Using Unwired in Shadowrun Missions NYC |
Using Unwired in Shadowrun Missions NYC |
Jul 13 2008, 09:45 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Shooting Target Group: Retired Admins Posts: 1,784 Joined: 28-July 04 From: Cleveland, OH Member No.: 6,522 |
What rules from Unwired are off-limits?
In keeping with the usual policy, optional rules are not used in Shadowrun Missions games. Unwired has one minor exception to this rule, in that the Dramatic Encryption rules (p. 66, Unwired) may be used by scenario writers. Can my character spoof her lifestyle? Yes, but in doing so she must devote at least one week to the task. The Extended Test must be done in the presence of a Missions GM. Also, you may not spoof months in advance, you may only improve a character's lifestyle for the current month. Can I be a Dissonant ... Stop right there. No. Dissonance is for NPCs. |
|
|
Jul 13 2008, 10:21 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,251 Joined: 11-September 04 From: GA Member No.: 6,651 |
Can an Agent with the Profession (Software) Autosoft spoof a lifestyle?
How about a Tutor Sprite? (They get the Software skill) |
|
|
Jul 13 2008, 11:06 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Shooting Target Group: Retired Admins Posts: 1,784 Joined: 28-July 04 From: Cleveland, OH Member No.: 6,522 |
Can an Agent with the Profession (Software) Autosoft spoof a lifestyle? That Autosoft is a drone autosoft, not an agent autosoft. I don't believe it's available to agents. QUOTE How about a Tutor Sprite? (They get the Software skill) Yes, though the above restrictions about when they can do so still apply. |
|
|
Jul 14 2008, 12:02 AM
Post
#4
|
|
Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,650 Joined: 21-July 07 Member No.: 12,328 |
Can I drone with a Profession (Software) Autosoft spoof a lifestyle? Drones can make matrix actions - e.g. electronic warfare - so they can 'obviously' act in the matrix.
Edit: I don't playmissions and am just being mulish, though I do feel the obvious third case bears examination. |
|
|
Jul 14 2008, 12:33 AM
Post
#5
|
|
Shooting Target Group: Retired Admins Posts: 1,784 Joined: 28-July 04 From: Cleveland, OH Member No.: 6,522 |
Can I drone with a Profession (Software) Autosoft spoof a lifestyle? Yes, though the above restrictions about when they can do so still apply. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nyahnyah.gif) |
|
|
Jul 14 2008, 10:25 AM
Post
#6
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,251 Joined: 11-September 04 From: GA Member No.: 6,651 |
May the rules for rushing an Extended Test be used to shorten the minimum duration to a half of a week?
(SOURCE: "Rushing the Job", BBB pg59) |
|
|
Jul 14 2008, 10:29 AM
Post
#7
|
|
Mr. Johnson Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 3,148 Joined: 27-February 06 From: UCAS Member No.: 8,314 |
If it was me, and Mr. Dunn hadn't said anything, I'd say no, it'd just give you more chances for hits in the week. For what that's worth.
|
|
|
Jul 14 2008, 11:06 AM
Post
#8
|
|
Shooting Target Group: Retired Admins Posts: 1,784 Joined: 28-July 04 From: Cleveland, OH Member No.: 6,522 |
May the rules for rushing an Extended Test be used to shorten the minimum duration to a half of a week? (SOURCE: "Rushing the Job", BBB pg59) Rushing the Job is a rule that's applied in specific situations when things are dire. IMO, upgrading your lifestyle doesn't fall into that category. So, no, you cannot decrease the time requirement. |
|
|
Jul 17 2008, 04:54 AM
Post
#9
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,251 Joined: 11-September 04 From: GA Member No.: 6,651 |
SOURCE: Unwired, pg136
I'm confused on what parts of pg136 are and are not optional, if at all. I'm specifically interested in the Program Options for Complex Forms (and program options for hackers are not, AFAIK, optional). How should I interpret what parts are optional? It says new complex forms in one spot then uses vague terms in another... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/frown.gif) |
|
|
Jul 17 2008, 11:07 AM
Post
#10
|
|
Shooting Target Group: Retired Admins Posts: 1,784 Joined: 28-July 04 From: Cleveland, OH Member No.: 6,522 |
<merged Wasabi's question into this thread>
Program options are not "optional." (Really, isn't that fun to say?) Though, it is noted as subject to GM discretion. The Advanced Complex Forms section on p.136 is is also "At the gamemaster's discretion." We'll be using the Advanced Complex Forms and the Program Options rules. |
|
|
Aug 8 2008, 10:49 AM
Post
#11
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,251 Joined: 11-September 04 From: GA Member No.: 6,651 |
The rules for Resonance Bond's (unlike Spirit Pacts from Street Magic) seem to be able to be forced upon a Sprite and unable to be ended at-will like most of the Spirit Pacts. (SM, pg26 and pg108).
For my NY character I'm shooting for a TM who uses Threading like a SR 2.0 Decker would use "Hacking on the Fly". That means I'll need a ton of Fading mitigation and a Resonance Bond (Unwired, pg37) chosen as an Allocation Bond (Unwired, pg 160) looks like it could help with that. Since the Resonance Bond rules are GM Discretion and not Optional does that mean they are ok for SRM use or do I need to inquire about their use? |
|
|
Aug 11 2008, 01:55 AM
Post
#12
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,251 Joined: 11-September 04 From: GA Member No.: 6,651 |
|
|
|
Aug 11 2008, 08:47 PM
Post
#13
|
|
The back-up plan Group: Retired Admins Posts: 8,423 Joined: 15-January 03 From: San Diego Member No.: 3,910 |
*We appreciate your call and will be with you shortly...*
At the moment, Dunner is buried under several projects, the largest of which should clear off his desk in the next couple of days. You can also try questioning Aaron. |
|
|
Aug 11 2008, 10:22 PM
Post
#14
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,251 Joined: 11-September 04 From: GA Member No.: 6,651 |
No worries, thanks BishopMcQ!
|
|
|
Aug 12 2008, 12:31 AM
Post
#15
|
|
Mr. Johnson Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 3,148 Joined: 27-February 06 From: UCAS Member No.: 8,314 |
|
|
|
Aug 12 2008, 12:48 AM
Post
#16
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 325 Joined: 24-February 06 From: Kansas Member No.: 8,304 |
he was asking about that stuff,with that thing, you know that happened that time, at the place, you where all over dude,
|
|
|
Aug 12 2008, 02:57 AM
Post
#17
|
|
Mr. Johnson Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 3,148 Joined: 27-February 06 From: UCAS Member No.: 8,314 |
Oh, you mean that place I put that thing that time?
|
|
|
Aug 12 2008, 03:31 AM
Post
#18
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 325 Joined: 24-February 06 From: Kansas Member No.: 8,304 |
Yup
|
|
|
Aug 12 2008, 05:58 AM
Post
#19
|
|
Grumpy Old Ork Decker Group: Admin Posts: 3,794 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Orwell, Ohio Member No.: 50 |
The one with the girl? The the one where he was doing the Cincinnati Sprinkler with that Troll?
|
|
|
Aug 12 2008, 01:40 PM
Post
#20
|
|
Technomancer Group: Retired Admins Posts: 4,638 Joined: 2-October 02 From: Champaign, IL Member No.: 3,374 |
No; the dude with the hair!
|
|
|
Aug 12 2008, 01:42 PM
Post
#21
|
|
Mr. Johnson Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 3,148 Joined: 27-February 06 From: UCAS Member No.: 8,314 |
QUOTE The one with the girl? The the one where he was doing the Cincinnati Sprinkler with that Troll? Naw, you're thinking of the WotC party. This is that other thing. |
|
|
Aug 12 2008, 04:33 PM
Post
#22
|
|
Technomancer Group: Retired Admins Posts: 4,638 Joined: 2-October 02 From: Champaign, IL Member No.: 3,374 |
Oh! That one. Got it.
|
|
|
Aug 13 2008, 06:36 PM
Post
#23
|
|
Shooting Target Group: Retired Admins Posts: 1,784 Joined: 28-July 04 From: Cleveland, OH Member No.: 6,522 |
As BishopMcQ indicated, I've been a bit busy lately with a couple of behind the scenes projects. Sorry for the late reaponse.
The rules for Resonance Bond's (unlike Spirit Pacts from Street Magic) seem to be able to be forced upon a Sprite and unable to be ended at-will like most of the Spirit Pacts. (SM, pg26 and pg108). I'm not sure where you're getting this aspect from. On p.160, under the resonance bond header, it's pretty clearly stated that the free sprite is the one that chooses to enter a resonance bond. QUOTE Since the Resonance Bond rules are GM Discretion and not Optional does that mean they are ok for SRM use or do I need to inquire about their use? I'd prefer that you not use a Resonance Bond (or, for that matter, a Spirit Pact) for a Missions character. |
|
|
Aug 13 2008, 11:09 PM
Post
#24
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,251 Joined: 11-September 04 From: GA Member No.: 6,651 |
NP, The_Dunner. Busy is understandable. As to the Resonance Bond I'll skip getting it as I build my NYC character.
As to the 'forced' part I meant in the sense it is a positive quality able to be chosen at chargen and not able to be broken by the free sprite. The initial creation of the bond would then be handwaved as part of chargen leaving an unbreakable resonance bond. Again, not pushing, just 'splainin my choice of wording. |
|
|
Aug 14 2008, 07:02 PM
Post
#25
|
|
Great Dragon Group: Members Posts: 7,089 Joined: 4-October 05 Member No.: 7,813 |
I'm not sure where you're getting this aspect from. On p.160, under the resonance bond header, it's pretty clearly stated that the free sprite is the one that chooses to enter a resonance bond. QUOTE ('Unwired pg 174-175) Enforce a Resonance Bond: A technomancer who possesses a free sprite’s source code and wishes to force that free sprite to enter into a resonance bond (see p. 160) may travel to the realm where the source code was found in order to compel the sprite to create the bond. though of course, if a GM doesn't want a resonance bond in the game, it's probably easiest to agree not to do this. it is, however, entirely possible. |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th November 2024 - 05:24 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.