IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Melee vs Unarmed
Montecka
post Apr 3 2009, 08:14 AM
Post #1


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 2
Joined: 27-February 09
From: Trondheim, Norway
Member No.: 16,921



Hi.
I am new to SR4 and I am reading up on combat right now.
According to the core rules of SR4, can a defender in melee use Unarmed Combat to defend against a melee weapon?



Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
bmcoomes
post Apr 3 2009, 08:16 AM
Post #2


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 651
Joined: 15-September 06
From: Ephrata, Wa
Member No.: 9,382



Yes, but most likely the unarmed defender will be at a disadvantage.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
KCKitsune
post Apr 3 2009, 08:22 AM
Post #3


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,186
Joined: 9-February 08
From: Boiling Springs
Member No.: 15,665



I think so, but if I were GMing the fight, then the player wanting to defend had better have something like brass knuckles or hardliner gloves. Otherwise he's going to be in a world of hurt.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Uli
post Apr 3 2009, 08:27 AM
Post #4


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 171
Joined: 30-August 08
Member No.: 16,291



Well it is possible to defend yourself unarmed against an armed aggressor without getting injured. It's just damn difficult. If you want, you kann reduce the defender's skill, but I wouldn't complicate the system any further. Obviously everyone is learning self-defense against weapons. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Dakka Dakka
post Apr 3 2009, 08:35 AM
Post #5


Prime Runner
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,507
Joined: 11-November 08
Member No.: 16,582



QUOTE (bmcoomes @ Apr 3 2009, 10:16 AM) *
Yes, but most likely the unarmed defender will be at a disadvantage.
Unless the attacker uses a knife or brass knuckles he get's +1 per point of net reach. Not exactly a disadvantage for the defender but an advantage for the attacker. But from a mechanics point of view this is better.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
bmcoomes
post Apr 3 2009, 08:44 AM
Post #6


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 651
Joined: 15-September 06
From: Ephrata, Wa
Member No.: 9,382



same deference you got want I meant. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Dakka Dakka
post Apr 3 2009, 08:47 AM
Post #7


Prime Runner
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,507
Joined: 11-November 08
Member No.: 16,582



Not exactly a negative modifier on the defender would increase the probability of glitches for him. The way it is by RAWthe glitch probability decreases for the attacker. I like it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Montecka
post Apr 3 2009, 08:52 AM
Post #8


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 2
Joined: 27-February 09
From: Trondheim, Norway
Member No.: 16,921



Thanks for the quick replies (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

It looks like you are all agreeing that the rule says that you can use R+UC vs a melee weapon attack.

I really just wanted to know the official core rule for this and I totally agree that this might not hyperrealistic.


Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Caadium
post Apr 3 2009, 02:22 PM
Post #9


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 604
Joined: 1-December 08
From: Sacramento, California
Member No.: 16,646



QUOTE (Dakka Dakka @ Apr 3 2009, 12:47 AM) *
Not exactly a negative modifier on the defender would increase the probability of glitches for him. The way it is by RAWthe glitch probability decreases for the attacker. I like it.


Actually, reach can be applied as either.

QUOTE (SR4A BBB pg. 158)
The character with the higher net Reach can choose to apply his net Reach bonus as a dice pool modifier bonus to his test or as a negative dice pool modifier to his opponent's test.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Dakka Dakka
post Apr 3 2009, 02:31 PM
Post #10


Prime Runner
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,507
Joined: 11-November 08
Member No.: 16,582



Oops, forgot that
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ElFenrir
post Apr 3 2009, 03:26 PM
Post #11


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,168
Joined: 15-April 05
From: Helsinki, Finland
Member No.: 7,337



It's not hyper-real, but it at least is fair for both sides. It's a game, after all. Picking too much on something isn't good for fun.

We just say that since a melee attacker has Reach, they have a better chance of getting the hit to land home. So, in a way, they ARE at a slight advantage over an unarmed attacker(who can't negate that reach with Kick Attack, since we can't see how that would work on defense) but we don't sit there and require hardliners, forearm guards, and the like on TOP of it.

There is a maneuver, Clinch, that can negate the Reach bonus of an attacker, if i recall.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
InfinityzeN
post Apr 3 2009, 07:25 PM
Post #12


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 992
Joined: 23-December 08
From: the Tampa Sprawl
Member No.: 16,707



Clinch and then knee da' crap out of them. Use Finishing Move to get in another knee or two.

And the PPP Forearm guards are fairly cheap to buy if the GM requires some sort of "parry" item to use Unarmed against weapons. Heck, depending on the style, Shin Guards would work as well.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stahlseele
post Apr 3 2009, 07:56 PM
Post #13


The ShadowComedian
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,526
Joined: 3-October 07
From: Hamburg, AGS
Member No.: 13,525



Kick-Boxing, or Muay Thai or however that is called.
if your GM does not want to let you block edged weapons with these, just add in some metal or ceramic plating.
Remember, that there's the kick attack and maneuvre that add reach to unarmed combat as well, so kickboxing would actually even things out for the unarmed against a reach of 1 or maximum 2.
but if you face a troll using a reach 2 weapon, you are fucked anyway *snickers*
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
TBRMInsanity
post Apr 3 2009, 10:16 PM
Post #14


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,002
Joined: 22-April 06
From: Canada
Member No.: 8,494



This reminds me on what my knife instructor said,

QUOTE
If you get in a knife fight your going to get cut. If you think your going to get cut, your going to get cut. If you think your not going to get cut, your going to get cut. In summary your going to get cut. Now if your trained well enough you can choose where you want to get cut.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tymeaus Jalynsfe...
post Apr 7 2009, 02:35 AM
Post #15


Prime Runner Ascendant
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 17,568
Joined: 26-March 09
From: Aurora, Colorado
Member No.: 17,022



QUOTE (TBRMInsanity @ Apr 3 2009, 03:16 PM) *
This reminds me on what my knife instructor said,

If you get in a knife fight your going to get cut. If you think your going to get cut, your going to get cut. If you think your not going to get cut, your going to get cut. In summary your going to get cut. Now if your trained well enough you can choose where you want to get cut.


Sounds a lot like what my Combat Instructor in the Marine Corps told me as well...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Degausser
post Apr 7 2009, 04:43 AM
Post #16


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 380
Joined: 19-May 07
Member No.: 11,698



QUOTE
If you get in a knife fight your going to get cut. If you think your going to get cut, your going to get cut. If you think your not going to get cut, your going to get cut. In summary your going to get cut. Now if your trained well enough you can choose where you want to get cut.


Not as good as what my martial arts instructor always said.

"Bring a Knife to a fistfight. Bring a sword to a Knife fight. Bring a Gun to a swordfight. Don't go to a gunfight."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
the_real_elwood
post Apr 7 2009, 04:56 AM
Post #17


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 483
Joined: 16-September 08
From: Madison, WI
Member No.: 16,349



QUOTE (Degausser @ Apr 6 2009, 10:43 PM) *
Not as good as what my martial arts instructor always said.

"Bring a Knife to a fistfight. Bring a sword to a Knife fight. Bring a Gun to a swordfight. Don't go to a gunfight."


No, you bring armored vehicles to a gunfight, then you bring air support to an armored vehicle fight, and then you nuke it from orbit, because its the only way to be sure.

And you don't go to an orbital weapon fight.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
AngelisStorm
post Apr 7 2009, 07:27 AM
Post #18


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 616
Joined: 30-April 07
From: Edge of the Redmond Barrens, Borderline NAN. Runnin' the border for literal milk runs.
Member No.: 11,565



That's the problem now-a-days. No one knows how to have a nice impersonal fist fight. Everyone feels the need to escalate. (*sigh*)

But yup, in a knife fight your going to get cut. Try not to jump on the knife, since your likely to catch it with your guts. Which (litterally, I believe) isn't kosher. The back of the forearm is pretty decent place if your going to choose. The bone is right there, pretty strong, and not a whole lot vital to get cut.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cardul
post Apr 7 2009, 09:35 AM
Post #19


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 992
Joined: 2-August 06
Member No.: 9,006



QUOTE (KCKitsune @ Apr 3 2009, 03:22 AM) *
I think so, but if I were GMing the fight, then the player wanting to defend had better have something like brass knuckles or hardliner gloves. Otherwise he's going to be in a world of hurt.



It depends on the mechanism they are using....since their hits increase threshold needed, it would seem to me more like:
Player: I am using unarmed combat to try and block his sword swing! (Rolls 3 Hits)
GM:(Rolls 4 hits, still succeeds) Your hand moves up, under his sword arm, unfortunately, his angle was still good, so the blade sinks into your shoulder, instead of your collar bone, and your block slows some of the blade momentum down...Roll Damage resistance!
or
GM(Rolls 2 hits): You forearm catches the inside of the sword arm, and pushes it it away just enough to miss striking you.

Neither of those options, though, involves the PC striking at/blocking the blade directly..Something I admit I kind of wonder about, though, is the "Aggressive Defense", where your opponent tries to swing a sword at you, and, instead of trying to block him, you kick him in the gut/sweep his legs/any other tactic to get him staggering away from/on the ground/not swinging that sword at you..
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CanRay
post Apr 7 2009, 12:29 PM
Post #20


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,358
Joined: 2-December 07
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Member No.: 14,465



QUOTE (AngelisStorm @ Apr 7 2009, 02:27 AM) *
That's the problem now-a-days. No one knows how to have a nice impersonal fist fight. Everyone feels the need to escalate. (*sigh*)

Two NPCs in my group are always in for a good Fistfight. Krunch and Klub.

It's just that Krunch is a Troll, Klub is a Dwarf, and Krunch uses Klub as a Ranged Weapon.

So far, it's proven to be very, very effective.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tymeaus Jalynsfe...
post Apr 8 2009, 03:07 AM
Post #21


Prime Runner Ascendant
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 17,568
Joined: 26-March 09
From: Aurora, Colorado
Member No.: 17,022



QUOTE (Degausser @ Apr 6 2009, 10:43 PM) *
Not as good as what my martial arts instructor always said.

"Bring a Knife to a fistfight. Bring a sword to a Knife fight. Bring a Gun to a swordfight. Don't go to a gunfight."


Also Good Advice for those inclined to remain healthy
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tymeaus Jalynsfe...
post Apr 8 2009, 03:07 AM
Post #22


Prime Runner Ascendant
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 17,568
Joined: 26-March 09
From: Aurora, Colorado
Member No.: 17,022



QUOTE (the_real_elwood @ Apr 6 2009, 10:56 PM) *
No, you bring armored vehicles to a gunfight, then you bring air support to an armored vehicle fight, and then you nuke it from orbit, because its the only way to be sure.



Yep, The only way to be sure...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tymeaus Jalynsfe...
post Apr 8 2009, 03:09 AM
Post #23


Prime Runner Ascendant
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 17,568
Joined: 26-March 09
From: Aurora, Colorado
Member No.: 17,022



QUOTE (CanRay @ Apr 7 2009, 06:29 AM) *
Two NPCs in my group are always in for a good Fistfight. Krunch and Klub.

It's just that Krunch is a Troll, Klub is a Dwarf, and Krunch uses Klub as a Ranged Weapon.

So far, it's proven to be very, very effective.



Ahhh Yes, The old Cannonball Express tactic...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
TBRMInsanity
post Apr 8 2009, 03:54 PM
Post #24


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,002
Joined: 22-April 06
From: Canada
Member No.: 8,494



I sense the Dwarf Tossing jokes coming. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CanRay
post Apr 8 2009, 04:15 PM
Post #25


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,358
Joined: 2-December 07
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Member No.: 14,465



Well, it started with one of the PCs noting "Metahuman Body" in the weapon statistics, and came up with the idea of a Max-Strength Troll using a Heavy Body Armour wearing Max-Body Dwarf as a weapon. Krunch and Klub are born.

It started as two joke NPCs, but they've been fleshed out quite a bit, and Krunch's education has come in handy a few times. Klub's knowledge of engineering has been useful to, come to think of it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 12th April 2022 - 05:43 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.