Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: How to Start a Corporate War
Dumpshock Forums > Discussion > Shadowrun
Nasrudith
I realized an incredible flaw in the extraction runs, especially unwilling extractions. Corporations when they hire Runner teams to perform extractions do so because they want to steal talent. While it may be possible to get away with say stealing a prototype or plans and claiming that they developed the technology independent of the other corps it is pretty damn hard to deny the fact that a leading scientest was kidnapped and ended up working for their corporation. If they track down any missing talent and find them in another megacorps possession, well I'm pretty sure thats grounds for an Omega Order.
Critias
QUOTE (Nasrudith)
If they track down any missing talent and find them in another megacorps possession, well I'm pretty sure thats grounds for an Omega Order.

That's a big if, and a big and, and you're forgetting the part where everyone does it. Omega Orders are a big deal. One smart guy changing hands isn't.
Eurotroll
It's a matter of detente: I don't follow up on personnel that vanished from my roster and appeared in yours, and you reciprocate.

Corps are nothing if not pragmatic.
Paradigm
It really depends on what happens to the guy, as there's plenty of ways to make sure noone ever finds out what happened. Just off the top of my head some plausible scenarios are:
1. Kidnap the talent, put them to work in a closed high security facilty with his family under threat.
2. Put the talent through brain washing/indoctrination camp, give him plastic surgery, spoof some records in the corp's own personnel files. Instant clean corporate drone.
3. Take the stereotypical egotistical genius, as seen in the movies: "I do not care who I work for or what's done with it, just let me do my research to prove my superiority to all my rivals"

As for reasons not to persue an Omega Order, apart from the proof needed (which a brainwashed/threatened scientist will not give). There's also the nasty thing called legal precedent. Meaning that this would over time effectively wipe out all the corps, as they're all quite likely to try this sort of thing. In other words, it's part of the corporate game and you can be sure the entire corporate court is aware of that fact. Besides.. what would it do to the economy if AAA's knew the Omega Order was coming and took steps to take the rest with them?
mfb
and, actually, it's pretty easy to deny the fact that a leading scientist was kidnapped. if i got to issue an Omega Order every time someone kidnapped one of my scientists, then anytime a scientist of mine voluntarily left me for another megacorp, i'd certainly claim he'd been kidnapped. that means that anytime you kidnap a scientist, you can claim that he came over voluntarily and that the corp you kidnapped him from is just crying wolf. ah, lies, the world would be so boring without you!
cx2
Also the scientist or whoever never speaks for himself, the corp speaks for him. Thus you try proving it was unwilling. It's a case of one corp's word against another's without evidence.
Simon May
If corp A has talent stolen by corp B and finds out, why bother with an Omega Order when suddenly corp A has the right to break into corp B and steal him and all sorts of other goodies back with no serious repurcussions?
kzt
Just blow up a data center. Remember, this is shadow run, where nobody ever makes off-site backups.
hobgoblin
think about it, what would happen if a similar action was performed by any side in the cold war?
hyzmarca
QUOTE (mfb)
and, actually, it's pretty easy to deny the fact that a leading scientist was kidnapped. if i got to issue an Omega Order every time someone kidnapped one of my scientists, then anytime a scientist of mine voluntarily left me for another megacorp, i'd certainly claim he'd been kidnapped. that means that anytime you kidnap a scientist, you can claim that he came over voluntarily and that the corp you kidnapped him from is just crying wolf. ah, lies, the world would be so boring without you!

Actually, it doesn't matter if he is kidnapped or not. A scientist worth kidnapping will have an employment contract. That contract with be registered with the CC. Hiring corporations would be legally required to check the contract database before hiring and would be legally barred from hiring someone who has outstanding obligations and would be legally required to return him to the party that holds his contract.

Kidnapping is a very minor offense compared to contract violation.

If the damaged party learns of the offense it would sue the new employer in a Contract Court of appropriate jurisdiction. Usually, there will be a face-saving settlement which involves the kidnapping corporation buying its captive's contract at an inflated price, thus making the kidnapping legal and barring the employee from leaving the kidnapper until the contract expires. Sometimes, it will go to trial, at which time a judge will certainly order that the employee by returned to the legal contract holder and have the illegal employer compensate the contract holder for lost services.

It really isn't something worth making a big stink over.

Or, of course, they can just hire their own shadowrunners and kidnap him back.
mfb
QUOTE (hyzmarca)
Actually, it doesn't matter if he is kidnapped or not. A scientist worth kidnapping will have an employment contract. That contract with be registered with the CC.

meh. all the receiving corporation has to do is show a breach of contract on the part of the losing corporation. it'll turn into a lawyer fight that will take years to resolve, during which time, the stolen scientist will be producing work for his new masters. and if, after almost a decade of deliberation, the receiving corporation is ruled against by the CC, they can just 'lose' their scientist, or just put a bullet in him. definitely worth the hassle.
Serial_Peacemaker
So you are saying there are runs to destroy the contracts for kidnapped personel? Unless they are keeping those contracts in Zurich orbital.
cx2
Extra territoriality makes problems I think. Imagine how awkward it would be today to get someone for contract violation if they're in another country from the original employer? Now imagine that country doesn't want to give them up?

Now this would only apply for the bigger corps, but given that their own laws rule on their own turf they are essentially a seperate country. I can imagine this being a legal nightmare.
mfb
well, i imagine most contracts in SR are stored in duplicate at multiple locations in multiple formats to prevent that. but altering a few copies could cast doubt on the legitimacy of the contract, which can help a court case.
kzt
QUOTE (mfb)
and if, after almost a decade of deliberation, the receiving corporation is ruled against by the CC, they can just 'lose' their scientist, or just put a bullet in him. definitely worth the hassle.

No, they lose the consequential damages too. And the discovery phase should be pretty cool.

So they get to pay for the project that the scientist was working on that was disrupted, the likely profits from this, and interest. It gets very ugly. You can, if you look, find some roughly similar patent cases in which someone got to pay hundreds of millions of dollars.

Plus if anyone one was killed they get to turn over the organizer, as it's going to be hard to explain how he ended up working for them if they didn't organize the kidnapping. Fortunately, the discovery phase would have already gotten that data into view, so the court would know who had organized it.

And given how the corps control the media, it would be VERY public.
TonkaTuff
Also, a surprising number of the world's top researchers and scientists have a nasty habit of dying in horrible accidents that leave no identifiable remains. The fact that another corp hired a guy with the exact same degrees from another instutution the very next day is completely coincidental. What do you mean 'It's the same guy!'? Professor Someguy's ID and credentials are iron-clad. They're all here in the computer for anybody to read.
mfb
QUOTE (kzt)
So they get to pay for the project that the scientist was working on that was disrupted, the likely profits from this, and interest. It gets very ugly. You can, if you look, find some roughly similar patent cases in which someone got to pay hundreds of millions of dollars.

sure, if you can prove it. if it comes down to it, you can just kill the scientist and then say he'd spent the entire time researching softer facial tissues. and hadn't gotten any results. all his actual research gets attributed to Doctor McFake, the receiving corporation's 'lead researcher'.
hyzmarca
QUOTE (cx2 @ Nov 11 2007, 10:51 PM)
Extra territoriality makes problems I think. Imagine how awkward it would be today to get someone for contract violation if they're in another country from the original employer? Now imagine that country doesn't want to give them up?

Now this would only apply for the bigger corps, but given that their own laws rule on their own turf they are essentially a seperate country. I can imagine this being a legal nightmare.

Contracts are ultimately handled by the Corporate Court, which all incorporated businesses are beholden to according to the Corporate Interactions Act . Most nations have signed the the Business Recognition Accords, which require them to enforce all corporate contacts, even those which would be illegal in the nation's territory.

The penalties for flagrant violation of CC decisions would be very high.



QUOTE

meh. all the receiving corporation has to do is show a breach of contract on the part of the losing corporation. it'll turn into a lawyer fight that will take years to resolve, during which time, the stolen scientist will be producing work for his new masters. and if, after almost a decade of deliberation, the receiving corporation is ruled against by the CC, they can just 'lose' their scientist, or just put a bullet in him. definitely worth the hassle.


Yes, which is why settlements are most likely. Lawyer fights will cost both corporations more than the scientist is worth. Lets say five 10,000 nuyen.gif per hour guys working 8 hour days 5 days a week plus 40 1,000 nuyen.gif per hour guys working 16 hour days 6 days a week (+ half overtime) for 10 years including appeals, two weeks vacation. That's a little less than 3 and a quarter billion nuyen.gif, not counting expenses.
Megas aren't going to use anything less than OJ caliber lawyers, even for traffic tickets.
kzt
Yeah, which is when a CC contract specialist shows up to ask detailed questions of many people. Coincidences don't tend to exist in their world.

And given how much R&D and science are collaborative efforts with researchers all over the world, exactly how would you expect soemone to actually do anything useful if you lock them in a room and tell them "do great things"? Or do you allow them to do interactive collaborations, live on-line meetings and show up at international conferences?
kzt
QUOTE (hyzmarca)
Yes, which is why settlements are most likely. Lawyer fights will cost both corporations more than the scientist is worth. Lets say five 10,000 nuyen.gif per hour guys working 8 hour days 5 days a week plus 40 1,000 nuyen.gif per hour guys working 16 hour days 6 days a week (+ half overtime) for 10 years including appeals, two weeks vacation. That's 3 billion nuyen.gif, not counting expenses.
Megas aren't going to use anything less than OJ caliber lawyers, even for traffic tickets.

IIRC, 1 nuyen.gif = something like $5. And you don't have the everyone doing things all the time, the reason these things run for years are due to investigations and gathering evidence and appeals, all of which don't have the lawyers doing anything. As TOP corporate lawyer only rarely exceeds $1000/hr, your costs are several orders of magnitude too high.

And the Megas employ GOOD lawyers, so it's just opportunity cost. That is, what else could our 5000 person corporate law department work on that would return us more money than getting all the money that that Xyz has ever earned for their product, tripled for damages, plus our legal costs, plus our R&D costs, plus interest.
hyzmarca
QUOTE (kzt)
Yeah, which is when a CC contract specialist shows up to ask detailed questions of many people. Coincidences don't tend to exist in their world.

And given how much R&D and science are collaborative efforts with researchers all over the world, exactly how would you expect soemone to actually do anything useful if you lock them in a room and tell them "do great things"? Or do you allow them to do interactive collaborations, live on-line meetings and show up at international conferences?

I imagine that there is an informal etiquette to corporate extractions and associated gentleman's agreements. The corp A expresses interest in employing dude B who works for corp C. Corp A attempts to enter negotiations to purchase dude B's employment contract from corp C. Corp C either agrees or rebuffs. Corp A makes a fair officer given the current market value of dude B's contract. Corp C refuses. Corp A makes a more generous offer. Corp C refuses. Corp A has him extracted and later informs corp C that they have him, offering once more to buy his contract. Corp C relents.
mfb
QUOTE (hyzmarca)
Yes, which is why settlements are most likely. Lawyer fights will cost both corporations more than the scientist is worth. Lets say five 10,000 nuyen.gif per hour guys working 8 hour days 5 days a week plus 40 1,000 nuyen.gif per hour guys working 16 hour days 6 days a week (+ half overtime) for 10 years including appeals, two weeks vacation. That's 3 billion nuyen.gif, not counting expenses.
Megas aren't going to use anything less than OJ caliber lawyers, even for traffic tickets.

eh? nonsense, that's not even physically possible. there aren't enough OJ-caliber lawyers alive to keep up with the number of court cases any single mega has going at any one time, much less all of the megas. besides which, your pricing is insane. 10k/hr is fine for high-end hired gun lawyers, but no corporation with half a brain is going to pay its own lawyers that much. and they're certainly not going to be working one case at a time. they'll probably be defending (read: delaying) six or seven extraction cases a year.
Riley37
As I imagine it, there is a very blurry line between routine competition, and escalation that could lead to major disruptive conflict "(you realize, of course, that this means war"). If Corp A really wants researcher B, and makes an offer, and the legit methods fail, and then arranges an extraction... maybe it all blows over; maybe it's settled out of court, with threat of Corporate Court action; maybe most of the Court was already annoyed at Corp A anyways and is itching for a pretext to fine them (with all kinds of ways to punish noncompliance); then again, maybe Corp A happened to extract the researcher from Corp C, and most of the court is unhappy with Corp C, and thus will side with Corp A out of spite regardless of the facts. An Omega Order is a big hassle and could result in major losses all around... then again, it could be darn profitable for whoever gets to buy up the assets of the target of the Omega Order, at fire-sale prices.

In otherwords: sometimes you think you're playing for low stakes and it turns out you're playing for high stakes; and third parties can complicate things. Also: Shadowrun is unpredictable and dangerous, except when it's boring and routine, except for the times when it's routine AND dangerous.

Putting the extracted researcher into an isolated, secret lab seems like a good idea.
See also Project Paperclip en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_paperclip

A classic extraction scene from fiction happens in "Burning Chrome" by Gibson; see also New Rose Hotel www.lib.ru/GIBSON/hotel.txt
Rotbart van Dainig
QUOTE (hyzmarca)
A scientist worth kidnapping will have an employment contract. That contract with be registered with the CC.

That's a premise not actually covered by material.

Why should corporations want to report who's on their payroll?
FrankTrollman
Remember that while each of the corporations actually functions as a command economy and a nation in and of themselves, publically each claims to be an individual actor in a truly free market. Which means that on the public side they have to claim to support free labor in addition to free trade.

Thus, coercive contracts and the virtual enslavement of scientists and wage earning button pressers is actually illegal. They "don't do it" and "wouldn't if they could because of their faith in the invisible even of the free market which rewards competition." So when Aztechnology loses a high value researcher to Ares, they can't go to the corporate court about it. Their "possession" of the scientist was a violation of CC law in the first place.

-Frank
kzt
Which means if you kidnap someone who is working for someone openly and freely they CAN come down on you like the proverbial ton of bricks. And hence they will.
Earlydawn
Eurotroll has it on the head; it's the price of playing the game. I extract your man, you extract mine. We don't bring it up, and if we ever do have to address it, we either cover it up, call it voluntary, or claim we don't even have him.
hyzmarca
QUOTE (FrankTrollman)
Remember that while each of the corporations actually functions as a command economy and a nation in and of themselves, publically each claims to be an individual actor in a truly free market. Which means that on the public side they have to claim to support free labor in addition to free trade.

Thus, coercive contracts and the virtual enslavement of scientists and wage earning button pressers is actually illegal. They "don't do it" and "wouldn't if they could because of their faith in the invisible even of the free market which rewards competition." So when Aztechnology loses a high value researcher to Ares, they can't go to the corporate court about it. Their "possession" of the scientist was a violation of CC law in the first place.

-Frank

Indentured servitude is a free market principle. A person can sell the rights to his future labor to anyone he wants. But, he can't sell the rights to the same future labor to two different entities, that's fraud.
DireRadiant
It's a MAD world isn't it?

Old news. It's not as if we have a couple thousand years of historical examples of low level conflict resolution instead of big bad horrible Final Solution|War to End all Wars|The Big One|Omega Order.
Kyoto Kid
..so let's throw out this case.

The person extracted is a minor (17) living in a "corporate village" of a midsized Tech Corp who's parents have mysteriously disappeared. Until they can be found, the Corporation becomes her legal guardian.

Now the kid is a designer baby genius who has received further gene treatments as well as some bio Augmentation over the years and is being carefully "groomed" by the Corporation for whatever purpose they may have. In addition (at the age of 15) she also received a prototype commlink implant. Given this, technically she could be considered a ward (property) of said Corporation. She has been assured by her corporate appointed caretaker that her the Corporation is doing everything they can to locate her parents

The girl of course doesn't buy that in the least.

Instead, she wants out because she believes she knows what is going on and maybe why her parents disappeared, but as of yet is not of legal age to take any legal recourse of he own. So, she gets on the matrix and finds a party interested in trading some important data she has (Namely the commlink's design that she backwards engineered though the diagnostic routines) in exchange for her extraction, a way out of town (Boston) and a new identity. The buyer goes for it, the deal goes down, and the gene-engineered kid genius ends up in the Seattle shadows.

While in hiding:

...she turns 18.

...the buyer releases the commlink design on the market several months later with just enough tweaks to skirt infringement laws.

...the Tech Corp which she was extracted from took a hit with the release of the commlink by its competitor and is forced to partner with one of the Megas

Does the Original Corp. or it's Parent Mega still have legal rights to get her back or are they SOL?
Tarantula
SOL shes 18.
Kyoto Kid
...even though the original corp invested quite a bit in her development not just through specialised education and the implants she received, but in more so because of, her genetic "design"?

This is where the whole GeneTech issue muddies things up for her genetic structure could possibly be considered legal property (especially if patented) of the corporation even though she is a sentient being.
Tarantula
Do your parents "own" you because they created your genetic makeup entirely and invested a ton into you?
CircuitBoyBlue
Also, what exactly defines one as "human"? Does the genetic engineering alter her enough that she no longer counts as a person? If not, then where does one draw the line where legal status changes? If a ghoul is not a human, shouldn't anyone that's had their genetic material modified stop being a person? But more to the point, I imagine that these questions are going to get answered a number of different ways in different places. UCAS law is going to be different from Ares corporate law, which will be different from Aztechnologies law, and there's a good chance that none of these laws are going to be worded very specifically, because it's likely to be an issue that's still being sorted out in 2070.
Glyph
I would say that it's a moot point.

They probably could legally claim her, on some technicality or other, since their control of the legal system is far greater - they could say she was kidnapped and not currently in her right mind, say that they have the right to remove the augmentations that they gave her, claim that she committed this or that crime and needs to be extradited to face corporate justice, and so on (and once back in their clutches, a bit of brainwashing can change her mind quickly).

They are just as likely to simply kidnap her off the street, though. She will never be able to live a normal life out in the open. Her only two options are to remain in hiding or exile for the rest of her life, or to find a different corporate "master" which can protect her from the original corporation.
Kyoto Kid
QUOTE (Tarantula @ Nov 12 2007, 04:29 PM)
Do your parents "own" you because they created your genetic makeup entirely and invested a ton into you?

...the difference is they had no means to custom tailor or manipulate genetic code to fit their exact needs. In the case of the girl, the Corporation did.

QUOTE (Glyph)
She will never be able to live a normal life out in the open. Her only two options are to remain in hiding or exile for the rest of her life, or to find a different corporate "master" which can protect her from the original corporation.

...or get some biosculpting done, a total change of identity (fake of course), and take her chances in the shadows as that is not living a "normal life".
Paradigm
I think that no matter the genetic modifications, a person is still considered a person in 6th world law. The main theme seems to be if something is sentient or not. No matter how much someone's been gene-engineered, they're still metahuman and thus have the basic metahuman rights, or at least on paper.

Plus, any legal action to make her a 'property' would be bad for various reasons. firstly, the PR. Secondly, the fact that they'd have to prove how exactly she isn't (meta)-human. Putting all that lovely research data straight in the public domain for the competition to snap up and use.

Genetic and/or personal modification in itself is definately not a reason to take away someone's rights as a person, seeing how bioware and genetech are commercial products.
Simon May
QUOTE (Glyph)
Her only two options are to remain in hiding or exile for the rest of her life, or to find a different corporate "master" which can protect her from the original corporation.

I thought the latter was implied.

She essentially traded her comm link knowledge for another job with a different corp in a different city and a little more freedom under the thumb of her new masters. Being in hiding doesn't mean she's not, for all intensive purposes, their employee. In fact, they be tossing her extra cash to do jobs for them while under the radar.
Jaid
QUOTE (Simon May)
QUOTE (Glyph @ Nov 12 2007, 04:42 PM)
Her only two options are to remain in hiding or exile for the rest of her life, or to find a different corporate "master" which can protect her from the original corporation.

I thought the latter was implied.

She essentially traded her comm link knowledge for another job with a different corp in a different city and a little more freedom under the thumb of her new masters. Being in hiding doesn't mean she's not, for all intensive purposes, their employee. In fact, they be tossing her extra cash to do jobs for them while under the radar.

obviously this is the first time you've heard violet's (# somethingorother) backstory then =P

she paid for an extraction with reverse-engineered plans for the commlink in her head (if she was smart, she probably "forgot" to mention it was in her head in the first place, and probably also "forgot" to mention that she's a genetically modified highly-trained researcher of any sort) and then slipped into the shadows wink.gif
Fortune
QUOTE (Jaid @ Nov 13 2007, 08:52 AM)
... violet's (# somethingorother) ...

grinbig.gif
Simon May
I'd only allow that in 3 scenarios: 1) the corp that got her out is a bunch of idiots; 2) the corp that got her out no longer functioned by the time she "slipped" into the shadows; 3) the corp that got her out wanted her in the shadows and are somehow controlling her without her knowledge. Either way, simply slipping into the shadows is far too easy and hurts my suspension of disbelief.
Kyoto Kid
...Jaid wins the not so fabulous no-prize. grinbig.gif

@Simon May, you are close on one of your points, can't say how much as I do not even know since that is in the GM's domain.

@Paradigm. Excellent points. Basically wanted to get some interpretations on how far Gentech and the law could go, especially when it comes to individual corporate/megacorporate law. My thinking was since there are patents/copyrights supposedly held on Chimeras, and Gene Art, why not on "Genebrats"?
Buster
I think of the Corporate Court to be in a state of perpetual Cold War. Just think of all the scientists and military officers that defected back and forth between Nazi Germany/Italy and the Allied nations before WWI and WWII and between the Soviet Union and the Western countries during the Cold War. If inventors of nuclear technology could defect without starting an all out war, then I doubt the defections of inventors of a new mouthwash would cause that kind of extreme response either. They would try to get him back sure, probably even assassinate him and his family if they couldn't but they wouldn't start an all out war over it.
Kyoto Kid
...I have to agree. An all out corp war would be bad for business, especially in the case of an extraction. Now this is not to say, as Buster mentioned, some kind action of might not be taken, but it would only be done if it were cost effective and could be kept fairly quiet.

As Paradigm alluded to, the last thing any corp wants is bad press. Bad press affects public opinion. Bad public opinion in turn affects sales. Sales affects the sacred bottom line and the sacred bottom line affects the almighty shareholders
Serial_Peacemaker
Actually in Hong Kong extractions are part of the etiquette. For example if you want person Y from Corp X, you can't have him since it would be a loss of face. However if someone tries to extract them, and fails because of your actions. You might be able to get him from the company as a way to save face, and a 'thank you' for stopping the extraction. Even if everyone involved knows the real score.
Falconer
I think the OP misses something very big up front. Something like this only involves 2 corps. The only omega order ever involved one corp/nation conglomerate giving every single one of them the finger at once.

This strikes me very much as business as normal. And internal politics are such that a corp w/ shares in one corp might not mind if corp Z has Corp Y's gizmo and is selling it for a profit. Based on the fiction it seems that a little bit of corporate incest in ownership is present. Certain corps forming loose coalitions where their interests align and oppose as well.

Also, it may be far easier to kidnap someone close to the target to blackmail him into switching than to kidnap the target himself. Also w/ the availability of fake SINs (especially with a corp footing the bill), a rating 6 new SIN shouldn't be that hard to come up with to get around a non-compete claus in a contract.
DTFarstar
Seeing as corps can issue their own SINs it wouldn't even have to be fake. Take a formerly Ares SIN-less person, give him a brand new legit Ares SIN. Nothing fake about it, they can do it for anyone they deem worth the money.

Chris
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Dumpshock Forums © 2001-2012