IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> hmm, how to use this in a game..., 100 mile border zone
hobgoblin
post Oct 24 2008, 09:57 AM
Post #1


panda!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,331
Joined: 8-March 02
From: north of central europe
Member No.: 2,242



http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20081...-free-zone.html

something tells me this could turn really dystopian, really fast if enforced...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shiloh
post Oct 24 2008, 12:40 PM
Post #2


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 421
Joined: 4-April 08
Member No.: 15,843



Holy crap. And that map just covers the surface borders. If they already consider airports to be exempt because of the *border* exemption, it's not a big leap from there to their powers being valid within 100 miles of any international airport. Though that wouldn't move the line much, I suppose, because most of the States' international gateways are already near the coast, as far as I can think... Dallas? Denver? Are they international? Are there other international airports outside the coastal strip?

It's like the powers of the UK's British Transport Police. They have authority within a mile of any railway or depot associated with the railway. So that's almost all of the built up area of the UK, then, and while their powers are the equal of a "real" copper, the entry requirements and training standards are (or at least were, it's been a while since I looked) significantly lower.

There are, I guess, all sorts of Authorities in the supposedly "free" West which can potentially have draconian powers.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nezumi
post Oct 24 2008, 01:11 PM
Post #3


Incertum est quo loco te mors expectet;
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,546
Joined: 24-October 03
From: DeeCee, U.S.
Member No.: 5,760



It won't be "really" enforced, just selectively enforced, which is both more realistic, and more dystopian.

Also note that the ACLU was only focusing on one amendment. It didn't apply things like instituted violations of freedom of speech or habeas corpus, nor (of course, this is the ACLU) 2nd amendment violations. I suspect most of that middle bit would be a good deal darker if it did.

On the flip side, some areas are far more "Constitution free" than others. DC and Chicago both don't seem especially eager to respect the bill of rights when it interferes with the political good (or "public safety").
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
darthmord
post Oct 27 2008, 04:51 PM
Post #4


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,245
Joined: 27-April 07
From: Running the streets of Southeast Virginia
Member No.: 11,548



Chicago's O'Hare airport is international if I'm not mistaken.

There are state branches of the ACLU that *WILL* stand up for 2nd Amendment rights.

On the note of civil liberties... why is it no one requires justification for exercising the 1st Amendment yet you face nothing but justification demands for exercising the 2nd Amendment? That right there is plenty to work from for a SR perspective. Selective right & privilege enforcement / encouragement / usage.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Connor
post Oct 27 2008, 05:38 PM
Post #5


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 511
Joined: 30-May 03
From: Tulsa, OK
Member No.: 4,652



A full list of international airports in the US: http://aerospace.web.mtsu.edu/usinternational.htm

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 22nd December 2024 - 01:22 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.