Sensor Software and Cybereyes, Do they work together? |
Sensor Software and Cybereyes, Do they work together? |
Jun 18 2010, 10:39 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Target Group: Members Posts: 72 Joined: 3-June 02 From: Baltimore Member No.: 2,824 |
Simple question really. If someone had cyber eyes, and was running one of the camera-based sensor software programs (facial recognition, empathy software, etc) on their PAN, would they be able to use the feed from their cybereyes for the program? Or would they need an additional camera sensor bought separately?
|
|
|
Jun 18 2010, 10:44 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,717 Joined: 23-March 09 From: Weymouth, UK Member No.: 17,007 |
Simple answer. Yes. There's no difference between cybereye cameras and other cameras.
|
|
|
Jun 19 2010, 03:26 AM
Post
#3
|
|
Advocatus Diaboli Group: Members Posts: 13,994 Joined: 20-November 07 From: USA Member No.: 14,282 |
I run it all, all the time. Whee! Pop in a separate commlink just for that.
|
|
|
Jun 19 2010, 08:58 AM
Post
#4
|
|
Prime Runner Group: Members Posts: 3,803 Joined: 3-February 08 From: Finland Member No.: 15,628 |
|
|
|
Jun 19 2010, 03:52 PM
Post
#5
|
|
Neophyte Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,188 Joined: 9-February 08 From: Boiling Springs Member No.: 15,665 |
If you have cyber-ears you can run the audio sensor software packages as well.
|
|
|
Jun 19 2010, 03:52 PM
Post
#6
|
|
Advocatus Diaboli Group: Members Posts: 13,994 Joined: 20-November 07 From: USA Member No.: 14,282 |
Bleh, clustering is trash. And I'd rule that clustering things like that makes them stop doing their normal jobs. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
And since the OP asked, you can just do all the same sensors/software without the cyber, which is almost certainly a better idea. |
|
|
Jun 19 2010, 04:45 PM
Post
#7
|
|
Also posts as Dynamo Dave Group: Members Posts: 49 Joined: 30-May 10 Member No.: 18,641 |
Why do you need to cluster it anyway??? Dont they get a device rating from their cyberware grade which determines their commlink stats??? You can run software on them without problems that way. Clustering is only useful if you have lots and lots of programs to run and even then i dont really see the point compared to just running them separatly.
|
|
|
Jun 19 2010, 04:55 PM
Post
#8
|
|
Advocatus Diaboli Group: Members Posts: 13,994 Joined: 20-November 07 From: USA Member No.: 14,282 |
Right. But I'd rather just get another commlink or two, instead of having all my cyber up, running, and connected like that. In the end, it doesn't matter much, but I don't like the 'device rating = free instant commlinks' mechanic (at my table).
|
|
|
Jun 19 2010, 08:22 PM
Post
#9
|
|
Prime Runner Group: Members Posts: 3,803 Joined: 3-February 08 From: Finland Member No.: 15,628 |
Why do you need to cluster it anyway??? Dont they get a device rating from their cyberware grade which determines their commlink stats??? You can run software on them without problems that way. Clustering is only useful if you have lots and lots of programs to run and even then i dont really see the point compared to just running them separatly. Well my Sasha has empathy, gait and noise analysis, lie detection, vehicle identification, facial and noice recognition running 24/7 so i figured clustering her senseware together with her datajacks is the easiest way to run them. |
|
|
Jun 19 2010, 10:11 PM
Post
#10
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 298 Joined: 15-March 09 Member No.: 16,974 |
Well my Sasha has empathy, gait and noise analysis, lie detection, vehicle identification, facial and noice recognition running 24/7 so i figured clustering her senseware together with her datajacks is the easiest way to run them. Your issue will be system rating limiting software rating. Unless you upgrade the system on all components in the cluster, you'll be utilizing the weakest system (likely a 2 or 3) limiting the program whereas a commlink will give you a much higher system rating for much cheaper. |
|
|
Jun 19 2010, 10:13 PM
Post
#11
|
|
Advocatus Diaboli Group: Members Posts: 13,994 Joined: 20-November 07 From: USA Member No.: 14,282 |
I just don't think it makes sense to use Rating X stats for most peripheral nodes.
|
|
|
Jun 19 2010, 10:44 PM
Post
#12
|
|
Prime Runner Group: Members Posts: 3,803 Joined: 3-February 08 From: Finland Member No.: 15,628 |
Your issue will be system rating limiting software rating. Unless you upgrade the system on all components in the cluster, you'll be utilizing the weakest system (likely a 2 or 3) limiting the program whereas a commlink will give you a much higher system rating for much cheaper. all ware is atleast 3 and becouse of how the prising of sensor softwares work, she only has them at rating 3 so the system rating isn't a problem and its hard to get cheaper them zero nuyen(she allready has all that ware anyway). |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 18th April 2024 - 04:19 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.