sleeved shirt. :D Still I'll stick to my nanowire connections just to be safe. In Unwired, I just know they're going to come up with an undetectable sticky dot that broadcasts your skinlink transmissions. Someone bumps into you on the street and bam, all your cybereye and cyberear transmissions are all over the internet. Nah, I'll stick with direct hardwires for everything but my smartgun and smartdoc. |
||
|
|||
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 8th July 2025 - 02:20 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.