IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

19 Pages V  « < 14 15 16 17 18 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Do Trolls belong in SR?, Offshoot from the troll heavy weapons
Fortune
post Nov 26 2007, 10:57 PM
Post #376


Immoral Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 15,247
Joined: 29-March 02
From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat
Member No.: 2,486



Found the book ...

QUOTE (Shadows of Asia pg 94)
In 2034, Alliance forces crossed the Dardanelles to take on a weakened Europe. This was the Great Jihad, or the Second Ottoman Jihad, as Europeans call it. Five hundred million Muslims mobilized for war; the Alliance was a jumble of Arabs, Turks and Persians, all glued together by Jazrir’s charisma. Alliance leaders knew Israel’s destruction was essential for the Jihad’s success, but none wanted to wait before attacking their pet enemies in North Africa, India and Central Asia. Israel resisted the onslaught, thanks to judicious use of tactical nukes, intelligence operations and some unexpected support from the Palestinians. Israeli forces soon threatened Alliance supply lines running through Egypt and Syria. Instead of uniting to face the threat, Alliance leaders blamed each other for this disaster. Then Jazrir was assassinated and the Alliance broke down. The rest, as they say, is history.


This is followed by a comment in the shadowtalk ...

QUOTE (Shadows of Asia pg. 94)
> Five million Muslim soldiers strike at the heart of Lofwyr’s power. Does that look like a miscalculation?
> Riyalpolitik


Make of all that what you will, but the first answer that strikes me as being adequate is to assume that the word 'hundred' was a misprint and go with the more probable number, just as Riyalpolitik seems to do.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Nov 26 2007, 11:18 PM
Post #377


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,013
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



I think blame still falls on someone, but "someone" just changed to the editor. Thanks for the quotes.

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ThreeGee
post Nov 26 2007, 11:39 PM
Post #378


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 212
Joined: 30-November 04
Member No.: 6,858



And, of course, no discontinuity in fluff would ever be deliberate would it? Go back to the SR3 boards Kage.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Falconer
post Nov 27 2007, 01:52 AM
Post #379


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Validating
Posts: 2,283
Joined: 12-October 07
Member No.: 13,662



QUOTE (Kagetenshi @ Nov 25 2007, 02:09 AM)
QUOTE (Falconer @ Nov 24 2007, 08:44 PM)
But in society, it's possible for humans to have 12, 13, even 20 children from a single mother.  They don't because economically it's not viable.  I'd think economic pressures would impact similarly on orks/humans/whatever... those who can afford kids will be the ones who can raise them.

You may want to double-check what sort of income range, statistically speaking, people who pop out a dozen or more kids tend to be in. Compare it to, say, who is most likely to have a single child. Not that some of your points aren't correct; most important to understanding, I think, will be reexamining your idea of what makes large families economically viable.

~J

Firstly... re: female troll, male victim... I have flashbacks of Futurama and the 'schnoo schnoo amazons episode coming to mind.

But anyhow, I disagree with this. If you look at the people having that many children it's because they see the children as a net economic asset or religious reasons. It's only once you start getting into high cost of living and such that children start to be seen as luxury items or status symbols.

The largest families are typically farm families where each child is a free farmhand. Plus in those environs social security isn't a given so having children to help provide when you're older is a big help. Same goes for disease and such, only having 2 can be risky because disease could wipe out your retirement quite easily and they might not be able to help support you. But very quickly, you can see that whole economic side of things coming back into play.

Otherwise the other big determinant of large families is religion. And even then a lot of those who have many are 'poor' because they choose to have a lot of kids. Not because they're poor per se.

Now in shadowrun, poor farmers have been utterly wiped out is my understanding. The large mechanized farming conglomerates are just that big and that efficient. So it quickly comes back to... can you feed all those mouths. Economics starts looming large as are children still net assets or decreasing returns. Now once again, we hit another limitation, unlike todays society, we don't buy votes by handing out cash to poor mothers to have kids out of wedlock. There's a much more darwinian aspect to it... if you can't provide you/they starve and no one looks the other way.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jaid
post Nov 27 2007, 02:03 AM
Post #380


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,089
Joined: 4-October 05
Member No.: 7,813



true, but more kids means you've got more people who can bash that other family over the head with a tire iron and steal their food, more people who can take turns watching the entrance(s) to the building you're squatting in to make sure ghouls don't kill you, more people to rummage through garbage to find food, and (this is a dystopia) more children you can basically sell into slavery (either working in a corp factory or in a bunraku parlor etc).

keep in mind, the lack of social security also comes hand-in-hand with a lack of controls on child labor laws and such things.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Grinder
post Nov 27 2007, 05:06 AM
Post #381


Great, I'm a Dragon...
*********

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 6,699
Joined: 8-October 03
From: North Germany
Member No.: 5,698



QUOTE (Fortune)
Found the book ...

QUOTE (Shadows of Asia pg 94)
In 2034, Alliance forces crossed the Dardanelles to take on a weakened Europe. This was the Great Jihad, or the Second Ottoman Jihad, as Europeans call it. Five hundred million Muslims mobilized for war; the Alliance was a jumble of Arabs, Turks and Persians, all glued together by Jazrir’s charisma. Alliance leaders knew Israel’s destruction was essential for the Jihad’s success, but none wanted to wait before attacking their pet enemies in North Africa, India and Central Asia. Israel resisted the onslaught, thanks to judicious use of tactical nukes, intelligence operations and some unexpected support from the Palestinians. Israeli forces soon threatened Alliance supply lines running through Egypt and Syria. Instead of uniting to face the threat, Alliance leaders blamed each other for this disaster. Then Jazrir was assassinated and the Alliance broke down. The rest, as they say, is history.


This is followed by a comment in the shadowtalk ...

QUOTE (Shadows of Asia pg. 94)
> Five million Muslim soldiers strike at the heart of Lofwyr’s power. Does that look like a miscalculation?
> Riyalpolitik


Make of all that what you will, but the first answer that strikes me as being adequate is to assume that the word 'hundred' was a misprint and go with the more probable number, just as Riyalpolitik seems to do.

Thanks for the quotes :)

Agreed, seems like the little word hundred is a misprint.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Critias
post Nov 27 2007, 05:57 AM
Post #382


Freelance Elf
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 7,324
Joined: 30-September 04
From: Texas
Member No.: 6,714



QUOTE (Stahlseele)
and i repeat: TROLLZ IZ NOT STOOPID!
Trolls are slower in thinking/learning and not quite as attentive, maybe. That's basically reflected by the ammount of knowledge skills and language skill-points one got in SR3 depending on the int Stat. But they are not plain stupid. .

You can repeat it as many times as you want, it doesn't change the fact that on average they are stupider than other metaraces, and have been for all four editions now. Intelligence is a quantifiable asset in Shadowrun, and Trolls just plain have a lower number there than everyone else. Period. Sorry.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kingmaker
post Nov 27 2007, 07:48 AM
Post #383


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 85
Joined: 16-June 07
Member No.: 11,924



Just going to toss this out here. Five hundred million Muslims mobilizing for war doesn't necessarily mean Five hundred million AK toting fanatics swarming across Europe. It could very well mean the mentioned five million invading Europe while the rest wrestle with the colossal task of supporting five million fighting men hundreds of miles away.
Just like saying all of America mobilized for war after Pearl Harbor doesn't mean every American was grabbing a rifle and marching off to fight the Japanese.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mercer
post Nov 27 2007, 09:18 AM
Post #384


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,326
Joined: 15-April 02
Member No.: 2,600



QUOTE (Falconer)
If you look at the people having that many children it's because they see the children as a net economic asset or religious reasons. 

Or, they aren't thinking about it at all. Birth control is inconvenient or frowned upon, sex feels good, and there is a biological imperative at work. Almost half the pregnancies in the US are unplanned. (Which is of itself something of a modern idea, planning for pregnancy, as opposed to just assuming that people will marry and produce children as soon as possible.)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Riley37
post Nov 28 2007, 02:42 AM
Post #385


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 573
Joined: 17-September 07
Member No.: 13,319



QUOTE (CircuitBoyBlue)
Unless you're talking about one of the Hardy Boys, or the left-wing author, I have no idea who Frank Hardy is.

Then clearly you're proving my point, because Francis Eamon deValera Hardy is smart enough to look things up, unlike most puny-brained humans. For those of us with high mental stats and computer access, "I don't know" is usually the beginning of "I don't know yet... hold on... okay, now I do."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CircuitBoyBlue
post Nov 28 2007, 06:37 AM
Post #386


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 830
Joined: 3-April 04
From: Columbus, Ohio
Member No.: 6,215



QUOTE (Riley37)
QUOTE (CircuitBoyBlue @ Nov 26 2007, 05:06 PM)
Unless you're talking about one of the Hardy Boys, or the left-wing author, I have no idea who Frank Hardy is.

Then clearly you're proving my point, because Francis Eamon deValera Hardy is smart enough to look things up, unlike most puny-brained humans. For those of us with high mental stats and computer access, "I don't know" is usually the beginning of "I don't know yet... hold on... okay, now I do."

Well maybe I'm just blinded by awe of your incredibly high mental stats, but my puny human brain has looked this up twice now, and still fails to see what point you were trying to make by saying someone named Frank Hardy hates me.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Critias
post Nov 28 2007, 07:22 AM
Post #387


Freelance Elf
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 7,324
Joined: 30-September 04
From: Texas
Member No.: 6,714



QUOTE (CircuitBoyBlue)
QUOTE (Riley37 @ Nov 27 2007, 09:42 PM)
QUOTE (CircuitBoyBlue @ Nov 26 2007, 05:06 PM)
Unless you're talking about one of the Hardy Boys, or the left-wing author, I have no idea who Frank Hardy is.

Then clearly you're proving my point, because Francis Eamon deValera Hardy is smart enough to look things up, unlike most puny-brained humans. For those of us with high mental stats and computer access, "I don't know" is usually the beginning of "I don't know yet... hold on... okay, now I do."

Well maybe I'm just blinded by awe of your incredibly high mental stats, but my puny human brain has looked this up twice now, and still fails to see what point you were trying to make by saying someone named Frank Hardy hates me.

Just do what I do when someone says they hate me, and not care.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fuchs
post Nov 28 2007, 08:56 PM
Post #388


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,328
Joined: 28-November 05
From: Zuerich
Member No.: 8,014



A bit late, but to show the size difference: Here's a link to a picture of a 2.7 meter tall troll and a 1.8 meter tall ork.

(The Tusks should be bigger, and the skin rougher - it shows the size nicely though.)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
bibliophile20
post Nov 28 2007, 09:13 PM
Post #389


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,180
Joined: 22-January 07
From: Rochester, NY
Member No.: 10,737



QUOTE (Fuchs)
A bit late, but to show the size difference: Here's a link to a picture of a 2.7 meter tall troll and a 1.8 meter tall ork.

(The Tusks should be bigger, and the skin rougher - it shows the size nicely though.)

*blinks* :eek:

Okay... that helps alot for visualization (Speaking as someone that's 1.8 meters tall)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stahlseele
post Nov 28 2007, 09:51 PM
Post #390


The ShadowComedian
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,538
Joined: 3-October 07
From: Hamburg, AGS
Member No.: 13,525



that orc does not look 1.8m tall . .
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fuchs
post Nov 28 2007, 10:06 PM
Post #391


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,328
Joined: 28-November 05
From: Zuerich
Member No.: 8,014



The base model for both is the same, M3. I took that to be 150 cm (arbitrally), and enlarged the ork to 120%, the troll to 180%. So, they are the right size in relation to each other - and to the enviroment.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Riley37
post Nov 28 2007, 11:37 PM
Post #392


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 573
Joined: 17-September 07
Member No.: 13,319



QUOTE (Critias)
Just do what I do when someone says they hate me, and not care.

Works for me, in most situations.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fuchs
post Nov 29 2007, 01:55 AM
Post #393


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,328
Joined: 28-November 05
From: Zuerich
Member No.: 8,014



(Here's a Link to average-sized Troll, Ork, Human and Elf (250, 190, 175 und 190 cm).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
HappyDaze
post Nov 29 2007, 04:11 AM
Post #394


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,838
Joined: 1-September 05
Member No.: 7,669



Is there a way to adjust the builds without altering the height? The elf needs to have a lighter build while the ork and the troll both need heavier builds.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mercer
post Nov 29 2007, 04:12 AM
Post #395


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,326
Joined: 15-April 02
Member No.: 2,600



The size difference looks a great deal more dramatic in the first picture (1.8m vs 2.7m), I think because its greater than in the second (1.9 vs 2.5) and also because the ork in the first one is crouching a little. But its still a difference of roughly half again as big in the first one, and about a quarter again as big in the second. A few things:

1) Yeah, those might be the prettiest troll and ork combo out there, but that's okay. A guy moves to LA, he might get some skin treatments and have the tusks filed down a bit. Or maybe they're just naturally pretty. (If I and Adriana Lima are members of the same species-- and I'm assuming we are, although I still think she might be a space alien-- then those two might represent the high end of pretty for orks and trolls. The elf and the human are pretty hot themselves, but what, no dwarf? What are you, a racist?)

2) The first picture would make a great trid movie poster. Trog Justice or By Any Means Necessary. I leave that to the marketing department. (That looks a lot like a CP2020 pulse rifle that troll is holding, by-the-by.) One's a cop on the edge who plays by his own rules. The other is a 2.7 meter tall horned vigilante who collects antiques. They fight crime.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CircuitBoyBlue
post Nov 29 2007, 04:36 AM
Post #396


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 830
Joined: 3-April 04
From: Columbus, Ohio
Member No.: 6,215



QUOTE (Mercer)
Trog Justice or By Any Means Necessary. I leave that to the marketing department. (That looks a lot like a CP2020 pulse rifle that troll is holding, by-the-by.) One's a cop on the edge who plays by his own rules. The other is a 2.7 meter tall horned vigilante who collects antiques. They fight crime.

You forgot "Trognet"

Hahaha! I say that because I'm racist against magical species that don't exist and will never have hurt feelings!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Critias
post Nov 29 2007, 05:47 AM
Post #397


Freelance Elf
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 7,324
Joined: 30-September 04
From: Texas
Member No.: 6,714



QUOTE (Stahlseele)
that orc does not look 1.8m tall . .

Really?

Maybe it's because he's standing right next to a Troll and they're fucking giant compared to every other metarace, which is what we've all been saying all along.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mercer
post Nov 29 2007, 07:20 AM
Post #398


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,326
Joined: 15-April 02
Member No.: 2,600



Well, like I said he is crouching a bit, making the troll look twice as tall rather than half again as tall. Of course, its not like trolls being fucking giants was ever really in contention. Its not like we've been playing for years with 5' tall trolls and someone looked it up in the book the other day and said, "Holy shit, these guys are like 8-10' tall. How is that possible?"
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fuchs
post Nov 29 2007, 07:37 AM
Post #399


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,328
Joined: 28-November 05
From: Zuerich
Member No.: 8,014



QUOTE (Mercer)
1) Yeah, those might be the prettiest troll and ork combo out there, but that's okay. A guy moves to LA, he might get some skin treatments and have the tusks filed down a bit. Or maybe they're just naturally pretty. (If I and Adriana Lima are members of the same species-- and I'm assuming we are, although I still think she might be a space alien-- then those two might represent the high end of pretty for orks and trolls. The elf and the human are pretty hot themselves, but what, no dwarf? What are you, a racist?)

2) The first picture would make a great trid movie poster. Trog Justice or By Any Means Necessary. I leave that to the marketing department. (That looks a lot like a CP2020 pulse rifle that troll is holding, by-the-by.) One's a cop on the edge who plays by his own rules. The other is a 2.7 meter tall horned vigilante who collects antiques. They fight crime.

Dwarf is next on the list. But that takes some time as well.

Good idea about the movie poster, I'll add some lines!

One can adjust the weight and builds without adjusting the height, so one can make the elf skinnier. I'll play around with it tonight.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Critias
post Nov 29 2007, 07:54 AM
Post #400


Freelance Elf
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 7,324
Joined: 30-September 04
From: Texas
Member No.: 6,714



QUOTE (Mercer)
Well, like I said he is crouching a bit, making the troll look twice as tall rather than half again as tall. Of course, its not like trolls being fucking giants was ever really in contention. Its not like we've been playing for years with 5' tall trolls and someone looked it up in the book the other day and said, "Holy shit, these guys are like 8-10' tall. How is that possible?"

No, you're right, everyone has always given lip service to the height, weight, and sheer general just badassed size of Trolls.

Sometimes something like the above links -- a visual reminder, a slap in the face that you cannot ignore -- is required to make some people really think about what they're saying when the words "these guys are 8-10 feet tall" come out of their fool mouths, though. It's one of the ongoing themes of the thread, you could almost say. The size of Trolls is a big fucking deal, and not just a few free attribute points (the same as you can get from any old piece of cyber or bioware) the way some people like to think.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

19 Pages V  « < 14 15 16 17 18 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 11th June 2026 - 01:47 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.