IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

28 Pages V  « < 25 26 27 28 >  
Closed TopicStart new topic
> The Great CGL Rumors and Speculation Thread
Demonseed Elite
post Mar 23 2010, 06:04 PM
Post #651


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,078
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 67



QUOTE (JM Hardy @ Mar 23 2010, 11:52 AM) *
QFT. I'm trying to move Shadowrun forward, but I know plenty of mistakes have been made that shouldn't have happened. However, I should point out that I wouldn't be still trying to move forward if I did not think people were working to address those mistakes.

Jason H.


And I would like to believe those mistakes are being addressed on a long-term basis (and not just as an short-term fix), but I've been involved with three Shadowrun license holders now and I've heard that exact statement a few times already, including from Catalyst years ago.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
emouse
post Mar 23 2010, 06:12 PM
Post #652


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 233
Joined: 26-October 02
Member No.: 3,502



RE: Ancient's quote from the WildFire site

That would seem to fall into the slow-to-print issues that CGL has had for a while now, which is possibly related to what has been going on with their finances? The post is not specific; the 'renegotiations' could involve some sort of withholding by WF to get CGL to pay on something, or it could involve WF trying to get CGL to up the print run or reprint certain material beyond whatever existing contract might exist.

The notice was posted March 11th, another sign that the issue in question might have been known about and was being dealt with well before being made public?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JM Hardy
post Mar 23 2010, 06:18 PM
Post #653


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 595
Joined: 12-May 05
Member No.: 7,392



QUOTE (Demonseed Elite @ Mar 23 2010, 01:04 PM) *
And I would like to believe those mistakes are being addressed on a long-term basis (and not just as an short-term fix), but I've been involved with three Shadowrun license holders now and I've heard that exact statement a few times already, including from Catalyst years ago.


I can't dispute that, unfortunately. Mistakes have been made by various license holders. As I mentioned earlier, the only proof of how the new processes will work will be what happens next. If Catalyst cannot get its house in order and cannot pay freelancers, it will deserve what it gets, and what it gets will not be good.

Jason H.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nezumi
post Mar 23 2010, 06:28 PM
Post #654


Incertum est quo loco te mors expectet;
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,546
Joined: 24-October 03
From: DeeCee, U.S.
Member No.: 5,760



Really, either path is a gamble.

Stick with CGL, who so far has shown itself to be of questionable integrity, and who has lost the loyalty of some of the best writers Shadowrun ever had. IF they right their boat, they're going to be taking on a lot more freelancers to fill out the ranks. What quality will their work be? That depends a lot on management and the line developer. We're gambling they'll keep more or less the same view as has been established. CGL has made some good products. I don't normally consider buying books for an edition of a game I don't play, but the CGL products look to have been good stuff. But with this turnover, past performance is not a dependable indicator of future performance.

Move to someone else and... well, even a bigger gamble. I don't totally understand the Topps/Fan Pro relationship, but Fan Pro has taken good care of us. Would they sell to Hasbro? Would they hold onto it for some little new guy? (CGL was a 'little new guy' when it acquired Shadowrun - but it advertised a lot of passion for the brand name, which it held to.) If they sell it to someone else, I think we can bet on a new edition in 2011/2012. If it's new management, maybe a few of the older freelancers will come back/follow along (I don't know AH personally, but from what I've seen of his work, Shadowrun is in his blood, and he couldn't stay away for long, and I think Bull "comes with" the property (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nyahnyah.gif) ). But what would fifth edition look like? It almost certainly will take another step away from SR3, and won't be like SR4. It'll be... different. Good different or bad is still just a toss of the dice.


Choose between the evil you know or the evil you don't. Looking at the odds though, CGL seems to be the safer bet.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MindandPen
post Mar 23 2010, 06:46 PM
Post #655


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 200
Joined: 23-March 10
From: Nashville, TN, CAS
Member No.: 18,348



QUOTE (nezumi @ Mar 23 2010, 12:28 PM) *
Really, either path is a gamble.

[-- SNIP --]

Choose between the evil you know or the evil you don't. Looking at the odds though, CGL seems to be the safer bet.


Personally, I'd rather see CGL pull it off.

QUOTE (JM Hardy @ Mar 23 2010, 12:18 PM) *
I can't dispute that, unfortunately. Mistakes have been made by various license holders. As I mentioned earlier, the only proof of how the new processes will work will be what happens next. If Catalyst cannot get its house in order and cannot pay freelancers, it will deserve what it gets, and what it gets will not be good.


@Jason
You are correct. At least you guys know what the situation is, as far as the fans are concerned, and you are trying to move forward. While I know you can not control the ownership, I think that a greater accounting for the situation that lead up to $850,000 missing would be a good thing. In this case, I think heads need to roll as well.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Sengir
post Mar 23 2010, 06:54 PM
Post #656


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 5,086
Joined: 3-October 09
From: Kohle, Stahl und Bier
Member No.: 17,709



QUOTE (raben-aas @ Mar 23 2010, 10:48 AM) *
And yes, 850.000$ is no small amount of cash, but I imagine any corp financially big enough that you can actually take 850.000$ WITHOUT ANYONE NOTICING may not be THAT bad off.

If "a significant balance" in company money can go missing without anyone moticing, either through bad bookkeeping or plain theft, the company DOES have a significant problem. And not just a monetary one.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JM Hardy
post Mar 23 2010, 06:58 PM
Post #657


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 595
Joined: 12-May 05
Member No.: 7,392



QUOTE (MindandPen @ Mar 23 2010, 01:46 PM) *
@Jason
You are correct. At least you guys know what the situation is, as far as the fans are concerned, and you are trying to move forward. While I know you can not control the ownership, I think that a greater accounting for the situation that lead up to $850,000 missing would be a good thing. In this case, I think heads need to roll as well.


First, let me just say that I am totally not in a position to say anything about any dollar amounts, and nothing I say should be taken as any sort of commentary, one way or another, on those numbers.

Second, Catalyst is a privately owned company, meaning there will be activities that will not take place in the public eye. For many reasons, businesses tend to keep their financial info and other business matters private, and that's going to be the case here. The owners, however, need a greater amount of info about the whole situation, and I am told that have been and will continue to receive it. Others involved with Catalyst have also been provided with additional information about the situation, what is happening next, and why management has made some of the decisions they are making.

What people will do in response to this information is their decision. What more comes out to the public is not my decision--management will continue working on official communications as the situation progresses.

Jason H.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tete
post Mar 23 2010, 07:09 PM
Post #658


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,095
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Seattle Wa, USA
Member No.: 1,139



QUOTE (emouse @ Mar 23 2010, 05:57 PM) *
Where did you get that info? Over the weekend WildFire had a very 'wait and see' attitude.

Or is this conflating the partially incorrect ICV2 news item that CGL responded to and ICV2 ended up pulling?

Edit: And has since been reposed with more correct information and CGL's response to the original, "there has been no halt to sales of any Cthulhu Tech products."


Off a link on RPG.net, I'm assuming the info has been updated seeing how I read it on Saturday and I cant get rpg.net at work. As of Saturday they were considering legal action if necessary, but it sounds like they are working it out with CGL now. Its just pointing to that it would appear that CGL has problems paying people on time PERIOD. Not just Shadowrun freelancers. Maybe they don't have the money but all in all it looks grim to always pay your bills late.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
The Monk
post Mar 23 2010, 07:29 PM
Post #659


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 258
Joined: 31-January 08
Member No.: 15,593



QUOTE (tete @ Mar 23 2010, 02:09 PM) *
Its just pointing to that it would appear that CGL has problems paying people on time PERIOD. Not just Shadowrun freelancers. Maybe they don't have the money but all in all it looks grim to always pay your bills late.


Telling your employees to keep working, they'll get paid when the company makes a little money is one thing. Saying that and "accidentally" making hundreds of thousands of dollars while people working for you are tightening their belts is outrageous (if in fact that is what's happened).

I hope when all of this settles down, the owners have the guts to come on here, if not to explain themselves then just to get an ear full from the fans.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hobgoblin
post Mar 23 2010, 07:31 PM
Post #660


panda!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,331
Joined: 8-March 02
From: north of central europe
Member No.: 2,242



QUOTE (kzt @ Mar 23 2010, 06:59 PM) *
Begins to make you think that Frank was right all along, eh?

scares the crap out of me.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Rotbart van Dain...
post Mar 23 2010, 07:32 PM
Post #661


Hoppelhäschen 5000
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,807
Joined: 3-January 04
Member No.: 5,951



QUOTE (Bull @ Mar 23 2010, 01:51 PM) *
Who says that whoever gets the license has any interest in working with the former freelancers?

It's been that way when FASA caved in and FanPro, a former sub-licensee, took over. It's been that way when FanPro caved in and CGL took over. Sure – not everyone continued marching on.
QUOTE (Bull @ Mar 23 2010, 01:51 PM) *
Who says they're not going to gut the game and remake it in some horrible image.

While I'm not an entirely big fan with the german additions or changes under FanPro and even acknowledging that some of the people (the nicer ones) from FanPro now work at Pegasus – it didn't ruin Shadowrun.

Sure, I might not like the changes in layout design or the covers (and, honestly – there are people hating the original covers even more) – but it's far from "some horrible image".
QUOTE (Bull @ Mar 23 2010, 01:51 PM) *
THere's no guarantee anyone will even pick up the license.

There is no guarantee for nothing. On the other hand, history seems repeating itself, so I'm considering the likelihood that Pegasus stops being a sub-licensee and becoming the main licensee quite more than "slighty bigger" than "very slim."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
emouse
post Mar 23 2010, 07:34 PM
Post #662


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 233
Joined: 26-October 02
Member No.: 3,502



QUOTE (tete @ Mar 23 2010, 08:09 PM) *
Off a link on RPG.net, I'm assuming the info has been updated seeing how I read it on Saturday and I cant get rpg.net at work.


Such info was probably originating from the WildFire board, where their head has posted a few things in response. It mainly adds up to WildFire is keeping their options open, currently willing to continue to work with Catalyst and in negotiations with them, but also considering other options to continue CT as a product if their relationship with CGL is not resolved satisfactorily.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bull
post Mar 23 2010, 07:45 PM
Post #663


Grumpy Old Ork Decker
*******

Group: Admin
Posts: 3,794
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Orwell, Ohio
Member No.: 50



QUOTE (Rotbart van Dainig @ Mar 23 2010, 02:32 PM) *
It's been that way when FASA caved in and FanPro, a former sub-licensee, took over. It's been that way when FanPro caved in and CGL took over. Sure – not everyone continued marching on.

While I'm not an entirely big fan with the german additions or changes under FanPro and even acknowledging that some of the people (the nicer ones) from FanPro now work at Pegasus – it didn't ruin Shadowrun.

Sure, I might not like the changes in layout design or the covers (and, honestly – there are people hating the original covers even more) – but it's far from "some horrible image".

There is no guarantee for nothing. On the other hand, history seems repeating itself, so I'm considering the likelihood that Pegasus stops being a sub-licensee and becoming the main licensee quite more than "slighty bigger" than "very slim."


Here's the thing to keep in mind in both cases though... WHen the properties were licensed, the staff had already been in place. It was a staff of folks who had worked with the previous company extentsivly. CGL pretty much just brought over all of FanPro LLC when they got it, for example. There was some change, but by and large the chain of people working on Shadowrun has been unbroken despite the changes in companies.

Of course, that could potentially happen yet again if, somehow, everyone who left got together to form a new company and were able to raise enough captial to start up a publishing business and acquire he license. But chances seem somewhat slim on that front.

Bull
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hobgoblin
post Mar 23 2010, 07:49 PM
Post #664


panda!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,331
Joined: 8-March 02
From: north of central europe
Member No.: 2,242



or they get hired on by the new licensee. Right now anything can happen.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
emouse
post Mar 23 2010, 07:53 PM
Post #665


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 233
Joined: 26-October 02
Member No.: 3,502



QUOTE (Bull @ Mar 23 2010, 08:45 PM) *
Of course, that could potentially happen yet again if, somehow, everyone who left got together to form a new company and were able to raise enough captial to start up a publishing business and acquire he license. But chances seem somewhat slim on that front.


It sounded like some of the people who left are/were already part of a new-ish company, Posthuman Studios.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
otakusensei
post Mar 23 2010, 08:01 PM
Post #666


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 695
Joined: 2-January 07
From: He has here a minute ago...
Member No.: 10,514



QUOTE (JM Hardy @ Mar 23 2010, 10:49 AM) *
The last book, Vice, had a street date of February 23rd. So it wasn't that long ago, and I know people in Catalyst are working to get it back on the streets as soon as possible.

Jason H.



Jason, it's pretty clear now that the slow pace of publishing at CGL had something to with the criminal actions of company members. Money was being made, but that money was not going to fuel new publication at an efficient rate. Like parasites in a body. We all wondered about it, speculated about it. Watched the line of developers change seats until you found yourself there. I have friend who want to buy books and a store owner who was devastated to hear about this issue at CGL. He's a new player and now he's wondering if he should even carry your products, both out of ethical concerns and the effort of promoting a product that has been so mishandled.

You've been doing spin over the last few days. Do us a favor and stop. I know you want to keep positive about this, that doing so is a part of your job. But you aren't going to be in that seat long if things are as bad as they sound. If things are, say 25%, as bad as they sound we should have heard about the resignation or termination of someone by this point and a court filing. I have not seen anything like that, so I can only assume that the same ability and capacity to do the same harm to my beloved game are still in place and no treatment has been started. CGL has had some time to deal with this out in the open, but considering how much time you must have been privately aware of this I must say I'm disappointed with the present state of things. Just two weeks ago I can recall telling someone that I loved the work CGL was doing and that I honestly believed you were one of the best outfits in pen and paper gaming today. CGL has made me regret that statement and I've been very sorry to see most of the people that I based that on leave in the wake of this fiasco.

Be honest, Jason. It might not seem like it but it's always worth it. Spin is mostly half truths, and a half truth is as good as a lie. A lie may buy you time but it never pays it's debt.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Adam
post Mar 23 2010, 08:01 PM
Post #667


Prime Runner
*******

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 3,929
Joined: 26-February 02
From: .ca
Member No.: 51



Posthuman Studios has existed since 2008; we own the rights to Eclipse Phase and some other things we've been working on.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
kzt
post Mar 23 2010, 08:04 PM
Post #668


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,537
Joined: 27-August 06
From: Albuquerque NM
Member No.: 9,234



Regarding people trying to gain the license - Smart people don't conduct negotiations on public internet forums....
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Redjack
post Mar 23 2010, 08:30 PM
Post #669


Man Behind the Curtain
**********

Group: Admin
Posts: 14,871
Joined: 2-July 89
From: End of the Yellow-Brick Road
Member No.: 3



QUOTE (otakusensei @ Mar 23 2010, 03:01 PM) *
You've been doing spin over the last few days. Do us a favor and stop.
I don't think this is fair or that you appreciate the delicate position Jason is in as the line developer. First and foremost, he is an employee of Catalyst. So I'll start by asking that you respect that position before someone vaults from your post into personal attacks.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Grexul
post Mar 23 2010, 08:42 PM
Post #670


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 45
Joined: 6-March 10
From: San Fernando Valley, PCC
Member No.: 18,250



I have to agree here, just because CGL doesn't want to air all of it's dirty laundry at this time, doesn't mean that they're not taking care of business.

Grexul

PS my screen name is missing an X

Grex
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Sans Pants
post Mar 23 2010, 08:59 PM
Post #671


Target
*

Group: New Member Probation
Posts: 2
Joined: 23-March 10
Member No.: 18,351



I have heard rumors in regard to some SR books being recalled because of this. Do we have a list of which books are being pulled, so some of us can run out and buy them?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
emouse
post Mar 23 2010, 09:04 PM
Post #672


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 233
Joined: 26-October 02
Member No.: 3,502



QUOTE (Greul @ Mar 23 2010, 09:42 PM) *
I have to agree here, just because CGL doesn't want to air all of it's dirty laundry at this time, doesn't mean that they're not taking care of business.


They've hired a team to take care of it real quiet-like, so I've heard. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JM Hardy
post Mar 23 2010, 09:06 PM
Post #673


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 595
Joined: 12-May 05
Member No.: 7,392



QUOTE (otakusensei @ Mar 23 2010, 03:01 PM) *
Jason, it's pretty clear now that the slow pace of publishing at CGL had something to with the criminal actions of company members. Money was being made, but that money was not going to fuel new publication at an efficient rate. Like parasites in a body. We all wondered about it, speculated about it. Watched the line of developers change seats until you found yourself there. I have friend who want to buy books and a store owner who was devastated to hear about this issue at CGL. He's a new player and now he's wondering if he should even carry your products, both out of ethical concerns and the effort of promoting a product that has been so mishandled.

You've been doing spin over the last few days. Do us a favor and stop. I know you want to keep positive about this, that doing so is a part of your job. But you aren't going to be in that seat long if things are as bad as they sound. If things are, say 25%, as bad as they sound we should have heard about the resignation or termination of someone by this point and a court filing. I have not seen anything like that, so I can only assume that the same ability and capacity to do the same harm to my beloved game are still in place and no treatment has been started. CGL has had some time to deal with this out in the open, but considering how much time you must have been privately aware of this I must say I'm disappointed with the present state of things. Just two weeks ago I can recall telling someone that I loved the work CGL was doing and that I honestly believed you were one of the best outfits in pen and paper gaming today. CGL has made me regret that statement and I've been very sorry to see most of the people that I based that on leave in the wake of this fiasco.

Be honest, Jason. It might not seem like it but it's always worth it. Spin is mostly half truths, and a half truth is as good as a lie. A lie may buy you time but it never pays it's debt.


Okay, I'll be a little more blunt. If I'm saying something that you believe is not honest, call me on it. Don't tell me I'm spinning, or not being honest, without telling me what it is I got wrong, specifically. And I would hope, if you're telling me to be more honest, that you are basing that on something other than the fact that you might have a different opinion of events than I do. That's okay if you have a different opinion--lots of people do. But I don't think it should be implied that I'm being dishonest simply because my opinion differs from yours.

I'd also like to point out that there were plenty of things contributing to the slow pace of Shadowrun products being released, and likely neither you nor I know all of them, so we should be cautious about making overly broad conclusions.

Jason H.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
emouse
post Mar 23 2010, 09:09 PM
Post #674


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 233
Joined: 26-October 02
Member No.: 3,502



QUOTE (Sans Pants @ Mar 23 2010, 09:59 PM) *
I have heard rumors in regard to some SR books being recalled because of this. Do we have a list of which books are being pulled, so some of us can run out and buy them?


The four titles I've heard are...

Vice - Hasn't made it to print yet?
DotA Midnight - Hasn't made it to print yet?
Running Wild
Seatle 2072 - Print copy still listed on Battlecorps, no PDF

Dusk doesn't seem to be listed either, so it might have been pulled as well?

It's not many titles in the scheme of things, but it is their most recent titles.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Sans Pants
post Mar 23 2010, 09:17 PM
Post #675


Target
*

Group: New Member Probation
Posts: 2
Joined: 23-March 10
Member No.: 18,351



QUOTE (emouse @ Mar 23 2010, 01:09 PM) *
The four titles I've heard are...

Vice - Hasn't made it to print yet?
DotA Midnight - Hasn't made it to print yet?
Running Wild
Seatle 2072 - Print copy still listed on Battlecorps, no PDF

Dusk doesn't seem to be listed either, so it might have been pulled as well?

It's not many titles in the scheme of things, but it is their most recent titles.


Guess this means I have an order to make.

For what it's worth, I just hope everything gets settled, no matter the outcome, so things can move forward.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

28 Pages V  « < 25 26 27 28 >
Closed TopicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 30th November 2024 - 12:05 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.