IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Riot Shields..., sword and boarding it
WalksWithWiFi
post Jan 29 2010, 03:56 PM
Post #1


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 98
Joined: 27-December 09
Member No.: 17,999



So, i have a player who on average carries around a ballistic riot shield, he likes to wade into
battle and pretty much use his 6'5 orkish frame to for all intents and purposes, get everyone on his sorry
ass and 'tank'.
Here is where it gets interesting, said player now has the idea to carry two shields, one on his back,
another in his off-hand.
So, should i slap the player with another -1 mod to all phys actions?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Draco18s
post Jan 29 2010, 04:05 PM
Post #2


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,289
Joined: 2-October 08
Member No.: 16,392



I'd slap him with a -1 to all actions and only grant additional armor (equal to half the value of the shield) only when the attack comes from behind. He can't maneuver that shield like the one he's carrying on his arm, so its of limited use, but still causes encumbrance.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nightfalke
post Jan 29 2010, 04:39 PM
Post #3


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 159
Joined: 30-October 09
From: Roseville, MN
Member No.: 17,823



QUOTE (WalksWithWiFi @ Jan 29 2010, 09:56 AM) *
Here is where it gets interesting, said player now has the idea to carry two shields, one on his back,
another in his off-hand.
So, should i slap the player with another -1 mod to all phys actions?


I see someone has been playing a lot of Modern Warfare 2...

At least another -1. It's an inflexable backpack at least, and a major annoyance at most. Most riot shields are not designed to be worn on the back, no matter what the folks at Infinity Ward say, and would probably have to be specially modified to do that comfortably.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Squinky
post Jan 29 2010, 04:49 PM
Post #4


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,479
Joined: 6-May 05
From: Idaho
Member No.: 7,377



My point of view is this:

If he wants additional armor from it, and you agree, trade it off with an appropriate penalty.

If he just wants to have it on him, kinda like some folks carry multiple weapons, and he isn't trying to gain more armor, its all good. Excepting certain physical skill tests (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kliko
post Jan 29 2010, 04:50 PM
Post #5


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,817
Joined: 29-July 07
From: Delft, the Netherlands
Member No.: 12,403



whack your player for being silly (IMG:style_emoticons/default/talker.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Machiavelli
post Jan 29 2010, 06:37 PM
Post #6


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,911
Joined: 26-February 02
From: near Stuttgart
Member No.: 1,749



By the way: do ratings exist for an medieval shield from a knight or an samurai?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BishopMcQ
post Jan 29 2010, 06:42 PM
Post #7


The back-up plan
**********

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 8,423
Joined: 15-January 03
From: San Diego
Member No.: 3,910



I've never seen official stats for a medieval style shield. What I'd recommend is a heater would be +0/+4, a Kite Shield is +1/+5 (with an additional -1 if not on horseback), and a tower shield if +1/+8 (with a -3 for all physical actions when moving with the shield)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kovu Muphasa
post Jan 29 2010, 07:53 PM
Post #8


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 186
Joined: 14-May 05
From: Riverside CA
Member No.: 7,394



As someone who has used Shields in Medieval Reenactment I can tell you this.
-A Shield on the “Back” is a big waste, It is encumbering and unless specifically made for this purpose, very restricting.

I he wants to wear a shield on his back it’s not a shield, It is armor. Apply the Stacking Armor Rules
SR4 pg315
SR4.20 pg 161

Or just say NO! I don’t want to come with rules for that!

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Axl
post Jan 29 2010, 08:03 PM
Post #9


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 175
Joined: 19-October 09
Member No.: 17,767



I would say "no".
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mongoose
post Jan 29 2010, 09:02 PM
Post #10


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 588
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 227



Wearing a big flat board strapped to your back is a sure way to get grabbed from behind and effectively immobilized. Once they grab on, you've got and enemy behind you by an enemy you can't reach or even see. That's exactly why the knights went for armor that allowed MOBILITY.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
wind_in_the_ston...
post Jan 30 2010, 04:47 AM
Post #11


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 560
Joined: 4-March 06
From: Pueblo Corporate Council
Member No.: 8,332



When I was a teenager and played AD&D, we didn't use encumbrance rules, and we did that. Oh, and I was an 80th level paladin.

But if you want to get serious, ask the guy how well he'll be able to maneuver that shield into the path of an attack. When the guy who's behind him is swinging for his head. I'd go with the armor stacking rules, and also that it only applies to attacks from behind. I mean, how often is someone attacked from behind, and hit in the back? Or... there are still too many cases where that wouldn't make sense. Just no.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
WalksWithWiFi
post Jan 30 2010, 06:51 AM
Post #12


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 98
Joined: 27-December 09
Member No.: 17,999



Thanks for all the input,
i will talk to the player, if not direct him to this thread and see what he thinks in general towards his idea now.

thanks again.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Lansdren
post Jan 31 2010, 08:03 PM
Post #13


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 572
Joined: 6-February 09
From: London Uk
Member No.: 16,848



I can speak from experience that trying to walk around with a archers shield on your back is bad enough (mine is abit custom made with a second strap to let me carry it slung over my back when I'm carrying other gear from one place to the other). They are heavy, uncomfortable in that position and only of any use in actual combat if you use them correctly. Whilst I kind of like the idea from a look perspective from a combat perspective its not a very good idea.

I apologise for bring the real world into a discussion about shadowrun
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
McCummhail
post Jan 31 2010, 11:28 PM
Post #14


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 388
Joined: 30-July 09
From: Charlotte, NC
Member No.: 17,452



If he wants to gain some benefit from it, he can use the ladder eqp on the SWAT shields to use it as stationary cover.
He would be using it as Cover rather than Armor with those rules applicable.
The main drawback is having to set it rather than carrying it.
In the end, the bother of dealing with 2 shields if probably not worth the benefit.
I had a troll hacker that carried a shield almost everywhere and it was a constant hassle.
2 would be a logistic nightmare in most situations.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CanadianWolverin...
post Feb 1 2010, 01:53 AM
Post #15


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 574
Joined: 22-June 09
From: Ucluelet - Tofino - Nanaimo Salish-Sahide Council
Member No.: 17,309



Stacking Armor rules sounds good enough to me. Let him have his fun and the encumbrance penalties that come with it. *shrug*
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Saint Sithney
post Feb 1 2010, 04:40 AM
Post #16


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,705
Joined: 5-October 09
From: You are in a clearing
Member No.: 17,722



Make him the butt of a bunch of turtle jokes. Everywhere he goes, it's "Cowabunga dude!"
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MikeKozar
post Feb 1 2010, 05:47 AM
Post #17


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 557
Joined: 26-July 09
From: Kent, WA
Member No.: 17,426



Just out of curiosity, do riot forces ever rig those Troll-stunners to their riot shields? Give 'em a little more punch?

...'cause I think they do in my game now. >:D

(checks his SR4A on the way to the Patent Office) Oh, hey, look at that...pg 327.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BishopMcQ
post Feb 1 2010, 07:48 PM
Post #18


The back-up plan
**********

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 8,423
Joined: 15-January 03
From: San Diego
Member No.: 3,910



Shock shields were introduced in SR3, SotA 64 I want to say...I had a combat shaman who fought with one. I almost made it a sustaining focus to, but I never got around to it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ophis
post Feb 1 2010, 08:00 PM
Post #19


Mystery Archaeologist
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,906
Joined: 19-September 05
From: The apple tree
Member No.: 7,760



QUOTE (BishopMcQ @ Feb 1 2010, 07:48 PM) *
Shock shields were introduced in SR3, SotA 64 I want to say...I had a combat shaman who fought with one. I almost made it a sustaining focus to, but I never got around to it.


Surely throwing it is the next logical stage.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Draco18s
post Feb 1 2010, 08:05 PM
Post #20


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,289
Joined: 2-October 08
Member No.: 16,392



QUOTE (Ophis @ Feb 1 2010, 03:00 PM) *
Surely throwing it is the next logical stage.


See my signature.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Neraph
post Feb 1 2010, 11:37 PM
Post #21


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,542
Joined: 30-September 08
From: D/FW Megaplex
Member No.: 16,387



QUOTE (Ophis @ Feb 1 2010, 02:00 PM) *
Surely throwing it is the next logical stage.

Missile Mastery + Power Throw.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ophis
post Feb 1 2010, 11:55 PM
Post #22


Mystery Archaeologist
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,906
Joined: 19-September 05
From: The apple tree
Member No.: 7,760



QUOTE (Neraph @ Feb 1 2010, 11:37 PM) *
Missile Mastery + Power Throw.


Obviously. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Neraph
post Feb 2 2010, 12:15 AM
Post #23


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,542
Joined: 30-September 08
From: D/FW Megaplex
Member No.: 16,387



Oh, let's add a smartgun link to the taser shield, then add an explosive self destruct advanced saftey.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MikeKozar
post Feb 2 2010, 02:05 AM
Post #24


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 557
Joined: 26-July 09
From: Kent, WA
Member No.: 17,426



QUOTE (Neraph @ Feb 1 2010, 04:15 PM) *
Oh, let's add a smartgun link to the taser shield, then add an explosive self destruct advanced saftey.


Self-propelled mod and a pilot system so it can fly back to you.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ophis
post Feb 2 2010, 08:16 AM
Post #25


Mystery Archaeologist
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,906
Joined: 19-September 05
From: The apple tree
Member No.: 7,760



QUOTE (MikeKozar @ Feb 2 2010, 02:05 AM) *
Self-propelled mod and a pilot system so it can fly back to you.


I'd suggest Dikote (but its gone) and inhabiting it with my ally spirit. That way it can fly and thus bounce off wall back to me.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 28th April 2024 - 09:59 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.