IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

7 Pages V  « < 5 6 7  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Shadowrun without Earthdawn as past, Quick Poll
If you do not use Earthdawn as Shadowrun's History/Background, but some generic or home brew fantasy world as the "4th World", is it still Shadowrun?
You cannot see the results of the poll until you have voted. Please login and cast your vote to see the results of this poll.
Total Votes: 117
Guests cannot vote 
Glyph
post Dec 13 2007, 07:11 AM
Post #151


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,116
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 1,449



How is "most serious people believe..." not an insult to anyone who doesn't "believe" what he thinks most "serious" people believe? And "a giant, invisible superhero who lives in outer space" was just an exceptionally offensive way of categorizing the beliefs of anyone who doesn't see God as a "metaphor". He was being an asshat, and I called him on it. End of story.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fortune
post Dec 13 2007, 07:29 AM
Post #152


Immoral Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 15,247
Joined: 29-March 02
From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat
Member No.: 2,486



Whatever you think. Not my problem. Have a nice day. :)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Whipstitch
post Dec 13 2007, 07:34 AM
Post #153


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,883
Joined: 16-December 06
Member No.: 10,386



Erm, yeah, I just don't see anything wrong with what Mercer said. If there's anything I learned in Catholic school (I basically fly between atheism and seriously considering becoming a priest on a yearly basis), it's that the whole "made in His image" thing aside, God is beyond mortal ken, and as such our understanding of Him IS quite quite literally a metaphor, whether He is real or not. The world isn't South Park and Jesus is not just some dude hanging out with the other deities getting into the occasional crazy misadventure, and as such it's just really for the good of the setting that Shadowrun doesn't touch such an idea with a ten foot pole. There's enough metaphysical implications going on as it is without the devs pissing everyone off and getting in waaay over their heads, after all.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mfb
post Dec 13 2007, 01:25 PM
Post #154


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



QUOTE (Glyph @ Dec 13 2007, 02:11 AM)
How is "most serious people believe..." not an insult to anyone who doesn't "believe" what he thinks most "serious" people believe?  And "a giant, invisible superhero who lives in outer space" was just an exceptionally offensive way of categorizing the beliefs of anyone who doesn't see God as a "metaphor".  He was being an asshat, and I called him on it.  End of story.

you are mistaken. Mercer wasn't talking about the beliefs of anyone who doesn't see God as a metaphor, he was talking about people who believe, specifically, that gods are gigantic humanoids that run around physically fighting each other. i know this because he was responding, specifically, to a post that categorized gods as gigantic humanoids who run around physically fighting each other. if you want to call someone an asshat for that, at least attribute the alleged asshattery to the person who actually said it first, instead of jumping on the guy who happened to be discussing said allegedly asshatish metaphor.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CircuitBoyBlue
post Dec 13 2007, 03:40 PM
Post #155


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 830
Joined: 3-April 04
From: Columbus, Ohio
Member No.: 6,215



I really think the bit about what "most serious people don't believe" was nothing more than an effort to pre-empt asshats like me flippantly saying something like "I believe God is a giant invisible humanoid stalking the stars looking for injustice to fight. Also, he's a robot. And a ninja." From the rest of his post, it sure looks like he was making every reasonable effort to avoid accidentally offending anyone. If you're offended, then he obviously did offend someone, but I think the mere fact that he was making the effort should at least be enough for him to avoid getting called an asshat. He was just trying to contribute to a conversation; he wasn't declaring a crusade against anyone.

*edited for typographical errors
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mercer
post Dec 13 2007, 04:35 PM
Post #156


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,326
Joined: 15-April 02
Member No.: 2,600



Hi everybody. (I'm glad the general consensus is I'm not a dick, although I suppose that could all change tomorrow.)

I was specifically addressing the point as to why, if belief influences reality in SR, the major religions that have billions of believers aren't represented more explicitly in SR Magic. It was a fair question, because the books repeatedly imply that belief does influence magic, and yet very little beyond a passing mention is made to organized religions. I could expound on that topic come more, but considering that post went unremarked for three days and even now the discussion isn't about what was said but the way I said it, its probably not worth the effort. (I will say that it seems in SR that a billion people believing something doesn't give one person powers, it matters more what that one person believes.)

Beyond that, I'm not really interested in getting into a debate on religion because 1) its not relevant to the topic at hand (how belief affects magical ability in SR), and 2) I'm never particularly interested in getting into a debate on religion. (Maybe I violated my own rule about the three things you never discuss in polite company, Politics, Religion and the Great Pumpkin.) I'm not particularly interested in being called an asshat either, but I can weather the occasional slings and arrows.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ravor
post Dec 13 2007, 11:58 PM
Post #157


Cybernetic Blood Mage
******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,472
Joined: 11-March 06
From: Northeastern Wyoming
Member No.: 8,361



Well I for one would enjoy additional expounding. :cyber:
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
swirler
post Dec 14 2007, 04:26 AM
Post #158


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 438
Joined: 21-September 07
From: Houston
Member No.: 13,369



i honestly never played Earthdawn so it doesnt have any bearing on me or my games really
I read one of the novels but thats about it
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cheops
post Dec 14 2007, 03:45 PM
Post #159


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,512
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 392



QUOTE (Mercer)
Hi everybody. (I'm glad the general consensus is I'm not a dick, although I suppose that could all change tomorrow.)

I was specifically addressing the point as to why, if belief influences reality in SR, the major religions that have billions of believers aren't represented more explicitly in SR Magic. It was a fair question, because the books repeatedly imply that belief does influence magic, and yet very little beyond a passing mention is made to organized religions. I could expound on that topic come more, but considering that post went unremarked for three days and even now the discussion isn't about what was said but the way I said it, its probably not worth the effort. (I will say that it seems in SR that a billion people believing something doesn't give one person powers, it matters more what that one person believes.)

Beyond that, I'm not really interested in getting into a debate on religion because 1) its not relevant to the topic at hand (how belief affects magical ability in SR), and 2) I'm never particularly interested in getting into a debate on religion. (Maybe I violated my own rule about the three things you never discuss in polite company, Politics, Religion and the Great Pumpkin.) I'm not particularly interested in being called an asshat either, but I can weather the occasional slings and arrows.

I seem to recall that we have actually already had a thread where this was discussed at length. I have no search-fu whatsoever and so unfortunately can't give you the thread.

The discussion wasn't about belief influencing magic but if I recall correctly centered around what sort of demographics we should be seeing for Magical Traditions and the peculiarities that the Awakening wrought on Religion (rise of the Norse and Egyptian pantheons for eg).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

7 Pages V  « < 5 6 7
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 3rd February 2026 - 02:04 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.