IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Cyberware sans living host?
TheMadderHatter
post Sep 22 2009, 03:48 AM
Post #1


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 73
Joined: 18-September 09
Member No.: 17,649



Are there any guidelines out there for how long cyberware remains hackable/usable after the host organism dies? I.E. if one of my runners wants to hack the cyberarm attached to a guard's newly cooling corpse, is there still enough power in the arm to permit the hacked limb to move? If said runner then removes the arm, how long before it's out of power? It's not a question of the correct signals, it's a question of the hardware having the energy to act on them.

Basically, how long can a cyberarm/cyberleg remain mobile when separated from a living host? Are there any guidelines on this?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
the_real_elwood
post Sep 22 2009, 03:53 AM
Post #2


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 483
Joined: 16-September 08
From: Madison, WI
Member No.: 16,349



I've looked over pretty much every book out there and I've seen absolutely no guidelines. Since cyberware isn't described as having as having its own power supply or batteries (and I'm pretty sure that it's described as running off bioelectric current), I'd give you a couple combat turns at best to hack a dead guy's cyberware. But we're completely into houserules here so argue with your GM for whatever you think seems reasonable.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MJBurrage
post Sep 22 2009, 04:17 AM
Post #3


Moving Target
**

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 748
Joined: 22-April 07
From: Vermont
Member No.: 11,507



I would agree that since the books have never had any kind of rules or fluff about powering cyberware or it running out of power for a user, that it should be assumed to be bio-powered (like implanted LEDs).

I.E. dead user = unpowered cyber.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Dragnar
post Sep 22 2009, 06:50 AM
Post #4


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 386
Joined: 28-November 08
From: Germany
Member No.: 16,638



QUOTE (MJBurrage @ Sep 22 2009, 06:17 AM) *
I would agree that since the books have never had any kind of rules or fluff about powering cyberware or it running out of power for a user, that it should be assumed to be bio-powered (like implanted LEDs).

I.E. dead user = unpowered cyber.


Or you assume its internal batteries can hold out for longer than any possible campaign would last. And even if you want them biopowered, a skilled tech should need all of a few minutes to wire them to an external source (of which he has at least a dozen with him, even disregarding his own cyber).
Really, there's no reason to try to screw players over that.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ravor
post Sep 24 2009, 03:13 PM
Post #5


Cybernetic Blood Mage
******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,472
Joined: 11-March 06
From: Northeastern Wyoming
Member No.: 8,361



Meh, although I think I'd rule that each piece of cyber has a small amount of battery backup, since they are supposedly run off of the body's electircal field, tis hardly "screwing them over" to rule that cyber runs down at the users death.

Really people, telling your players no IS NOT necessarily the same thing as fucking them over.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
otakusensei
post Sep 24 2009, 03:37 PM
Post #6


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 695
Joined: 2-January 07
From: He has here a minute ago...
Member No.: 10,514



QUOTE (Ravor @ Sep 24 2009, 10:13 AM) *
Meh, although I think I'd rule that each piece of cyber has a small amount of battery backup, since they are supposedly run off of the body's electircal field, tis hardly "screwing them over" to rule that cyber runs down at the users death.

Really people, telling your players no IS NOT necessarily the same thing as fucking them over.



I see where he's coming from though. On one hand you're adding a level of depth and flavor to the game. However, depending on the situation it can also be distracting from the focus and feel like a chore.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ravor
post Sep 24 2009, 04:17 PM
Post #7


Cybernetic Blood Mage
******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,472
Joined: 11-March 06
From: Northeastern Wyoming
Member No.: 8,361



Aye, I can see that side of the argument as well, but I get really tired of posters whining about how it's "screwing them over" when one of their clever ideas is ruled not to work. especially in grey areas where people can and often do simply have different visions of how things work.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
eidolon
post Sep 24 2009, 06:12 PM
Post #8


ghostrider
********

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 4,196
Joined: 16-May 04
Member No.: 6,333



QUOTE (Ravor @ Sep 24 2009, 10:17 AM) *
Aye, I can see that side of the argument as well, but I get really tired of posters whining about how it's "screwing them over" when one of their clever ideas is ruled not to work. especially in grey areas where people can and often do simply have different visions of how things work.


Amen to that.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Dragnar
post Sep 25 2009, 10:43 AM
Post #9


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 386
Joined: 28-November 08
From: Germany
Member No.: 16,638



To reiterate my previous post, my point was that it doesn't even matter who the ware gets its energy, because a skilled technician will get at it without too much problem anyways, so why make it a chore, like otakusensei said, just because?
It's not "saying no to a good plan", it's forcing something he's going to succeed at anyways to take 10 minutes of your gaming time. Why do that instead of skip it by handwavery and get back to the fun stuff?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Twilights_Herald
post Sep 25 2009, 10:55 AM
Post #10


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 28
Joined: 7-January 09
Member No.: 16,741



I'm just really unclear about why you'd care to do this. I mean, other than turning the loose cyberware into Thing, which might be funny but not very helpful.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Traul
post Sep 25 2009, 12:32 PM
Post #11


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,190
Joined: 31-May 09
From: London, UK
Member No.: 17,229



Unless there is a special need for extra power storage, I don't see any reason why a piece of ware should have more batteries than a desktop computer: none. Just some capacities to soften the power drop and give enough time for a graceful shut down.

Batteries are heavy, pollutant, have a short life span and can occasionnally explode. I don't see anyone putting such a drek in his body without some real use for it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
eidolon
post Sep 25 2009, 07:10 PM
Post #12


ghostrider
********

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 4,196
Joined: 16-May 04
Member No.: 6,333



Batteries today are like that. Nothing stopping you from making Batteries of the Futureā„¢ that are better. *shrug*

I'd go with whatever makes the stories and games fun.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
the_real_elwood
post Sep 25 2009, 07:48 PM
Post #13


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 483
Joined: 16-September 08
From: Madison, WI
Member No.: 16,349



QUOTE (Dragnar @ Sep 25 2009, 04:43 AM) *
To reiterate my previous post, my point was that it doesn't even matter who the ware gets its energy, because a skilled technician will get at it without too much problem anyways, so why make it a chore, like otakusensei said, just because?
It's not "saying no to a good plan", it's forcing something he's going to succeed at anyways to take 10 minutes of your gaming time. Why do that instead of skip it by handwavery and get back to the fun stuff?

It sounded to me like the characters wanted to hack a dead security guard's cyber in the middle of combat. So it's hardly an easy proposition for a tech to wire it up to an external power source as the bullets are flying. Once combat is over, you're right, any decent cyber technician could get some unused cyber hooked up to a power source and do something with it real easy. During combat is a different story, and ruling that they can't just hack a dead guy's cyber during combat is hardly screwing over the players.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Screaming Eagle
post Sep 25 2009, 08:14 PM
Post #14


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 304
Joined: 23-April 09
From: Canada eh?
Member No.: 17,109



Although I personally assume that most cyberware operates day to day off of the *Handwave* bioelectric field I have a greater amount of trouble believing the strenght 6+ cyber arm with Gyro stabilisation and build in lazer weapon doesn't have SOME sort of supplemental energy source for when its hefting a BFG and running full gyro and shooting some guy at the same time...

More definativly powered cyberware: Occular Drone

or maybe this is just me...
None of the following has ever been RAW to the best of my knowledge:
I rule that power maintaince on more Warez' is trivial - aka - Are you on the street with no access to power outlets? If so you are opperating in "low power mode" - no build in lazers, or gyro mount and you strength is quite curtailed, the limb still works but none of the bells and whistles have juice.
If not it is assumed you get what you need and Future Batteries ™, Proudly an Aztecnology product, are both light and hold signifigant (days to weeks) power. This would of course lead to all sorts of on the fly calls as what is and is not powered if people were hacking the dead guys arm... low STR cyber arm not, cyber arm with upgraded STR yes, spurs no, intergral rocket launcher yes... good times - have the power degrade FAST once the host is dead... and have it do damage to the battery redusing the resale value. Alternativly (if you feel like) have any such Ware automatically lock on user death.

Seriously using the dead guards cyberhand and intergral smartlink to kill his buds is fairly weird and kinda cool so I'd be inclined to allow it if only for the novelty/ cunning/ cyberpunk.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ravor
post Sep 26 2009, 07:17 PM
Post #15


Cybernetic Blood Mage
******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,472
Joined: 11-March 06
From: Northeastern Wyoming
Member No.: 8,361



Dragnar, because it is hardly a chore for a player to declare that he is taking a few minutes wiring power into the cyber using the toolkit he brought and for the DM to nod. In fact, the only time that having to rewire the 'ware would be considered a "chore" is when there is some sort of deadline in which case we have dramitic tension instead. Which is still a good thing and isn't fucking the players over.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
AndyZ
post Sep 26 2009, 09:19 PM
Post #16


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 152
Joined: 29-July 09
Member No.: 17,444



There's a Drone Hand modification in Augmentation, page 46. Basically it works in the same way as letting an eye slip out and work as an ocular drone. If you have that, though, you can't get further modification.

Given the stifling rules for that already noted, I would absolutely not allow cyberlimbs to keep fighting upon the removal of its living host.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Hartbaine
post Sep 26 2009, 11:02 PM
Post #17


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 141
Joined: 4-September 07
Member No.: 13,115



The brain lives for about 8 minutes (roughly) after death (YMMV). Give them at least 8 minutes before the body's BE current dies out completely. You could even subtract 1 minute for every 1 point of essence (or fraction thereof) dedicated to cyberware as the internal batteries drain the body's last amount of BE juice faster.

So if a guy had three point of Essence in cyberware, give the PCs 5 minutes to hack what they need and GTFO. No matter how low the Essence the time can not drop below 30 seconds. Even then, you'd need one damn good hacker.

Hope it helps.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 29th April 2024 - 03:30 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.