IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> GE Autocannons and firing them...
Jonny Reload
post Apr 7 2010, 07:53 PM
Post #1


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 153
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Albany, NY
Member No.: 1,757



In Arsenal, I was looking at the GE Autocannons under Vehicle Weapons, it states the Autocannons use the rules for Miniguns. My question is under the rules for Miniguns, it doesn't state you need to waste a simple action to get the barrels rotating. It only states that under the Vindicator section, do Autocannons need to spend a simple action to get the barrels rotating or can you just press and destroy?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nezumi
post Apr 7 2010, 08:32 PM
Post #2


Incertum est quo loco te mors expectet;
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,548
Joined: 24-October 03
From: DeeCee, U.S.
Member No.: 5,760



Autocannons have only a single barrel, so no, you don't need an action for that. You do, however, need the weapon to be braced, since it's too large for a metahuman (except, possibly, trolls) to haul around and actually use.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jonny Reload
post Apr 7 2010, 09:08 PM
Post #3


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 153
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Albany, NY
Member No.: 1,757



Oh pfff, screw that that. It's mounted on a vehicle, I'm not even gonna try to start min/maxing how to recoil compensate a -15 (IMG:style_emoticons/default/grinbig.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Dumori
post Apr 7 2010, 09:49 PM
Post #4


Dumorimasoddaa
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,687
Joined: 30-March 08
Member No.: 15,830



Oh its easy-ish XD High Str. gyro-harness, foot anchors, gas vent and what ever else can but put on a minigun should be 10-12 min. Though autocannons cant made man-portable by RAW.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hobgoblin
post Apr 7 2010, 10:22 PM
Post #5


panda!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,331
Joined: 8-March 02
From: north of central europe
Member No.: 2,242



just watch out for the doubling of uncompensated recoil when firing heavy weapons...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stahlseele
post Apr 7 2010, 10:28 PM
Post #6


The ShadowComedian
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,538
Joined: 3-October 07
From: Hamburg, AGS
Member No.: 13,525



QUOTE (Dumori @ Apr 7 2010, 11:49 PM) *
Oh its easy-ish XD High Str. gyro-harness, foot anchors, gas vent and what ever else can but put on a minigun should be 10-12 min. Though autocannons cant made man-portable by RAW.

Even if your "Man" can lift and carry and throw Motorcycles? O.o
See Trolls/Metavariants/Ghouls and Drakes for example. Maybe even Shape-Shifters.
And yeah, Recoil-Compensation of 12 means still missing 3 points which are doubles to 6.
Still a big dent in the dice pool . .
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
X-Kalibur
post Apr 7 2010, 10:54 PM
Post #7


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,579
Joined: 30-May 06
From: SoCal
Member No.: 8,626



Lifting/throwing is very different though, you aren't holding it for a long period of time in a braced position and taking recoil.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Udoshi
post Apr 7 2010, 11:02 PM
Post #8


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,782
Joined: 28-August 09
Member No.: 17,566



QUOTE (Jonny Reload @ Apr 7 2010, 02:08 PM) *
Oh pfff, screw that that. It's mounted on a vehicle, I'm not even gonna try to start min/maxing how to recoil compensate a -15 (IMG:style_emoticons/default/grinbig.gif)


I keep on hearing/remembering a rule that says vehicle mounted weapons don't suffer recoil (which is why the not-so-optional arsenal optional rule of RC=body exists), but IS there actually a ruling that says so?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Faraday
post Apr 7 2010, 11:03 PM
Post #9


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,026
Joined: 13-February 10
Member No.: 18,155



QUOTE (Stahlseele @ Apr 7 2010, 03:28 PM) *
Even if your "Man" can lift and carry and throw Motorcycles? O.o
See Trolls/Metavariants/Ghouls and Drakes for example. Maybe even Shape-Shifters.
And yeah, Recoil-Compensation of 12 means still missing 3 points which are doubles to 6.
Still a big dent in the dice pool . .

Yeah, your choice of +15 DV or a -15 to *their* dodge dice is, like, nothing. Why would you even bother?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Udoshi
post Apr 7 2010, 11:20 PM
Post #10


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,782
Joined: 28-August 09
Member No.: 17,566



QUOTE (Stahlseele @ Apr 7 2010, 03:28 PM) *
Even if your "Man" can lift and carry and throw Motorcycles? O.o
See Trolls/Metavariants/Ghouls and Drakes for example. Maybe even Shape-Shifters.
And yeah, Recoil-Compensation of 12 means still missing 3 points which are doubles to 6.
Still a big dent in the dice pool . .


Give it to a Cyborg. Between their high strength(and boostable with cyberlimb strength enhancements), and a Body Stabilizer, getting 3 more points of RC shouldn't be too hard - hitting strength 14 can handle those last 3 points of RC.

... of course, you could just put it on a cyborg with a Weapon Mount and a Gyro Link(turret required), and do the same thing while -sprinting- about at no penalty.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Dumori
post Apr 7 2010, 11:56 PM
Post #11


Dumorimasoddaa
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,687
Joined: 30-March 08
Member No.: 15,830



That body 10 combat drone (for get the name) is nasty for that. I mean when you have a 11 base DV autocannon for one arm and the other has an inbuilt AR/GL all using the same skill and plus its quite possible to ad a spur or such in to the mix. On top of 20 hardened armor and such makes for a very nasty drone.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Dumori
post Apr 7 2010, 11:57 PM
Post #12


Dumorimasoddaa
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,687
Joined: 30-March 08
Member No.: 15,830



QUOTE (Udoshi @ Apr 8 2010, 12:02 AM) *
I keep on hearing/remembering a rule that says vehicle mounted weapons don't suffer recoil (which is why the not-so-optional arsenal optional rule of RC=body exists), but IS there actually a ruling that says so?

Read arsenal. Just before the rules on weapon mounts iirc
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jonny Reload
post Apr 8 2010, 12:11 AM
Post #13


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 153
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Albany, NY
Member No.: 1,757



QUOTE (Udoshi @ Apr 8 2010, 12:02 AM) *
I keep on hearing/remembering a rule that says vehicle mounted weapons don't suffer recoil (which is why the not-so-optional arsenal optional rule of RC=body exists), but IS there actually a ruling that says so?


Page 105, Arsenal
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Udoshi
post Apr 8 2010, 12:21 AM
Post #14


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,782
Joined: 28-August 09
Member No.: 17,566



QUOTE (Jonny Reload @ Apr 7 2010, 05:11 PM) *
Page 105, Arsenal


That's the one I knew about. Rather, the first line of it: "Theoretically, vehicle weapons mounted in a weapon mount do not suffer negative recoil modifiers". Great. Now where's the rule that says -that- is true. Is it in the core book somewhere? Or was it one of the rules taken out in Anniversary edition. Because as far as I can tell, without Arsenal, vehicles get no recoil-love at -all-.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Faraday
post Apr 8 2010, 01:23 AM
Post #15


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,026
Joined: 13-February 10
Member No.: 18,155



QUOTE (Udoshi @ Apr 7 2010, 05:21 PM) *
That's the one I knew about. Rather, the first line of it: "Theoretically, vehicle weapons mounted in a weapon mount do not suffer negative recoil modifiers". Great. Now where's the rule that says -that- is true. Is it in the core book somewhere? Or was it one of the rules taken out in Anniversary edition. Because as far as I can tell, without Arsenal, vehicles get no recoil-love at -all-.
That's because, theoretically, they don't need any. They just ignore recoil and go about their day. The point is that a 5 ton vehicle isn't going to care about the puny forces emitted by a 10 pound assault rifle.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Faraday
post Apr 8 2010, 01:23 AM
Post #16


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,026
Joined: 13-February 10
Member No.: 18,155



Needs less double post.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
D2F
post Apr 8 2010, 02:55 AM
Post #17


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 765
Joined: 28-December 09
Member No.: 18,001



QUOTE (nezumi @ Apr 7 2010, 09:32 PM) *
Autocannons have only a single barrel, so no, you don't need an action for that. You do, however, need the weapon to be braced, since it's too large for a metahuman (except, possibly, trolls) to haul around and actually use.


It is reasonable to assume that the GE autocannons from arsenal are actually multi-barreled rotary autocannons. Very much like this one!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jonny Reload
post Apr 8 2010, 03:08 AM
Post #18


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 153
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Albany, NY
Member No.: 1,757



QUOTE (D2F @ Apr 8 2010, 03:55 AM) *
It is reasonable to assume that the GE autocannons from arsenal are actually multi-barreled rotary autocannons. Very much like this one!


Actually, under the the Light GE Autocannon, it specifically states it is similar in model to the Vindicator Minigun.... I'd assume their talking about the barrel system otherwise why even mention it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
D2F
post Apr 8 2010, 03:11 AM
Post #19


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 765
Joined: 28-December 09
Member No.: 18,001



QUOTE (Jonny Reload @ Apr 8 2010, 04:08 AM) *
Actually, under the the Light GE Autocannon, it specifically states it is similar in model to the Vindicator Minigun.... I'd assume their talking about the barrel system otherwise why even mention it.


That's why I said it's reasonable to assume (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Saint Sithney
post Apr 8 2010, 06:49 AM
Post #20


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,705
Joined: 5-October 09
From: You are in a clearing
Member No.: 17,722



QUOTE (Jonny Reload @ Apr 7 2010, 07:08 PM) *
Actually, under the the Light GE Autocannon, it specifically states it is similar in model to the Vindicator Minigun.... I'd assume their talking about the barrel system otherwise why even mention it.



Because It can only fire FA bursts at 20 rounds/pass?

As for why it may not be a gatling system such as the Avenger, perhaps this picture might best explain it. I dunno though. I only know that it never mentions the need to spin up to speed, so I always pictured it like the old double-barreled AA guns. You know, where it fires from two independent barrels using two independent mechanisms to give it twice as long to recoil each time. Those 30mm suckers are so big, it's just silly.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stahlseele
post Apr 8 2010, 08:24 AM
Post #21


The ShadowComedian
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,538
Joined: 3-October 07
From: Hamburg, AGS
Member No.: 13,525



No, Silly is what you can get up to with reasonable firing speed.
8.8cm FLAK/PAK for example.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HK_GMW < = there's a nice example of silly that might pass as an Autocannon.
40mm fully automatic grenade launcher.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Sengir
post Apr 8 2010, 11:28 AM
Post #22


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 5,092
Joined: 3-October 09
From: Kohle, Stahl und Bier
Member No.: 17,709



QUOTE (Stahlseele @ Apr 8 2010, 09:24 AM) *
No, Silly is what you can get up to with reasonable firing speed.
8.8cm FLAK/PAK for example.

The 88 was still loaded manually, though (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)


But the word "autocannon" really can mean a lot of things: Gatling guns, revolver cannons, chainguns, gas/recoil-operated systems with one or more barrels...and while probably most people agree that something like the PzH 2000 (which even has a burst-fire mode for three shells) or naval artillery with autoloaders does not qualify as autocannon, drawing the exact line between "autocannon" and "cannon with autoloader" is difficult.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stahlseele
post Apr 8 2010, 11:41 AM
Post #23


The ShadowComedian
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,538
Joined: 3-October 07
From: Hamburg, AGS
Member No.: 13,525



And it's STILL firing pretty fast.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Sengir
post Apr 8 2010, 11:46 AM
Post #24


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 5,092
Joined: 3-October 09
From: Kohle, Stahl und Bier
Member No.: 17,709



Pre-tuned by German engineers (IMG:style_emoticons/default/grinbig.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stahlseele
post Apr 8 2010, 11:50 AM
Post #25


The ShadowComedian
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,538
Joined: 3-October 07
From: Hamburg, AGS
Member No.: 13,525



Building Killing Stuff. German Engineering Corps. We are the best at what we do, and what we do ain't nice!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 1st October 2025 - 11:28 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.