![]() ![]() |
Jun 7 2009, 05:02 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 24 Joined: 2-January 06 From: Seattle Member No.: 8,117 |
|
|
|
|
Jun 7 2009, 05:55 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,000 Joined: 30-May 09 From: Germany Member No.: 17,225 |
Why would anyone need specs for that? It's for kinky fantasies. (It's even got an "Interogation Pouch" containing a small whip). If you want to show off your "assets" while in this, you are still wearing combat gear. And if you wear combat gear you should as well wear armor too.
It is pretty useless. Stats like a armored vest without the armor? |
|
|
|
Jun 7 2009, 06:08 AM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 325 Joined: 24-February 06 From: Kansas Member No.: 8,304 |
I'm sorry...could you pardon me, when I get done laughing at this I I need to start crying,
Yes both funny and depressing. But if any one here really has to much money on there hands for things like these um...my middle names charity? and if you don't belive me I'm willing to get it legaly changed to that (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) |
|
|
|
Jun 7 2009, 07:25 PM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 20 Joined: 16-December 07 Member No.: 14,674 |
The devs are ahead of you on this. There's already an armored corset as part of the Steampunk fashion line on page 46 of Arsenal. It has an armor rating of 2/2 and costs 600 (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nuyen.gif) .
|
|
|
|
Jun 7 2009, 07:35 PM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Prime Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,577 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Gwynedd Valley PA Member No.: 1,221 |
dear goddess this is so wrong on so many levels.
Beyond the obvious- did you see the 'interogation pouch"? Two things jumped out at me, no not those! 1) Even if going for 'sexy' that is going to be reduced by loading up a bunch of the pouches onto it. so why bother? 2) It's only usful as armor if the shooter goes for a belly shot. That -ahem- armor, leaves your heart and shoulders wide open. Sorry I'll stick with jeans and a cami or blouse under a leather armored jacket. fashinoable and infinately more protection. |
|
|
|
Jun 7 2009, 09:53 PM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 41 Joined: 11-May 09 Member No.: 17,161 |
No... just no. There is no way in hell that should be rated as armor. Yes there are some vital organs that are protected, but you do not aim that low when trying to kill someone (I am not saying that you are aiming for a headshot).
After reading the description of this corset I am certain it is mostly made for goth and SM women who want to be what they called "empowered," and\or cool. Sorry if I offended any persons who fit that description and also find this silly. |
|
|
|
Jun 7 2009, 10:14 PM
Post
#7
|
|
|
The ShadowComedian ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 14,538 Joined: 3-October 07 From: Hamburg, AGS Member No.: 13,525 |
Well it does LOOK Cool . .
|
|
|
|
Jun 7 2009, 10:23 PM
Post
#8
|
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 41 Joined: 11-May 09 Member No.: 17,161 |
|
|
|
|
Jun 7 2009, 10:35 PM
Post
#9
|
|
|
The ShadowComedian ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 14,538 Joined: 3-October 07 From: Hamburg, AGS Member No.: 13,525 |
*shrugs*
so? If it looks good, that's enough use in and of itself in my eyes. Just as there are no empty calories, as long as it tastes good. |
|
|
|
Jun 7 2009, 10:37 PM
Post
#10
|
|
|
panda! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 10,331 Joined: 8-March 02 From: north of central europe Member No.: 2,242 |
it may grant distraction bonus, but no way it will give armor bonus (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
|
Jun 7 2009, 10:58 PM
Post
#11
|
|
|
The ShadowComedian ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 14,538 Joined: 3-October 07 From: Hamburg, AGS Member No.: 13,525 |
Good enough ^^
|
|
|
|
Jun 8 2009, 12:21 AM
Post
#12
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 944 Joined: 19-February 03 Member No.: 4,128 |
I loved how the adcopy implied that there are size 1, female security contractors in Kabul and Baghdad right now complaining about how there just isn't any field gear that makes them feel pretty.
Yeah, right. That isn't tactical, it's tacti-cool. |
|
|
|
Jun 8 2009, 12:33 AM
Post
#13
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 150 Joined: 4-November 08 Member No.: 16,567 |
practical, most of the time nope...
fluff, oh yes it is it is good for those strapless dresses, and security guards who just shot at the person now most professional shooters (cops, military, etc) are taught to shot center mass. I think the strapless won't be very helpful many halo players do head shots. enough said fluff though, the corset is great. its worn under the clothes, giving protection when you got to sneak into that high society party and the armored jacket just won't cut it to me it is real life fluff. and before we know it, it will be featured in several movies "Darling, I saw him shot you in the breast. How are you alive?" "Tactical corset, honey, stopped the bullet. Still hurts like hell. Got me right on the nipple." or "I wore both armors, my vest and my corset. Never leave home without them." |
|
|
|
Jun 8 2009, 12:35 AM
Post
#14
|
|
|
panda! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 10,331 Joined: 8-March 02 From: north of central europe Member No.: 2,242 |
|
|
|
|
Jun 8 2009, 02:18 AM
Post
#15
|
|
|
Prime Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,577 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Gwynedd Valley PA Member No.: 1,221 |
I don't even think it looks pretty. It looks tacky and cheap. Of course i don't have the same 'eye' that a guy might have but still, it looks ugly.
As for owmen in Kabul? yeah right. 1) pro's are not gonna like this crap and 2) This is coing to freak out the conservative muslim culture in Afghanistan and even the pro-Americans are going to be offended by this. |
|
|
|
Jun 8 2009, 02:20 AM
Post
#16
|
|
|
panda! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 10,331 Joined: 8-March 02 From: north of central europe Member No.: 2,242 |
heh, seems most of their models go for the goth look anyways...
|
|
|
|
Jun 8 2009, 01:40 PM
Post
#17
|
|
|
Incertum est quo loco te mors expectet; ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 6,548 Joined: 24-October 03 From: DeeCee, U.S. Member No.: 5,760 |
The pouches really are too much, and the model totally did not strut it. However, I could totally see this becoming more common in SR. Sure, it's not effective as a full-body suit, but here's the thing, most women aren't going to wear a full-body suit anyway. It's like asking if it's better to have $5,000 life insurance or NO life insurance. $5,000 isn't nearly enough, but at least it's something.
I still don't know what one could do about delicately hiding the shoulders and head. Modern fashion really does not allow for that easily. Any idea what this is rated for? I'm guessing class II? |
|
|
|
Jun 8 2009, 01:53 PM
Post
#18
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 494 Joined: 19-February 05 From: Amazonia Member No.: 7,102 |
"Style over substance" anyone? Why are you all concerned with armor ratings? If you don't look good, it's not worth going out anyway. Oh wait... That would only be true if you played a game with a cyberpunk theme...
That being said... the 'tactical corset' thing is definitely ugly. |
|
|
|
Jun 8 2009, 01:59 PM
Post
#19
|
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,653 Joined: 22-January 08 Member No.: 15,430 |
Nobody need stats for clothing with pockets and/or pouches. All you need to do is say "my corset has a whole bunch of pouches." I'm actually pissed at them for creating those smart packs in Arsenal -- they're cool, but they get people into the mindset of needing stats for everything, including minute bookeeping details like making stats for ordinary pouches on a tactical vest.
|
|
|
|
Jun 8 2009, 02:10 PM
Post
#20
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 932 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Orlando, Florida Member No.: 1,042 |
It's sexy, in an industrial, apocolyptic way. It is MOLLE compatible. And it covers from under the armpits to the hipbones, to it could provide some armor protection, just like ARS pg. 46 says. After all, the canon says that wearing a helmet alone gives 1/2.
None of the buttons at the top of the tactical corsets page worked, which makes me wonder if it's a joke. |
|
|
|
Jun 8 2009, 02:28 PM
Post
#21
|
|
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,162 Joined: 16-November 07 Member No.: 14,229 |
That isn't tactical, it's tacti-cool. If only I had more space in my .sig (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) |
|
|
|
Jun 8 2009, 03:20 PM
Post
#22
|
|
|
Incertum est quo loco te mors expectet; ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 6,548 Joined: 24-October 03 From: DeeCee, U.S. Member No.: 5,760 |
|
|
|
|
Jun 8 2009, 06:34 PM
Post
#23
|
|
|
Shadow Cartographer ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,737 Joined: 2-June 06 From: Secret Tunnels under the UK (South West) Member No.: 8,636 |
|
|
|
|
Jun 8 2009, 07:12 PM
Post
#24
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 325 Joined: 24-February 06 From: Kansas Member No.: 8,304 |
I don't know? am I getting dinner and a movie with this? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/grinbig.gif)
|
|
|
|
Jun 8 2009, 07:37 PM
Post
#25
|
|
|
Shadow Cartographer ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,737 Joined: 2-June 06 From: Secret Tunnels under the UK (South West) Member No.: 8,636 |
You know, I read this thread and all I can think about is how I can shoe-horn in a joke about some fashion-victim starlet not being seen dead in mil-spec armour. @Cadmus: Sorry, the deal's off. I never realised you were so high-maintenance. Dinner and a movie? You're such a gold-digger! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/grinbig.gif) |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 13th June 2026 - 02:57 AM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.