IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

58 Pages V  « < 23 24 25 26 27 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> OOC: Phoenix Rising, Out of Character thread for the runners
crizh
post Sep 28 2008, 10:18 PM
Post #601


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,666
Joined: 29-February 08
From: Scotland
Member No.: 15,722



OK that will let DD perform an Intercept Traffic, although presumably she'll have to Decrypt it first, which ought to let her pick out the relevant Access ID's which is all she will need to start a hack.

If we are really lucky the local system is slaved to whatever is on the other end of this cable. If we're really unlucky she might try to hack the wrong system and bring the whole UCAS Military down on us...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
bmcoomes
post Sep 28 2008, 10:22 PM
Post #602


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 651
Joined: 15-September 06
From: Ephrata, Wa
Member No.: 9,382



Right, dame your lucky with those dice, a bad roll there you would have been fried.

Brent
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
crizh
post Sep 28 2008, 10:28 PM
Post #603


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,666
Joined: 29-February 08
From: Scotland
Member No.: 15,722



Frankly that is the most unlikely roll I've ever seen. I usually use an off-line roller and I wouldn't have had the balls to post that, I'd have just re-rolled it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shalimar
post Sep 28 2008, 10:42 PM
Post #604


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 661
Joined: 23-March 03
Member No.: 4,322



So what could we legitimately access through the tap?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
crizh
post Sep 28 2008, 10:46 PM
Post #605


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,666
Joined: 29-February 08
From: Scotland
Member No.: 15,722



Everything, nothing.

It depends on how good DD is...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shalimar
post Sep 28 2008, 10:51 PM
Post #606


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 661
Joined: 23-March 03
Member No.: 4,322



QUOTE (crizh @ Sep 28 2008, 06:46 PM) *
Everything, nothing.

It depends on how good DD is...


I'm hoping a critical success will help on it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Oenone
post Sep 28 2008, 11:12 PM
Post #607


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 765
Joined: 27-July 08
From: England
Member No.: 16,167



QUOTE (crizh @ Sep 28 2008, 11:46 PM) *
It depends on how good DD is...


And just what exactly is hooked up to the main fibre-optic cable. If we're lucky and they're linked to the research computers for sending out updates and backing up the data we can get right in to the information we need.

As there aren't any records of signals sent between this place and anywhere else it seems at the very least we can monitor all the communications traffic between this place and whichever base they're reporting to.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Zaranthan
post Sep 29 2008, 12:08 AM
Post #608


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 503
Joined: 3-May 08
Member No.: 15,949



Dancing Eyes shouldn't have a problem slowing down one of the spirits for you.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shalimar
post Sep 29 2008, 12:29 AM
Post #609


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 661
Joined: 23-March 03
Member No.: 4,322



Just so long as he doesn't take it out, its only force 4. It only has 10 boxes. If you hit it with a Force 5 and get 5 net hits it'll go pop. I suggest Force 4 so at most you drop it 8 boxes, 9 boxes would be good, but if you rolled great and got 5 net hits we'd be in trouble.

If we are going to do this, we need to do this before somebody sets off an alarm or something since its critical that the two of us surprise them. The +6 modifieer will help, but I don't think we could do it without the plus 6.

Hey, Brent. How would penalties for having stun damage interact with the penalties from Orgasm? If the spirit is already at -2 from stun, would I still need to hit him with a -4 penalty from orgasm, or would it only need to be a -2?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
bmcoomes
post Sep 29 2008, 12:46 AM
Post #610


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 651
Joined: 15-September 06
From: Ephrata, Wa
Member No.: 9,382



They would stack, I think.

Brent
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DWC
post Sep 29 2008, 01:01 AM
Post #611


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,973
Joined: 3-October 07
From: Fairfax, VA
Member No.: 13,526



QUOTE (bmcoomes @ Sep 28 2008, 04:40 PM) *
They been there about an hour so they have had an appitiser, some drinks, and have just started the meal.

Brent


As an aside, DD did get access to the restaurant's security cameras, so Truth is broadcasting live video of their meal to anyone on the network who wants it, along with the rotodrone subscribed to the network that's broadcasting aerial camera footage of the restaurant exterior.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shalimar
post Sep 29 2008, 01:03 AM
Post #612


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 661
Joined: 23-March 03
Member No.: 4,322



QUOTE (bmcoomes @ Sep 28 2008, 08:46 PM) *
They would stack, I think.

Brent


If thats the case, then a Force 5 Orgasm spell should do it, meaning I could get away with using my sustaining Foci (I'd have to drop invisibilty though). Only at -2 instead of -4, so not bad.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Little Johnson
post Sep 29 2008, 01:49 AM
Post #613


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 199
Joined: 18-August 08
Member No.: 16,250



QUOTE (bmcoomes @ Sep 28 2008, 04:16 PM) *
any of you guys/galls play on OpenRPG?



ive used it a few years ago. Im looking for a reason to try it again.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
bmcoomes
post Sep 29 2008, 01:50 AM
Post #614


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 651
Joined: 15-September 06
From: Ephrata, Wa
Member No.: 9,382



Well I'm looking at it, I think I'll try a game or two on it. I'd love to have some of you guys there.

Brent
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Little Johnson
post Sep 29 2008, 02:32 AM
Post #615


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 199
Joined: 18-August 08
Member No.: 16,250



Im in (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Zaranthan
post Sep 29 2008, 05:26 AM
Post #616


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 503
Joined: 3-May 08
Member No.: 15,949



I've used OpenRPG, and it's great and all, but I can't commit to being anywhere at any particular time. Sure, I'm usually on afternoons and weekends, but I can't count on it. If I could, I'd be in a tabletop game. My lack of posting isn't just lack of stuff to do. I'm simply not here.

QUOTE (Shalimar @ Sep 28 2008, 08:29 PM) *
Just so long as he doesn't take it out, its only force 4. It only has 10 boxes. If you hit it with a Force 5 and get 5 net hits it'll go pop. I suggest Force 4 so at most you drop it 8 boxes, 9 boxes would be good, but if you rolled great and got 5 net hits we'd be in trouble.


Sounds about right to me.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
bmcoomes
post Sep 29 2008, 02:55 PM
Post #617


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 651
Joined: 15-September 06
From: Ephrata, Wa
Member No.: 9,382



Fuchs: DD at turn 6 10d6 = 3 hits You crack the decryption, But I need a Computer + Browse (6) to locate the right information flow.

The system's perception test Firewall 6 + Analyze 6 = 12d6 = 6

Right now the system detects your tap.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fuchs
post Sep 29 2008, 03:14 PM
Post #618


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,328
Joined: 28-November 05
From: Zuerich
Member No.: 8,014



Well, if possible I spend one edge on the sniffer test:
rerolling failures on the sniffer test (5d6.hits(5) =1)
Still getting detected anyway.

Browse+Computer (if it's an extended test):
Browse + computer to check data flow (12d6.hits(5) =2)
Browse + computer to cehck data flow (12d6.hits(5) =3)
Browse + computer to cehck data flow (12d6.hits(5) =0)
Browse + computer to cehck data flow (12d6.hits(5) =2)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shalimar
post Sep 29 2008, 04:10 PM
Post #619


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 661
Joined: 23-March 03
Member No.: 4,322



Was any bonus given from the critical success of placing the tap?

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
crizh
post Sep 29 2008, 04:14 PM
Post #620


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,666
Joined: 29-February 08
From: Scotland
Member No.: 15,722



QUOTE (Shalimar @ Sep 29 2008, 05:10 PM) *
Was any bonus given from the critical success of placing the tap?



Hey, I got a critical success, I didn't even notice that.

Cool.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shalimar
post Sep 29 2008, 04:27 PM
Post #621


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 661
Joined: 23-March 03
Member No.: 4,322



How about the stealth 6 program (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nyahnyah.gif)

We are so hosed.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fuchs
post Sep 29 2008, 05:05 PM
Post #622


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,328
Joined: 28-November 05
From: Zuerich
Member No.: 8,014



Can't do much more than spend edge, sorry. Bad luck someone was monitoring the exact node we were tapping.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Oenone
post Sep 29 2008, 05:15 PM
Post #623


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 765
Joined: 27-July 08
From: England
Member No.: 16,167



Erk. This could get very very messy then....

Say, we have access to the place she's having her meals security system right? I wonder if triggering the fire alarm to pull her outside might be a good idea, because I suspect we're going to need to shoot her pretty quickly if the hacking has been detected.

@Brent - Is there anywhere nearby which has good line of sight to the front door (or the point people are gathered to during a fire alarm) and is within extreme submachinegun range?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
crizh
post Sep 29 2008, 05:18 PM
Post #624


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,666
Joined: 29-February 08
From: Scotland
Member No.: 15,722



Thing is I'm not sure that is how it works.

Intercept Traffic is for wired comms. Imagine you have three nodes, two that are communicating and a third that is merely the telecommunications hub between them.


A-------------HUB------------B


Like so. You can Intercept Traffic between A and B by running sniffer on HUB. You can only detect the Intercept by making a Matrix Perception test whilst accessing HUB.

What we've done is inserted my commlink thus.

A----------TAP-----------HUB-----------B

This allows DD, who I'm allowing access to traffic to run Sniffer in her own Comm-link on the traffic passing through our network which I've physically inserted into the data-stream.

The Spider can detect her Sniffer program but only if he has access to her comm-link. Which he doesn't unless he wants to hack his way through mine.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fuchs
post Sep 29 2008, 05:34 PM
Post #625


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,328
Joined: 28-November 05
From: Zuerich
Member No.: 8,014



The rules say the matrix perception must be done on the node the sniffer program runs in. If that's the commlink, and not the closest node it's tapping, well then we're fine.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

58 Pages V  « < 23 24 25 26 27 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 11th January 2025 - 01:47 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.