Piggybacking on knowsofts, Gaining the bias of the soft's author |
Piggybacking on knowsofts, Gaining the bias of the soft's author |
Feb 27 2004, 03:43 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 101 Joined: 12-September 03 Member No.: 5,613 |
In another thread about knowsofts someone said something to the effect of "you just know the information like you know your own name."
I just read a short story where a girl was worried because her mother converted to Islam, and she thought that her Mom might convert her through her neural implants, or use libido filters on her. Now SR isn't really at that level of tech yet, but the next time that the characters buy discount knowlage softs, It might be interesting to slip a Shinto religion:3 skill in on the Japanese launguge:6 chip. Or Crazy militiaman conspiracy theory:5 bundled with Firearms B/R:4 I don't even know if the rules allow for it, but it would be an interesting peice of flavor in the game. |
|
|
Feb 27 2004, 04:02 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Ain Soph Aur Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 3,477 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Montreal, Canada Member No.: 600 |
Yay, I spawned a sub-thread :D
I think making multi-program chips is possible, because when making an Instructor chip, you have to chose an Instructor Rating, and then the Skill rating. However, an Instructor chip isn't a knowsoft, and canon-wise I don't think split-skill chips have been touched. That said, I don't see why it couldn't be done. It might affect game balance a bit, but since multi-slot jacks are dirt cheap anyway, that still doesn't seem to be a problem. So yeah, I like your idea. |
|
|
Feb 27 2004, 04:10 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Chicago Survivor Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 5,079 Joined: 28-January 04 From: Canton, GA Member No.: 6,033 |
Just add subversive ASSIST technology from the CC. This is very similair to the Dream Chipper module.
|
|
|
Feb 27 2004, 04:34 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Traumatizing players since 1992 Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 3,282 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Las Vegas, NV Member No.: 220 |
the problem is that if you buy a rating 4 system, it can only use a skill value at one time equal to its rating. A japanese(4)/shinto(3) chip will ignore one or the other, as it can use only 4 points at one time. Someone would definitely notice if they chip a Korean (2)/Bhuddist(2) chip and expect 4 rating points of a skill and only get 2.
|
|
|
Feb 27 2004, 05:02 PM
Post
#5
|
|||
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 518 Joined: 24-February 03 From: Tucson Member No.: 4,153 |
Unless the skills are pluscoded to reduce the size of the program the ASIST see's. :D |
||
|
|||
Feb 27 2004, 05:02 PM
Post
#6
|
|
Dragon Group: Members Posts: 4,065 Joined: 16-January 03 From: Fayetteville, NC Member No.: 3,916 |
Interesting thought -- knowledge chips don't require skill wires to process.
Emotional programming chips -- mood, behavior, personality don't have an Active classification. Could you combine an Active chip with a Knowledge chip? Or behavior/emotional modifier program? So you buy Handgun 4 but, unless you scan the chip and wonder why the file size(s) are so much larger, you probably won't notice the: Aggression 4 or Homicidal Impulses (4) commands... -Siege |
|
|
Feb 27 2004, 05:06 PM
Post
#7
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 101 Joined: 12-September 03 Member No.: 5,613 |
Well it wouldn't technically be two separate skills. the second skill that would be piggybacked would be from the bias of the author of the chip. So if you get a Macroeconomics chip from a liberal university it is different than a Macroecon chip written by conservative talk radio hosts.
This wouldn't apply all the time, just another curve that a GM can throw at a character when they try and save some money. I would agree that the whole thing would be kind of broken from a game balance point of veiw. I just like the idea of someone buying a Auto B/R chip and suddenly calling trucks lorries. |
|
|
Feb 27 2004, 05:08 PM
Post
#8
|
|
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,685 Joined: 17-August 02 Member No.: 3,123 |
I think it's a great idea, and I think you're right that it shouldn't be a seperate skill.
Just when does a character roll his Homicidal Impulses skill, anyway? |
|
|
Feb 27 2004, 05:18 PM
Post
#9
|
|||
Dragon Group: Members Posts: 4,065 Joined: 16-January 03 From: Fayetteville, NC Member No.: 3,916 |
I included two examples: Aggression 4 which functions as a skill. When presented with a situation, the chip rolls it's dice against the host's Willpower. If the chip scores 1 or more successes, the host responds in an aggressive manner. The more successes, the more aggressive the response. The form of that aggression is subject to the GM -- it would take a lot more successes to make a Girl Scout reach for a knife than, say, a samurai pull his gun and start firing. Homicidal Impulses (4) is an emotional command chip that embeds thoughts or actions in the host's subconscious. When presented with a trigger that could be pre-determined: see women alone or Renraku logo, the character must make a Willpower check against the TN of the emotional command chip. The trigger could simply be open-ended: whenever thwarted or frustrated or simply "right the frag now", meaning the character has to make regular Willpower checks _not_ to feel the need to kill. If the character fails the check, he or she feels the overwhelming urge to act upon this thought/need/impulse in his or her head. Depending on the chip, the host might be compelled to do everything in his or her power to destroy the object of their ire or simply go on crazed killing spree. Rough ideas off the top of my head, sorry. -Siege |
||
|
|||
Feb 27 2004, 05:21 PM
Post
#10
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,049 Joined: 24-March 03 Member No.: 4,323 |
Knowsofts links and chipjacks don't have a rating. With the purchase of the basic version of either you can use any rating of knowsoft.
I'm not so sure I like the idea of having multiple softs on a single chip, as it does render the idea of a multislot chipjack somewhat worthless. Also, softs that emulate skills (knowsofts and activesofts) are generated from the knowledge/activities of a large number of subjects that possess the skill, so its unlikely that bias would remain in the recording unless that was the intent of the recorder - which would probably be rare insofar as the chip would become less marketable. I think the idea of philosophically-biased chips is a valid one, but a shinto-biased language chip wouldnt necessarily teach the user anything about the shinto religion - you would just be inclined to agree with those sorts of Shintoish statements made in Japanese. |
|
|
Feb 27 2004, 05:25 PM
Post
#11
|
|
Dragon Group: Members Posts: 4,065 Joined: 16-January 03 From: Fayetteville, NC Member No.: 3,916 |
It can be argued either way:
The chipjack/datajack is only capable of reading one source of information at a time which seems a little silly in the case of a datajack -or- Since the same type of chip can store Handgun 2 or Handgun 10, you can combine knowledge skills but at a much higher cost to the PC. Truthfully, I rather like the idea -- it helps expand the idea of p-fix chips. Although your point about game balance is well-founded. Multislot chipjacks would still have their uses because Active skills do have ratings and if you've invested in skillwires, odds are you're not gonna stop with one Actively chipped skill. -Siege Edited: To restructure the sentence and remove the double "although". |
|
|
Feb 27 2004, 05:40 PM
Post
#12
|
|||
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 101 Joined: 12-September 03 Member No.: 5,613 |
Well the idea is that these biased chips either come from discount providers or people with an agenda. There shouldn't be a bias in most commercially available chips. |
||
|
|||
Feb 27 2004, 06:01 PM
Post
#13
|
|||
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 188 Joined: 16-June 03 From: Da Burgh, PA Member No.: 4,751 |
I think in the case of languages it's much easier than this. Just look at the dialect list. You can just have him speak like a priest. Since my nihongo is rusty I'll give you a reverse example. Johnson: Do you understand? An asian-looking chipper(in a brogue): Don'cha know it'll be terminated, boyo. In the name of da fadder, da son, and da holy ghost. The Johnson looks away slightly while all the runners make language skill rolls to see what he said. |
||
|
|||
Feb 27 2004, 06:40 PM
Post
#14
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 693 Joined: 26-March 03 Member No.: 4,335 |
Minor biases would be encoded into the skill, by the choice of what information to include and how to weight it - but the only thing that would be biased is the knowledge from the chip.
Anything outside of such a limited bias would probably fall under the catagory of personafix BTLs (mood chips, agression chips, etc). |
|
|
Feb 28 2004, 01:13 AM
Post
#15
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,047 Joined: 12-November 03 From: Perilously close to the Sioux Nation. Member No.: 5,818 |
There are chips in M&M that do that already, aren't there?
|
|
|
Feb 28 2004, 07:28 AM
Post
#16
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 101 Joined: 12-September 03 Member No.: 5,613 |
There might be?
|
|
|
Feb 29 2004, 01:56 AM
Post
#17
|
|
Great Dragon Group: Members Posts: 7,116 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 1,449 |
I don't think other skills should be piggybacked on knowsofts, but I do like the idea of a knowsoft having an "author" bias, especially in fields where there is no consensus. If someone slots a psychology or economics chip, he/she will be likelier to get one that has built-in biases (for or against supply-side economics, etc.). For cheaper chips, you could do a lot worse. Imagine slotting a sociology chip and finding yourself saying "There would be a lot less overcrowding if they'd euthanize all those damn trogs".
|
|
|
Mar 1 2004, 02:38 AM
Post
#18
|
|||
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,047 Joined: 12-November 03 From: Perilously close to the Sioux Nation. Member No.: 5,818 |
There is not. I was thinking of BTL's |
||
|
|||
Mar 1 2004, 10:57 AM
Post
#19
|
|||
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 402 Joined: 23-April 03 From: London, UK Member No.: 4,491 |
Don't let a megacorp hear you say that! |
||
|
|||
Mar 1 2004, 01:18 PM
Post
#20
|
|
Dragon Group: Members Posts: 4,065 Joined: 16-January 03 From: Fayetteville, NC Member No.: 3,916 |
I think it would add some flavor to skillchips in general and make PCs wary of buying cracked or illegal copies from the local street vendor.
Alternatively, nasty deckers could contaminate chip batches, forcing recalls of chips...which are slated for destruction, but end up getting liquidated on the street instead. And in the hands of PCs...or their dependents. For those of you who dislike the piggyback idea -- are you voting against it because of game balance or you just don't think the idea would fly? -Siege |
|
|
Mar 1 2004, 03:59 PM
Post
#21
|
|||
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 402 Joined: 23-April 03 From: London, UK Member No.: 4,491 |
Read that. Pretty good stuff. |
||
|
|||
Mar 1 2004, 05:07 PM
Post
#22
|
|||||
Dragon Group: Members Posts: 4,065 Joined: 16-January 03 From: Fayetteville, NC Member No.: 3,916 |
Sort of -- although the chips from "Dreamchipper" didn't require skillwires, if I remember correctly. Although p-fix chips of "Cleopatra" or "Ultimate Seductress" or "James Bond: Man of Mystery" would have to be abound somewhere. "Paco, the Cabana Boy"? "Jack the Ripper" or "Jason with a Chainsaw Fetish." Read "When Gravity Fails" by George Alec Effinger. That'll put p-fix chips in a whole new light. I'm still debating on bio-stimulus chips -- they'd be nixed on game balance issues alone, but it's a neat idea. -Siege |
||||
|
|||||
Mar 2 2004, 04:19 AM
Post
#23
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,047 Joined: 12-November 03 From: Perilously close to the Sioux Nation. Member No.: 5,818 |
Siege-
I'm not so much voting against it as wondering how it would work in game mechanics terms. |
|
|
Mar 2 2004, 07:33 AM
Post
#24
|
|||
Dragon Group: Members Posts: 4,065 Joined: 16-January 03 From: Fayetteville, NC Member No.: 3,916 |
Sorry Moose -- how what would work in game terms? -Siege |
||
|
|||
Mar 5 2004, 12:57 PM
Post
#25
|
|||||
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 402 Joined: 23-April 03 From: London, UK Member No.: 4,491 |
And my warning STILL stands! |
||||
|
|||||
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 28th March 2024 - 08:25 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.