![]() ![]() |
Oct 11 2007, 07:09 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 55 Joined: 1-September 07 Member No.: 13,032 |
I have a character that uses automatic weapons a lot. I've never much liked having to put all my eggs in one basket by choosing narrow or wide. What do people think of a kind of middle ground option....?
Burst +1 DV and -1 defensive pool Long Burst +2 DV and -2 defensive pool Full burst, +4 DV and -4 defensive pool Also... I'd kinda like to see the negative to defensive pool changed to a bonus to strike (but that would be odd with recoil wouldnt it).... Why? Bob the ganger sucks with a gun. His agility is 2 and his heavy weapon skill is 2. He wants to shoot a stationary object 30 ft away with his machine gun. After cuttling loose full burst after full burst, not a single bullet ever strikes the unmoving target. With the -9 for recoil, poor Bob has no dice to throw no matter how many thosands of rounds he throws in the target's general direction. Sure the immoble target would have a -9 to dodge if it were ever forced to.. after all... there are bullets flying EVERYWHERE except for exactley where it is. I miss the old target number system where 6s kept going up so even if you sucked, after hundreads of trys a fluke success was at least possible. |
|
|
|
Oct 11 2007, 07:22 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Prime Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Banned Posts: 3,732 Joined: 1-September 05 From: Prague, Czech Republic Member No.: 7,665 |
The Reoil system is frankly dumb. I don't even use recoil penalties. I have an entirely arbitrary system comparing weapon recoil to character strength. Characters who lack the strength to control their weaponry get fucked, and characters with sufficient strength get bonuses from firing more bullets.
-Frank |
|
|
|
Oct 11 2007, 08:11 AM
Post
#3
|
|||
|
Immoral Elf ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 15,247 Joined: 29-March 02 From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat Member No.: 2,486 |
Care to share in a bit more detail? :) |
||
|
|
|||
Oct 11 2007, 08:24 AM
Post
#4
|
|||
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,288 Joined: 4-September 06 From: The Scandinavian Federation Member No.: 9,300 |
Well your "middle ground" rule probably won't unbalance the game so go for it if you want. My players seldom want anything but massive damage though, as they always hit anyway. As for the example of firing against a stationary large object, I don't think you're applying the rules right. A narrow burst actually hitting means that a high percentage of the rounds fired in a relatively short burst actually hits the target, while the narrow one you spread it around to make it harder for a target to dodge. What you said about bob firing thousands of rounds sounds more like suppressive fire. Now, since the target is immobile, and certainly has no edge, then it is automatically hit and takes normal damage. |
||
|
|
|||
Oct 11 2007, 08:59 AM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,009 Joined: 25-September 06 From: Paris, France Member No.: 9,466 |
Bob the ganger can do a suppressive fire if the stationary object doesn't have any Edge.
Personally I had the same thought one day about the possibility to shoot more than 2 bullets in 3s for SA weapons. I tend to explain the slow rate of fire by saying that runners are pro and will tend to shoot less but hit more, but it doesn't really work with non-professional characters. And what if someone wants to shoot all his bullets to try to hit a target? The quick rule I've found is to allow the character to have a +1 modifier for each bullet he shoots after the first one (I'm not sure how to limit the number of bullets he can shoot in an IP) but if he hits he only does the base damage of the weapon. Of course it can't be used with a called shot. Maybe I should also make it easier for the target to dodge the attack. Another option I'd like is to be able to empty your clip on a target to make more damage, for example when a angry hellhound is rushing towards you just want to empty your Predator without trying to adjust each shot. But I can't find a non-broken way to allow it. |
|
|
|
Oct 11 2007, 09:44 AM
Post
#6
|
|||
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 615 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 1,895 |
Well this one is an easy fix... Make all Sixes exploded (not just ege dice) Its listed as one of the optional sidebar rules IIRC. |
||
|
|
|||
Oct 11 2007, 01:24 PM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 633 Joined: 23-February 06 Member No.: 8,301 |
It would be easy enough to say that for each bullet in the burst after the first, you can choose to give the target -1 defense, or add +1 DV.
I've thought about it, but I don't do it in my game just to keep things simple. |
|
|
|
Oct 11 2007, 03:50 PM
Post
#8
|
|||
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,288 Joined: 4-September 06 From: The Scandinavian Federation Member No.: 9,300 |
Emptying guns? That's called fluff. As a GM you can describe the gangers running towards the Runners blazing away... even though you only actually check to see if 2 shots hit. If the effect of shooting wildly was more effective than careful aimed shots, than that would be the order of the day for the professonals. It's not like ammo is expensive (in real life!). Laughingbowl your fix would not help ganger B to shoot a full auto burst, as the recoil would mean he would have no dice that could "explode." Whilst in 3rd ed you never lost dice for penalties, only the target number increased (which could still always be achieved with luck). I'm glad it's not like that anymore though. |
||
|
|
|||
Oct 11 2007, 04:08 PM
Post
#9
|
|||
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 184 Joined: 29-August 03 Member No.: 5,553 |
I'd love to get a glimpse of that, too. I think I remember you posting somewhere about a set of house rules that emphasize skills over attributes a bit more than in SR4. I like that idea, but I imagine that this sort of house rule on recoil might counteract that to a degree. Well, maybe. <<Grin>> Not that I can really comment on recoil rules vs. reality. I'm a skinny guy with no automatic weapons, so I can really only look at these things from a game-balance perspective. |
||
|
|
|||
Oct 11 2007, 05:49 PM
Post
#10
|
|
|
Prime Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Banned Posts: 3,732 Joined: 1-September 05 From: Prague, Czech Republic Member No.: 7,665 |
Heck, now that I live in the Czech Republic I don't even see guns anymore. My nots are unfortunately in the United States. But here's the gist:
And that's it. So mooks who use large weapons to perform suppressive fire become sitting ducks. Street Samurai invest in decent Strength scores even when they have no intention of cutting fools up with swords. It was never a fully worked up system, but then it didn't have to be because I was using it on my own time. Basically I ended up with low strength characters actually using Light Pistols on occassion, while people who wanted to fight with anti-tank weaponry also invested in high strength. Also I got people to stop bouncing up and down demanding to put assault cannons onto fly-spies. Mission accomplished as far as I'm concerned. ;) -Frank |
|
|
|
Oct 11 2007, 07:13 PM
Post
#11
|
|
|
Slacker Extraordinaire ![]() ![]() Group: Retired Admins Posts: 337 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Ashburn, VA Member No.: 997 |
It's an interesting base. There are things I'd have to tweak for it to work for me, but I like the basic concept. I especially like that it would provide actual drawbacks to large weapons, especially single shot varieties that aren't currently affected by recoil despite the implication that they should be.
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 12th June 2026 - 10:21 AM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.