![]() ![]() |
Nov 12 2003, 02:47 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 24 Joined: 4-August 03 From: Montreal Member No.: 5,243 |
Does the armor spell and the mystic armor adept power stack?
|
|
|
|
Nov 12 2003, 02:51 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Manus Celer Dei ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 17,013 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Boston Member No.: 3,802 |
Don't believe anything states otherwise.
Is it true? Do you have rigger adaptation? ~J |
|
|
|
Nov 12 2003, 03:20 AM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Senior GM ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 1,406 Joined: 12-April 03 From: Redmond, WA Member No.: 4,442 |
I think this is a judgement call for each GM to make for his/her campaign. In my campaign, if their functions are very similar, I rule they are two different magical ways to achieve the same effect and thus do not stack -- only the stronger would be used. If their functions are markedly different, I rule they are different affects and thus would stack.
As I read the descriptions of the Armor Spell and Mystic Armor, I see they behave differently. The Armor spell is ballistic and impact armor but only on the physical plane, while the adept power is impact only but works when attacked by either physical and astral opponents. This is enough of of a difference that I would rule them to be two different affects, and would stack as impact armor in the physical world. |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 18th January 2026 - 09:27 AM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.