![]() ![]() |
Apr 6 2008, 08:35 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 588 Joined: 27-February 06 Member No.: 8,316 |
I get tired of people always saying this or that thing is broken/ too powerful. However, I was doing some playing around with troll martial artist, and it was pretty easy to get an Adept with a base unarmed DV of 15p. This without being minmaxed on stats. Using cyber and bioware, it was easy to get 14p.
To do it dump 30 bp's into martial arts taking different styles with the increase UA dv +1 option. This becomes especially dangerous when combined with sweep, set up, finishing blow, throw and kick. for a total cost of 40 bp. I think the martial arts section is really cool, but am worried the raw might be too easy to abuse. |
|
|
|
Apr 6 2008, 09:12 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 177 Joined: 12-March 08 Member No.: 15,766 |
I can shoot you about 8 times while you close the distance between us in a normal encounter. How many dice do you have to soak?
So, the short answer is: No. And the long answer is: No. |
|
|
|
Apr 6 2008, 09:14 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,883 Joined: 16-December 06 Member No.: 10,386 |
You can roll Reaction+Skill against melee attacks without taking Full Defense or even take Reaction+Skill+Skill if you are willing to burn an initiative pass on Full Defense. Meanwhile, ranged attacks limit you to Reaction+Skill at best and opponents can typically threaten two such attacks a round. There's things I dislike about the martial arts rules, but I don't think being overpowered is one of the real issues. It's tremendously effective at bullying unskilled opponents, but even characters whose self-defense skills can be best described as merely adequate often have a fighting chance when it comes to evading blows long enough to retaliate with gunfire.
|
|
|
|
Apr 6 2008, 09:15 PM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,664 Joined: 21-September 04 From: Arvada, CO Member No.: 6,686 |
Not to mention your punch master will still get whooped by a riposte specialist.
|
|
|
|
Apr 6 2008, 09:17 PM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 734 Joined: 30-August 05 Member No.: 7,646 |
Are the maneuvers positive qualities? I don't recall, but if so, they'll count against your 35 BP qualities.
Did you take Hardliner gloves? (makes Killing Hands mostly redundant and gives you a higher DV) make it a weapon focus for the skill bonus and maybe try to munch away a extra die with personalized grip (fit). So ... The question becomes what can someone else get with with those same 75 BPs (Troll adept martial artist)? How about a sniper rifle? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif) Edit: and what they said. I need to type faster. |
|
|
|
Apr 6 2008, 09:21 PM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,653 Joined: 22-January 08 Member No.: 15,430 |
for a total cost of 40 bp. *choke* *cough* 40 bp?! Being able to punch really hard for 40 BP is broken??? That is a huge chunk of points. And I should point out that the maximum points you can spend in positive qualities at chargen is 35, anyway. Regardless, as is said every time there is a thread about melee: guns are better. They have range, and the enemy can't even dodge effectively without Full Defense, and you can shoot between 2 and 20 bullets in one action phase. As long as there are guns, it's hard to get upset about any level of melee asskickery. Especially from a troll. Trolls are *supposed* to be totally insane up close. Once again: it's a feature, not a bug. If you don't like it, you can house rule it, but there really isn't any outright brokenness to speak of. |
|
|
|
Apr 6 2008, 09:28 PM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,883 Joined: 16-December 06 Member No.: 10,386 |
Yeah, a troll samurai trained in Boxing/Muay Thai along with things like bone lacing, and Wired Reflexes II should reduce you to a small bloody pile. You're basically getting punched out by Manbearpig at that point.
|
|
|
|
Apr 6 2008, 09:36 PM
Post
#8
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 734 Joined: 30-August 05 Member No.: 7,646 |
*choke* *cough* 40 bp?! Being able to punch really hard for 40 BP is broken??? That is a huge chunk of points. And I should point out that the maximum points you can spend in positive qualities at chargen is 35, anyway. That 40 pts, I believe is 30 for Martial Arts, 5 for adept quality and 5 for skill. Though it might be 5 for maneuvers (but that goes back to my question about maneuvers being positive qualities) or 5 BP for nuyen to buy the cyber. Thus it (probably) does not violate the 35 BP positive quality limit. In any case, the cost is actually more like 130+ BP because trolls aren't free and neither is a high str stat. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) |
|
|
|
Apr 6 2008, 09:37 PM
Post
#9
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 464 Joined: 3-March 06 From: CalFree Member No.: 8,329 |
I can shoot you about 8 times while you close the distance between us in a normal encounter. It's accepted (like, in court) that a guy with a knife standing about 21 feet (~7m-ish) will probably close that distance and stab you before you can get your gun out and shoot him. I think in SR this would have to be represented by the guy moving and stabbing you in the same IP, and given the sort of unrealistic way some actions are handled I am not sure this would be workable, but it should be. EDIT: Other than that, being really good at something you spent 40 BP on is, er, pretty reasonable. I mean, for 36 BP you could have 3 contacts each with 6 connection and 6 loyalty -- that's like your best friends from school, with whom you made a pact to share your fortunes, becoming a royal advisor, a famous poet/astronomer, and an Evil Overlord with a mountain hideout guarded by legions of drug-crazed assassins. For 40 BP you could also be, like, really strong. |
|
|
|
Apr 6 2008, 10:11 PM
Post
#10
|
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 58 Joined: 17-August 07 Member No.: 12,700 |
It should be pointed out that, by the RAW, you divide the movement rate per IP. Which would equate to the '21 foot rule' for SR. By my reckoning, that would be 35/4 or a 8.75 meters per IP. Thus, for trolls, it's the 8.75 meter rule (assuming that they won initiative). Outside 8.75 meters, the defender would get to attack first at least once (twice for semi-automatic or short burst shots).
Edit: Almost forgot. I should also point out that another advantage a ranged fighter possesses is that it is easier to gain surprise when attacking from range. |
|
|
|
Apr 6 2008, 10:28 PM
Post
#11
|
|
|
Immoral Elf ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 15,247 Joined: 29-March 02 From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat Member No.: 2,486 |
Contrary to most responses so far, I too have a problem with the unlimited stacking of DV bonuses across the various Martial arts. I don't mind that most of the other factors are stackable, but the DV bonus can get out of hand, with no real logical reasoning behind it. I am thinking about instigating a house rule that limits these specific DV bonuses to +3, as there are Martial Arts that grant up to +2, and there should be some benefit to cross-training. If that doesn't work, I'll just drop the limit to a straight +2 across the board.
|
|
|
|
Apr 6 2008, 10:32 PM
Post
#12
|
|
|
Neophyte Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,168 Joined: 15-April 05 From: Helsinki, Finland Member No.: 7,337 |
Honestly, they, IMO, make playing a fully melee character now viable and something to be reckoned with.
Ive always liked the melee types. (And wait, Sweep and Kick are Manuvers now? I just thought they were, you know, regular attacks. My buddy has the book so i can't reference it at the moment. I don't remember that part How is Kick as a manuver different than saying you kick the guy?) Anyway, they were never 'bad', IMO, in SR4. But yeah, they had some issues. You did have to build em pretty specific-cybered up with Bone Lacing, alot in Unarmed(or Blades or whatnot, they have weapon based arts too). You wanted a good Dodge(well, Gymnastics Dodge) to make sure they could close the distance; while the marksman needed Dodge(Specialized). Adept-wise, yeah, the critical strike and killing hands. And don't forget you kind of had to worry about stats. Body to soak the hits(you will get hit), Agility since, of course, all combat skills are linked, Strength to up the damage(ok, an adept with enough Critical Strike, even a 3 strength person can be nasty), Reaction, again to help your defense and initative. Now, if you're a Riposte machine, you CAN get away with less Initative Passes if you juice your Reaction and Initative, but be ready to borrow actions and keep in mind your lucky parry/blocking will probably run out, and you're stuck with no defense. To build a gunslinger expert, Body was nice, but enough for you to wear an Armor Jacket was fine. but you needed basically Agility, a maxed firearms skill, some sort of reflex increase, a dodge, and a smartlink(i mean, firearms people basically get 2 extra dice with a smartlink. There is no 'smart gloves.') Martial Arts skills help even the playing field, IMO. I mean, it really helps give them some tools; for instance, Finishing Blow is great for getting an extra attack, Riposte, Watchful Guard, and the like. Im toying with a character now for an upcoming game and it looks quite hopeful(the party has two marksmen as it is, and one is really good with blades as well so i won't be alone and undefended.) Ran a few mock-combats to test the waters, and yeah, against low-skilled people(he's a human adept with some muscle/speed augmenting and bits of other ware, not too much), he did turn people into sacks of meat. Against moderate people, they eventually became sacks of meat but it took some work. Against even people, it's about using tactics and your manuvers to your best advantage. But with the points i put into it, as someone mentioned, I would HOPE i'd be good at something. I do suggest a couple of flash-bangs and a flash-pak, too. It can help. But yeah, what they were saying. They aren't broken. They HELP the melee characters even the ground a bit; not surpass, but close in more. |
|
|
|
Apr 6 2008, 11:05 PM
Post
#13
|
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,991 Joined: 1-February 08 From: Off the rock! Back In America! WOOOOO! Member No.: 15,601 |
I concur with the growing consensus that blowing 30-40 bp on anything should more or less entitle you to be able to throw 10+ dice at a problem. Yes it gets into "Armor piercing jiujitsu" but I mean... you are an adept, that's kinda what you... you know do. If you can't kick down a strong door and punch through the occasional wall, that takes away from the whole "Being an adept is awesome" factor.
|
|
|
|
Apr 6 2008, 11:22 PM
Post
#14
|
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,653 Joined: 22-January 08 Member No.: 15,430 |
Contrary to most responses so far, I too have a problem with the unlimited stacking of DV bonuses across the various Martial arts. I don't mind that most of the other factors are stackable, but the DV bonus can get out of hand, with no real logical reasoning behind it. I am thinking about instigating a house rule that limits these specific DV bonuses to +3, as there are Martial Arts that grant up to +2, and there should be some benefit to cross-training. If that doesn't work, I'll just drop the limit to a straight +2 across the board. I agree that imposing a limit on the DV bonus is reasonable. I don't think it will ever come up in a game though; it would take such a ridiculous amount of karma to learn all those martial arts, I can't see anyone doing it. But it is silly to double your hand to hand damage just by knowing more martial arts. Two martial arts gives you more options than one, but it probably shouldn't give you double the brute power of one... It's like bows -- it's a bit silly, quite unrealistic, maybe not game breaking, but you might need to tweak it so it doesn't fail the laugh test. |
|
|
|
Apr 6 2008, 11:33 PM
Post
#15
|
|
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,883 Joined: 16-December 06 Member No.: 10,386 |
Ive always liked the melee types. (And wait, Sweep and Kick are Manuvers now? I just thought they were, you know, regular attacks. My buddy has the book so i can't reference it at the moment. I don't remember that part How is Kick as a manuver different than saying you kick the guy?) I agree that the naming conventions are a bit awkward, but just try not to think of it that way. Think of it as "Improved Kick" and "Improved Sweep" and it passes the sniff test a bit easier. You're just so good at those particular maneuvers that you always manage to gain a spacing advantage over your opponent when kicking and that you've learned how to knock your opponent down in such a way that they don't have a chance at breaking their fall and thus take damage. I apply the same logic with the "Throw" and "Disarm" maneuvers. You can already throw/disarm your opponent as the end result of a grapple or called shot check under the current rules, and so "Throw" and "Disarm" already really mean "Counter Throw" and "Disarming Counter" more than anything. It's not an elegant solution, by any means, and should really probably be unnecessary, but it makes things a li'l easier to stomach. |
|
|
|
Apr 6 2008, 11:40 PM
Post
#16
|
|
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 7,116 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 1,449 |
First of all, martial arts is a positive quality, while maneuvers are more like skills. The former count against the 35 BP limit, but the latter should not.
Martial arts bonuses stack, up to a dice pool bonus equal to your unarmed combat skill, but it only talks about dice, not DP bonuses. I would not let those stack, so the most you could get would be +2 DV (which is still awesome). |
|
|
|
Apr 6 2008, 11:41 PM
Post
#17
|
|
|
Neophyte Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,168 Joined: 15-April 05 From: Helsinki, Finland Member No.: 7,337 |
I agree that the naming conventions are a bit awkward, but just try not to think of it that way. Think of it as "Improved Kick" and "Improved Sweep" and it passes the sniff test a bit easier. You're just so good at those particular maneuvers that you always manage to gain a spacing advantage over your opponent when kicking and that you've learned how to knock your opponent down in such a way that they don't have a chance at breaking their fall and thus take damage. I apply the same logic with the "Throw" and "Disarm" maneuvers. You can already throw/disarm your opponent as the end result of a grapple or called shot check under the current rules, and so "Throw" and "Disarm" already really mean "Counter Throw" and "Disarming Counter" more than anything. It's not an elegant solution, by any means, and should really probably be unnecessary, but it makes things a li'l easier to stomach. Ahh, i think i follow you there. I mean, i figure i should try to learn all the little bits here. it seemed pretty cut and dry at first, but as i learn more...whew. Well, at least taking the 'Improved Kick' manuver would fit a Tae Kwan Do master, methinks. Looking at them as 'improvements' over stuff you can already do seems simple. Anyone can try to Disarm, Throw, or whatnot...take the manuvers and you do it better. |
|
|
|
Apr 7 2008, 12:48 AM
Post
#18
|
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,653 Joined: 22-January 08 Member No.: 15,430 |
First of all, martial arts is a positive quality, while maneuvers are more like skills. The former count against the 35 BP limit, but the latter should not. Martial arts bonuses stack, up to a dice pool bonus equal to your unarmed combat skill, but it only talks about dice, not DP bonuses. I would not let those stack, so the most you could get would be +2 DV (which is still awesome). I don't think anyone said maneuvers should count against the 35 BP limit, but I agree with you, they don't. Good call on the DV stacking though! I think it's a little rules-lawyer-ie, because the sentence just before talks in terms of "advantages" and does not specify dice pool modifiers... Still, since knowing two martial arts shouldn't really make your punches more powerful than knowing just one, I think your way is the better way to read it. |
|
|
|
Apr 7 2008, 01:00 AM
Post
#19
|
|
|
Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,664 Joined: 21-September 04 From: Arvada, CO Member No.: 6,686 |
Martial arts bonuses stack, up to a dice pool bonus equal to your unarmed combat skill, but it only talks about dice, not DP bonuses. I would not let those stack, so the most you could get would be +2 DV (which is still awesome). Arse, 156, "A character gains the advantages of all martial arts styles she knows; should they overlap, these dice modifiers stack. The maximum number of dice that can be added to or subtracted from a character’s dice pool from martial art modifiers is equal to the rating of the relevant Combat skill." I think that fairly clearly says that if the advantages from multiple styles are for the same bonus, they stack together, with a limit of your combat skill. Thus, the absolute most you could get from stacking up DV bonuses is +7. And thats assuming you took an aptitude unarmed, and raised it all the way up to 7. (Of course, you can't do that, since 7 martial arts is 35BP maxxing out your qualities for chargen, and aptitude would exceed that). As far as the BP cost on that, it'd be 10 for aptitude, 32 for unarmed 7, 25 for various martial arts, and then 20 karma for the remaining martial arts. Thats, 67BP and 20 karma to get a +7DV in his unarmed. I think thats quite worth the cost to balance it out. (Especially since someone can be an adept with magic 6 for 70bp, and have a +6 to unarmed dv, while still having 4.5power points open for other abilities, like killing hands, improved reflexes, distance strike, or penetrating strike). |
|
|
|
Apr 7 2008, 01:51 AM
Post
#20
|
|
|
Mr. Johnson ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 3,148 Joined: 27-February 06 From: UCAS Member No.: 8,314 |
I don't think anyone said maneuvers should count against the 35 BP limit, but I agree with you, they don't. I disagree. I think they should count against the 35-point limit at character generation. I believe Arsenal mentions that you can learn more during play with Karma. |
|
|
|
Apr 7 2008, 01:59 AM
Post
#21
|
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 58 Joined: 17-August 07 Member No.: 12,700 |
Arse, 156, "A character gains the advantages of all martial arts styles she knows; should they overlap, these dice modifiers stack. The maximum number of dice that can be added to or subtracted from a character’s dice pool from martial art modifiers is equal to the rating of the relevant Combat skill." I think that fairly clearly says that if the advantages from multiple styles are for the same bonus, they stack together, with a limit of your combat skill. It says dice modifiers. As per the bbb, dice modifiers add and subtract dice. DV modifiers are not dice modifiers since they neither add nor subtract dice. Ergo, DV modifiers would not stack. |
|
|
|
Apr 7 2008, 02:02 AM
Post
#22
|
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,653 Joined: 22-January 08 Member No.: 15,430 |
It says both. First it says advantages, then it says dice modifiers. I think you're right. But I also wouldn't throw things at someone for reading it the other way. I don't think a GM should be criticized for letting their players go nuts with more, better, stronger options. They generally just add to the party (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) Plus, NPC martial arts gurus can do it to, so it goes both ways.
|
|
|
|
Apr 7 2008, 02:32 AM
Post
#23
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 811 Joined: 30-January 07 From: Portland, OR Member No.: 10,845 |
Need I remind you fool: on our first run together your street sam Aeon easily took out the precious feet of my melee adept before I could even get close?
Melee is about flavor, not damage. There are a million better ways to do damage than through melee. So what if you can do the same DV as a missile with the same -AP? It does not have the same radius, and that is the issue. Either way, it is the most inefficient way to get massive damage. Just make a Troll bowman, then at least you can take out helicopters. Or just be a possession mage troll (talk about soak dice)! |
|
|
|
Apr 7 2008, 02:51 AM
Post
#24
|
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 58 Joined: 17-August 07 Member No.: 12,700 |
It says both. First it says advantages, then it says dice modifiers. I think you're right. But I also wouldn't throw things at someone for reading it the other way. I don't think a GM should be criticized for letting their players go nuts with more, better, stronger options. They generally just add to the party (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) Plus, NPC martial arts gurus can do it to, so it goes both ways. Well, I hope no one thought that I was throwing anything, because I wasn't. If they meant that all advantages stack, shouldn't they have said advantages? Perhaps we could ask for someone 'official' to clarify. Besides, I'm thinking of *protecting* players from NPC martial arts gurus. Anything you can abuse your GM can abuse better. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif) |
|
|
|
Apr 7 2008, 03:19 AM
Post
#25
|
|
|
Neophyte Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,188 Joined: 9-February 08 From: Boiling Springs Member No.: 15,665 |
I can shoot you about 8 times while you close the distance between us in a normal encounter. How many dice do you have to soak? So, the short answer is: No. And the long answer is: No. But if you blow 2.5 power points you can get Distance Blow and Killing Hands. This would allow me to blow the crap out of you without having to close the distance. Yes I lose the bone lacing bonus... but that can be made up by spending points on Critical Strike. |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 23rd April 2026 - 09:44 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.