IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Commanding Voice
raggedhalo
post Nov 1 2007, 04:12 PM
Post #1


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 343
Joined: 3-October 07
From: Birmingham, UK
Member No.: 13,515



OK, so, a couple of scenarios that I'd like clarification on:

Adept standing on one side of the door, guard is on the other. Adept's team are all standing by. Can the adept use Commanding Voice to get the guard to open the door by shouting through the door? What about over an intercom? Are the adept's team affected too?

Adept and team approach (known) location of invisible opponent. Can the adept (without Astral Perception) use Commanding Voice to get the opponent to apply the adept's tranq patch to themselves? Will it affect the other team members, causing a scramble for the tranq patch?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Dashifen
post Nov 1 2007, 05:08 PM
Post #2


Technomancer
********

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 4,638
Joined: 2-October 02
From: Champaign, IL
Member No.: 3,374



I feel that Commanding Voice is a targeted effect, as represented by the opposed test between the Adept and the target. Thus, in no situation involving Commanding Voice do I require anyone other than the intended target (or targets) to make a test. To speak directly to your examples:
  1. In the first case, I would make the test between the Adept and the guard. However, depending on the guard's instructions, this could be a situation wherein he wouldn't actually perform the whole action before realizing how stupid it would be. In other words, he might only unlock the door or turn the handle (for example) but wouldn't actually open the door. If the Adept then kicks the door or otherwise forces it open, that's up to the PC. Also, since the guard just heard someone on the other side of his door tell him to open said door and then almost did, I'd give him another test to see if he thinks he might have just been mentally manipulated and, depending on that result, his next action is probably to start alerting other guards to a potential "situation."
  2. Again, I'd allow this action, perhaps with a penalty as the Adept may not know exactly on whom to focus his commanding will, but asking someone to tranq themselves definately falls under the "hesitate and lose an action" option for the power.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DireRadiant
post Nov 1 2007, 05:27 PM
Post #3


The Dragon Never Sleeps
*********

Group: Admin
Posts: 6,924
Joined: 1-September 05
Member No.: 7,667



Don't forget that multiple targets do this. p. 176 Street Magic

"If multiple
individuals are targeted, use the largest dice pool among the defenders
and add +1 dice per additional target (max. +5)."

Also,

"It
has no effect when the voice is amplified or broadcast via
technological means (eg. wireless transmission, loudspeaker,
etc)."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DireRadiant
post Nov 1 2007, 05:33 PM
Post #4


The Dragon Never Sleeps
*********

Group: Admin
Posts: 6,924
Joined: 1-September 05
Member No.: 7,667



QUOTE (raggedhalo)
Can the adept use Commanding Voice to get the guard to open the door by shouting through the door?

Yes

QUOTE (raggedhalo)
What about over an intercom? 

No

QUOTE (raggedhalo)
Are the adept's team affected too?

Only if the adept chooses to target his own team, in which case apply multiple target modifiers


QUOTE (raggedhalo)
Adept and team approach (known) location of invisible opponent.  Can the adept (without Astral Perception) use Commanding Voice to get the opponent to apply the adept's tranq patch to themselves? 

Yes.

However I do not think it is unreasonable to apply a blind fire modifier to the opposed test.

QUOTE (raggedhalo)
Will it affect the other team members, causing a scramble for the tranq patch?

Only if the adept chooses to target his own team, in which case apply multiple target modifiers

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 29th April 2024 - 09:28 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.