The CGL situation p3 |
The CGL situation p3 |
Apr 3 2010, 04:44 AM
Post
#726
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 595 Joined: 12-May 05 Member No.: 7,392 |
Jason, are you able to shed any additional light on this? It seems interesting that if Catalyst is picking and choosing which projects to live up to their own contracts on, they'd choose to ignore ones which are being held up from sale. I can think of only two reasons why Catalyst would make this decision and neither one of them are very good. There's not information I can release publicly at the moment. There are (at least) two sides to every story, which means I'm getting different information from different sources. As the weekend kicks in, there's likely to be not a lot more I can say until Monday, but I anticipate having more information then. Jason H. |
|
|
Apr 3 2010, 04:49 AM
Post
#727
|
|
Neophyte Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,431 Joined: 3-December 03 Member No.: 5,872 |
That last sentence is exactly right. For the record, the writers pitching in are people who have previously written for Shadowrun and enjoy the setting--they reached out to me, often because Shadowrun's just plain fun to write for. I could list their resumes, but no one will be buying upcoming books for their resumes--they'll be buying them for the content. My job is to make sure good content is there, so I'll be working with the writers to make sure that's what you get. Jason H. That is good to hear. From the things I have picked up, read, checked out a friends copy etc the batteletech writing is top notch overall. Getting a few of them who happen to be shadowrun fans working on shadowrun will be a benefit to shadowrun overall I think. |
|
|
Apr 3 2010, 05:28 AM
Post
#728
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 425 Joined: 27-May 09 From: Evil's Nexus Member No.: 17,207 |
What you are describing is charity. That's not how I see it. My logic is that I am paying for a product that she produced (in part) and has not received payment for, I hope to help rectify that by paying for it twice if necessary and ensuring that the second time around my money goes to the person who earned it. What I am describing is doing the right thing. If some people want to dress up as Batman and then log onto Paypal makes no difference to me. How much a person sends...be it the cover price of a PDF...or the cost of a cup of Starbucks java I won't fling monkey poo as long as they expect nothing but the warm fuzzy of doing the right thing. You know for 29 pages there has been all of this acrimony in this thread...now...we have the opportunity to do something other than whine. I would be stunned if we could NOT get 500 people to step up and help out a fellow SR fan and her two children. |
|
|
Apr 3 2010, 05:43 AM
Post
#729
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 321 Joined: 4-April 08 From: Detroit, MI Member No.: 15,844 |
QUOTE I would be stunned if we could NOT get 500 people to step up and help out a fellow SR fan and her two children. Provided she accepts. The respect I have for her and her work makes me think I'd much rather buy what she created than just send money, and for some reason I think she'd prefer it that way (although if I'm wrong, she can correct me). Anyway, this is a really sad story, and I'm a lot less optimistic about the outcome of this story. |
|
|
Apr 3 2010, 05:50 AM
Post
#730
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 595 Joined: 12-May 05 Member No.: 7,392 |
Given that it's Friday night (actually, early Saturday morning where I am) there will not be a whole lot of official news for the next two days. I know that various things are in the works, and I hope to be able to give more details on what's going on on Monday. Until then, I'd like to ask people to be restrained about any speculation they may wish to engage in.
Jason H. |
|
|
Apr 3 2010, 06:00 AM
Post
#731
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 308 Joined: 17-March 10 Member No.: 18,303 |
Given that it's Friday night (actually, early Saturday morning where I am) there will not be a whole lot of official news for the next two days. I know that various things are in the works, and I hope to be able to give more details on what's going on on Monday. Until then, I'd like to ask people to be restrained about any speculation they may wish to engage in. Jason H. Well, it's not like there's been three 30 pages of idle speculation to date or anything. *marks in appointment book* "Push Sky is Falling meeting back to Monday...check." (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif) Edit: More importantly, you mean there's actually people who work schedules that don't require working through the weekend? I'm jealous. |
|
|
Apr 3 2010, 06:14 AM
Post
#732
|
|
Target Group: Members Posts: 21 Joined: 3-April 10 Member No.: 18,404 |
No...it does not. I am talking about passing the hat around (virtually) sending her $5 per person (or more if you are comfortable with that) just because she is a single mother of two children that is in financial straights. The people sending her money get NOTHING but that warm fuzzy for helping out a fellow human being. NO goods are received by the people DONATING money!!! Oh, I'm for that - sorry I misunderstood. I'm coincidentally going to be in Seattle in May so perhaps I can buy the lady and some other friends dinner! Does that count? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) - Ket |
|
|
Apr 3 2010, 07:42 AM
Post
#733
|
|
Grand Master of Run-Fu Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 6,840 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Tir Tairngire Member No.: 178 |
No...it does not. I am talking about passing the hat around (virtually) sending her $5 per person (or more if you are comfortable with that) just because she is a single mother of two children that is in financial straights. The people sending her money get NOTHING but that warm fuzzy for helping out a fellow human being. NO goods are received by the people DONATING money!!! I'm up for that. If she agrees, I'd gladly chip in. I'll also offer to take her and her kids to dinner the next time I'm in Seattle. I'll bring my daughter, and we can introduce the next generation of Shadowrun players. |
|
|
Apr 3 2010, 08:40 AM
Post
#734
|
|
Hoppelhäschen 5000 Group: Members Posts: 5,807 Joined: 3-January 04 Member No.: 5,951 |
|
|
|
Apr 3 2010, 08:58 AM
Post
#735
|
|
Shadow Cartographer Group: Members Posts: 3,737 Joined: 2-June 06 From: Secret Tunnels under the UK (South West) Member No.: 8,636 |
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/frown.gif) If Topps management has any belief in this statement, especially if CGL happened to be so foolish as to turn around and send dummied up data anyway, then I'm not sure how it could not become lights out for CGL on the Shadowrun and Battletech licenses. At least under current ownership and management. If CGL is reduced to sending fake figures to Topps, then the problem is not that they tried to send fake figures to Topps (that's just stupidity), the problem is that they need to. It doesn't bode well. Of course they could just be greedy and be trying to get more money out than they ought, but the lack of payment of freelancers suggests necessity. and your making your accusations do to, because even if what you say is true, making these accusations in a public fourm has proably hurt your ability to get a job, but hey, you and these other "disgrunted freelancers" won't need to worry about that when you set your own company up. which is the real reason you're trying to sink CGL isn't it? Okay, I'd like to ask who you are. This was your fourth post on DS, you appear to have registered under this account purely to have a go at these people (people who we on DS have long benefited from their contributions, btw). You accuse people of trying to sink CGL when firstly CGL could make the whole situation go away by paying the modest amounts that it owes these people and secondly, these people have for a long time shown strong professionalism by avoiding spilling the beans on what's been going on. Your posts don't contain anything substantive, just ad hominems and snide suggestions. So in order to lend them any weight, who are you and what's your involvement in this? Anything I've already been paid for, which is everything in print except Vice, belongs to CGL (or is part of the SR property, if you want to define it that way). Everything that I wasn't paid for at the time I terminated my contracts remains my own property, and Jason Hardy has been busy as a beaver assigning various BattleTech authors to rewriting several of my chapters, from what I hear. This is weird. Aside from the concern about your work being re-written by less experienced writers (in Shadowrun, I mean), it just doesn't make a lot of sense from a business point of view. You'd written the work and it was ready to go. I don't know if layout was done or not (if so, then the situation is even worse). In any case, CGL would rather pay others and pay for the whole editing and proofing cycle to be repeated (which is going to be a pain for something as number-crunchy as PACKs sounds). And additionally there's the uncertainty of delivery times which is always a pain for a business too. Additionally they've drafted in writers from BattleTech (though JM says they've written for SR before, so I'm really curious to know what their writing credits are). So anyway, they'd rather all this than pay you your money. How does this make sense? You terminated your contracts, so if they want to press ahead with this they have to either approach you with a cheque in hand and ask you nicely to re-sign. If they're bitter about you leaving, then perhaps they don't want to do this and that is the reason, but it's poor business sense and spite is a bad master. Besides which, they knew you were threatening to leave over the money they owed, so really this decision was theirs to make before you left. If they could pay you, then why would they let your completed work go so that they could spend more money on a copy product from less experienced (in Shadowrun) writers. So this one doesn't really make much sense. It could make financial sense if the replacement writers were going to cost a lot less than you were owed, but this seems unlikely. As stated in the prior hypothesis, repeating proofing and editing has costs which means the margin of savings has to be even greater and there is the delay this adds to release. Also, you weren't paid a great deal in the first place (not saying it's irrelevant to you, but it's not high as hourly wages go) so if there can't really be much room to pay them less. What would that be? 2cents per word? And finally, the amounts that you get paid are small proportions of the money these products should reap. If you have a product that would make you $60,000 proft, you're unlikely to say "I'm going to try and jeopardise quality and release dates by saving $800". So this one doesn't make much sense to me. Third explanation is that this is just such small potatoes to them that they don't really care. ("Oh, yeah, um, just stick one of the BT writers on it, it doesn't matter"). I hope that's not the case but given what we've learned about CGL's circumstances it doesn't seem like they can regard anything as small potatoes right now. So I really only see a few options that explain this. One is that this is genuinely just spiteful behaviour from the people at CGL despite the harm it does them. Two, they're planning to do to the new writer (and perhaps any proofers / editors) what they've done to many others which is string him along until they've got the work on the promise of payments "soon". Three, they didn't have the money to pay you then, but now either do have the money or expect to have the money and so are re-starting with this money. In the case of three, it would still make more sense to make amends with you, but depending on how you left that might not be an option. However, the amounts are pretty small compared to what we can estimate their sales figures must actually be like so if they were struggling to raise a few thousand over a long period of time, it doesn't fill one with hope. So really, thinking they can get away with non-payment or tardy payment with the new person seems one of the few explanations that stands up. Although there is a fourth, and it goes like this: If CGL were trying to deceive Topps about something, then it was presumably to do with how much profit they made out of the line or their ability to make a viable business out of the line. Assuming that it were the latter, then CGL would be under pressure, especially with the upcoming licence renewal, to demonstrate that they still had products being produced and ready to go out of the door. If Topps is suspicious by this point (fools if they're not), then the simplest thing to do is to throw a few authors at a product and say: "look - we're making this, it'll be ready by X and make Y". In this scenario, none of the problems that exist with the approach CGL has taken to re-writing products matters, because the aim is simply to show that they're producing product, regardless of what's going on under the hood. Sort of like when you haven't done your homework but you say "look, I'm doing it now!" Anyway, just some reasoning. I'm interested in other hypotheses. We have a single mother of two young children...a fellow Shadowrun fan who could use some assistance. Do NOT tell me that you guys are not willing to give up two days of Starbucks to help one our OWN! Lets get this ball rolling! Instead of spitting into the wind...we can actually help somebody. I would donate and be happy to do so. I get a lot of use out of my Shadowrun books and I'd like to see reward go to the right people for that. But you should PM Jennifer Harding and ask her what she feels about this. Also, I don't know what response you'd get for this - not because people don't care, but because people often aren't very proactive and because DS is only a part of the general Shadowrun player base. If you did this, it would need to be done properly, with a sticky thread, a simple statement that you're asking people to click a link and give $5." Also, it should be locked as there are some ill people around here who are just looking for threads in which to have a go at people. It would also need to be left up there for a while because people often take a long time to do even what they intend to do. But as I say, you should contact the lady herself. K. |
|
|
Apr 3 2010, 09:16 AM
Post
#736
|
|
Target Group: Members Posts: 48 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 118 |
The thread over on the CBT regarding the CGL issues has been closed a few days ago.
|
|
|
Apr 3 2010, 09:18 AM
Post
#737
|
|
Hoppelhäschen 5000 Group: Members Posts: 5,807 Joined: 3-January 04 Member No.: 5,951 |
Just closed, not deleted entirely – like the ones before?
|
|
|
Apr 3 2010, 09:35 AM
Post
#738
|
|
Shadow Cartographer Group: Members Posts: 3,737 Joined: 2-June 06 From: Secret Tunnels under the UK (South West) Member No.: 8,636 |
|
|
|
Apr 3 2010, 09:42 AM
Post
#739
|
|
Target Group: Members Posts: 80 Joined: 18-August 08 From: Germany Member No.: 16,249 |
I would donate and be happy to do so. I get a lot of use out of my Shadowrun books and I'd like to see reward go to the right people for that. I agree. Reading the post of TigerEyes really got me mad at CGL for the first time in this situation. Not paying freelancers is one thing - and it's bad - but not paying a freelancer who is really in need of the money for her livelyhood ist just low beyond words, especially if, as I read it, the management went through all the due payments and decided which of them to pay and which not. Since I profited from the very good $/€-exchange rates when I bought Midnight and Vice I'd be more than willing to donate the difference I saved on the purchase, to Jennifer. |
|
|
Apr 3 2010, 09:47 AM
Post
#740
|
|
The ShadowComedian Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 14,538 Joined: 3-October 07 From: Hamburg, AGS Member No.: 13,525 |
Just closed, not deleted entirely – like the ones before? Nah, they only close threads they don't think are needed anymore. The deleting is just for stuff that they don't want to see there anymore. Like, for example, if i had copied the statement about being asked to lie and falsify numbers, that would have been deleted. |
|
|
Apr 3 2010, 10:17 AM
Post
#741
|
|
Target Group: Members Posts: 92 Joined: 20-March 10 From: Around the Ley Lines on the 'moors. Great Britain. Member No.: 18,323 |
When they closed it they did say that they would open a new one when they had anything new too report, looking at what Jason H said above it might be they have another official re-lease on Monday.
|
|
|
Apr 3 2010, 10:19 AM
Post
#742
|
|
The ShadowComedian Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 14,538 Joined: 3-October 07 From: Hamburg, AGS Member No.: 13,525 |
i'm contemplating stepping on some toes and just opening my own new thread . . nah, my postings have been deleted more than once in this over there allready . .
|
|
|
Apr 3 2010, 10:21 AM
Post
#743
|
|
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,849 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Melbourne, Australia Member No.: 872 |
So let me get this straight -
Rather than PAY the writers what they are owed, JM Hardy is apparently getting whole slabs of text re-written to avoid paying the writers what they are owed? In the interim, Midnight has shipped and with it, text that is contractually prohibited from seeing the light of day is now out in consumerland and they stand to profit from this? Wow ok. Tiger Eyes, I hope you contact a lawyer to discuss your options. I'm pretty sure some lawyer out there would take this on pro-bono and hit CGL and file for punitive damages, hardship, interest, etc. I also hope the other writers jump in and maybe a class action suit comes together. It doesn't sound undeserved at this juncture. - J. |
|
|
Apr 3 2010, 10:47 AM
Post
#744
|
|
The ShadowComedian Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 14,538 Joined: 3-October 07 From: Hamburg, AGS Member No.: 13,525 |
Basically.
In the appropriate thead(which got both Bull and Frank banned) on rpg.net there were some really good points raised too. Or was that in here? Or on one of the 2 German Shadowrun Boards i visit? I get confused with several angles on the same discussion @.@ |
|
|
Apr 3 2010, 10:52 AM
Post
#745
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 595 Joined: 20-January 09 Member No.: 16,795 |
Rather than PAY the writers what they are owed, JM Hardy is apparently getting whole slabs of text re-written to avoid paying the writers what they are owed? Right now the only rewrites that have been mentioned are for things that aren't published, and therefore people aren't owed for. In fact the only rewrites that have been mentioned are for stuff where the freelancer terminated their contract, thus effectively retracting their work from use by CGL. |
|
|
Apr 3 2010, 11:10 AM
Post
#746
|
|
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,757 Joined: 11-December 02 From: France Member No.: 3,723 |
Rather than PAY the writers what they are owed, JM Hardy is apparently getting whole slabs of text re-written to avoid paying the writers what they are owed? As far as I understand, there are different things going on : - Ancient History ended his contract, preventing Catalyst from publishing Sixth World Almanac, Corporate Guide and Runner's Toolkit. He chose not to be paid for those, and Catalyst has contracted other people to write replacements. - Other authors who worked on Running Wild, Seattle 2072, Dawn of the Artifacts: Dusk, Vice have been withholding copyrights until paid, preventing Catalyst form selling those any further. Catalyst must pay them. - Jennifer Harding withheld copyright on Dawn of the Artifacts: Midnight before its actual release. Catalyst had no right at all to publish it. Catalyst must also pay her, but it seems that book is not in the top priority for release, and thus payment (implying Catalyst is not able to pay for all the books). - Upcoming books : no real info. I'd guess outside of AH particular case, Catalyst won't get people rewriting stuff that is already written (also, maybe Jennifer Harding had started writing Dawn 3, and that work will be lost as well). But I could be wrong. Catalyst can dump material, not pay its authors and find cheaper, more patient and less troublesome people to restart from scratch ongoing projects. |
|
|
Apr 3 2010, 11:26 AM
Post
#747
|
|
Hoppelhäschen 5000 Group: Members Posts: 5,807 Joined: 3-January 04 Member No.: 5,951 |
It's looking pretty dim for the other books AFAIK, too:
Awakend Haunts, the city type book about, well, awakened cities, is pretty much dead. Cities of Intrigue, the city type book about Denver and other political hotspots has been reduced to City of Intrigue – a Denver book with spy gear. (Yes, that type of gear that Arsenal told us wouldn't make sense to provide extensive listing) War!, the new Fields of Fire type / Merc book featuring Bogota and MilGear was stripped of it's Fields of Fire type / Merc part. And given that the main layouter jumped ship, it's most likely not looking good for the Anniversery Core Rule Books, either. |
|
|
Apr 3 2010, 11:45 AM
Post
#748
|
|
Great Dragon Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 5,086 Joined: 3-October 09 From: Kohle, Stahl und Bier Member No.: 17,709 |
How to see red in 2 seconds flat. That's why you don't feed Forumus Trollus Stupidus. Besides potentially negative effects on your blood pressure, they are also quick to lose their natural shyness and become a persistent pest. Edit @Rotbart: You'd think they have enough material about intrigue and war recently... |
|
|
Apr 3 2010, 12:22 PM
Post
#749
|
|
Hoppelhäschen 5000 Group: Members Posts: 5,807 Joined: 3-January 04 Member No.: 5,951 |
Recently? Just to get a perspective for the whole mess, just look at the date:
To avoid further confusion and since there's been at least one mistaken posting on the order of upcoming books, the order of our developent and release schedule (barring disaster or intervention by the spirits) looks something like this:
Unwired Ghost Cartels Feral Cities Runners Companion Vice Corp Guide We have a number of other books listed and planned for release after that (including Running Wild and Awakened Haunts), but they are not in production at the moment. |
|
|
Apr 3 2010, 12:30 PM
Post
#750
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 765 Joined: 28-December 09 Member No.: 18,001 |
I've heard rumors of authors who can write for three different universes. The legends even speak of the "Short One" who will fulfill destiny and write for Shadowrun, BattleTech, Star Wars AND Star Trek. Fair point, my personal legend (Nigel D. Findley) among them. Yet, I remain sceptical until I see the fruits of their labor. I will give them a fair chance, though. |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 28th November 2024 - 07:03 AM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.