Maximum Force, Questioin about spells |
Maximum Force, Questioin about spells |
Sep 19 2007, 02:32 PM
Post
#26
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 325 Joined: 9-December 06 From: the Maaatlock-Expressway! Member No.: 10,326 |
Also, if they're not already completely lost to the Cheese Side, it sometimes works to "reward" them for using physical/indirect combat spells.
Emphasize on the secondary effects, and also the psychological effects of having a fireball detonate right smack in the middle of a horde of mooks. Cook off some ammo, let them roll around on the floor, trying to put out the flames, amp up on the FX. Don't overdo it, of course, a meager Force 1 Fireball shouldn't blow up CRTs on a regular basis, but for a lot of players, making shit go boom can be more satisfying than rolling a ton of dice just to make some random npc drop down. If they ARE real, rotten-to-the-core cheesemonkeys, let them have their fun for a while, if it gets too wild, amp up the opposition, not necessarily with tons of mojo, just more nasty tricks. suppressive fire, smoke grenades, cover, and random meteor strikes are all pefectly good ways to show a player that he is offsetting the fun-had-per-group-member ratio. |
|
|
Sep 19 2007, 02:38 PM
Post
#27
|
|||
Great Dragon Group: Members Posts: 5,430 Joined: 10-January 05 From: Fort Worth, Texas Member No.: 6,957 |
He's not soaking 10 damage, he's soaking the damage from a Force 10 Stunbolt, which is only 4. You're still going to fail sometimes with 16 dice, but nowhere near as often as if the DV was 10. |
||
|
|||
Sep 19 2007, 03:11 PM
Post
#28
|
|||
Immoral Elf Group: Members Posts: 15,247 Joined: 29-March 02 From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat Member No.: 2,486 |
Power Foci cannot be used for Drain. Only for tests that include the Magic Attribute. Spellcasting Foci, on the other hand, are fine to use in the Drain test. |
||
|
|||
Sep 19 2007, 03:40 PM
Post
#29
|
|||||||
Dragon Group: Members Posts: 4,664 Joined: 21-September 04 From: Arvada, CO Member No.: 6,686 |
If you're going that route, just go for bloodzilla and be done with it. |
||||||
|
|||||||
Sep 19 2007, 05:16 PM
Post
#30
|
|||
Mr. Johnson Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 3,148 Joined: 27-February 06 From: UCAS Member No.: 8,314 |
If by "are fine to use" you mean, "cannot be used," then you have read what the errata has to say about page 191 of your hymnal. |
||
|
|||
Sep 19 2007, 05:20 PM
Post
#31
|
|||||
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,245 Joined: 27-April 07 From: Running the streets of Southeast Virginia Member No.: 11,548 |
Either you're wrong in your quoted text above or I missed what you were getting at. Nothing in the errata indicates that spellcasting foci can't be used for drain tests. |
||||
|
|||||
Sep 19 2007, 05:35 PM
Post
#32
|
|||||
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,228 Joined: 24-July 07 From: Canada Member No.: 12,350 |
Ok, let's spell it out for you. SR4 errata, page 2, column 2, indicates a correction to page 191, under Spellcasting Foci. Here are the results of the errata:
Note the removal of the "or withheld to help the magician with Drain." |
||||
|
|||||
Sep 19 2007, 05:38 PM
Post
#33
|
|||||||||||
Genuine Artificial Intelligence Group: Members Posts: 4,019 Joined: 12-June 03 Member No.: 4,715 |
edit: I don't know how that little square got in there, sorry for the funny character. Now aside from the obviously missing "is" in the errata, the point that the text "or withheld to help the magician with Drain" is now specifically excluded by the errata, does give a pretty strong implication in Aaron's favor that spellcasting foci can't be used for drain anymore. :) edit: yeah, what Malachi said! |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
Sep 19 2007, 07:28 PM
Post
#34
|
|
Immoral Elf Group: Members Posts: 15,247 Joined: 29-March 02 From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat Member No.: 2,486 |
I believe the wording of the Errata is an unfortunate oversight. There has been no change to the wording of the similarly-functioning Spirit Focus rules as to Drain test usage.
If it were the case that Spellcasting Foci could not be used on Drain tests, then they are virtually worthless for their cost in both Karma and money when compared to a Power Focus. The one decent thing they could do was to assist with Drain for their specific category, which is something that Power Foci cannot do. |
|
|
Sep 19 2007, 07:41 PM
Post
#35
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,245 Joined: 27-April 07 From: Running the streets of Southeast Virginia Member No.: 11,548 |
Isn't casting the spell more effectively also imply casting it in such a manner as to minimize drain on you?
Effectiveness is measured in more ways than just raw power. I'm inclined to agree with Fortune. The interpretation you showed above makes spellcasting foci next to worthless. Time for some Errata for Errata perhaps? |
|
|
Sep 19 2007, 08:08 PM
Post
#36
|
|
Great Dragon Group: Members Posts: 5,430 Joined: 10-January 05 From: Fort Worth, Texas Member No.: 6,957 |
I highly doubt it's an oversight, since there's no point at all in the erratta if its intent was not to prevent spellcasting foci from being used on Drain.
|
|
|
Sep 19 2007, 10:00 PM
Post
#37
|
|||||||
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 615 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 1,895 |
I belive what the errata is intended to be (or will be read in my games as is:)
The modified (for my games and all I have played in) is:
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Sep 20 2007, 01:01 AM
Post
#38
|
|||||
Immoral Elf Group: Members Posts: 15,247 Joined: 29-March 02 From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat Member No.: 2,486 |
That is what I believe is intended. James: The intent of the Errata is to point out the Spell Category limitation, which was not previously made clear. |
||||
|
|||||
Sep 20 2007, 01:09 AM
Post
#39
|
|
Great Dragon Group: Members Posts: 5,430 Joined: 10-January 05 From: Fort Worth, Texas Member No.: 6,957 |
If that's the intent, why go out of your way to remove the part about allowing them to apply to drain tests?
I'm not saying that wasn't the intent, just that if it was, someone was either really dumb or had another hidden agenda, because the change clearly removes drain tests. |
|
|
Sep 20 2007, 01:17 AM
Post
#40
|
|
Immoral Elf Group: Members Posts: 15,247 Joined: 29-March 02 From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat Member No.: 2,486 |
I just think that the actual wording of the change was not thought through enough. :)
|
|
|
Sep 20 2007, 01:29 AM
Post
#41
|
|||
Canon Companion Group: Members Posts: 8,021 Joined: 2-March 03 From: The Morgue, Singapore LTG Member No.: 4,187 |
Stun spells may be cheesy but so can AOE Indirect Combat spells. All you are doing is encouraging cheese in both areas instead of cheese in 1 area. Hey, but you'd call that a well rounded PC, won't you? |
||
|
|||
Sep 20 2007, 03:09 AM
Post
#42
|
|||
Mr. Johnson Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 3,148 Joined: 27-February 06 From: UCAS Member No.: 8,314 |
Do you mean to say that the language is unclear, or that you wish it wasn't that way? =i) |
||
|
|||
Sep 20 2007, 05:53 AM
Post
#43
|
|||
Immoral Elf Group: Members Posts: 15,247 Joined: 29-March 02 From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat Member No.: 2,486 |
In all seriousness, the former. But you may take it any way you please. |
||
|
|||
Sep 20 2007, 02:43 PM
Post
#44
|
|||||||
Dragon Group: Members Posts: 4,664 Joined: 21-September 04 From: Arvada, CO Member No.: 6,686 |
I second this one. I believe the intent of the errata is to point out the spell category as well, not to remove the drain abilities. |
||||||
|
|||||||
Sep 20 2007, 03:32 PM
Post
#45
|
|||
Old Man of the North Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 10,063 Joined: 14-August 03 From: Just north of the Centre of the Universe Member No.: 5,463 |
Same letters, pronounced respectively "aw", "oo", "uh". Isn't English fun? |
||
|
|||
Sep 20 2007, 03:45 PM
Post
#46
|
|||||||||
Canon Companion Group: Members Posts: 8,021 Joined: 2-March 03 From: The Morgue, Singapore LTG Member No.: 4,187 |
While I believe that is the intent as well, I have no proof and by the letter, drain resistance is removed. |
||||||||
|
|||||||||
Sep 20 2007, 04:04 PM
Post
#47
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 398 Joined: 16-August 06 Member No.: 9,130 |
Who is the "Errata Official Spokesperson" that would be able to tell use. I can almost always see anybody using a spellcasting focus for drain resistance unless they know they are going up against a lot of counterspelling and willpower.
|
|
|
Sep 20 2007, 11:05 PM
Post
#48
|
|||||
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,245 Joined: 27-April 07 From: Running the streets of Southeast Virginia Member No.: 11,548 |
Well, in my 1st printing SR4 it is very clear how spellcasting foci can be used...
Bolded text is emphasis mine. Each foci must be for a given category. No generic sustaining. You must have sustaining foci for detection if you wish to sustain Detection spells with a focus.
What additional clarification was needed? Why was the errata written the way it was? The text already made it QUITE clear that a given type of spell foci had to be made for a given category of spells. As such, a spellcasting foci had to be for a certain group of spells. The rules already spelled that out. The net result was that the Errata was NOT needed unless the purpose was to remove the ability to use spellcasting foci on the Drain Test or later printings really sporked up the text from the 1st Printing. |
||||
|
|||||
Sep 20 2007, 11:23 PM
Post
#49
|
|||
Immoral Elf Group: Members Posts: 15,247 Joined: 29-March 02 From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat Member No.: 2,486 |
The pieces that you quote are from two seperate sections, albeit on the same page. The entirety of the Spellcasting Focus listing was as follows ...
If a player was to just reference that section (which would be logical as that is where their function is described), then there is no mention that they apply only to their own category. Questions were asked, and it would seem that clarification was in order. There would be no reason to remove the Drain applications of Spellcasting Foci (and only Spellcasting Foci, leaving Summoning Foci free of this supposed limitation), as that makes them virtually useless pieces of junk. |
||
|
|||
Sep 20 2007, 11:37 PM
Post
#50
|
|||||
Dragon Group: Members Posts: 4,664 Joined: 21-September 04 From: Arvada, CO Member No.: 6,686 |
They aren't seperate at all. In fact, the errataed text follows immediately after the text limitting all foci. Prior to errata, the text looked like this. "Spell Foci Spell foci empower a magician's Sorcery skills. There are three types of spell foci: Spellcasting foci, Counterspelling foci, and Sustaining foci. Each spell focus must be attuned to a specific category of spells (Combat, Detection, Health, etc) when it is created, and this cannot be changed. Spellcasting foci add their Force to a magician's Spellcasting and Ritual Spellcasting dice pools. These dice may be used to cast a spell more effectively or withheld to help the magician with Drain." Post errata, the text would look like this. "Spell Foci Spell foci empower a magician's Sorcery skills. There are three types of spell foci: Spellcasting foci, Counterspelling foci, and Sustaining foci. Each spell focus must be attuned to a specific category of spells (Combat, Detection, Health, etc) when it is created, and this cannot be changed. Spellcasting foci add their Force to a magician's Spellcasting and Ritual Spellcasting dice pools. These dice may be used to cast a spell more effectively as long as it is of the category appropriate to the focus." I've gotta say, with the errata, it seems fairly redundant about the category limitation. |
||||
|
|||||
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 5th January 2025 - 12:23 AM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.