IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

5 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 5 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Creative specializations
Fortune
post Nov 3 2007, 02:50 AM
Post #51


Immoral Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 15,247
Joined: 29-March 02
From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat
Member No.: 2,486



Wiki definitions are not really worth much.

As far as I am concerned, as hyzmarca said, if it teaches techniques to kill or disable people, then it is a martial art. That is the whole point of the word 'martial'.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cain
post Nov 3 2007, 02:51 AM
Post #52


Grand Master of Run-Fu
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,840
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Tir Tairngire
Member No.: 178



Those are reasons for study. I'll point you at the first line of your definition:

QUOTE
Martial arts are systems of codified practices and traditions of training for combat

Now, I don't know much about Parkour and Free Running, but I understand that they focus more on the "flight" side of the fight-or-fight instinct. I would hesitate to call them martial arts. Self-defense, most definitely, but that's a different beast than a martial art.

Edit: Fortune, I'll go with the wiki definition, simply because anything can be considered a martial art under your definition. Toddlers fighting over a toy, for example. It's important that the training be codified and have certain traditions, such as methods of training. This differentiates a martial art from two kids learning to tussle in the backyard.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fortune
post Nov 3 2007, 02:58 AM
Post #53


Immoral Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 15,247
Joined: 29-March 02
From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat
Member No.: 2,486



Note the 'teaches techniques' part of my post. ;)

And I wasn't really giving my version of an 'official' definition, as much as a brief summation of my opinion, as already stated by someone else. :D
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
WearzManySkins
post Nov 3 2007, 03:29 AM
Post #54


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,159
Joined: 12-April 07
From: Ork Underground
Member No.: 11,440



Hmm so these would not be martial arts by you definition then
Noroshijutsu-Signaling Technique
Suieijutsu-The Art of swimming, both with and without armor
Bajutsu- Horse Riding Technique
HojÅ?jutsu-Binding Technique
Karumijutsu-is the body lightening art
Chikujojutsu-is the art of building and destroying fortifications
Senjojutsu-Field Deployment
Iaijutsu-sword drawing

Note
"Bujutsu is the Japanese word for "martial art". The long history and complex tradition of the Japanese art of combat is embodied in a variety of forms, methods, and weapons, each of which constitutes a particular specialization of that martial art. Each specialization, in turn, is known as a jutsu, and is indicative of the particular way or ways in which certain actions are performed. In the context of the Japanese art of combat, therefore, a specialization (jutsu) consists of a particular, systematic method of using a specific weapon that has been proven to be the most effective means of utilizing that weapon."

Note the top above have the jutsu in the last part of the name, ie they are martial arts.

WMS
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Riley37
post Nov 3 2007, 03:32 AM
Post #55


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 573
Joined: 17-September 07
Member No.: 13,319



Wearz: I await Fortune's definition, but in the meantime, I define "martial" as usable in combat, or under the of domain Mars, Spirit of War.

Is there an element, aspect or variation of Parkour that involves disabling an attacker?

Wikipedia says: As martial arts are a form of training for the fight, parkour is a form of training for the flight. Because of its difficulty to categorize, it is often said that parkour is in its own category: "parkour is parkour."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
WearzManySkins
post Nov 3 2007, 03:41 AM
Post #56


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,159
Joined: 12-April 07
From: Ork Underground
Member No.: 11,440



@Riley37
It could be like Iaijutsu, the rapid drawing of ones sword, in itself does not kill anyone, but does get ones weapon out and usable.

Parkour can the same gets you over/up an obstacle to then allow you to combat your foe(s).

If by running or jumping over obstacles to get a message out, can be most devastating to ones foes.

The examples I listed above most do not disable or hurt an attacker directly, but they are "Defined" as martial arts. Now binding I would say as disabling ones attacker though. :)

Technique/Martial Art is merely a tool to allow you use your mind to gain what you wish from one's attackers.

WMS
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Riley37
post Nov 3 2007, 03:50 AM
Post #57


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 573
Joined: 17-September 07
Member No.: 13,319



Fortune posted while I was attending to another tab!

"Martial arts are systems of codified practices and traditions of training for combat. They may be studied for various reasons including combat skills, fitness, self-defense, sport, self-cultivation/meditation, mental discipline, character development and building self-confidence, or any combination of the above."

This establishes that people study parkour for *many of the same reasons* as the reasons for studying martial arts. Not the same as establishing that it *IS* a martial art.

"jutsu" is translatable as "technique, method, skill or trick"; wajutsu (narrative skill), shujutsu (surgery), geijutsu (craft) and gijutsu (technique, technology).

Bujutsu emphasizes technique; budo emphasizes "-do" or tao, which I will not define here.

Anyways, back to Shadowrun, I would not allow Parkour as a specialization of Unarmed Combat... with one possible exception: an opposed test to bypass an attack of opportunity (see BBB p. 151, under "Interception").
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fortune
post Nov 3 2007, 03:53 AM
Post #58


Immoral Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 15,247
Joined: 29-March 02
From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat
Member No.: 2,486



QUOTE (Riley37)
I await Fortune's definition...

Was I supposed to be giving one? :D

I'm not a fanatic, and don't really care that much about the semantics of the whole thing. :)

I just think martial arts should encompass something that has at least some relation to the 'martial' part of the term.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Riley37
post Nov 3 2007, 03:54 AM
Post #59


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 573
Joined: 17-September 07
Member No.: 13,319



New specialization...

Dumpshock Posting (+2: Hair Splitting)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cain
post Nov 3 2007, 04:02 AM
Post #60


Grand Master of Run-Fu
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,840
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Tir Tairngire
Member No.: 178



QUOTE (Fortune)
QUOTE (Riley37 @ Nov 3 2007, 01:32 PM)
I await Fortune's definition...

Was I supposed to be giving one? :D

I'm not a fanatic, and don't really care that much about the semantics of the whole thing. :)

I just think martial arts should encompass something that has at least some relation to the 'martial' part of the term.

I think it should be more than that. At the very least, it has to be more than a two kids teaching each other to punch. I agree with the definition: It has to be codified, and have certain traditions. For example, boxing has the tradition of working the heavy bags (unless you're Rocky Balboa, that is. ;))
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
WearzManySkins
post Nov 3 2007, 04:08 AM
Post #61


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,159
Joined: 12-April 07
From: Ork Underground
Member No.: 11,440



@Riley37
I was posting Parkour being a specialization of gymnastics not a martial art.

Gymnastics (Parkour)
Running (Free Running)

Also I posted what you attributed to Fortune.:)

WMS
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ghost in the Mac...
post Nov 3 2007, 03:26 PM
Post #62


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 56
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 283



Rephrase of an earlier question that I think got lost in the deluge of responses:

Many vehicle operation skills have suggested specializations of "Remote Operation". Would that differ from a specialization of "Rigging"? Could you take a specialization Pilot Ground Craft (Rigging)?

Meanwhile, all the other vehicle operation specializations are "specific vehicle type" -- and that seems kinda dull. Sure, I can see a lot of characters taking Pilot Ground Craft (Motorcycles). But how about Pilot Ground Craft (Stunts) or Pilot Ground Craft (Off-Road)?

-~GitM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Redjack
post Nov 3 2007, 03:50 PM
Post #63


Man Behind the Curtain
**********

Group: Admin
Posts: 14,873
Joined: 2-July 89
From: End of the Yellow-Brick Road
Member No.: 3



QUOTE (Ghost in the Machine)
Many vehicle operation skills have suggested specializations of "Remote Operation". Would that differ from a specialization of "Rigging"? Could you take a specialization Pilot Ground Craft (Rigging)?

Since utilizing a drone or vehicle remotely without rigging it is done with a command program, the drone/vehicle then uses it's stats for all driving checks. That negates the usefulness of a Remote Operation unless it means rigging. :)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ghost in the Mac...
post Nov 3 2007, 04:03 PM
Post #64


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 56
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 283



Why not just say "Specialization: Rigging" then? :scatter:

-~GitM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Redjack
post Nov 3 2007, 04:39 PM
Post #65


Man Behind the Curtain
**********

Group: Admin
Posts: 14,873
Joined: 2-July 89
From: End of the Yellow-Brick Road
Member No.: 3



Good question that begets more good questions like: Why is syntax not consistent for every entry and why do we have questions, FAQs and errata? :P
The inevitable facts of my previous post do remain. :)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Riley37
post Nov 3 2007, 09:05 PM
Post #66


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 573
Joined: 17-September 07
Member No.: 13,319



I have a different interpretation, based on rules in three different sections (BBB 158ff Vehicle Combat, BBB 220 Controlling Devices, BBB 238-240 Drones) which may be addressed already on other threads. It sure seems to me that each of these levels was considered by at least one writer/editor, but that writers did not have consensus about them.

Level A: You give instructions to the drone/vehicle, often verbally. It interprets those instructions and chooses how to implement them, using its own stats. Example: "Rover 1, drive yourself back to the garage." Rover then uses Pilot stat plus Maneuver autosoft for any crash tests, and uses Pilot stat alone to remember where the garage is. Meanwhile, you can be busy doing other things and give no attention until either "Hey look, Rover's back" or "Hmm, shouldn't Rover be back by now?" - or if you like, you can observe Rover's progress on a screen or an AR display.
p238 "Drones acting on their own use their own Pilot and autosoft ratings for all necessary tests and act on their own initiative" See also BBB 221, Issuing Commands. "Rovers 1 2 and 3, drive yourselves back to the garage" is one Simple Action, and "Rover 4, drive to my location" is a separate Simple Action. Rover's Initiative equals Pilot plus Response, and Rover gets 3 IPs. (I imagine that people usually install a Pilot equal in rating to the Response.)

Level B: You remote-control Rover using some kind of control interface on your hardware (eg the joystick or up-down-left-right buttons on your comlink). You are choosing Rover's path moment-by-moment. Rover's sensors are feeding into a display on your screen or your AR. Kinda like driving a vehicle in a game such as Halo. The rating of your Command program represents the quality of the interface. "Remotely controlling a drone would take a Command + vehicle skill Test" p. 220. I interpret this as the mode also called "Captain's Chair" (page?), and "remotely controlling" by AR p. 159 (no bonus; you get +1 if you use AR while actually sitting in the vehicle's driver seat). Rover acts on your Initiative.

Level C: Jumped in, cold sim... rules are unclear if this is possible.
You see the input from the vehicle sensors directly onto your full field of vision, and you aren't using a joystick anymore; you experience the vehicle as if it were your own body. You get -1 threshold to all piloting tests (p. 159).
Directly contradicting text on the same page, BBB 239:
"Any tests are made using the rigger's own skills and attributes"
Two sections down:
"When observing through a drone, a rigger rolls Sensor (rather than Intuition) + Perception"

Level D: Jumped in, hot sim. Rigger risks Stun whenever drone is damaged and risks dumpshock if drone is destroyed, per BBB 239 "Jumping Into Drones". Text implies, but does not state, that all jumped-in rigging is hot sim (and thus impossible without hot-sim ASIST module).

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PlatonicPimp
post Nov 4 2007, 10:45 PM
Post #67


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,219
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Lofwyr's stomach.
Member No.: 1,320



When explaining parkour to incredulous onlookers and cops, I've always called it a "Physical Discipline, like a martial art, only about movement instead of fighting."

I also have called it " the french martial art, you know, it's about running away."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mercer
post Nov 4 2007, 11:22 PM
Post #68


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,326
Joined: 15-April 02
Member No.: 2,600



QUOTE (Ghost in the Machine)
Why not just say "Specialization: Rigging" then? :scatter:

-~GitM

Well, all remote operation may be rigging, but all rigging may not be remote operation.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DTFarstar
post Nov 5 2007, 03:16 AM
Post #69


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,269
Joined: 18-September 06
Member No.: 9,421



I need to get a like "How-To Parkour" book or something. I'm pretty sure no one around here practices it, but it sounds interesting.

Chris
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Simon May
post Nov 5 2007, 07:57 AM
Post #70


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 232
Joined: 7-October 07
Member No.: 13,604



I hate the term "Parkour." The sport was just as cool when people called it "Freestyle Walking."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
noonesshowmonkey
post Nov 5 2007, 02:24 PM
Post #71


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 393
Joined: 2-July 07
Member No.: 12,125



Sometimes I think to myself that wikipedia is saving the world. Other times I feel like Wikipedia self incriminating and is the strongest case towards the world's damnation.

Ah the internet! Oh the internet!

- der menkey

"Certainly there is no hunting like the hunting of man and those who have hunted armed men long enough and liked it, never really care for anything else thereafter."
~ Ernest Hemingway
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
eidolon
post Nov 5 2007, 02:48 PM
Post #72


ghostrider
********

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 4,196
Joined: 16-May 04
Member No.: 6,333



QUOTE (Riley37)
New specialization...

Dumpshock Posting (+2: Hair Splitting)

Really? A specialization? Did they errata that? Because in my PDF it has that under Negative Qualities.

;)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Whipstitch
post Nov 5 2007, 03:28 PM
Post #73


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,883
Joined: 16-December 06
Member No.: 10,386



QUOTE (Simon May @ Nov 5 2007, 02:57 AM)
I hate the term "Parkour." The sport was just as cool when people called it "Freestyle Walking."

I must vehemently disagree with this one. When bringing up parkour, most people I know realize exactly what is being talked about immediately. On the other hand, when I mentioned "freestyle walking" to my brother he thought I had come up with a new euphemism for activities commonly performed by the Ministry of Silly Walks. If people had come up with something cooler earlier, maybe the term wouldn't of been hijacked and thrown under the bus by some Frenchies. It doesn't bother me that much, however; it's the people who say extreme walking/running that I want to punch repeatedly in the kidneys. Extreme is the most played out word in the history of mankind at this point.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kyoto Kid
post Nov 5 2007, 03:55 PM
Post #74


Bushido Cowgirl
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,782
Joined: 8-July 05
From: On the Double K Ranch a half day's ride out of Phlogiston Flats
Member No.: 7,490



...Matrix Forums (Extreme Dumpshocking +2) :grinbig:

[...runs away really really fast with the aid of an air spirit's movement power].
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Simon May
post Nov 5 2007, 04:54 PM
Post #75


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 232
Joined: 7-October 07
Member No.: 13,604



QUOTE (Whipstitch)
I must vehemently disagree with this one. When bringing up parkour, most people I know realize exactly what is being talked about immediately. On the other hand, when I mentioned "freestyle walking" to my brother he thought I had come up with a new euphemism for activities commonly performed by the Ministry of Silly Walks. If people had come up with something cooler earlier, maybe the term wouldn't of been hijacked and thrown under the bus by some Frenchies. It doesn't bother me that much, however; it's the people who say extreme walking/running that I want to punch repeatedly in the kidneys. Extreme is the most played out word in the history of mankind at this point.

I just find the sudden air of pretension that appeared surprising. I mean, this is a sport invented so that people who can't afford equipment for street luge or roller blading or mountain biking could actually have something inventive to do. Yet when I mention that I used to do "Freestyle Walking" when I was 12 to people who do "Parkour" (though I never claim I was any good), they get all uppity and claim "Parkour" isn't just a sport, it's a lifestyle.

I don't mind when people get really into their hobbies, but good lord they should learn to show some humility.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

5 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 5 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 20th September 2025 - 12:54 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.