 If IMR/CGL retains the license, will you:, Another public opinion poll |
  |
 May 2 2010, 01:26 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Moving Target  Group: Members Posts: 272 Joined: 5-April 10 Member No.: 18,416  |
This one shamelessly plagiarized from Bull.
|
 |
 
|
|
May 2 2010, 04:41 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Target Group: Members Posts: 45 Joined: 6-March 10 From: San Fernando Valley, PCC Member No.: 18,250 |
I am of the opinion that #1 is only possible if #2 is accomplished.
Grexul |
|
|
|
|
May 2 2010, 06:07 AM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 510 Joined: 19-May 06 From: Southern CA Member No.: 8,574 |
Where's the "I don't frakking care as long as CGL doesn't go bankrupt"? Is that #1?
|
|
|
|
|
May 2 2010, 07:23 AM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,379 Joined: 16-April 02 From: the LI shadows Member No.: 2,607 |
what changes will Randall make? Is there a link to a list?
|
|
|
|
|
May 2 2010, 07:54 AM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 251 Joined: 17-March 10 From: Bug City Member No.: 18,315 |
If IMR/CGL retains the license, will you:
d) celebrate the end of these polls. |
|
|
|
|
May 2 2010, 07:57 AM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,286 Joined: 24-May 05 From: A 10x10 room with an orc and a treasure chest Member No.: 7,409 |
I'll play regardless. Unless they change the system to d20 or something like that.
|
|
|
|
|
May 2 2010, 07:58 AM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,336 Joined: 25-February 08 From: San Mateo CA Member No.: 15,708 |
QUOTE (Kid Chameleon @ May 1 2010, 11:54 PM)  If IMR/CGL retains the license, will you: d) celebrate the end of these polls. I hope this isn't considered a personal attack: Dreamer. You and I both know that no matter how this ends, there will be years of bitterness popping up here on DumpShock. BlueMax |
|
|
|
|
May 2 2010, 08:14 AM
Post
#8
|
|
|
Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,782 Joined: 28-August 09 Member No.: 17,566 |
QUOTE (BookWyrm @ May 2 2010, 01:23 AM) what changes will Randall make? Is there a link to a list? Curious minds - who haven't kept up with all 5 CGL debate threads - wish to know. Anyone? |
|
|
|
|
May 2 2010, 09:28 AM
Post
#9
|
|
|
Runner Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 2,946 Joined: 1-June 09 From: Omaha Member No.: 17,234 |
QUOTE (BlueMax @ May 2 2010, 01:58 AM) I hope this isn't considered a personal attack: Dreamer. You and I both know that no matter how this ends, there will be years of bitterness popping up here on DumpShock. BlueMax On what planet would this be considered a personal attack? Someone (you, not the poster) seems to have taken their overly sensitive pill this morning. Actually I'm fairly certain that with the exception of a few people like AH and others directly affected there won't be a lot of bitterness over the whole thing unless it leads to the end of shadowrun basically. |
|
|
|
|
May 2 2010, 09:49 AM
Post
#10
|
|
|
Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,899 Joined: 29-October 09 From: Leiden, the Netherlands Member No.: 17,814 |
Eh. This endless speculation and fighting is rather dreary.
I just want my Corporate Guide. |
|
|
|
|
May 2 2010, 01:25 PM
Post
#11
|
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 595 Joined: 12-May 05 Member No.: 7,392 |
QUOTE (Udoshi @ May 2 2010, 03:14 AM) Curious minds - who haven't kept up with all 5 CGL debate threads - wish to know. Anyone? There is not a list of all the detailed changes, because a lot of it is internal business matters. Some of it is simple stuff like changing how checks are signed and who signs what checks. Others involve implementing new accounting procedures that will help each project be individually profitable (and make those profits clear), which will mean each project will generate the revenue to fully pay off those who worked on it (that's been the goal for a long time, but procedures were not in line with that goal). There are other changes happening that I'm not aware of simply because I'm not on that side of the business. Jason H. |
|
|
|
|
May 2 2010, 01:36 PM
Post
#12
|
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 633 Joined: 16-March 05 From: 51° 16' North 7° 11' East Member No.: 7,168 |
QUOTE (Angelone @ May 2 2010, 09:57 AM) I'll play regardless. Unless they change the system to d20 or something like that. QFT |
|
|
|
|
May 2 2010, 02:38 PM
Post
#13
|
|
|
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,532 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Calgary, Canada Member No.: 769 |
As long as CGL continues to put out books that I find useful or entertaining in my campaigns I will continue to buy them.
|
|
|
|
|
May 2 2010, 04:50 PM
Post
#14
|
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,379 Joined: 16-April 02 From: the LI shadows Member No.: 2,607 |
I agree with imperialis.
|
|
|
|
|
May 2 2010, 05:24 PM
Post
#15
|
|
|
Prime Runner Ascendant Group: Members Posts: 17,568 Joined: 26-March 09 From: Aurora, Colorado Member No.: 17,022 |
QUOTE (BookWyrm @ May 2 2010, 10:50 AM) I agree with imperialis. Hard to argue with Imperialis... that is my general outlook on most game materials... Keep the Faith |
|
|
|
|
May 2 2010, 06:03 PM
Post
#16
|
|
|
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,768 Joined: 31-October 08 From: Redmond (Yes, really) Member No.: 16,558 |
QUOTE (Tymeaus Jalynsfein @ May 2 2010, 10:24 AM) Hard to argue with Imperialis... that is my general outlook on most game materials... Keep the Faith Ditto. [Edit:] 900 posts! |
|
|
|
|
May 2 2010, 06:18 PM
Post
#17
|
|
|
Shooting Target Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 1,755 Joined: 5-September 06 From: UCAS Member No.: 9,313 |
I will continue to support Shadowrun as long as it continues on the path its on. If the quality/content drop into the crapper I'll move on, I'll shed a tear but I'll move on. If number 2. is accomplished and great material starts pouring out of the pipeline again I'll be happy to support it. Looking forward to completeing DotA and its follow up and all the great stuff on the schedule but I'll reserve my opinion beyond that until I have some hard copy in my hands.
|
|
|
|
|
May 2 2010, 06:32 PM
Post
#18
|
|
|
Dumorimasoddaa Group: Members Posts: 2,687 Joined: 30-March 08 Member No.: 15,830 |
I'll likey suport the licence holder no matter what how ever this would likely be grudingly if CGL dosen't clean up its act I'll only buy any new books that I feel I NEED no more buying every SR book ever if I don't feel CGL deserves my custom.
|
|
|
|
|
May 2 2010, 08:20 PM
Post
#19
|
|
|
Slacker Extraordinaire Group: Retired Admins Posts: 337 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Ashburn, VA Member No.: 997 |
I don't plan to support IMR/CGL. I just can't get past the fact that some portion of my money would go to those responsible for putting my favorite game in jeopardy. If the offending parties were removed I'd certainly reconsider.
|
|
|
|
|
May 2 2010, 10:12 PM
Post
#20
|
|
|
Target Group: Members Posts: 62 Joined: 23-December 05 From: Fun City Member No.: 8,095 |
If the product is good, people will buy. As much as I don't like employee/employer maleficence that won't stop people that don't know anything about this drekstorm from actually buying the content that's actually good. Handing the license over to another company that manages on their own system or stays with this one doesn't matter as long as they make good on the content as well. If either way it goes bad with horrid writing or an excessive need for errata then people might not buy as the content is no good from infighting dragging down progress or a company that doesn't know anything about Shadowrun.
In the end, all we can really hope for is a quick, clean resolution to this that doesn't cause more than the already unavoidable damage to the creative process of making the content currently in place. Content is King. |
|
|
|
|
May 3 2010, 12:35 AM
Post
#21
|
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 372 Joined: 2-March 10 Member No.: 18,227 |
I will continue to buy good products at reasonable prices.
I don't really care if they're in financial trouble. If they can crawl out, great! If they can't, oh well, hopefully the next guy does better. It's not my job to balance their books, nor to oversee their accounts: I'm not a shareholder. Well, I guess if the company were ritually sacrificing innocent children on a blood-soaked ziggurat, I'd give their products a pass, no matter how good & cheap those products were. But short of human rights violations, I don't much care. Give me good products at reasonable prices. |
|
|
|
|
May 3 2010, 01:28 AM
Post
#22
|
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,379 Joined: 16-April 02 From: the LI shadows Member No.: 2,607 |
Hear hear, Nifft.
|
|
|
|
|
May 3 2010, 10:54 AM
Post
#23
|
|
|
Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,705 Joined: 5-October 09 From: You are in a clearing Member No.: 17,722 |
It's easy enough to say "as long as they keep cranking out the hits," but after they shit on the talent so hard during this whole mess, I'm not sure that's going to happen.
They sure as hell don't have to ask my forgiveness, but they're going to have to try real hard to convince me that they're not just pushing shit out of the door. There are parts of 10 Jackpointers which didn't even enjoy a spellcheck sweep... |
|
|
|
|
May 3 2010, 03:14 PM
Post
#24
|
|
|
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,768 Joined: 31-October 08 From: Redmond (Yes, really) Member No.: 16,558 |
QUOTE (Saint Sithney @ May 3 2010, 03:54 AM) <snip> There are parts of 10 Jackpointers which didn't even enjoy a spellcheck sweep... Really? Yeesh! |
|
|
|
|
May 3 2010, 05:24 PM
Post
#25
|
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 619 Joined: 24-July 08 From: Resonance Realms, behind the 2nd Star Member No.: 16,162 |
Let's see what the future brings. I started losing interest in the whole mumbo jumbo after ... 3 Weeks? I even ignore the speculation threads, the only one i read is on the german SR-Nexus and there you just have the important info.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 16th April 2024 - 08:54 AM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.