IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

3 Pages V   1 2 3 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> What stories rub you the wrong way?
Voran
post Jul 30 2010, 12:37 AM
Post #1


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,401
Joined: 23-February 04
From: Honolulu, HI
Member No.: 6,099



I was just flipping through my Seattle sourcebook, and was reading the short-story that leads into the first chapters "Kaboom Ka-bye". Now, don't get me wrong, its an excellently crafted story, and I enjoyed it in that sense, but after finishing it my first thought was this.

I would track Marie down and disable her, then feed her to ghouls, alive.

The casual nature by which she decides, "Hey the best way to deal with this courier is to slap a bomb on him", while entirely efficient, is entirely on the terrorist side of things. She rationalizes "Oh the blood is on the hands of the corp that used this unwitting wageslave to transport a datafile he didn't even know he had", then proceeds to blow him up, presumably the 7+ escorts in hidden array around him, and who knows how many innocent civilians.

She's not a runner. She's a fucking terrorist.


Anyway, we've had some excellent stories across the various new source material, just wondering if anyone else had any stories that for some reason or another inspired such a reaction. Whether homicidal, like mine, or whatever (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
eidolon
post Jul 30 2010, 02:20 AM
Post #2


ghostrider
********

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 4,196
Joined: 16-May 04
Member No.: 6,333



I think maybe your definition of "runner" is a bit narrow. You personally might not like her methods, but "runner" != white knight in shining armor. Some of them are bad, bad people that can get a job done.

There aren't any bits of the fiction that I can remember not liking in a "that irritated me" way, but I'm probably just blocking them out and remembering the awesome that is all of Cybertechnology.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CanRay
post Jul 30 2010, 05:00 PM
Post #3


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,358
Joined: 2-December 07
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Member No.: 14,465



QUOTE (eidolon @ Jul 29 2010, 09:20 PM) *
I think maybe your definition of "runner" is a bit narrow. You personally might not like her methods, but "runner" != white knight in shining armor. Some of them are bad, bad people that can get a job done.

Some?

Yeah, the "Stick t to the Corps" types died with the Neo-@s for the most part.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
eidolon
post Jul 30 2010, 05:50 PM
Post #4


ghostrider
********

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 4,196
Joined: 16-May 04
Member No.: 6,333



Yeah, I know. I don't know if it was the fluff changed the player base, or if the player base changed regardless of the fluff and then the fluff changed or what.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
suoq
post Jul 30 2010, 06:14 PM
Post #5


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,272
Joined: 22-June 10
From: Omaha. NE
Member No.: 18,746



I blame/credit William Gibson for using Mark Brandon Chopper Read as his inspiration for Keith Blackwell. Once that happened, all bets were off.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tete
post Jul 30 2010, 06:19 PM
Post #6


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,095
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Seattle Wa, USA
Member No.: 1,139



Well she certainly isnt getting Good Karma *snicker*
Runners to some extent ARE terrorists, that said she wont live long in the shadows with that kind of behavior... One of those innocent civilians could always be a good friend of Lofwyr... best not to blow up his friends.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
LurkerOutThere
post Jul 30 2010, 06:42 PM
Post #7


Runner
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 2,946
Joined: 1-June 09
From: Omaha
Member No.: 17,234



I think morality has somewhat softened on Shadowrun but occasionally the pendulum swings back. For my part I and my characters don't like explosives for just this exact reason and a bomb on a crowded street is not an acceptable tool for one guy.


A sniper rifle is the professional answer.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
eidolon
post Jul 30 2010, 07:14 PM
Post #8


ghostrider
********

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 4,196
Joined: 16-May 04
Member No.: 6,333



Meh. "Professional." Humph.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CanRay
post Jul 30 2010, 08:04 PM
Post #9


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,358
Joined: 2-December 07
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Member No.: 14,465



Yeah, but then people know who the target was with a sniper rifle.

Bombs create more "Noise", and it takes more time to figure out who was the target, and, thusly, the suspect pool.

Drive-By, that's a bit better. And, if you're squeemish about bodycount, program a Smartgunned SMG to only miss except for one target IDed by Biometrics. A bit of noise with the bystanders, and you still only nail your target.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Catadmin
post Jul 30 2010, 09:01 PM
Post #10


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 174
Joined: 16-March 10
Member No.: 18,299



The main character of the story was a single 'runner with no team backup. Yes, there were alternatives to how she could have done the hit, but she didn't appear to be a sniper or a ninja or a poisoner. Her specialty seemed to be explosives / demolitions.

So when reading this tale, I make the assumption that Mr. Johnson knows the runner's skillset and either knew exactly how the hit was going to go down or specifically requested it to go down that way.

I'm willing to give the author the benefit of this doubt because in a story this short, there's no way she could explain everything going on behind the scenes. She just had to assume the readers would know enough about SR to figure it out.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Brazilian_Shinob...
post Jul 30 2010, 09:50 PM
Post #11


Shooting Target
****

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 1,989
Joined: 28-July 09
From: Somewhere along the brazilian coast
Member No.: 17,437



QUOTE (LurkerOutThere @ Jul 30 2010, 03:42 PM) *
I think morality has somewhat softened on Shadowrun but occasionally the pendulum swings back. For my part I and my characters don't like explosives for just this exact reason and a bomb on a crowded street is not an acceptable tool for one guy.


A sniper rifle is the professional answer.


Rule number 7: There is no problem that can't be solved with the right amount of explosives.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tete
post Jul 30 2010, 09:52 PM
Post #12


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,095
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Seattle Wa, USA
Member No.: 1,139



QUOTE (Brazilian_Shinobi @ Jul 30 2010, 10:50 PM) *
Rule number 7: There is no problem that can't be solved with the right amount of explosives.


Depends on your definition of "solved", I suppose that is one way to "solve" bleeding out from a knife wound, but I would have preferred the Doc Wagon approach.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CanRay
post Jul 30 2010, 09:54 PM
Post #13


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,358
Joined: 2-December 07
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Member No.: 14,465



QUOTE (Brazilian_Shinobi @ Jul 30 2010, 04:50 PM) *
Rule number 7: There is no problem that can't be solved with the right amount of explosives.

I prefer Rule 11: "Everything is air-droppable at least once."

Especially useful when you have some nice, tall buildings. Or a T-Bird. Or a Helicopter.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Smokeskin
post Jul 30 2010, 10:33 PM
Post #14


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 881
Joined: 31-July 06
From: Denmark
Member No.: 8,995



QUOTE (Voran @ Jul 30 2010, 02:37 AM) *
I was just flipping through my Seattle sourcebook, and was reading the short-story that leads into the first chapters "Kaboom Ka-bye". Now, don't get me wrong, its an excellently crafted story, and I enjoyed it in that sense, but after finishing it my first thought was this.

I would track Marie down and disable her, then feed her to ghouls, alive.

The casual nature by which she decides, "Hey the best way to deal with this courier is to slap a bomb on him", while entirely efficient, is entirely on the terrorist side of things. She rationalizes "Oh the blood is on the hands of the corp that used this unwitting wageslave to transport a datafile he didn't even know he had", then proceeds to blow him up, presumably the 7+ escorts in hidden array around him, and who knows how many innocent civilians.

She's not a runner. She's a fucking terrorist.


Anyway, we've had some excellent stories across the various new source material, just wondering if anyone else had any stories that for some reason or another inspired such a reaction. Whether homicidal, like mine, or whatever (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)


Compared to a bunch of "no-wetwork" runners who run after run sneak into corp facilities and every other time they have to shoot their way out with automatics with APDS ammo? She's doing about the same.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CanRay
post Jul 30 2010, 10:53 PM
Post #15


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,358
Joined: 2-December 07
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Member No.: 14,465



The fact is that, in 2070, a lot of Security Companies are lumping Shadowrunners into the "Terrorist" category, even if they don't deserve it.

Why? Well, they figured out it's a "Hot Topic Button" that makes the Norms "OMGWTF SCARED!!!" and takes away from the glamour that Shadowrunners had in the '50s and '60s, where they were seen as "The last bastallion of Freedom, sticking it to the Corps" thanks to a lot of Trid and Sims that were "Based" on Shadowruns.

Terrorism became a horrific thing in the public eye (At least in the Western World) again after Dues and Winternight did their things during Crash 2.0. Before that, they were seen mostly as either Eco-Terrorists (Which kind of make sense, in a insane sort of way) and Policlubs (And who can't help but hate a bigot?). But, with Crash 2.0 and it's affiliates erasing SINs, causing "Apes", setting MAGICALLY ENHANCED NUKES off... Yeah...

Funny, considering what Shadowrunners did to help prevent ACTUAL nutbar terrorists from blowing up the world!

RIP, Captain Chaos and ShadowLand.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Whipstitch
post Jul 31 2010, 12:16 AM
Post #16


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,883
Joined: 16-December 06
Member No.: 10,386



QUOTE (Voran @ Jul 29 2010, 07:37 PM) *
She's not a runner. She's a fucking terrorist.



A lot of runners effectively are terrorists. My last team had 2. Doesn't mean they're not runners.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MortVent
post Jul 31 2010, 12:28 AM
Post #17


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 446
Joined: 16-May 03
Member No.: 4,598



to paraphrase another story:

some runners are out for vengence, survial, to stick it to the man.. and others are just paid to shoot someone in the face



runners are professionals, but not all professionals are going to use the same tools and methods. Some are scapels others are a truck load of C-12

Each is used by the corps for different reasons, collateral damage is going to happen.

sometimes it's the runners that cause it, other times it's corp security firing without hesitation into the crowd to take down the runners (and killing innocent wage slaves held as meat shields to do it)

Life is cheap in SR, morality is based for most on how much ya willing to pay
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CanRay
post Jul 31 2010, 05:20 AM
Post #18


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,358
Joined: 2-December 07
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Member No.: 14,465



The problem with "Professional" runs, which my group just dealt with right now, is the amount of work that goes into it. Particularily on the Hacker, who needs to Forge the documents, do the research, hack the facilities, blah blah blah, while the Street Sami and the Magician sit around playing Poker. (There is an advantage to all that Cyberwear, it makes the Aura harder to read!).

On the bright side, when it comes time to steal Lincoln Sprawlcars and put on fake Diplomatic Plates, and the occasional flatbed truck, well, that's fun for everyone!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Voran
post Jul 31 2010, 05:50 AM
Post #19


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,401
Joined: 23-February 04
From: Honolulu, HI
Member No.: 6,099



oooh activity (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

I'm not opposed to wet-work runs, sometimes you're going to have to leave a few bleeders and make a few widows/orphans/whatever. Guess I'm just old. Time was the game was about 'sticking it to the man!', now apparently a good day's work is to take a page from the IRA, or Al-Qaeda. Not really a criticism, as the game and the vibe go with the times I suppose. Still, from a PC perspective, my history in gaming lent towards less collateral damage, cause our GM was nasty enough with consequences we KNEW about, why give him extra ammo, "Oh that bomb stunt? Yeah, you killed the daughter of one of your contacts."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jaid
post Jul 31 2010, 06:49 AM
Post #20


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,089
Joined: 4-October 05
Member No.: 7,813



ah. well, i guess if your GM is going to arbitrarily punish your characters for doing your job in a way he doesn't like, then i could see why that angle might be particularly bothersome.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CanRay
post Jul 31 2010, 08:18 AM
Post #21


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,358
Joined: 2-December 07
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Member No.: 14,465



QUOTE (Voran @ Jul 31 2010, 12:50 AM) *
Guess I'm just old. Time was the game was about 'sticking it to the man!'

Ah, the good ol' days, I never knew them. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/frown.gif)

Thing is, you're working for "The Man" while sticking it to "The Other Man", so, really, who was getting anything out of the deal?

That said, as a GM, yeah, going out of your way to up the body count is not a good idea at all. But, then again, it's socially accepted that there is some "Collateral Damage". After all, you see security guards get aced all the time by Shadowrunners on the 'Trid.

Still doesn't stop Lone Star from beating the ever-loving $Diety out of Shadowrunners who are Cop Killers or geeked Little Suzy in a Drive-By/Bombing or some such. And then handing them over to Bubba the Love Troll (BTW, loved his Cameo in Shadowrun: Vice!), after finding "Evidence" of enough crimes to put them away for an Elf's Lifetime.

If they're SINless, of course. If they have SINs, well, there are a "Few" protections left for them... Better hope you got enough laundered cash in your legitimate accounts to pay a good Lawyer to make sure you get those, however.

As the SINner in my group is finding out. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/devil.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Whipstitch
post Jul 31 2010, 04:28 PM
Post #22


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,883
Joined: 16-December 06
Member No.: 10,386



See, I consider the form of "sticking it to the Man" that shadowrunners typically engage in as being somewhat akin to terrorism in many instances. It's not just sabotage anymore when you're willing to shoot your way through a half dozen people on your way to wreck the machinery or otherwise prove that you don't want the corps pushing people around anymore. It's a matter of perspective, in the end. One man's mujahideen is another man's cowardly fanatic. Even purely mercenary criminals who liked wearing the bad boy image on their sleeve tended to think of themselves as more of daring than as bad guys. Dillinger was fond of letting people know who we as, after all, and he rather successfully cultivated an image of being fairly polite to hostages. People don't like thinking themselves as the bad guy, so forgive me if I always took the fuzzy neo-anarchist shadowrunning scene with a big ol' honking bag of salt.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Voran
post Jul 31 2010, 05:30 PM
Post #23


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,401
Joined: 23-February 04
From: Honolulu, HI
Member No.: 6,099



QUOTE (Jaid @ Jul 31 2010, 01:49 AM) *
ah. well, i guess if your GM is going to arbitrarily punish your characters for doing your job in a way he doesn't like, then i could see why that angle might be particularly bothersome.


Why is it arbitrary tho? Consequences for choices made, you choose to be random, you get random consequences too.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tete
post Jul 31 2010, 06:29 PM
Post #24


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,095
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Seattle Wa, USA
Member No.: 1,139



QUOTE (Voran @ Jul 31 2010, 05:30 PM) *
Why is it arbitrary tho? Consequences for choices made, you choose to be random, you get random consequences too.


/agree

everyone has relatives and friends, rack up a body count and eventually you killed someone important enough that you made yourself a target. Thats part of the fun of Shadowrun.

You can do the moral thing,
You can do the get rich thing
or
You can just try to survive chummer
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Eimi
post Jul 31 2010, 06:45 PM
Post #25


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 113
Joined: 13-April 09
Member No.: 17,073



There have always been runners that didn't give a crap about leaving a huge bodycount behind on jobs, just like there have always been runners that have been careful not to kill anyone they didn't have to. Nothing's really changed, other than the PR rap runners as a whole tend to get, though they're still pretty darn popular in some places, as LA's 'star runners' will attest to.

Running hasn't gotten any bloodier or more conscientious on the whole, it's still down to how individual runners and runner groups operate. Leaving behind piles of bodies still gets you more heat than not leaving any would, and not leaving any while still succeeding on a run is still more complicated and hard to do than the alternative. The corps still need the runners, so they tend to invest about the same amount of effort in delivering retribution after a run as they ever did. Johnsons may still want to either avoid collateral damage and the extra attention it brings with it, or they may want a lot of explosions and noise to send a message, just as they sometimes did in the past. Runners that try to avoid wanton killing still come into some conflict with runners that just don't care or even enjoy it.

There is no new breed of more dangerous and immoral runners, just like there's no new breed of more conscientious and moral corp or government targets. Nothing changes. Except for the SOTA, chummer.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

3 Pages V   1 2 3 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 26th April 2024 - 01:40 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.