IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

5 Pages V   1 2 3 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Sexual "oddities" in SR... Redux, No links because we want this to continue
KCKitsune
post Mar 15 2008, 01:18 PM
Post #1


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,188
Joined: 9-February 08
From: Boiling Springs
Member No.: 15,665



OK Everyone, The Dunner shut down the last thread and for a good reason (we violated Dumpshock's TOS). I would like this thread to continue, but NO links to anything. If someone has a question, then it should be asked in a PM. Also Wikipedia is a "good" source of information (at least it will get you started) and you can find out lots of information about Things That Mortal Man Was Never To Know™. So come on people... let's continue this discussion.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DreadPirateKitte...
post Mar 15 2008, 01:22 PM
Post #2


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 177
Joined: 12-March 08
Member No.: 15,766



I think its time to make the cyberkitty. I'll get to work
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Chrysalis
post Mar 15 2008, 01:47 PM
Post #3


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,141
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Neverwhere
Member No.: 2,048



Am I allowed to post?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
the_dunner
post Mar 15 2008, 01:51 PM
Post #4


Shooting Target
****

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 1,784
Joined: 28-July 04
From: Cleveland, OH
Member No.: 6,522



This is a Moderator Posting.

This is not a thread warning. This is an attempt to avoid a thread warning. As moderators, we do NOT want to have to give out further warnings based on postings to this thread. In an attempt to prevent this thread from venturing into realms that are not acceptable, I'm re-posting the relevant points in the Terms of Service here. Please keep these in mind BEFORE hitting the submit post button.

QUOTE (Terms of Service)
1. Personal attacks, flaming, trolling, and baiting are prohibited. This includes any form of racism, sexism or religious intolerance.

QUOTE (Terms of Service)
3. No sexually explicit or offensive material. This includes links leading to materials of this nature. DSF is accessed by many people in many different settings, and we want the forum to remain accessible to everyone.

QUOTE (Terms of Service)
4. Discussion of politics, religion, and sex are prohibited, except as they directly pertain to Shadowrun or another game. Discussions on these subjects will be watched closely, and any inappropriate posts may result in warnings or suspensions.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
knasser
post Mar 15 2008, 02:29 PM
Post #5


Shadow Cartographer
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,737
Joined: 2-June 06
From: Secret Tunnels under the UK (South West)
Member No.: 8,636




It was me talking about monogamy, wasn't it? I freaked people out - my bad. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/frown.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hermit
post Mar 15 2008, 03:33 PM
Post #6


The King In Yellow
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,922
Joined: 26-February 05
From: JWD
Member No.: 7,121



Allrighty ...

Firstly, what constitutes sexually explicit materials? This can be stretched or limited almost as people see fit, so I'd like to have a moderatorial definition here so we know what can be done and what cannot. Would, for instance, Chrysalis', Trolls' and Hyzsomethings 'hidden' texts qualify as explicit, or discussing the cyber kitty, or discussing sex with spirits? In a thread dealing with sexual matters, not mentioning sex is a bit difficult .... so it's in everyone's interest to know just how far we're allowed to go.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Critias
post Mar 15 2008, 03:53 PM
Post #7


Freelance Elf
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 7,324
Joined: 30-September 04
From: Texas
Member No.: 6,714



If I were to hazard a guess -- and I'll go ahead, otherwise there's not much point in typing -- I'd say it was probably some of the spoiler-hidden text in the last thread. The rest of it was, by and large, fairly tame. But the snippets of short fiction were, no matter how well written they may or may not have been, likely "beyond the pale" by moderator's standards.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hobgoblin
post Mar 15 2008, 04:01 PM
Post #8


panda!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,331
Joined: 8-March 02
From: north of central europe
Member No.: 2,242



funny then that about a year or so ago someone wrote a short story that included hot elf sex, and posted it on here...

but that was before the mod overhaul i guess.

btw, there was some talk about a scene in a gits:sac episode. iirc, what was going on there was that the major was searching her remote memory for the time of the original laughing man incident. she had it stashed with a friend. the other girls there, no clue (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hyzmarca
post Mar 15 2008, 04:19 PM
Post #9


Midnight Toker
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,686
Joined: 4-July 04
From: Zombie Drop Bear Santa's Workshop
Member No.: 6,456



It strongly depends on the cycle of the moon and whatever drugs the moderators happen to be smoking at the time. Sometimes, things which don't contain any sexual content are considered sexually explicit (a particular Werewolf: The Apocalypse character description comes to mind). Sometimes detailed descriptions of sex act go unnoticed.
It seems to be a total crapshoot really. Of course, it doesn't help that the new board software seems to have somehow driven the moderators insane.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Redjack
post Mar 15 2008, 04:20 PM
Post #10


Man Behind the Curtain
**********

Group: Admin
Posts: 14,871
Joined: 2-July 89
From: End of the Yellow-Brick Road
Member No.: 3



QUOTE (hermit @ Mar 15 2008, 09:33 AM) *
Firstly, what constitutes sexually explicit materials? This can be stretched or limited almost as people see fit, so I'd like to have a moderatorial definition here so we know what can be done and what cannot. Would, for instance, Chrysalis', Trolls' and Hyzsomethings 'hidden' texts qualify as explicit, or discussing the cyber kitty, or discussing sex with spirits? In a thread dealing with sexual matters, not mentioning sex is a bit difficult .... so it's in everyone's interest to know just how far we're allowed to go.

Of course, as with everything, the definition is subjective. That said, many of those spoilered stories where explicit. In one (or more cases), they generated a moderator warning to the poster.

This is Dumpshock, not Penthouse Letters or cyber-sex diaries... or worse.
QUOTE (Terms of Service)
- Lastly, the Dumpshock Forums are for discussion of Shadowrun and gaming. The Dumpshock Forums do not have an "off-topic" area, and discussions unrelated to Shadowrun or gaming should be taken elsewhere.

Time and time again we emphasize that this board should be accessible to persons of the age of 14. You do not know the true age of anyone you have not met in RL who posts in that forum.

One litmus test of your post could be: Is it written such that you could stand before a judge in the United States and not feel (that because you were in a discussion with a 14 year old) that you may be going to prison for your post?
Another might be: Would you feel comfortable with the detail of the content having the same discussion with your mother?

That said, this is not an invitation to debate the laws in the US, nor the interpretation of those laws, nor how open minded your mother is.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hobgoblin
post Mar 15 2008, 04:29 PM
Post #11


panda!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,331
Joined: 8-March 02
From: north of central europe
Member No.: 2,242



ah, the joys if not being a US citizen (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Critias
post Mar 15 2008, 04:43 PM
Post #12


Freelance Elf
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 7,324
Joined: 30-September 04
From: Texas
Member No.: 6,714



QUOTE (Redjack @ Mar 15 2008, 12:20 PM) *
Would you feel comfortable with the detail of the content having the same discussion with your mother?

That said, this is not an invitation to debate the laws in the US, nor the interpretation of those laws, nor how open minded your mother is.

What about having the discussion with someone else's mother? 'Cause some folks are totally into that.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Zak
post Mar 15 2008, 04:47 PM
Post #13


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 323
Joined: 17-November 06
From: 1984
Member No.: 9,891



so, shouldn't dumpshock 'move' somewhere save instead? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nyahnyah.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Critias
post Mar 15 2008, 04:54 PM
Post #14


Freelance Elf
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 7,324
Joined: 30-September 04
From: Texas
Member No.: 6,714



QUOTE (Zak @ Mar 15 2008, 11:47 AM) *
so, shouldn't dumpshock 'move' somewhere save instead? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nyahnyah.gif)

I'm pretty sure the Terms of Service says something like "follow these rules," not "or don't follow these rules, and the Forum will change for you."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Zak
post Mar 15 2008, 05:07 PM
Post #15


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 323
Joined: 17-November 06
From: 1984
Member No.: 9,891



That's why it was a question including a (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nyahnyah.gif) , and not a threat, demand or attempted bribe.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
thedafan
post Mar 15 2008, 05:18 PM
Post #16


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 12
Joined: 26-October 07
From: Florida,CAS
Member No.: 13,905



Back to the subject at hand. Part of the problem of all this sexual perversion is money. So we assume that some corporate money maker would spend big buck to make his very own sex toy out of some poor unfortunate without a SIN. If I was a corporation with plans to rise to the top. One of things on my to-do list would be a psych evaluation of anybody hitting middle management. People willing to spend big bucks on delta grade sex toys would get flagged. The corporations are not going to let a self obsessive person in a position to create a bad PR moment.

Dr. Evil
"Scary ain't it"
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Critias
post Mar 15 2008, 05:24 PM
Post #17


Freelance Elf
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 7,324
Joined: 30-September 04
From: Texas
Member No.: 6,714



QUOTE (thedafan @ Mar 15 2008, 01:18 PM) *
Back to the subject at hand. Part of the problem of all this sexual perversion is money. So we assume that some corporate money maker would spend big buck to make his very own sex toy out of some poor unfortunate without a SIN. If I was a corporation with plans to rise to the top. One of things on my to-do list would be a psych evaluation of anybody hitting middle management. People willing to spend big bucks on delta grade sex toys would get flagged. The corporations are not going to let a self obsessive person in a position to create a bad PR moment.

Dr. Evil
"Scary ain't it"

Right. Which is why no one with any money, power, influence, or all three has any secret (or less-than-secret) perversions in real life, either! The last thing a game all about dystopian oppression needs is crazy guys and perverts running the show, right?!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hermit
post Mar 15 2008, 05:32 PM
Post #18


The King In Yellow
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,922
Joined: 26-February 05
From: JWD
Member No.: 7,121



QUOTE
One litmus test of your post could be: Is it written such that you could stand before a judge in the United States and not feel (that because you were in a discussion with a 14 year old) that you may be going to prison for your post?

Then just close this thread.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Particle_Beam
post Mar 15 2008, 05:41 PM
Post #19


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 472
Joined: 14-June 07
Member No.: 11,909



Or don't post anything that violates the terms of conduct. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nyahnyah.gif)

Much easier, I guess...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
KCKitsune
post Mar 15 2008, 05:43 PM
Post #20


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,188
Joined: 9-February 08
From: Boiling Springs
Member No.: 15,665



QUOTE (thedafan @ Mar 15 2008, 12:18 PM) *
Back to the subject at hand. Part of the problem of all this sexual perversion is money. So we assume that some corporate money maker would spend big buck to make his very own sex toy out of some poor unfortunate without a SIN. If I was a corporation with plans to rise to the top. One of things on my to-do list would be a psych evaluation of anybody hitting middle management. People willing to spend big bucks on delta grade sex toys would get flagged. The corporations are not going to let a self obsessive person in a position to create a bad PR moment.

Dr. Evil
"Scary ain't it"


Actually my cyberkitty was all standard grade 'ware and it was only a little more expensive than a good sports car (Eurowind 3K). My upgraded kitty was a tad more expensive and it doubled as a bodyguard. My SuperKitty ™ is even more expensive, but she'd be a right terror to face in combat.

QUOTE (DreadPirateKitten @ Mar 15 2008, 08:22 AM) *
I think its time to make the cyberkitty. I'll get to work


My kitty is already done. Do you use Daegaan's SR4 character generator? If so then I can email you the file of cyberkitty™, cyberkitty+™, and Super CyberKitty™ .
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hyzmarca
post Mar 15 2008, 05:52 PM
Post #21


Midnight Toker
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,686
Joined: 4-July 04
From: Zombie Drop Bear Santa's Workshop
Member No.: 6,456



QUOTE (hermit @ Mar 15 2008, 12:32 PM) *
Then just close this thread.


The following excerpts are from the second book I randomly pulled from an American public high school 9th grade summer reading list, deemed appropriate for 14 years olds.

[ Spoiler ]


Given that this has the American 9th grader seal of approval I suppose we can use it as a guideline.
Most prominent is the lack of the words penis and vagina, or even euphemisms for the same, though it certainly describes sexual penetration. The lack of clinical terms or equivalent euphemisms is interesting and it could, perhaps, be the necessary component to maintain supposed appropriateness.

Though this is a bit odd when juxtoposed with the clinical nature of ninth grade health and sexual education textbooks.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DreadPirateKitte...
post Mar 15 2008, 06:01 PM
Post #22


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 177
Joined: 12-March 08
Member No.: 15,766



QUOTE (thedafan @ Mar 15 2008, 01:18 PM) *
Back to the subject at hand. Part of the problem of all this sexual perversion is money. So we assume that some corporate money maker would spend big buck to make his very own sex toy out of some poor unfortunate without a SIN. If I was a corporation with plans to rise to the top. One of things on my to-do list would be a psych evaluation of anybody hitting middle management. People willing to spend big bucks on delta grade sex toys would get flagged. The corporations are not going to let a self obsessive person in a position to create a bad PR moment.

Dr. Evil
"Scary ain't it"


I think I said "Mr. Important Yakuza dude" but I can only imagine some corporate muckity muck blackmailing so and so before "firing" him.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kremlin KOA
post Mar 15 2008, 07:59 PM
Post #23


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,590
Joined: 11-September 04
Member No.: 6,650



Nathanross wrote in the other thread
QUOTE
That just seems kind of boring. I mean, if the spirit isn't also wanting for it, then it's just a glorified sex-doll. And why would spirits want to have sex? There is no need for them to reproduce to perpetuate their genes, they are immortal! They also lack a nervous system, so really what can give them pleasure?


Um spirits can canonically feel pain, and are not immune to the orgasm spell. thus can feel sexual pleasure. Why wouldn't they want that?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nathanross
post Mar 15 2008, 08:15 PM
Post #24


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 811
Joined: 30-January 07
From: Portland, OR
Member No.: 10,845



Okay, I'm really confused why the previous thread was closed. It was my understanding that while sex talk for the sake of sex talk was not okay, anything relative to the Sixth world is okay. Could The Dunner please state what thread was the offender? Otherwise we have no idea what is wrong.

Also, the whole 14 year old rule is just plain impossible. It also involves far too much subjective judgment. I personally think that if I had a 14 year old child (even a son), I would encourage him to read about tentacle sex with organs, but hey that is just me. It is also hard to recall exactly the level of sexual perversion I had been exposed to at that age or should have been exposed to.

I was very happy with the previous thread because I believed it was an acknowledgment to the maturity of DS readers and posters. I am also happy that SR4 has totally given up the kiddy gloves and even references Bunraku metahuman sex-dolls in the Core book. I do not think that material is really something a "pure" 14yo should handle, but that's the way it is.

Instead of saying no sexual references, we need a more solid line drawn as to what is appropriate and what is not. Do you draw the line at sixth world sexual narrative? Is there a certain limit to the perversion that can be presented in this narrative? You must define these things since in the end, where the limit is drawn is relative to the moderator's subjective judgment.

EDIT - No matter how much we separate the Sixth world from our own, everything we present is relative to our own. It is impossible to talk only about sexuality in the sixth world without making reference to sexuality (and sexual perversion) in our own. This should be acknowledged.

QUOTE (Kremlin KOA @ Mar 15 2008, 03:59 PM) *
Um spirits can canonically feel pain, and are not immune to the orgasm spell. thus can feel sexual pleasure. Why wouldn't they want that?

I know they can feel pain, and I must admit, I didn't realize they could experience orgasm (even through the spell) due to lack of a central nervous system or brain. I always assumed the "pleasure" a spirit feels is due to something different than humans feel. We feel sexual pleasure because our genetics want to provide incentive for us to reproduce. Since spirits cannot reproduce, why would they receive sexual pleasure from sex?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Muskie
post Mar 15 2008, 08:43 PM
Post #25


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 63
Joined: 2-April 06
Member No.: 8,426



My group actualy discussed a new type of Bunkraku system, recently..

Name your sexual fantasy. Catgirls? Little kids? Naja Daviar (with improved Brown-nipple Action)? Mini-Dunklezahn? No problem. We can create anything you desire. And it's all real. no Pfixes, no Cyberware. It is, however a magical construct, so please, Keep your new playthings away from any wards, and keep the pendant it wearts on it's neck at all times.


-after taking the sicko's nuyen and specifications, the mage goes to the back room-

Hey, Mike, grab another stray kitten, will ya?

---


Shapechange + Sustaning focus = NUYEN!


BTW, about Dragons:
Dunklezahn's always been open-minded enough to ignore the Dragon/Metahuman mating taboo, Just look at Ryan Mercury!

Not to mention the Dunkie/Damien Knight Slash fic I wrote once..

"It was only 60 seconds, but What a ride!"

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

5 Pages V   1 2 3 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 5th May 2024 - 01:06 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.