![]() ![]() |
Mar 20 2010, 02:29 PM
Post
#26
|
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 23 Joined: 5-March 10 Member No.: 18,246 |
|
|
|
|
Mar 20 2010, 02:30 PM
Post
#27
|
|
|
The ShadowComedian ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 14,538 Joined: 3-October 07 From: Hamburg, AGS Member No.: 13,525 |
Well, it's a unique focus.
BUT this also means SOMEONE has figured out a way to do just this. This also means someone else could figure it out too. And technically, every focus is unique anyway. |
|
|
|
Mar 20 2010, 02:36 PM
Post
#28
|
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 23 Joined: 5-March 10 Member No.: 18,246 |
yep, i re-read the section about creating Unique formula, and it is fine. No perma active weapon foci all around (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)
The sword described p.9 has, for example, a carved fang from a Dragon as its hilt (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wobble.gif) |
|
|
|
Mar 20 2010, 02:39 PM
Post
#29
|
|
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 6,748 Joined: 5-July 02 Member No.: 2,935 |
We were gonna have that in Street Magic originally, to go along with the intro fiction, but it just didn't pan out. Glad it did finally find a home.
|
|
|
|
Mar 20 2010, 02:44 PM
Post
#30
|
|
|
The ShadowComedian ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 14,538 Joined: 3-October 07 From: Hamburg, AGS Member No.: 13,525 |
Yes well, of course the stronger enchantments need stronger telesma.
Also, the magic level is constantly on the rise, magitech is going to happen. But probably not before SR Version 10 *snickers* |
|
|
|
Mar 20 2010, 02:46 PM
Post
#31
|
|
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 6,748 Joined: 5-July 02 Member No.: 2,935 |
Hey, we have manatech in Arsenal...just whip out your PKE me...er, Ambient Mana Potentiometer and have a ball.
|
|
|
|
Mar 20 2010, 03:00 PM
Post
#32
|
|
|
The ShadowComedian ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 14,538 Joined: 3-October 07 From: Hamburg, AGS Member No.: 13,525 |
Yes, i know. But not of the Magitech Calbre used in Earthdawn or other high Fantasy settings. It's good like that too ^^
Hmm, a PKE-Meter . . wonder if one could build something like that within the woo . . err, rules ^^ |
|
|
|
Mar 22 2010, 12:14 PM
Post
#33
|
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 35 Joined: 30-July 09 Member No.: 17,453 |
How would foci work for my non-awakened streetsam? Aren't they connected to the user's magic?
|
|
|
|
Mar 22 2010, 01:47 PM
Post
#34
|
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 23 Joined: 5-March 10 Member No.: 18,246 |
How would foci work for my non-awakened streetsam? Aren't they connected to the user's magic? They would not work (you cannot bind a focus to yourself if not Awakened, nor do you have a Magic attribute), except for the Unique Enchantment type of objects, as described in Digital Grimoire and its example p.9 The user in "user's Magic" is the person bonded to the focus (an Awakened with a Magic attribute). If an active focus if separated from that user, it deactivates as mentioned in an earlier post in this thread |
|
|
|
Mar 22 2010, 04:54 PM
Post
#35
|
|
|
Immortal Elf ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 10,289 Joined: 2-October 08 Member No.: 16,392 |
except for the Unique Enchantment type of objects The user in "user's Magic" is the person bonded to the focus (an Awakened with a Magic attribute) I'd like to point out the two contradictory statements made here and point out the original question: QUOTE How would foci work for my non-awakened streetsam? Aren't they connected to the user's magic? Note how you didn't actually answer the question. He asked HOW those unique foci work if they're associated with a Magic attribute, and you said "they can't (except when they do, which was the question)" and then proceeded to state the obvious with regards to the normal circumstance, which was obvious (and not the question). |
|
|
|
Mar 23 2010, 11:57 AM
Post
#36
|
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 35 Joined: 30-July 09 Member No.: 17,453 |
Ah, thanks! Earlier on, I thought people were talking about the Grimoire of 3rd Edition and wondered what that would help me. Just found out that Digital Grimoire is something else entirely!
Question answered! |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 23rd February 2026 - 02:59 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.