IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

15 Pages V  « < 4 5 6 7 8 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Starting a new game., or at least gathering interest.
Crank
post Mar 15 2010, 03:31 PM
Post #126


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 94
Joined: 27-May 08
Member No.: 16,009



I know you said that you're going to be nitpicking each character this week. Does this mean that you're going to finish that and then make the final selection?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ravensoracle
post Mar 15 2010, 03:50 PM
Post #127


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 514
Joined: 31-July 08
From: Midwest, USA ~50mi NW of B.F.E.
Member No.: 16,184



I'll be making a final selection this week. I like the characters that have been submitted and I MAY go above my limit of 5. But if I do I will be very strict about keeping the game going. I think I've been pretty explicit about this from the beginning, that I have no qualms about dropping someone who drags down the game. Especially if it is at risk of dying.

This next part may seem like a jerk move, it does to me. But I am doing it anyway. If anyone has seen that a player that has submitted a character has been the death of another game, PM with this information. I won't call anyone out in a public forum but I want to know so it can be addressed. I am putting a lot of work into this game. I'm an insomniac so I have a lot of late nights already devoted. I just don't want to waste my time on a venture that may likely fail. The chances already for a game to survive on these forums are slim.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BlackHat
post Mar 15 2010, 04:10 PM
Post #128


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,486
Joined: 17-March 05
From: Michigan
Member No.: 7,180



QUOTE (ravensoracle @ Mar 15 2010, 11:24 AM) *
Knowing each other is completely up to you. Come up with a good story and I'll most likely approve it. It does take some of the awkwardness out of the initial meeting.

This will probably be easier later in the week, after people know who is in the team.

That said, I put some stuff in Tag's BG/50 about being extracted from a research facility, and being kept (as additional payment - and, later, as a contributing member) by the team which did the extraction. In order to make room for Tag to join a new team, however, I wrote that the other team had a botched job, and are now either dead, laying low, or retired... which leaves Tag looking for another way to make itself useful, and to pay for its maintenance.

If Tag is a part of the final cut, and anyone is interested, having the current team be the team that did the extraction (or at least have a few people in common) would be fine by me, and makes for a better story than Tag's old team conveniently disappearing. But, I can work with it, either way.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
cndblank
post Mar 15 2010, 04:39 PM
Post #129


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,210
Joined: 5-September 05
From: Texas
Member No.: 7,685



I'm all for everyone knowing at least one other person.

Keeps the game going.

Best of both worlds really since we really are trying to learn how to work together. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)


I'm open to suggestions on joint background.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
cndblank
post Mar 15 2010, 05:57 PM
Post #130


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,210
Joined: 5-September 05
From: Texas
Member No.: 7,685



Kit's sheet been updated. Still have not spend final 100K and gear is not finalized.

Touching up the 50 questions next.

Open to suggestions
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
cndblank
post Mar 15 2010, 06:03 PM
Post #131


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,210
Joined: 5-September 05
From: Texas
Member No.: 7,685



On casting an illusion spell on sensors.

It is 4 successes to overcome the Object Resistance of a camera or sensor with an illusion spell, correct?

And that applies even to a drone's sensors?

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ravensoracle
post Mar 15 2010, 06:29 PM
Post #132


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 514
Joined: 31-July 08
From: Midwest, USA ~50mi NW of B.F.E.
Member No.: 16,184



I'd have to look it up and I am AFB, anyone know off hand.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BlackHat
post Mar 15 2010, 06:36 PM
Post #133


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,486
Joined: 17-March 05
From: Michigan
Member No.: 7,180



Tough to say. A drone (and other computers, vehicles, etc) are "6+" but electronic equipment is "4". I suppose for illusion spells you don't need to affect the entire drone, just its camera-sensor, so it looks reasonable to me at first glance.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ravensoracle
post Mar 15 2010, 06:41 PM
Post #134


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 514
Joined: 31-July 08
From: Midwest, USA ~50mi NW of B.F.E.
Member No.: 16,184



Just got a call. The Universal Joint just went out on my SUV, I am having to got pick it up and trailer it home. I will be on for the next hour while I wait for the trailer to get here but then my plans are shot for the rest of the day. Take all plans for the game so far and bump it back at least a day.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
zzyxzs
post Mar 15 2010, 06:52 PM
Post #135


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 50
Joined: 6-February 10
Member No.: 18,118



Official errata has changed object resistance thresholds to 3 for sensors, 5+ for drones, hasn't it?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BlackHat
post Mar 15 2010, 06:55 PM
Post #136


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,486
Joined: 17-March 05
From: Michigan
Member No.: 7,180



QUOTE (zzyxzs @ Mar 15 2010, 01:52 PM) *
Official errata has changed object resistance thresholds to 3 for sensors, 5+ for drones, hasn't it?

Yeah, I just looked that up, and you're right. The fact that it calls out sensors, specifically, rather than just "electronic equipment" makes it pretty clear in this case that the OR should be 3.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
cndblank
post Mar 15 2010, 07:32 PM
Post #137


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,210
Joined: 5-September 05
From: Texas
Member No.: 7,685



So it is 3 successes to fool the drone's sensors that I'm not here with my Improved Invisibility spell.

And 5 successes to use my Shape Metal spell to change all the drone's metal parts to liquid (Bye Bye firing pin, Bye Bye magazine spring, Bye Bye ball bearings, Bye Bye 4 independent electric motor drive wheels. Bye Bye antenna, Bye Bye battery cable, Bye Bye drone)


Pretty damn hard to do but sounds fair considering.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ravensoracle
post Mar 15 2010, 07:46 PM
Post #138


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 514
Joined: 31-July 08
From: Midwest, USA ~50mi NW of B.F.E.
Member No.: 16,184



While I do reward creativity, I will admit I am a hardass about allowing something that is a insta-kill spell like that when there are other spells out there designed to take out a drone that require more hits and cause greater drain.

EDIT: For something like that I'd probably up the threshold slightly. I like to think that I am a laidback GM and let most things fly but I do differentiate between rule use and abuse. Not saying your idea isn't a good one. I like it, but like I said I'd probably add a to the threshold simply because of using it in a combat application like that and expecting inst-death.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
pbangarth
post Mar 15 2010, 07:58 PM
Post #139


Old Man of the North
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 10,584
Joined: 14-August 03
From: Just north of the Centre of the Universe
Member No.: 5,463



QUOTE (ravensoracle @ Mar 15 2010, 01:46 PM) *
While I do reward creativity, I will admit I am a hardass about allowing something that is a insta-kill spell like that when there are other spells out there designed to take out a drone that require more hits and cause greater drain.

EDIT: For something like that I'd probably up the threshold slightly. I like to think that I am a laidback GM and let most things fly but I do differentiate between rule use and abuse. Not saying your idea isn't a good one. I like it, but like I said I'd probably add a to the threshold simply because of using it in a combat application like that and expecting inst-death.
Rather than upping the threshold, you might consider that the machine is made of contiguous and interlocking pieces that are still separate, and take into account line of sight. Whatever metal the the mage can see, he can affect, but other pieces not fused to the parts he can see remain untouched. This may make the spell still a damn fine spell, but not necessarily an 'instakill'.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Crank
post Mar 15 2010, 08:08 PM
Post #140


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 94
Joined: 27-May 08
Member No.: 16,009



QUOTE (ravensoracle @ Mar 15 2010, 02:46 PM) *
While I do reward creativity, I will admit I am a hardass about allowing something that is a insta-kill spell like that when there are other spells out there designed to take out a drone that require more hits and cause greater drain.

EDIT: For something like that I'd probably up the threshold slightly. I like to think that I am a laidback GM and let most things fly but I do differentiate between rule use and abuse. Not saying your idea isn't a good one. I like it, but like I said I'd probably add a to the threshold simply because of using it in a combat application like that and expecting inst-death.

Another option is in cases like that, treat the spell like a damaging manipulation spell. Give the Drone resistance instead of the threshold of 5 and net hits do damage.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ravensoracle
post Mar 15 2010, 08:08 PM
Post #141


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 514
Joined: 31-July 08
From: Midwest, USA ~50mi NW of B.F.E.
Member No.: 16,184



That is an interesting way of putting it. I like that and will use it. As an aside, anyone feel free at any time to make suggestions like this anytime. I think we're all experienced players and many of us GM. I know I am not perfect and others have ideas better than mine.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
zzyxzs
post Mar 15 2010, 08:24 PM
Post #142


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 50
Joined: 6-February 10
Member No.: 18,118



Also, the object resistance threshold for drones is "5+" not 5, so a threshold higher than 5 would still be within the listed guidelines.

On another note, I've updated my sheet with the latest changes (mostly contacts, gear, qualities, and an updated questionnaire) here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
cndblank
post Mar 15 2010, 08:37 PM
Post #143


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,210
Joined: 5-September 05
From: Texas
Member No.: 7,685



I was looking for an example of a spell that needed the full 5 successes vs a simple physical Illusion spell only needing the 3 rather than plotting any insta-Drone-icide. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)

The only being able to change the metal that is visible (or directly connected to a visible piece of metal) would certainly slow you down considering how common plastic panels are on cars now let alone in 50 years. And is perfectly valid. Had the same issues come up when my players tried to Tunnel up a mountain using Shape Stone. And I certain agree that the smaller drones would likely have little metal in them at all.

I picked Shape Metal because I assume that HVAC duct works are still use metal (tin/aluminum) and metal grates are still common in air and sewer systems. I understand Jail bars are usually ceramic or plasteel to prevent monofilament saws from making short work of them.


Well Shape Material has the same drain as a Power Ball spell. And you have to break the material free from an existing structure (you can reduced the structure rating by the force of the spell per combat turn which would do in most medium drones but then so would a Powerball.)

Not to mention that it would do nothing to Plasteel or carbon fiber composite.


How about using Animate or Glue against a drone (as a purely academic examples)?


Speaking of being creative, One thought does come to mind.
Shape Metal is an area effect spell.

So assume a gun is mostly metal and most of the metal components are connected
And given that she could not effect a gun designed with ceramic or plasteel components.
Also assuming that there is no shortage of targets that are clearly visible and with in the area of effect.

How any could she weld solid (and unusable) in a single action? One per force of spell per combat turn? Or just one per action?
Or is that being ridicules?

Course the damm miniguns are likely compost barrels design to handle the super high heat levels.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Red-ROM
post Mar 15 2010, 08:49 PM
Post #144


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,756
Joined: 17-January 09
From: Va Beach , CAS
Member No.: 16,787



QUOTE (Glyph @ Mar 15 2010, 07:37 AM) *
Remember that for Attributes, you can spend half of your starting Karma, plus twice the listed BP cost for your metatype. So an ork can spend 375 + (20 x 2), or 415.

I didn't differentiate between the 750 and the 100 Karma because I didn't do anything post-chargen with it (buying Attributes past the 415 limit, getting a second skill at 6, etc.).


I figured as much, but your karma already added up to 850 with the core attributes listed at 345, i'm not trying to be a dick, feel free to check my math too
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ravensoracle
post Mar 15 2010, 08:55 PM
Post #145


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 514
Joined: 31-July 08
From: Midwest, USA ~50mi NW of B.F.E.
Member No.: 16,184



Ok guys before I leave I have made a decision. I like the characters submitted so far so I am going out on a limb and aloowing all characters submitted to join the game. I am still with-holding final approval on all characters until I get to look over them better but the concepts are accepted. Welcome to the game everyone. Now don't disappoint me and let's all work to keep this game going.

To move things along a little quicker, everyone review each others characters. Point out any number crunching errors or glaring mistakes. I promise as soon as I get the car situation dealt with I will dedicate time to final approval of characters.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
zzyxzs
post Mar 15 2010, 09:09 PM
Post #146


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 50
Joined: 6-February 10
Member No.: 18,118



QUOTE (Crank @ Mar 13 2010, 06:20 PM) *
Urban Explorer Jumpsuit: 6/6 [6] {500¥}
-Biomonitor {300¥}


The Urban Explorer Jumpsuit has a built-in biomonitor. You just saved 300¥!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
malachite333
post Mar 15 2010, 10:05 PM
Post #147


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 21
Joined: 27-October 09
Member No.: 17,796



Since we're doing the peer review thing here's my character.


[ Spoiler ]


Attributes
[ Spoiler ]


Qualities
[ Spoiler ]


Active skills
[ Spoiler ]


Knowledge skills
[ Spoiler ]


Adept powers
[ Spoiler ]


Gear
[ Spoiler ]


Contacts
[ Spoiler ]


50+ questions
[ Spoiler ]


Background
[ Spoiler ]







Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
pbangarth
post Mar 15 2010, 11:41 PM
Post #148


Old Man of the North
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 10,584
Joined: 14-August 03
From: Just north of the Centre of the Universe
Member No.: 5,463



Wow, malachite333, two of us with Sensing and Psychometry! And other Adept powers the same too. I wonder if Bongo and Antony know each other.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
malachite333
post Mar 16 2010, 01:58 AM
Post #149


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 21
Joined: 27-October 09
Member No.: 17,796



You're right they do share a lot of powers. If Bongo ever got shot up and needed patching up off the books they could very well have met.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Glyph
post Mar 16 2010, 04:59 AM
Post #150


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,116
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 1,449



QUOTE (Red-ROM @ Mar 15 2010, 01:49 PM) *
I figured as much, but your karma already added up to 850 with the core attributes listed at 345, i'm not trying to be a dick, feel free to check my math too

Null sweat, I know you were just trying to be helpful.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

15 Pages V  « < 4 5 6 7 8 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 14th June 2026 - 08:11 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.