Riot Shields..., sword and boarding it |
Riot Shields..., sword and boarding it |
Jan 29 2010, 03:56 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Target Group: Members Posts: 98 Joined: 27-December 09 Member No.: 17,999 |
So, i have a player who on average carries around a ballistic riot shield, he likes to wade into
battle and pretty much use his 6'5 orkish frame to for all intents and purposes, get everyone on his sorry ass and 'tank'. Here is where it gets interesting, said player now has the idea to carry two shields, one on his back, another in his off-hand. So, should i slap the player with another -1 mod to all phys actions? |
|
|
Jan 29 2010, 04:05 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Immortal Elf Group: Members Posts: 10,289 Joined: 2-October 08 Member No.: 16,392 |
I'd slap him with a -1 to all actions and only grant additional armor (equal to half the value of the shield) only when the attack comes from behind. He can't maneuver that shield like the one he's carrying on his arm, so its of limited use, but still causes encumbrance.
|
|
|
Jan 29 2010, 04:39 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 159 Joined: 30-October 09 From: Roseville, MN Member No.: 17,823 |
Here is where it gets interesting, said player now has the idea to carry two shields, one on his back, another in his off-hand. So, should i slap the player with another -1 mod to all phys actions? I see someone has been playing a lot of Modern Warfare 2... At least another -1. It's an inflexable backpack at least, and a major annoyance at most. Most riot shields are not designed to be worn on the back, no matter what the folks at Infinity Ward say, and would probably have to be specially modified to do that comfortably. |
|
|
Jan 29 2010, 04:49 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,479 Joined: 6-May 05 From: Idaho Member No.: 7,377 |
My point of view is this:
If he wants additional armor from it, and you agree, trade it off with an appropriate penalty. If he just wants to have it on him, kinda like some folks carry multiple weapons, and he isn't trying to gain more armor, its all good. Excepting certain physical skill tests (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) |
|
|
Jan 29 2010, 04:50 PM
Post
#5
|
|
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,817 Joined: 29-July 07 From: Delft, the Netherlands Member No.: 12,403 |
whack your player for being silly (IMG:style_emoticons/default/talker.gif)
|
|
|
Jan 29 2010, 06:37 PM
Post
#6
|
|
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,911 Joined: 26-February 02 From: near Stuttgart Member No.: 1,749 |
By the way: do ratings exist for an medieval shield from a knight or an samurai?
|
|
|
Jan 29 2010, 06:42 PM
Post
#7
|
|
The back-up plan Group: Retired Admins Posts: 8,423 Joined: 15-January 03 From: San Diego Member No.: 3,910 |
I've never seen official stats for a medieval style shield. What I'd recommend is a heater would be +0/+4, a Kite Shield is +1/+5 (with an additional -1 if not on horseback), and a tower shield if +1/+8 (with a -3 for all physical actions when moving with the shield)
|
|
|
Jan 29 2010, 07:53 PM
Post
#8
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 186 Joined: 14-May 05 From: Riverside CA Member No.: 7,394 |
As someone who has used Shields in Medieval Reenactment I can tell you this.
-A Shield on the “Back” is a big waste, It is encumbering and unless specifically made for this purpose, very restricting. I he wants to wear a shield on his back it’s not a shield, It is armor. Apply the Stacking Armor Rules SR4 pg315 SR4.20 pg 161 Or just say NO! I don’t want to come with rules for that! |
|
|
Jan 29 2010, 08:03 PM
Post
#9
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 175 Joined: 19-October 09 Member No.: 17,767 |
I would say "no".
|
|
|
Jan 29 2010, 09:02 PM
Post
#10
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 588 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 227 |
Wearing a big flat board strapped to your back is a sure way to get grabbed from behind and effectively immobilized. Once they grab on, you've got and enemy behind you by an enemy you can't reach or even see. That's exactly why the knights went for armor that allowed MOBILITY.
|
|
|
Jan 30 2010, 04:47 AM
Post
#11
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 560 Joined: 4-March 06 From: Pueblo Corporate Council Member No.: 8,332 |
When I was a teenager and played AD&D, we didn't use encumbrance rules, and we did that. Oh, and I was an 80th level paladin.
But if you want to get serious, ask the guy how well he'll be able to maneuver that shield into the path of an attack. When the guy who's behind him is swinging for his head. I'd go with the armor stacking rules, and also that it only applies to attacks from behind. I mean, how often is someone attacked from behind, and hit in the back? Or... there are still too many cases where that wouldn't make sense. Just no. |
|
|
Jan 30 2010, 06:51 AM
Post
#12
|
|
Target Group: Members Posts: 98 Joined: 27-December 09 Member No.: 17,999 |
Thanks for all the input,
i will talk to the player, if not direct him to this thread and see what he thinks in general towards his idea now. thanks again. |
|
|
Jan 31 2010, 08:03 PM
Post
#13
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 572 Joined: 6-February 09 From: London Uk Member No.: 16,848 |
I can speak from experience that trying to walk around with a archers shield on your back is bad enough (mine is abit custom made with a second strap to let me carry it slung over my back when I'm carrying other gear from one place to the other). They are heavy, uncomfortable in that position and only of any use in actual combat if you use them correctly. Whilst I kind of like the idea from a look perspective from a combat perspective its not a very good idea.
I apologise for bring the real world into a discussion about shadowrun |
|
|
Jan 31 2010, 11:28 PM
Post
#14
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 388 Joined: 30-July 09 From: Charlotte, NC Member No.: 17,452 |
If he wants to gain some benefit from it, he can use the ladder eqp on the SWAT shields to use it as stationary cover.
He would be using it as Cover rather than Armor with those rules applicable. The main drawback is having to set it rather than carrying it. In the end, the bother of dealing with 2 shields if probably not worth the benefit. I had a troll hacker that carried a shield almost everywhere and it was a constant hassle. 2 would be a logistic nightmare in most situations. |
|
|
Feb 1 2010, 01:53 AM
Post
#15
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 574 Joined: 22-June 09 From: Ucluelet - Tofino - Nanaimo Salish-Sahide Council Member No.: 17,309 |
Stacking Armor rules sounds good enough to me. Let him have his fun and the encumbrance penalties that come with it. *shrug*
|
|
|
Feb 1 2010, 04:40 AM
Post
#16
|
|
Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,705 Joined: 5-October 09 From: You are in a clearing Member No.: 17,722 |
Make him the butt of a bunch of turtle jokes. Everywhere he goes, it's "Cowabunga dude!"
|
|
|
Feb 1 2010, 05:47 AM
Post
#17
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 557 Joined: 26-July 09 From: Kent, WA Member No.: 17,426 |
Just out of curiosity, do riot forces ever rig those Troll-stunners to their riot shields? Give 'em a little more punch?
...'cause I think they do in my game now. >:D (checks his SR4A on the way to the Patent Office) Oh, hey, look at that...pg 327. |
|
|
Feb 1 2010, 07:48 PM
Post
#18
|
|
The back-up plan Group: Retired Admins Posts: 8,423 Joined: 15-January 03 From: San Diego Member No.: 3,910 |
Shock shields were introduced in SR3, SotA 64 I want to say...I had a combat shaman who fought with one. I almost made it a sustaining focus to, but I never got around to it.
|
|
|
Feb 1 2010, 08:00 PM
Post
#19
|
|
Mystery Archaeologist Group: Members Posts: 2,906 Joined: 19-September 05 From: The apple tree Member No.: 7,760 |
|
|
|
Feb 1 2010, 08:05 PM
Post
#20
|
|
Immortal Elf Group: Members Posts: 10,289 Joined: 2-October 08 Member No.: 16,392 |
|
|
|
Feb 1 2010, 11:37 PM
Post
#21
|
|
Great Dragon Group: Members Posts: 5,542 Joined: 30-September 08 From: D/FW Megaplex Member No.: 16,387 |
|
|
|
Feb 1 2010, 11:55 PM
Post
#22
|
|
Mystery Archaeologist Group: Members Posts: 2,906 Joined: 19-September 05 From: The apple tree Member No.: 7,760 |
|
|
|
Feb 2 2010, 12:15 AM
Post
#23
|
|
Great Dragon Group: Members Posts: 5,542 Joined: 30-September 08 From: D/FW Megaplex Member No.: 16,387 |
Oh, let's add a smartgun link to the taser shield, then add an explosive self destruct advanced saftey.
|
|
|
Feb 2 2010, 02:05 AM
Post
#24
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 557 Joined: 26-July 09 From: Kent, WA Member No.: 17,426 |
|
|
|
Feb 2 2010, 08:16 AM
Post
#25
|
|
Mystery Archaeologist Group: Members Posts: 2,906 Joined: 19-September 05 From: The apple tree Member No.: 7,760 |
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 28th April 2024 - 09:59 AM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.