IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Silly Rigger Question, For the more mathmatically inclined than me
Bladerunner
post Sep 10 2009, 08:10 PM
Post #1


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 39
Joined: 1-September 09
From: Chicago Metroplex
Member No.: 17,582



Alright so, I was looking over the Rigger I plan on playing for an upcoming game, and I noticed something that I couldn't get off my mind.

Speed

Given that the rules list everything in kph (not a huge problem) and things aren't exactly like the old rules as far as there being a top speed (unless my eyes got the better of me), for the car I'm using- 192 (after mods and such) kph seems pretty slow. The question is, can my rigger use each IP for movement and if so (and if Hot Simmed for 4 passes) move 192 four times? Or is 192 the most I can move in a combat turn.

I know there are separate rules as far as the length of time that passes in a "chase" rather than a non chase scene.

if I'm way off base, it could be the coffee...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DWC
post Sep 10 2009, 08:44 PM
Post #2


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,973
Joined: 3-October 07
From: Fairfax, VA
Member No.: 13,526



You're right. The rules are weird. The number listed for Speed is the safe maximum in meters per combat turn. Multiply Speed by 1.2 to get your velocity in kilometers per hour. That number is exceedable, but the GM is encouraged to assign penalties to actions when exceeding it.

If you're looking at actual distance travelled in a combat turn, you're going to be using the special, special mix of the tactical movement rules and the vehicle's Acceleration attribute, which is actually more of a base movement speed, and has nothing to do with anything that anyone would ever connect with Acceleration.

You'd look at the vehicle's Running Acceleration score (the number to the right of the slash), and see that is your base vehicle running rate in meters per combat turn. You'll obviously decide that's too slow (since it is) and spend a Complex Action making a Vehicle Test. Each hit increases your vehicle running rate by 5 meters for that turn. If you've got 4 passes, and you're confident that you're never going to fail a crash test, you can spend all four passes spending a Complex Action to make vehicle tests.

For example:
Robby the Rigger
Response 6
Pilot Ground (Wheel) 5(+2)
Hot VR w/Simsense Accelerator (for a 4th init pass)
Control Rig

Handling +3
Acceleeration: 20/60
Speed: 240

Base distance covered: 60 meters per turn
Vehicle Pool test (response+skill+handling+hot VR(2)+Control Rig(2) DP of 20, for an average of 6 hits
Those 6 hits increase the distance covered by 30 meters per turn, and Robby can try this 4 times, for a theoretical 24 hits, and a theoretical increase of 120 meters per turn, for a final tactical combat running rate of 180 meters per combat turn, or 216kph.

216kph. 130mph.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bladerunner
post Sep 10 2009, 09:00 PM
Post #3


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 39
Joined: 1-September 09
From: Chicago Metroplex
Member No.: 17,582



Interesting..

I always liked figuring out how fast I could go. I appreciate the help.

Now is that 130 mph (216kph) per combat turn? (ala 6 seconds)


Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DWC
post Sep 10 2009, 09:34 PM
Post #4


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,973
Joined: 3-October 07
From: Fairfax, VA
Member No.: 13,526



QUOTE (Bladerunner @ Sep 10 2009, 04:00 PM) *
Interesting..

I always liked figuring out how fast I could go. I appreciate the help.

Now is that 130 mph (216kph) per combat turn? (ala 6 seconds)


That's 216kph (or 130mph), for that 3 second combat turn. If you're actually in tactical combat, you're going to have to repeat that sequence in the next 3 seconds, and anything else you want to do other than focus your attention on going as fast as possible is going to rob you of some of that gained speed.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
McAllister
post Sep 10 2009, 10:30 PM
Post #5


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 509
Joined: 16-June 09
Member No.: 17,282



Really? I assumed Acceleration really worked like acceleration does, where each vehicle moves at the same speed as it did the round before, except that you can add/subtract the Walking acceleration to the speed, use a free action to add/subtract the Running acceleration to the speed, or spend an action to make a Vehicle test and use that to modify the speed even more. At least, that's reasonably realistic, and meshes APPROXIMATELY with the zero-to-sixty time of performance-oriented vehicles. And besides, if you're in a car going 200 kph, stopping in three seconds is NOT going to happen.

I don't know why I thought that, but it makes sense to me.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DWC
post Sep 10 2009, 10:36 PM
Post #6


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,973
Joined: 3-October 07
From: Fairfax, VA
Member No.: 13,526



Yeah. It sucks that SR uses Acceleration to mean Tactical Combat Speed and Speed to use Chase Speed, but those are the breaks.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bleifalke
post Sep 10 2009, 10:37 PM
Post #7


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 28
Joined: 8-September 09
From: Stockholm, Scandinavian Union
Member No.: 17,615



216 km/h is exactly 60m/s so in 3 sec you would travel 180m, thats pretty crazy if you think about it! Usain Bolt would run the same distance in approx 17.3 sec.

EDIT: Sorry, missed that you already calculated it to be 180m/turn
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RunnerPaul
post Sep 11 2009, 03:27 AM
Post #8


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,086
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 364



QUOTE (McAllister @ Sep 10 2009, 06:30 PM) *
And besides, if you're in a car going 200 kph, stopping in three seconds is NOT going to happen.


Yes, at those speeds, Mr. Brick Wall most decidedly is not your friend.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Red-ROM
post Sep 11 2009, 03:34 AM
Post #9


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,756
Joined: 17-January 09
From: Va Beach , CAS
Member No.: 16,787



I can't believe nobody used the name Bladerunner before now
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RunnerPaul
post Sep 11 2009, 03:46 AM
Post #10


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,086
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 364



QUOTE (Red-ROM @ Sep 10 2009, 11:34 PM) *
I can't believe nobody used the name Bladerunner before now


Other names still available:

  • Johnny Mnemonic
  • Molly
  • Officer Murphy
  • Hiro Protaginist
  • Y.T.
  • Bryce Lynch
  • J.C. Denton
  • Spider Jerusalem
  • ... And Many Others!

Supplies are limited! Act NOW!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Erl of Ingst
post Sep 11 2009, 04:04 AM
Post #11


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 35
Joined: 1-August 09
From: Currently Kazakhstan, but soon Lakewood, CO
Member No.: 17,458



QUOTE (RunnerPaul @ Sep 10 2009, 09:46 PM) *
Supplies are limited! Act NOW!


Ahh! Where did I put my credit card?!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bladerunner
post Sep 11 2009, 04:14 AM
Post #12


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 39
Joined: 1-September 09
From: Chicago Metroplex
Member No.: 17,582



QUOTE (Red-ROM @ Sep 11 2009, 03:34 AM) *
I can't believe nobody used the name Bladerunner before now



Same thing I said when I put it in

>>Yeah right, there's no way this name is available....

:(IMG:style_emoticons/default/eek.gif) :

It was the name of the first SR character I made, a Street Sam back in... oooo 1990. I had to pay homage to him if it was possible, plus I'm a huge Gibson fan so it made sense.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RunnerPaul
post Sep 11 2009, 06:15 AM
Post #13


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,086
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 364



QUOTE (Bladerunner @ Sep 11 2009, 12:14 AM) *
I'm a huge Gibson fan so it made sense.


Um. Bladerunner was an adaptation of the novel "Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep" by author Philip K. Dick.

The only connection with William Gibson that I know of was that Gibson attended a showing during the film's initial theatrical release, and decided to leave before the film was finished because he was afraid it'd end up too strongly influencing his not-yet-completed manuscript for Neuromancer.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bladerunner
post Sep 11 2009, 06:01 PM
Post #14


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 39
Joined: 1-September 09
From: Chicago Metroplex
Member No.: 17,582



Yeah, funny how our brains associate things sometimes.

For me, growing up I saw the movie before I ever read anything by Gibson, even though the movie was out before Neuromancer was completely written. I guess as a child I had easier access to seeing the movie than the book. I didn't end up getting my copy of Neuromancer till 1992, but by then I'd seen Bladerunner a few times and really fell in love with it (I prefer the original to the Director's cut, mostly because of the voice over work in the first part by Deckard) After reading Neuromancer my brain saw the symalarities and always seems to associate them.

Not be go unsung, Dick also write tons of great stuff to check out, like "We Can Remember it For You Wholesale" - which inspired Total Recall.



Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
milk ducks
post Sep 13 2009, 12:22 PM
Post #15


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 208
Joined: 11-September 09
From: America / Australia.
Member No.: 17,625



Awesome thread. Thanks for the info, DWC.

-milk.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 12th June 2025 - 01:08 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.