![]() ![]() |
Nov 12 2007, 05:08 PM
Post
#26
|
|
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,537 Joined: 27-August 06 From: Albuquerque NM Member No.: 9,234 |
Which means if you kidnap someone who is working for someone openly and freely they CAN come down on you like the proverbial ton of bricks. And hence they will.
|
|
|
|
Nov 12 2007, 06:07 PM
Post
#27
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 385 Joined: 20-August 07 Member No.: 12,766 |
Eurotroll has it on the head; it's the price of playing the game. I extract your man, you extract mine. We don't bring it up, and if we ever do have to address it, we either cover it up, call it voluntary, or claim we don't even have him.
|
|
|
|
Nov 12 2007, 06:26 PM
Post
#28
|
|||
|
Midnight Toker ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 7,686 Joined: 4-July 04 From: Zombie Drop Bear Santa's Workshop Member No.: 6,456 |
Indentured servitude is a free market principle. A person can sell the rights to his future labor to anyone he wants. But, he can't sell the rights to the same future labor to two different entities, that's fraud. |
||
|
|
|||
Nov 12 2007, 08:00 PM
Post
#29
|
|
|
The Dragon Never Sleeps ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 6,924 Joined: 1-September 05 Member No.: 7,667 |
It's a MAD world isn't it?
Old news. It's not as if we have a couple thousand years of historical examples of low level conflict resolution instead of big bad horrible Final Solution|War to End all Wars|The Big One|Omega Order. |
|
|
|
Nov 12 2007, 08:16 PM
Post
#30
|
|
|
Bushido Cowgirl ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,782 Joined: 8-July 05 From: On the Double K Ranch a half day's ride out of Phlogiston Flats Member No.: 7,490 |
..so let's throw out this case.
The person extracted is a minor (17) living in a "corporate village" of a midsized Tech Corp who's parents have mysteriously disappeared. Until they can be found, the Corporation becomes her legal guardian. Now the kid is a designer baby genius who has received further gene treatments as well as some bio Augmentation over the years and is being carefully "groomed" by the Corporation for whatever purpose they may have. In addition (at the age of 15) she also received a prototype commlink implant. Given this, technically she could be considered a ward (property) of said Corporation. She has been assured by her corporate appointed caretaker that her the Corporation is doing everything they can to locate her parents The girl of course doesn't buy that in the least. Instead, she wants out because she believes she knows what is going on and maybe why her parents disappeared, but as of yet is not of legal age to take any legal recourse of he own. So, she gets on the matrix and finds a party interested in trading some important data she has (Namely the commlink's design that she backwards engineered though the diagnostic routines) in exchange for her extraction, a way out of town (Boston) and a new identity. The buyer goes for it, the deal goes down, and the gene-engineered kid genius ends up in the Seattle shadows. While in hiding: ...she turns 18. ...the buyer releases the commlink design on the market several months later with just enough tweaks to skirt infringement laws. ...the Tech Corp which she was extracted from took a hit with the release of the commlink by its competitor and is forced to partner with one of the Megas Does the Original Corp. or it's Parent Mega still have legal rights to get her back or are they SOL? |
|
|
|
Nov 12 2007, 08:31 PM
Post
#31
|
|
|
Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,664 Joined: 21-September 04 From: Arvada, CO Member No.: 6,686 |
SOL shes 18.
|
|
|
|
Nov 12 2007, 09:18 PM
Post
#32
|
|
|
Bushido Cowgirl ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,782 Joined: 8-July 05 From: On the Double K Ranch a half day's ride out of Phlogiston Flats Member No.: 7,490 |
...even though the original corp invested quite a bit in her development not just through specialised education and the implants she received, but in more so because of, her genetic "design"?
This is where the whole GeneTech issue muddies things up for her genetic structure could possibly be considered legal property (especially if patented) of the corporation even though she is a sentient being. |
|
|
|
Nov 12 2007, 09:29 PM
Post
#33
|
|
|
Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,664 Joined: 21-September 04 From: Arvada, CO Member No.: 6,686 |
Do your parents "own" you because they created your genetic makeup entirely and invested a ton into you?
|
|
|
|
Nov 12 2007, 09:29 PM
Post
#34
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 830 Joined: 3-April 04 From: Columbus, Ohio Member No.: 6,215 |
Also, what exactly defines one as "human"? Does the genetic engineering alter her enough that she no longer counts as a person? If not, then where does one draw the line where legal status changes? If a ghoul is not a human, shouldn't anyone that's had their genetic material modified stop being a person? But more to the point, I imagine that these questions are going to get answered a number of different ways in different places. UCAS law is going to be different from Ares corporate law, which will be different from Aztechnologies law, and there's a good chance that none of these laws are going to be worded very specifically, because it's likely to be an issue that's still being sorted out in 2070.
|
|
|
|
Nov 12 2007, 09:42 PM
Post
#35
|
|
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 7,116 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 1,449 |
I would say that it's a moot point.
They probably could legally claim her, on some technicality or other, since their control of the legal system is far greater - they could say she was kidnapped and not currently in her right mind, say that they have the right to remove the augmentations that they gave her, claim that she committed this or that crime and needs to be extradited to face corporate justice, and so on (and once back in their clutches, a bit of brainwashing can change her mind quickly). They are just as likely to simply kidnap her off the street, though. She will never be able to live a normal life out in the open. Her only two options are to remain in hiding or exile for the rest of her life, or to find a different corporate "master" which can protect her from the original corporation. |
|
|
|
Nov 12 2007, 09:48 PM
Post
#36
|
|||||
|
Bushido Cowgirl ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,782 Joined: 8-July 05 From: On the Double K Ranch a half day's ride out of Phlogiston Flats Member No.: 7,490 |
...the difference is they had no means to custom tailor or manipulate genetic code to fit their exact needs. In the case of the girl, the Corporation did.
...or get some biosculpting done, a total change of identity (fake of course), and take her chances in the shadows as that is not living a "normal life". |
||||
|
|
|||||
Nov 12 2007, 10:20 PM
Post
#37
|
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 36 Joined: 9-November 07 Member No.: 14,105 |
I think that no matter the genetic modifications, a person is still considered a person in 6th world law. The main theme seems to be if something is sentient or not. No matter how much someone's been gene-engineered, they're still metahuman and thus have the basic metahuman rights, or at least on paper.
Plus, any legal action to make her a 'property' would be bad for various reasons. firstly, the PR. Secondly, the fact that they'd have to prove how exactly she isn't (meta)-human. Putting all that lovely research data straight in the public domain for the competition to snap up and use. Genetic and/or personal modification in itself is definately not a reason to take away someone's rights as a person, seeing how bioware and genetech are commercial products. |
|
|
|
Nov 12 2007, 10:20 PM
Post
#38
|
|||
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 232 Joined: 7-October 07 Member No.: 13,604 |
I thought the latter was implied. She essentially traded her comm link knowledge for another job with a different corp in a different city and a little more freedom under the thumb of her new masters. Being in hiding doesn't mean she's not, for all intensive purposes, their employee. In fact, they be tossing her extra cash to do jobs for them while under the radar. |
||
|
|
|||
Nov 12 2007, 10:52 PM
Post
#39
|
|||||
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 7,089 Joined: 4-October 05 Member No.: 7,813 |
obviously this is the first time you've heard violet's (# somethingorother) backstory then =P she paid for an extraction with reverse-engineered plans for the commlink in her head (if she was smart, she probably "forgot" to mention it was in her head in the first place, and probably also "forgot" to mention that she's a genetically modified highly-trained researcher of any sort) and then slipped into the shadows ;) |
||||
|
|
|||||
Nov 12 2007, 10:59 PM
Post
#40
|
|||
|
Immoral Elf ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 15,247 Joined: 29-March 02 From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat Member No.: 2,486 |
:grinbig: |
||
|
|
|||
Nov 12 2007, 11:01 PM
Post
#41
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 232 Joined: 7-October 07 Member No.: 13,604 |
I'd only allow that in 3 scenarios: 1) the corp that got her out is a bunch of idiots; 2) the corp that got her out no longer functioned by the time she "slipped" into the shadows; 3) the corp that got her out wanted her in the shadows and are somehow controlling her without her knowledge. Either way, simply slipping into the shadows is far too easy and hurts my suspension of disbelief.
|
|
|
|
Nov 13 2007, 12:12 AM
Post
#42
|
|
|
Bushido Cowgirl ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,782 Joined: 8-July 05 From: On the Double K Ranch a half day's ride out of Phlogiston Flats Member No.: 7,490 |
...Jaid wins the not so fabulous no-prize. :grinbig:
@Simon May, you are close on one of your points, can't say how much as I do not even know since that is in the GM's domain. @Paradigm. Excellent points. Basically wanted to get some interpretations on how far Gentech and the law could go, especially when it comes to individual corporate/megacorporate law. My thinking was since there are patents/copyrights supposedly held on Chimeras, and Gene Art, why not on "Genebrats"? |
|
|
|
Nov 13 2007, 12:48 AM
Post
#43
|
|
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,246 Joined: 8-June 07 Member No.: 11,869 |
I think of the Corporate Court to be in a state of perpetual Cold War. Just think of all the scientists and military officers that defected back and forth between Nazi Germany/Italy and the Allied nations before WWI and WWII and between the Soviet Union and the Western countries during the Cold War. If inventors of nuclear technology could defect without starting an all out war, then I doubt the defections of inventors of a new mouthwash would cause that kind of extreme response either. They would try to get him back sure, probably even assassinate him and his family if they couldn't but they wouldn't start an all out war over it.
|
|
|
|
Nov 13 2007, 01:15 AM
Post
#44
|
|
|
Bushido Cowgirl ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,782 Joined: 8-July 05 From: On the Double K Ranch a half day's ride out of Phlogiston Flats Member No.: 7,490 |
...I have to agree. An all out corp war would be bad for business, especially in the case of an extraction. Now this is not to say, as Buster mentioned, some kind action of might not be taken, but it would only be done if it were cost effective and could be kept fairly quiet.
As Paradigm alluded to, the last thing any corp wants is bad press. Bad press affects public opinion. Bad public opinion in turn affects sales. Sales affects the sacred bottom line and the sacred bottom line affects the almighty shareholders |
|
|
|
Nov 13 2007, 02:52 AM
Post
#45
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 192 Joined: 29-December 06 Member No.: 10,483 |
Actually in Hong Kong extractions are part of the etiquette. For example if you want person Y from Corp X, you can't have him since it would be a loss of face. However if someone tries to extract them, and fails because of your actions. You might be able to get him from the company as a way to save face, and a 'thank you' for stopping the extraction. Even if everyone involved knows the real score.
|
|
|
|
Nov 13 2007, 03:45 AM
Post
#46
|
|
|
Neophyte Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Validating Posts: 2,283 Joined: 12-October 07 Member No.: 13,662 |
I think the OP misses something very big up front. Something like this only involves 2 corps. The only omega order ever involved one corp/nation conglomerate giving every single one of them the finger at once.
This strikes me very much as business as normal. And internal politics are such that a corp w/ shares in one corp might not mind if corp Z has Corp Y's gizmo and is selling it for a profit. Based on the fiction it seems that a little bit of corporate incest in ownership is present. Certain corps forming loose coalitions where their interests align and oppose as well. Also, it may be far easier to kidnap someone close to the target to blackmail him into switching than to kidnap the target himself. Also w/ the availability of fake SINs (especially with a corp footing the bill), a rating 6 new SIN shouldn't be that hard to come up with to get around a non-compete claus in a contract. |
|
|
|
Nov 13 2007, 04:18 AM
Post
#47
|
|
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,269 Joined: 18-September 06 Member No.: 9,421 |
Seeing as corps can issue their own SINs it wouldn't even have to be fake. Take a formerly Ares SIN-less person, give him a brand new legit Ares SIN. Nothing fake about it, they can do it for anyone they deem worth the money.
Chris |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 24th November 2025 - 12:56 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.