IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

7 Pages V  « < 4 5 6 7 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Shadowrun and Antifa
Fortune
post Oct 21 2007, 10:38 PM
Post #126


Immoral Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 15,247
Joined: 29-March 02
From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat
Member No.: 2,486



QUOTE (Grinder)
They had. The police batallions who commited mass murder in the occupied states of Eastern Europe were formed by volunteers. The wardens in death camps where SS men who volunteered to get in there.

Note that I snipped the portion of your post referring to Wardens, and qualified my post with the word 'most'. The general rank and file soldier or guard had no more choice to be there than those assigned to the Eastern Front.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Grinder
post Oct 21 2007, 10:43 PM
Post #127


Great, I'm a Dragon...
*********

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 6,699
Joined: 8-October 03
From: North Germany
Member No.: 5,698



QUOTE (Fortune)
QUOTE (Grinder @ Oct 22 2007, 08:26 AM)
They had. The police batallions who commited mass murder in the occupied states of Eastern Europe were formed by volunteers. The wardens in death camps where SS men who volunteered to get in there.

Note that I snipped the portion of your post referring to Wardens, and qualified my post with the word 'most'. The general rank and file soldier or guard had no more choice to be there than those assigned to the Eastern Front.

The guards and wardens in the concentration camps were SS men. No soldiers of the Wehrmacht were on duty there. SS men were volunteers (we're talking about the german one - while other occupied countries formed SS divisions too, those didn't work on concentration camps), noone was forced to serve in the SS. Wouldn't made much sense, as the SS was a sort of "elite troop" and thus were attractive for fanatics only.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
martindv
post Oct 21 2007, 10:44 PM
Post #128


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 640
Joined: 8-October 07
Member No.: 13,611



QUOTE (Kagetenshi @ Oct 20 2007, 08:36 PM)
Edit: but Hyzmarca forgot us! You'd also need an Anarchist homeland.

But what organization would advocate for it?

QUOTE (Kyoto Kid)
1. The US had a decent transportation system, literally one of the best in the world that was sold out "lock stock & barrel" in the late 50s (major thesis of mine in college).  It was called the Interurban and surface street rail system (streetcars) that disappeared almost overnight.  The onslaught continues with further cuts to intercity rail, local transit systems, and regional transportation.

I like not having to travel between states out here on a two-lane road.

QUOTE (Grinder)
Was anything of it (the advancement in rocket science or the data gahtered by torturing people in death camps by sadists like Dr. Mengele) actually worth the lives of millions of people? Or would humanity maybe been able to get this knowledge over time without eleminating people?

Was anything that came from the colonization of North America worth the lives of millions of people?

I'd say so.

QUOTE (Penta)
"Because Mussolini had the motormen shot if the train was late."

I bet that kept the unions in line. But that's not a bad idea.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fortune
post Oct 21 2007, 10:52 PM
Post #129


Immoral Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 15,247
Joined: 29-March 02
From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat
Member No.: 2,486



QUOTE (Grinder)
The guards and wardens in the concentration camps were SS men

Volunteering to serve in the SS is a totally different thing than actually volunteering for the duty they ended up carrying out (in some cases). I am sure that most of those 'volunteers' did not have prior detailed knowledge of just what they were signing up for.

I was not intending to get this deeply into a discussion about a topic this sensitive to you (and some others), nor do I intend to pursue the matter. You obviously have your views, and they are by your own admission set so deeply in stone that they are unlikely to change with even the most convincing argument backed up by incontroversial proof (which isn't coming from me :D).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Oct 21 2007, 10:53 PM
Post #130


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,013
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



QUOTE (martindv)
QUOTE (Kagetenshi @ Oct 20 2007, 08:36 PM)
Edit: but Hyzmarca forgot us! You'd also need an Anarchist homeland.

But what organization would advocate for it?

I recognize that this is a joke, but anarchism and anomieism aren't the same thing. Now if it only weren't so difficult to keep non-hierarchical organizations together…

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
martindv
post Oct 21 2007, 11:02 PM
Post #131


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 640
Joined: 8-October 07
Member No.: 13,611



One Reich, One Fuhrer...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
HappyDaze
post Oct 21 2007, 11:35 PM
Post #132


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,838
Joined: 1-September 05
Member No.: 7,669



QUOTE
"move them far away" is the procrastinator's genocide. i'm not trying to draw any moral equivalence between moving people and killing them, but i think it's useful to remain aware of the logical conclusion of this sort of behavior.

So the Trail of Tears and the forced relocations of Palestinians both show streaks of procrastination...

It all makes sense.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kyoto Kid
post Oct 22 2007, 12:39 AM
Post #133


Bushido Cowgirl
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,782
Joined: 8-July 05
From: On the Double K Ranch a half day's ride out of Phlogiston Flats
Member No.: 7,490



QUOTE (martindv @ Oct 21 2007, 05:44 PM)
QUOTE (Kyoto Kid)
1. The US had a decent transportation system, literally one of the best in the world that was sold out "lock stock & barrel" in the late 50s (major thesis of mine in college).  It was called the Interurban and surface street rail system (streetcars) that disappeared almost overnight.  The onslaught continues with further cuts to intercity rail, local transit systems, and regional transportation.

I like not having to travel between states out here on a two-lane road.

...the above quote was primarily in reference to interurban transportation. If you read my last post you will notice that I agree a good highway system is important but as complement of rather than an exception to rail.

Personally I'd rather pay someone else to deal with the "piloting" (I know, poor term relating to rail but "driving" doesn't really fit either) responsibilities and hassles so I can sit back and enjoy the trip or tend to other things like writing or planning what I will be doing when I arrive at my destination. I don't have to deal with traffic, speed traps, big trucks, crappy fast food, roach motels, and the potential of that breakdown in the middle of bumf**k nowhere.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Critias
post Oct 22 2007, 02:32 AM
Post #134


Freelance Elf
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 7,324
Joined: 30-September 04
From: Texas
Member No.: 6,714



QUOTE (Fortune)
I was not intending to get this deeply into a discussion about a topic this sensitive to you (and some others), nor do I intend to pursue the matter.

Ditto most of the sentiment behind this part of the post, for the record. I'm primarily of German stock, myself, and have the dubious pleasure of actually having had family on both sides of WWII, as well as (I only learned somewhat recently, upon my last grandfather's death) actually having a measurable 1/16th Jewish ancestry (that branch of the family tree being cut off in the 1940s). I imagine having a certain three or four of my recent (great-grandparents or younger) family members in the same room at the same time would be...uhh...dramatic, for want of a better word.

So I know my own views concerning the entire affair of WWII are...well..my own views. It's a period of history I've studied quite a bit, thought about pretty hard, and had to make up my own mind about -- sometimes contrary to what I was told by one family member or another, or The History Channel, or any given movie or college class or whatever other single source you can think of.

I don't mean to piss anyone off -- just this once -- when I share those views or thoughts, since it's a topic that so many people rightfully take so seriously.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Oct 22 2007, 03:07 AM
Post #135


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,013
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



I would argue that because it is such a serious topic, it's one that we ought to be particularly willing to piss people off about—because ultimately many of the attitudes around it are actively dangerous. Sensitivity can be afforded for little things, but "it can't happen here"/"they're monsters, fundamentally different" and the like threatens us all.

I have to fight my tendency to avoid confrontation (hey, stop laughing!), but I believe the risks of letting that sort of thing go unchallenged far outweigh the personal discomfort and potential ire of others I may incur, or the discomfort I may cause others.

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Narse
post Oct 22 2007, 05:20 AM
Post #136


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 249
Joined: 2-November 06
From: Bozeman, MT
Member No.: 9,762



QUOTE (hyzmarca @ Oct 20 2007, 08:13 PM)
QUOTE (Grinder @ Oct 20 2007, 04:04 PM)
In Germany the six million killed Jews are the main number that is in our head when we talk about concentration camps.

That because of Zionists. Zionists use "Six million Jews were killed in the Holocaust" (a number which might be an overestimation, by the way) to excuse theft, terrorism, and genocide. The entire existence of the "State Of Israel" is founded on the mythology of the Holocaust and the lie that only Jews were killed.

If we were to actually accept the truth, then we the world wouldn't be able to accept the systematic theft of homes and ceaseless murder of Arabs and Christians in the name of maintaining a 'Jewish homeland' without also accepting a the violent militant creation of a 'Gypsy Homeland', a 'homosexual homeland', a 'Freemason's homeland', a 'Jehovah's Witness's Homeland', and a 'handicapped homeland'.

As it stands, it is equivalent to the excuse used by every rapist, child abuser, and serial murder. "I was abused, so it is okay for me to do it." Some liberals take that excuse seriously and tell child molesters to go a rape as many kids as they possibly can because it isn't their fault; reasonable people don't. Yet, somehow, billions of rational individuals accept that excuse from Zionists and tell them to go oppress Muslims and Christians and even other Jews as much as they feel like in ways that wouldn't be acceptable if Communist China were doing it.

So fuck the Holocaust. Fuck the mythology of the Holocaust. It doesn't matter. It shouldn't matter. It was more than sixty year ago now. But somehow this mythology is still being perpetuated. Our guiltridden European brothers have codified it into law, to the point where anyone who suggests that maybe it is five million Jews instead of six million Jews will either be imprisoned or killed. Screw that. It isn't a mythology that should be perpetuated. The perpetuation of this mythology is why the ICC exists. It is why hundreds of little girls are being held as sex slaves right now instead of being returned to their families where they belong. Fuck that. I don't believe that sexual slavery is a good thing. But the perpetuation of sexual slavery in Africa is the direct consequence of the world's belief in the mythology of the Holocaust. So screw it all.

A bunch of people died sixty years ago. Big deal. Get over it. Most of those people would be dead by now, anyway; and most of the people involved are dead already. It does not matter.

Nothing Nazi Germany did really matters, except for the Autobahn. It is the only thing that is still around. It is the only thing that isn't dead history. There is no reason to invest any emotions in it. There is no reason to let the bad stuff that they did that doesn't matter the slightest little bit overshadow the good stuff that they did that doesn't matter the slightest little bit, because none of it matters the slightest little bit. They're dead and gone. Their actions exist in immutable dead history. They might as well be fictional characters.

And, hell, if you are a Zionist then the Holocaust was a good thing, because there would be no Israel without it. Even the Holocaust has its good side from certain perspectives, such as the Israeli perspective. As long as the Israelis can keep milking it, they can get away with anything.

So, uh um.. do you have some sources to back up your assertions? See unlike Holocaust deniers (not saying you are one!) I like historical sources. Specifically:
  • Zioninst terrorism & genocide (I'll grant theft)
  • Ceaseless murder of Arabs & Christians
  • Suggesting that 5 million Jews died in the Holocaust causes one to be legally imprisoned and killed in Europe
  • Sex slavery as direct consequence of 'Holocaust mythology' (a definition would be apreciated)
What is the ICC exactly? Google lists all kinds of things, but somehow I don't think the Holocaust is responsible for The International Color Consortium. :grinbig:

Oh btw, I consider myself somewhat liberal and don't approve of Israel in its current incarnation.


There have been some good issues raised in this thread. One that I would like to comment on is the Idea of political speak. Its mentioned in George Orwell's 1984 (not sure if it was originally his idea) that one can control the conversation and even rational thought simply by controlling the political terms used. A good example is Fascist: Major negative association and even more importantly: almost completely disassociated from what actual fascists thought it meant.

And to shake up the rest of your world views:
It has been suggested that nothing that came out of Nazi Germany was worth the cost of their negative actions. Unfortunately these weren't direct costs. If I could accelerate rocketry/propulsion research or more generally: science research, simply by gassing 6 million people (less than 1/1000 th of the world's population) I would have to give it some thought. However it seems that it would be easier just to increase federal science spending by an order of magnitude or 2.

And yes SS officers weren't inhuman monsters; they were very human monsters -- the only kind there are.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mfb
post Oct 22 2007, 05:23 AM
Post #137


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



QUOTE (HappyDaze)
So the Trail of Tears and the forced relocations of Palestinians both show streaks of procrastination...

i was thinking of those two examples specifically when i wrote what i wrote. Amerinds haven't been wiped out completely because they simultaneously stopped being a threat and became a larger than life mythical people in the eyes of their oppressors (for chrissake, the US cavalry names most of their attack helicopters after Amerind tribes). the Palestinians haven't been wiped out--yet--because Israel doesn't have enough backing--yet--to get away with a genocide of their own.

QUOTE (Fortune)
Volunteering to serve in the SS is a totally different thing than actually volunteering for the duty they ended up carrying out (in some cases). I am sure that most of those 'volunteers' did not have prior detailed knowledge of just what they were signing up for.

i have a hard time believing anybody in the SS didn't know what they were getting into, no matter what their assignment was. you can't kill eight million people (give or take a few million) in total, or even near-complete, secrecy. you can keep it quiet enough that much of your civilian population can claim to have not known, but you can't keep it out of the rumor mill that is the real motive power behind any military. SS recruits getting shipped in as guards to the concentration camps may not have had any direct proof of what was going on there, but all of them had to have heard the rumors.

QUOTE (hyzmarca)
And, hell, if you are a Zionist then the Holocaust was a good thing, because there would be no Israel without it.

i'm not a big fan of Israel, but i'm a bigger not-fan of not-facts. an official plan to give Palestine to the Jews came into being in 1917, and the process of making it a reality began in 1922. reaction to the Holocaust may have sped things up, but Jewish power and influence in the area had been growing steadily for two and a half decades before the UN made the decision to officially create the nation of Israel.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Critias
post Oct 22 2007, 05:49 AM
Post #138


Freelance Elf
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 7,324
Joined: 30-September 04
From: Texas
Member No.: 6,714



QUOTE (Kagetenshi)
I would argue that because it is such a serious topic, it's one that we ought to be particularly willing to piss people off about—because ultimately many of the attitudes around it are actively dangerous. Sensitivity can be afforded for little things, but "it can't happen here"/"they're monsters, fundamentally different" and the like threatens us all.

I have to fight my tendency to avoid confrontation (hey, stop laughing!), but I believe the risks of letting that sort of thing go unchallenged far outweigh the personal discomfort and potential ire of others I may incur, or the discomfort I may cause others.

~J

Oh, right. And normally I'm quite willing to smack people across the face with my opinion, and then club them over the head with it, give them a shot to the abs to double them over, and a final two-handed swing with my opinion just behind one ear to knock the bitch right out.

But in this particular case, given the somewhat off-topic nature of the conversation as it's evolved, the fact I like Grinder, and the fact I feel like several of us were (accidentally or otherwise) kind of dog-piling on the guy as I reread this thread, I wanted to make it clear it wasn't anything personal. I wasn't necessarily arguing, so much as just conversing and sharing my own thoughts on the matter at hand.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fortune
post Oct 22 2007, 05:56 AM
Post #139


Immoral Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 15,247
Joined: 29-March 02
From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat
Member No.: 2,486



That's how I see it as well. I hold some pretty strong views on the topic myself, but I'm not really all that interested in 'winning an argument' about them. Especially here, and possibly at the expense of some good feeling on the part of other posters.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Critias
post Oct 22 2007, 05:58 AM
Post #140


Freelance Elf
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 7,324
Joined: 30-September 04
From: Texas
Member No.: 6,714



Oh yeah? Well FUCK YOU. Dumpshock sucks anywa--oh, wait. Nevermind. Okay, carry on. Sorry. Reflex.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hyzmarca
post Oct 22 2007, 06:36 AM
Post #141


Midnight Toker
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,686
Joined: 4-July 04
From: Zombie Drop Bear Santa's Workshop
Member No.: 6,456



QUOTE (Narse @ Oct 22 2007, 12:20 AM)
So, uh um.. do you have some sources to back up your assertions? See unlike Holocaust deniers (not saying you are one!) I like historical sources. Specifically:

  • Zioninst terrorism & genocide (I'll grant theft)



QUOTE

  • Ceaseless murder of Arabs & Christians

  • Have you watched the news any time within th past seven years?
    QUOTE

  • Suggesting that 5 million Jews died in the Holocaust causes one to be legally imprisoned and killed in Europe
  • QUOTE

  • Sex slavery as direct consequence of 'Holocaust mythology' (a definition would be apreciated)
  • What is the ICC exactly? Google lists all kinds of things, but somehow I don't think the Holocaust is responsible for The International Color Consortium. :grinbig:

    The International Criminal Court, the most evil orginization in existance today born out of silly notions about "War Crimes" and "Crimes against Humanity" for the implicit purpose of raping black children. And they do rape black children in a roundabout way. I explained that in a previous topic. It is a very obvious case of collective guilt about WWII spawning a merciless machine that rapes black children. Did I mention that they rape black children?

    QUOTE (mfb)
    i'm not a big fan of Israel, but i'm a bigger not-fan of not-facts. an official plan to give Palestine to the Jews came into being in 1917, and the process of making it a reality began in 1922. reaction to the Holocaust may have sped things up, but Jewish power and influence in the area had been growing steadily for two and a half decades before the UN made the decision to officially create the nation of Israel.

    UN General Assembly Resolutions are not binding. The Partion Plan was a General Assembly Resolution. Hence, the Partition Plan was not binding. And it wasn't implemented. There wasn't even a serious attempt to implement it. When the British Mandate Expired, everything would have been exactly as it was, except for the fact that militant Zionists "declared independence" the day before. Let us examine that, for a moment. They were a minority population consisting of a rather large number of refugees at that point in time which just "declared independence" and kicked out all of the people who actually lived there. It would be the equivalent of a bunch of Blackwater employees vacationing in France (with their guns) and just declaring that France is independent while violently displacing all of the French people. No one would have stood for it if not for the whole death camps thing. The British certainly wouldn't have. Hell, plenty of British soldiers resigned so that they could stay beind and help the Arabs.
    Go to the top of the page
     
    +Quote Post
    Kyoto Kid
    post Oct 22 2007, 06:46 AM
    Post #142


    Bushido Cowgirl
    *********

    Group: Members
    Posts: 5,782
    Joined: 8-July 05
    From: On the Double K Ranch a half day's ride out of Phlogiston Flats
    Member No.: 7,490



    QUOTE (Narse)
    What is the ICC exactly? Google lists all kinds of things, but somehow I don't think the Holocaust is responsible for The International Color Consortium. :grinbig:

    ...I thought it was the Interstate Commerce Commission :grinbig: ...Oh Crap we're back on that topic again...

    ...bad KK! Evil, naughty KK! No more derails about transportation. Now go back to your streetcar barn and don't come out until you are told you can.
    Go to the top of the page
     
    +Quote Post
    mfb
    post Oct 22 2007, 07:13 AM
    Post #143


    Immortal Elf
    **********

    Group: Members
    Posts: 11,410
    Joined: 1-October 03
    From: Pittsburgh
    Member No.: 5,670



    QUOTE (hyzmarca)
    When the British Mandate Expired, everything would have been exactly as it was, except for the fact that militant Zionists "declared independence" the day before. Let us examine that, for a moment. They were a minority population consisting of a rather large number of refugees at that point in time which just "declared independence" and kicked out all of the people who actually lived there.

    you make it sound like the Zionists had no hope at all before the UN swooped in in 1947. they had strong support (and strong opposition) from many sectors of many nations around the world, and their presence and influence in the region had been growing for decades by that point. if anything, Britain relinquishing their mandate was a step forward for the Zionists, since it appears to me that by that point they'd run out of influence with the crown.

    i'm not saying the Holocaust wasn't a major factor in speeding up the formation of Israel. but i don't think that without it, the Zionist movement would have suddenly fallen to pieces.
    Go to the top of the page
     
    +Quote Post
    Narse
    post Oct 22 2007, 08:02 AM
    Post #144


    Moving Target
    **

    Group: Members
    Posts: 249
    Joined: 2-November 06
    From: Bozeman, MT
    Member No.: 9,762



    QUOTE (hyzmarca)
    QUOTE (Narse @ Oct 22 2007, 12:20 AM)
    So, uh um.. do you have some sources to back up your assertions? See unlike Holocaust deniers (not saying you are one!) I like historical sources. Specifically:


    • Zioninst terrorism & genocide (I'll grant theft)



    QUOTE


  • Ceaseless murder of Arabs & Christians

  • Have you watched the news any time within th past seven years?
    QUOTE


  • Suggesting that 5 million Jews died in the Holocaust causes one to be legally imprisoned and killed in Europe
  • QUOTE


  • Sex slavery as direct consequence of 'Holocaust mythology' (a definition would be apreciated)

  • What is the ICC exactly? Google lists all kinds of things, but somehow I don't think the Holocaust is responsible for The International Color Consortium. :grinbig:

    The International Criminal Court, the most evil orginization in existance today born out of silly notions about "War Crimes" and "Crimes against Humanity" for the implicit purpose of raping black children. And they do rape black children in a roundabout way. I explained that in a previous topic. It is a very obvious case of collective guilt about WWII spawning a merciless machine that rapes black children. Did I mention that they rape black children?

    QUOTE (mfb)
    i'm not a big fan of Israel, but i'm a bigger not-fan of not-facts. an official plan to give Palestine to the Jews came into being in 1917, and the process of making it a reality began in 1922. reaction to the Holocaust may have sped things up, but Jewish power and influence in the area had been growing steadily for two and a half decades before the UN made the decision to officially create the nation of Israel.

    UN General Assembly Resolutions are not binding. The Partion Plan was a General Assembly Resolution. Hence, the Partition Plan was not binding. And it wasn't implemented. There wasn't even a serious attempt to implement it. When the British Mandate Expired, everything would have been exactly as it was, except for the fact that militant Zionists "declared independence" the day before. Let us examine that, for a moment. They were a minority population consisting of a rather large number of refugees at that point in time which just "declared independence" and kicked out all of the people who actually lived there. It would be the equivalent of a bunch of Blackwater employees vacationing in France (with their guns) and just declaring that France is independent while violently displacing all of the French people. No one would have stood for it if not for the whole death camps thing. The British certainly wouldn't have. Hell, plenty of British soldiers resigned so that they could stay beind and help the Arabs.

    OK, I'll grant Zionist terrorism too. But genocide seems to be too much of a reach. War crimes yes, Genocide no.

    The killing of Arabs (didn't see anyone identified as Christian, of course some of those Arabs could have been.) wasn't portrayed as ceaseless on the news, and btw for most of the last 7 years I lived VERY far away from Isreal, so lots of that stuff probably didn't make it (actually I still live pretty far away).

    None of the laws listed on wikipedia include capital punishment for holocaust denial. Most require gross underrepresentation so saying 5mill Jews died wouldn't get you thrown in jail.

    Maybe I just don't know enough about the international criminal court, but I'm completely missing the link between them, the Holocaust and sex slavery. Your post didn't really help illuminate me either.
    Go to the top of the page
     
    +Quote Post
    Fortune
    post Oct 22 2007, 08:10 AM
    Post #145


    Immoral Elf
    **********

    Group: Members
    Posts: 15,247
    Joined: 29-March 02
    From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat
    Member No.: 2,486



    QUOTE (Narse @ Oct 22 2007, 06:02 PM)
    Most require gross underrepresentation so saying 5mill Jews died wouldn't get you thrown in jail.

    1,000,000 people is not enough to qualify for gross underrepresentation? One sixth of the recognized figure? What specific number would you put up as the cut-off point then before it is considered illegal (or in poor taste, or whatever complaint you would prefer)? 2,000,000 less dead? 3,000,000?
    Go to the top of the page
     
    +Quote Post
    mfb
    post Oct 22 2007, 08:13 AM
    Post #146


    Immortal Elf
    **********

    Group: Members
    Posts: 11,410
    Joined: 1-October 03
    From: Pittsburgh
    Member No.: 5,670



    the formation of the ICC was inspired by the Nuremberg trials. hyz claims (i'm neither disputing nor lending credence to these claims) that the ICC spends an inordinate amount of time crushing the ability of African nations to govern themselves, thus propagating sex slavery (because the lack of a strong government makes it easier to run such slave rings).
    Go to the top of the page
     
    +Quote Post
    Kagetenshi
    post Oct 22 2007, 08:14 AM
    Post #147


    Manus Celer Dei
    **********

    Group: Dumpshocked
    Posts: 17,013
    Joined: 30-December 02
    From: Boston
    Member No.: 3,802



    I'm not sure as I agree with Hyzmarca, but his explanation of his opinion of the ICC (which comes from the Private Armys (sic) thread):

    QUOTE (Hyzmarca)
    The Lord's Resistance Army is a Christian paramilitary revolutionary organization, founded by Joseph Kony,  that has been in conflict with the government of Uganda for 20 years with the propose of establishing a Christian theocratic state.  Over these two decades, they've done the same twisted shit that every paramilitary resistance organization in Africa does, the forcible conscription of minors, systematic slaughter and mutilation of civilians in remote villages, systematic rape, sexual slavery, that sort of thing. Nothing particularly original, but very annoying nonetheless.

    Anyway, Kony is tired of fighting, anyone would be after 20 years of getting nowhere, so he and his top Lieutenants have been attempting to negotiate peace with the government of Uganda and they are all willing to stand trial and admit their crimes in a traditional judicial ritual called Mato Oput, which will probably result in forgiveness rather than punishment.  This is what the vast majority of Ugandans want, even those who have been victimized by the LRA, simply because they want to end the violence and get on with their lives.

    The one and only obstacle to this is the ICC, which has filed indictments against LRA leaders and refuses to resend them, citing the backwards theory that European justice is somehow superior to African justice as their justification for intentionally damaging the peace process.

    With an organization like the ICC around, peace and reconciliation are impossible. It refuses to accept anything less than the draconian punishments it provides and by doing so ensures that those who are most violent will fight as hard as they can to retain their power. And they know this. And they don't care. Or, more realistically, it is the entire point.

    And, let's face it, the only people that are going to be targeted are Black Africans. No White person is ever going to stand trial before the ICC, simply because Africa is where all of the genocides are happening. It is just European colonialism in another form.  The poor negros can't do anything without a White massah looking over their shoulders.  That is the sentiment that created the ICC. And the ICC has every intention to metaphorically whip Uganda until they're all screaming "Tobyyyyyyy!!!!!!!".


    ~J
    Go to the top of the page
     
    +Quote Post
    Grinder
    post Oct 22 2007, 10:23 AM
    Post #148


    Great, I'm a Dragon...
    *********

    Group: Retired Admins
    Posts: 6,699
    Joined: 8-October 03
    From: North Germany
    Member No.: 5,698



    I wasn't aware that I was so sensitive on this topic before I dived into the discussion. I don't have any hard feelings or hold a grudge against anyone who has been involved in it and made controversial (to me) postings that came across strange to me. It was really interesting to see what opinions every one of you has about the topic of the Third Reich, making it for a experience I don't want to miss. So everything's fine here. :)
    Go to the top of the page
     
    +Quote Post
    Grinder
    post Oct 22 2007, 10:24 AM
    Post #149


    Great, I'm a Dragon...
    *********

    Group: Retired Admins
    Posts: 6,699
    Joined: 8-October 03
    From: North Germany
    Member No.: 5,698



    You are aware that the ICC charges the serbian warlords and did so in the past too? Unless I confuse the ICC with another court, but I don't think I do.
    Go to the top of the page
     
    +Quote Post
    Kagetenshi
    post Oct 22 2007, 10:39 AM
    Post #150


    Manus Celer Dei
    **********

    Group: Dumpshocked
    Posts: 17,013
    Joined: 30-December 02
    From: Boston
    Member No.: 3,802



    No, actually, the ICC has only investigated Sudan, the DRC, the CAR, and Darfur. In accordance with the principle of avoiding retroactive laws, it has no authority to investigate alleged crimes committed before 2002 (the date of its creation). Milošević was prosecuted by a special tribunal created specifically for him [Edit: war crimes in former Yugoslavia]. You're probably thinking of the International Court of Justice, a UN body—the ICC is independent.

    ~J
    Go to the top of the page
     
    +Quote Post

    7 Pages V  « < 4 5 6 7 >
    Reply to this topicStart new topic

     



    RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 28th November 2025 - 09:54 AM

    Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.