![]() ![]() |
Feb 4 2009, 01:56 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
panda! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 10,331 Joined: 8-March 02 From: north of central europe Member No.: 2,242 |
http://www.gizmag.com/metal-storm-3-shot-g...ertified/10908/
now thats firepower (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif) |
|
|
|
Feb 4 2009, 02:01 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 35 Joined: 31-January 09 From: SEG Member No.: 16,829 |
|
|
|
|
Feb 4 2009, 03:04 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Old Man Jones ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 4,415 Joined: 26-February 02 From: New York Member No.: 1,699 |
The major problem with MetalStorm is the space it takes.
If you have an application where you only need to fire a limited amount of ammunition, it's great. If you need to be able to fire a large amount of ammo, well, you need to start packing on additional barrels. That can get kinda unwieldy. Something like a machine gun emplacement, would you rather be swinging around a massive heavy gun with 30 barrels, or a much lighter single barrel (or even 6-barrel rotary) weapon with an ammo feed? -karma |
|
|
|
Feb 4 2009, 04:54 PM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 35 Joined: 31-January 09 From: SEG Member No.: 16,829 |
It depends what you want to do. If you need to shoot only once, the metal storm might be of interest. That way you could for example shoot a full-auto burst from a sniper rifle without suffering recoil (or at least without having the recoil affecting precision)
|
|
|
|
Feb 4 2009, 10:11 PM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 997 Joined: 20-October 08 Member No.: 16,537 |
The metal Storm system is interesting but unless you have some loading mechanism you are stuck with switching multiple pre-loaded barrels, muzzle loading, break action loading and breach loadingm I'm not an expert but none of this options seems to me a good choise for combat zone; it could work great for bolt action sniper rifles thought.
|
|
|
|
Feb 4 2009, 11:44 PM
Post
#6
|
|
|
panda! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 10,331 Joined: 8-March 02 From: north of central europe Member No.: 2,242 |
something tells me that if one can carry multiple preloaded under-barrel grenade launchers and use some kind of quick release so that when 3 rounds have been fired one just drop the whole launcher assembly and attach a new one, it could work...
but it still may be more effective to just use the reloadable single round one, i guess... |
|
|
|
Feb 5 2009, 08:43 PM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 150 Joined: 5-April 04 Member No.: 6,219 |
The best use i've seen is integrating the electronic-fire with electronic-targeting on a fast-flyover vehicle of some sort. Precision strafing for the win.
|
|
|
|
Feb 5 2009, 09:41 PM
Post
#8
|
|
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,263 Joined: 4-March 08 From: Blighty Member No.: 15,736 |
In the case of underbarrel mortars your riflemen typically carry three grenades at most as far as I know. The ammunition limitation is, therefore, not exactly a problem for standard practice.
Nonstandard practicewise? It's probably better to carry those extra barrels slung beneath additional rifles. |
|
|
|
Feb 5 2009, 10:45 PM
Post
#9
|
|
|
Old Man Jones ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 4,415 Joined: 26-February 02 From: New York Member No.: 1,699 |
The best use i've seen is integrating the electronic-fire with electronic-targeting on a fast-flyover vehicle of some sort. Precision strafing for the win. I could have sworn I saw a concept vid of multiple short MetalStorm launchers mounted sideways in a missile, so that as the missile flew over a battlefield the launchers would fire downward as it went along. The forward-facing targeting system would note targets ahead and have the launcher fire down as the missile passed over them. Maybe I'm thinking of a non-MetalStorm system? -karma |
|
|
|
Feb 6 2009, 12:48 AM
Post
#10
|
|
|
panda! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 10,331 Joined: 8-March 02 From: north of central europe Member No.: 2,242 |
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 23rd November 2025 - 01:23 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.