IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

5 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 5 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> The Shadowrun Presidency!, Time to cast your vote, chummers!
Which SR character would you put on the upcoming ballot for president?
You cannot see the results of the poll until you have voted. Please login and cast your vote to see the results of this poll.
Total Votes: 151
Guests cannot vote 
Kagetenshi
post Feb 1 2004, 02:51 AM
Post #51


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,012
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



Century Ferret is cute.

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Austere Emancipa...
post Feb 1 2004, 02:52 AM
Post #52


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,889
Joined: 3-August 03
From: A CPI rank 1 country
Member No.: 5,222



Deus is far cuter.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Feb 1 2004, 02:54 AM
Post #53


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,012
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



That goes without saying.

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phaeton
post Feb 1 2004, 03:11 AM
Post #54


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 973
Joined: 3-October 03
Member No.: 5,677



Century Ferret > All.

And...Thank you. :D
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fortune
post Feb 1 2004, 03:30 AM
Post #55


Immoral Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 15,247
Joined: 29-March 02
From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat
Member No.: 2,486



We won in Afghanistan? :eek:

Might be a good idea to let those soldiers still fighting and dying over there in on that little tidbit.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phaeton
post Feb 1 2004, 03:43 AM
Post #56


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 973
Joined: 3-October 03
Member No.: 5,677



...*merciless death to the thread*

Bah...I give up...Maybe this thread was a bad idea...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Feb 1 2004, 04:06 AM
Post #57


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,012
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



It wasn't a bad idea! Look! Deus is only one vote behind right now!
GO DEUS!!!

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Foreigner
post Feb 1 2004, 04:10 AM
Post #58


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 586
Joined: 22-November 02
From: Gordonsville, Virginia, U.S.A. (or C.A.S.)
Member No.: 3,630



Dr Komuso:

We did NOT win in Somalia. We got our a$$es handed to us by a bunch of street thugs. Our stated objective was to capture Mohammed Farah Aidid, and we FAILED to do so because then-President Clinton didn't authorize the use of enough troops or equipment to get the job done properly.

Same problem in Kosovo. We never should have sent troops there, either. It wasn't any of our business. But because then-President Clinton was trying to make points with his friends at the U.N., he sent American troops into a situation they couldn't possibly win.

I'm not saying that the war with Iraq was entirely justifiable. However, we went there with at least 2 objectives in mind. The first was the removal of Saddam Hussein's government and the Ba'ath party from power, and the second was the restoration of a normal way of life for the average Iraqi.

We have accomplished the first objective, but the second remains elusive. And, if we abandon Iraq now, it will be a very short time before some of Hussein's former cronies (the ones who haven't been captured or killed), or others like them, take over the country.

--Foreigner
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phaeton
post Feb 1 2004, 04:32 AM
Post #59


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 973
Joined: 3-October 03
Member No.: 5,677



@ Kagetenshi: Ah, true. Just pray he doesn't get ticked off at anything. Is it a good idea to piss off an AI running three nuke reactors? ;)

@ Foreigner: Ah, there...Nice and civilized again. Continue, chummers.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Feb 1 2004, 05:11 AM
Post #60


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,012
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



QUOTE (Foreigner)
we went there with at least 2 objectives in mind.

No we didn't. The war was justified on the principle of preemptive self-defense, that Iraq was a significant and immediate threat to the safety and security of the United States and/or its citizens. One stated goal, unachieved and increasingly appearing to be unachievable due to the nonexistance of the conditions claimed as a "threat".

How is this relevant to the thread? Because storming the Arcology was done with much the same justification, only Deus really did have the drones and reactors. Deus, however, is cool.

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Dr Komuso
post Feb 1 2004, 05:29 AM
Post #61


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 50
Joined: 14-April 03
Member No.: 4,450



Deus is awesome. Still, I vote Darke. After all, the devil you know, and all that.
Plus it'd be a cool Jason Wynn style return to power from apparent death :)

Side Note: Freedoms are what make this country great. I'm free to team up with all my bleeding heart liberal buddies and bitch all day about what an evil SOB I think Bush and his cronies are, and those who disagree with us are free to sit around and bitch all day about how we're a bunch of bleeding heart liberals who wouldn't know a decent days work if it bit us in the ass. Agree or not, we all get to say whatever we want, and that's what's important.. America is wonderful :D

I think Deus would have loftier goals than simply the presidency of the UCAS. Perhaps the UN (What's left of it), the NAN, or.... gasp.... the Corporate Court. Deus in control of ZO..... resistance is futile. :cyber:

F'in A, finally found an excuse to use the cyber smiley.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Feb 1 2004, 05:34 AM
Post #62


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,012
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



Together we will administrate the world.

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Dr Komuso
post Feb 1 2004, 05:38 AM
Post #63


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 50
Joined: 14-April 03
Member No.: 4,450



And just try bringing him up on charges of monopoly.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phaeton
post Feb 1 2004, 05:57 AM
Post #64


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 973
Joined: 3-October 03
Member No.: 5,677



...Deus vs. Bill Gates...

...*flees*
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Feb 1 2004, 06:05 AM
Post #65


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,012
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



Deus would have difficulty at first due to being unable to run on horribly-buggy software. Eventually he'd learn to install some version of Linux and reboot systems before invading, making everything much easier.

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phaeton
post Feb 1 2004, 06:10 AM
Post #66


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 973
Joined: 3-October 03
Member No.: 5,677



...And I am suddenly reminded of my Agent Smith vs. Deus thread. :dead: Yay! I'm a complete looney at last!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
GoldenAri
post Feb 1 2004, 02:30 PM
Post #67


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 198
Joined: 26-December 03
Member No.: 5,935



Dues as president would be an awful idea. Once he's in and running on EVERY GOVERNMENT COMPUTER do you really think there would be any way to have a fair election, or in any way remove him from office?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Feb 1 2004, 05:49 PM
Post #68


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,012
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



Once Deus is president, you no longer need elections.

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shockwave_IIc
post Feb 1 2004, 06:20 PM
Post #69


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,512
Joined: 16-August 03
From: Northampton
Member No.: 5,499



There you happy now? i voted. Deus is winning.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Feb 1 2004, 07:01 PM
Post #70


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,012
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



Yay!

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JongWK
post Feb 1 2004, 11:36 PM
Post #71


Shooting Target
****

Group: Validating
Posts: 1,618
Joined: 29-January 03
From: Montevideo, Uruguay.
Member No.: 3,992



I beg your pardon but ... who's Century Ferret?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Foreigner
post Feb 2 2004, 12:51 AM
Post #72


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 586
Joined: 22-November 02
From: Gordonsville, Virginia, U.S.A. (or C.A.S.)
Member No.: 3,630



Dr Komuso:

I agree on one point. You're correct about the freedoms part. I believe that it was Voltaire who said, "I disagree with WHAT you say, but I will DEFEND UNTO DEATH your RIGHT to say it!" [Emphasis mine.]

Kagetenshi:

With all due respect, just because we haven't found the Weapons of Mass Distruction doesn't mean that they either don't exist now, or never existed in the first place.

Don't forget, Saddam and Co. had almost 5 years to hide their stash of forbidden weapons after then-President Clinton didn't do anything more than lodge a complaint with the United Nations following the expulsion from Iraq (in 1998) of all of the U.N. inspectors whose very presence they had agreed to as a condition of the cease-fire which ended the 1991 Gulf War, allegedly (according to the Iraqis, anyway) because they were all C.I.A. agents.

Said cease-fire also gave any of the so-called "Coalition" nations involved in the War--not just the United States, but also Great Britain, France, Kuwait, Syria, and Saudi Arabia, among others-- the right to use MILITARY FORCE to ensure Iraqi compliance with the provisions of the cease-fire agreement, in the event that other forms of coercion were unsuccessful. Under the provisions of the 1991 cease-fire, President Clinton had the authority, if not the obligation, to use military force to ensure the safe return of the U.N. inspectors to Iraq, and also to ensure that they were allowed unrestricted access to all suspected weapons sites--yet, as we all know, he chose not to do so, leaving yet another mess for his successor to clean up.

--Foreigner
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Herald of Verjig...
post Feb 2 2004, 01:10 AM
Post #73


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,066
Joined: 5-February 03
Member No.: 4,017



QUOTE (JongWK)
who's Century Ferret?

The first awakened beasties. Ferrets, yet more than ferrets.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Feb 2 2004, 01:27 AM
Post #74


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,012
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



QUOTE (Foreigner @ Feb 1 2004, 07:51 PM)
With all due respect, just because we haven't found the Weapons of Mass Distruction doesn't mean that they either don't exist now, or never existed in the first place.

The Gulf War demonstrated that the international community was not going to brook aggression by Iraq. Between that and the Clinton-era bombing of anything vaguely approaching infrastructure in Iraq (one of the various things Clinton did that I don't agree with), even if Iraq had N/B/C weapons filling the country hip-deep, they still would not have been a threat to the US. They didn't, and it would have made no sense for them to have had any. Since they could not have used them against their neighbors (Gulf War, as previously mentioned, let them know that their current borders would not be growing) and could not use them within their borders (the aforementioned cease-fire provisions, doing so would alert the world to their presence and be tantamount to suicide). In other words, they had NO USE for these weapons, and their existence could only serve as a liability.
That and the inspectors who got kicked out were all but conclusively demonstrated to have been conducting espionage...

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Dr Komuso
post Feb 2 2004, 02:19 AM
Post #75


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 50
Joined: 14-April 03
Member No.: 4,450



With Deus in office, you don't even need a constituency. :eek:
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

5 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 5 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 21st July 2025 - 06:51 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.