IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Arsenal Flechette Clarification, Incorrect APs?
XON2000
post Dec 30 2008, 06:05 PM
Post #1


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 70
Joined: 16-October 03
From: Westminster, CO
Member No.: 5,727



Hi, everyone,

I was just going over some errata, and I noticed that there are two weapons in Arsenal that don't conform to the new AP modifier for flechettes. The Aztechnology Series 5 Iron Bomb and the Mitsubishi-GM Outlaw, Block III (both on page 125) have APs of 0 and +3 respectively, while everything else with an "(f)" in the damage column now has an AP of +5.

I didn't see anything in the descriptions of these weapons to indicate that they used special rules. So what do you think: are these values that were missed in the errata, and should be changed to +5?

Thanks,

Shawn
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
psychophipps
post Dec 30 2008, 06:11 PM
Post #2


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,192
Joined: 6-May 07
From: Texas - The RGV
Member No.: 11,613



I seem to recall that fletchette ammo has been changed to +2 Damage and +5 AP for all weapon types and examples.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fix-it
post Dec 30 2008, 06:25 PM
Post #3


Creating a god with his own hands
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,405
Joined: 30-September 02
From: 0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1
Member No.: 3,364



I would use common sense that these items are not shotguns or needlers, but a guided missile and 500lb bomb. both these items can be expected to cut through most armor quite well.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
XON2000
post Dec 30 2008, 06:36 PM
Post #4


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 70
Joined: 16-October 03
From: Westminster, CO
Member No.: 5,727



QUOTE (Fix-it @ Dec 30 2008, 11:25 AM) *
I would use common sense that these items are not shotguns or needlers, but a guided missile and 500lb bomb. both these items can be expected to cut through most armor quite well.


Sure, I can buy that. But then why add the "(f)" notation to the damage code? This designation has a specific meaning, and specific modifiers (+2/+5), and these two weapons don't conform to those modifiers. So it seems like either the "(f)" should be removed, or the modifiers should be changed.

(I realize I'm picking nits. And of course I can make my own ruling in my own game. I'm just obsessive that way.)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
wind_in_the_ston...
post Dec 30 2008, 06:41 PM
Post #5


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 560
Joined: 4-March 06
From: Pueblo Corporate Council
Member No.: 8,332



QUOTE (Fix-it @ Dec 30 2008, 02:25 PM) *
I would use common sense that these items are not shotguns or needlers, but a guided missile and 500lb bomb. both these items can be expected to cut through most armor quite well.


Sure, the missile can, but what about its shrapnel? Note that frag grenades are +5.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
XON2000
post Dec 30 2008, 07:00 PM
Post #6


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 70
Joined: 16-October 03
From: Westminster, CO
Member No.: 5,727



Actually, I just realized that there is a way that the entries could be correct. First of all, the flechette designation in the damage column also means that the damage is resisted with Impact armor, rather than Ballistic. So even if the AP modifier is different, the "(f)" is still meaningful.

Also, the AP values could be correct, if the weapons themselves have a higher-than-average AP. So, the Iron Bomb might have a -5 AP, which is canceled out by the +5 of flechettes.

I'm just guessing here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Dr Funfrock
post Dec 30 2008, 09:20 PM
Post #7


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 353
Joined: 2-February 08
Member No.: 15,618



You are correct. The +5 does not replace the weapon's AP, it adds to it (although there is still some questionable statting, such as Shotguns, which by the normal rules for alternate ammo should have +4 (f) AP, not the +5 listed. I'd love to hear some word from the devs on why the inconsistency there).

And yes, the (f) notation exists to denote the fact that the weapon is resisted with Impact, not Ballistic armour.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 27th April 2024 - 02:10 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.