![]() ![]() |
Aug 18 2010, 01:00 AM
Post
#226
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 372 Joined: 2-March 10 Member No.: 18,227 |
Has anyone though about using weapon size (aka the concealment rating) of a weapon as a modifier to grappling/melee combat that involves someone trying to use a firearm in close combat? If you have a long weapon and are trying to bring it to bear on a target, but the target rushes you so he/she is in melee... things like that could make melee more viable, as well as make combat more exciting in terms of tactics. That is a really interesting thought. |
|
|
|
Aug 18 2010, 01:02 AM
Post
#227
|
|
|
Prime Runner Ascendant ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 17,568 Joined: 26-March 09 From: Aurora, Colorado Member No.: 17,022 |
Supposedly using guns in close quarters is hard to do, even though most RL gun battles take place with the shooters less than 30 feet from each other. The idea of shooting in close quarters were that if you had a long weapon (rifle, assault rifle, shotgun, SMG)... it would be harder to bring about the barrel of the gun into proper location for firing. Has anyone though about using weapon size (aka the concealment rating) of a weapon as a modifier to grappling/melee combat that involves someone trying to use a firearm in close combat? If you have a long weapon and are trying to bring it to bear on a target, but the target rushes you so he/she is in melee... things like that could make melee more viable, as well as make combat more exciting in terms of tactics. Just a silly thought in my head. That is already accounted for in the "Gun Weilding Attacker in Melee Combat" penalty (-3 to his ranged attack roll) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wobble.gif) |
|
|
|
Aug 18 2010, 01:13 AM
Post
#228
|
|
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,579 Joined: 30-May 06 From: SoCal Member No.: 8,626 |
Supposedly using guns in close quarters is hard to do, even though most RL gun battles take place with the shooters less than 30 feet from each other. The idea of shooting in close quarters were that if you had a long weapon (rifle, assault rifle, shotgun, SMG)... it would be harder to bring about the barrel of the gun into proper location for firing. Has anyone though about using weapon size (aka the concealment rating) of a weapon as a modifier to grappling/melee combat that involves someone trying to use a firearm in close combat? If you have a long weapon and are trying to bring it to bear on a target, but the target rushes you so he/she is in melee... things like that could make melee more viable, as well as make combat more exciting in terms of tactics. Just a silly thought in my head. That's why you give it melee hardening, take the clubs skill with a specialization for rifle butt, and smack them in the face with it. |
|
|
|
Aug 18 2010, 01:31 AM
Post
#229
|
|
|
Neophyte Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,431 Joined: 3-December 03 Member No.: 5,872 |
Supposedly using guns in close quarters is hard to do, even though most RL gun battles take place with the shooters less than 30 feet from each other. The idea of shooting in close quarters were that if you had a long weapon (rifle, assault rifle, shotgun, SMG)... it would be harder to bring about the barrel of the gun into proper location for firing. Has anyone though about using weapon size (aka the concealment rating) of a weapon as a modifier to grappling/melee combat that involves someone trying to use a firearm in close combat? If you have a long weapon and are trying to bring it to bear on a target, but the target rushes you so he/she is in melee... things like that could make melee more viable, as well as make combat more exciting in terms of tactics. Just a silly thought in my head. Hero 4 had a rule like that but it was for differing reaches in melee. If you had a reach 3 weapon and were going against a reach 1 guy you were at like +2 ocv/dcv, if the reach one guy scored a hit on the reach 3 person the bonuses and penalties would reverse under the assumption you got inside there reach. Once you get past the halberds head the guy with the sword has the advantage. |
|
|
|
Aug 18 2010, 01:37 AM
Post
#230
|
|
|
Old Man Jones ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 4,415 Joined: 26-February 02 From: New York Member No.: 1,699 |
That's why you give it melee hardening, take the clubs skill with a specialization for rifle butt, and smack them in the face with it. The Buttstroke. The most hilariously named melee attack since Monkey Steals Peach. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/grinbig.gif) -karma |
|
|
|
Aug 18 2010, 01:52 AM
Post
#231
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 347 Joined: 28-June 10 Member No.: 18,765 |
I thought the buttstroke was an unarmed specialty.
|
|
|
|
Aug 18 2010, 01:55 AM
Post
#232
|
|
|
Prime Runner Ascendant ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 17,568 Joined: 26-March 09 From: Aurora, Colorado Member No.: 17,022 |
I thought the buttstroke was an unarmed specialty. I thought it was a Seduction Strategy/Specialty... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wobble.gif) |
|
|
|
Aug 18 2010, 03:46 AM
Post
#233
|
|
|
Canon Companion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 8,021 Joined: 2-March 03 From: The Morgue, Singapore LTG Member No.: 4,187 |
I thought it was a Seduction Strategy/Specialty... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wobble.gif) Yes, the counterpart to the Breaststroke. |
|
|
|
Aug 18 2010, 04:05 AM
Post
#234
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 106 Joined: 27-March 10 From: California Member No.: 18,371 |
|
|
|
|
Aug 18 2010, 05:19 AM
Post
#235
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 278 Joined: 26-June 09 Member No.: 17,321 |
WIN!
|
|
|
|
Aug 18 2010, 05:22 AM
Post
#236
|
|
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,473 Joined: 24-May 10 From: Beijing Member No.: 18,611 |
The BreastStroke can be used in conjunction with the StopShort special maneuver
|
|
|
|
Aug 18 2010, 09:21 AM
Post
#237
|
|
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,705 Joined: 5-October 09 From: You are in a clearing Member No.: 17,722 |
Extended clip changes the magazine size from 14 to 17-18 (17.5) depending on how generous the GM feels. It's good since it allows you to do a full and long burst with each clip and if it's 18 rounds that lets you do 3 long bursts before reloading! Since you're going batshit crazy with this, why not just upmod to a 100rnd Drum? I mean, it's still never going to be as awesome as my High Velocity modded Ares Heavy MP Laser (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wobble.gif) It's completely recoilless! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/vegm.gif) |
|
|
|
Aug 18 2010, 09:39 AM
Post
#238
|
|
|
Prime Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,803 Joined: 3-February 08 From: Finland Member No.: 15,628 |
Since you're going batshit crazy with this, why not just upmod to a 100rnd Drum? I mean, it's still never going to be as awesome as my High Velocity modded Ares Heavy MP Laser (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wobble.gif) It's completely recoilless! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/vegm.gif) Both of those ar dissallowed by the rules. |
|
|
|
Aug 18 2010, 10:28 AM
Post
#239
|
|
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,405 Joined: 23-February 04 From: Honolulu, HI Member No.: 6,099 |
Is the Stopshort considered a specialization of Breaststroke or implied within the grouping?
|
|
|
|
Aug 18 2010, 07:12 PM
Post
#240
|
|
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,705 Joined: 5-October 09 From: You are in a clearing Member No.: 17,722 |
|
|
|
|
Aug 18 2010, 11:16 PM
Post
#241
|
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 44 Joined: 26-February 10 Member No.: 18,204 |
So if I specialize in aiming for the groin with my pistol. Can I specialize in "The Nut Shot"?
|
|
|
|
Aug 18 2010, 11:57 PM
Post
#242
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 347 Joined: 28-June 10 Member No.: 18,765 |
QUOTE Can I specialize in "The Nut Shot"? Sure you are not thinking of the "Moneyshot"? Or perhaps it is "Beretta Steals Peach". |
|
|
|
Aug 19 2010, 07:25 AM
Post
#243
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 245 Joined: 17-August 10 Member No.: 18,943 |
Going back to the original post:
What is the threshold for hearing somebody get stabbed vs the threshhold for hearing somebody get shot with an internally silenced weapon? |
|
|
|
Aug 19 2010, 07:30 AM
Post
#244
|
|
|
Advocatus Diaboli ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 13,994 Joined: 20-November 07 From: USA Member No.: 14,282 |
Same threshold, 2. You could try to argue that a 'silent stabbing' is threshold 3 (=='whispering').
|
|
|
|
Aug 19 2010, 07:34 AM
Post
#245
|
|
|
Prime Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,803 Joined: 3-February 08 From: Finland Member No.: 15,628 |
Same threshold, 2. You could try to argue that a 'silent stabbing' is threshold 3 (=='whispering'). ANd a gun with internal silencer reduses the perception pool by 6 dice, so its much harder to notice (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wobble.gif) |
|
|
|
Aug 19 2010, 07:52 AM
Post
#246
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 245 Joined: 17-August 10 Member No.: 18,943 |
Now that's just silly...
On the plus side, if you slit their throat from behind you are at least close enough to catch the falling body so it doesn't go "thud". |
|
|
|
Aug 19 2010, 11:13 AM
Post
#247
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 152 Joined: 12-January 10 Member No.: 18,033 |
|
|
|
|
Aug 19 2010, 12:21 PM
Post
#248
|
|
|
Immortal Elf ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 14,358 Joined: 2-December 07 From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada Member No.: 14,465 |
You can do that while using a gun, too. I remember Cobb doing this in Inception. Right, because movies are so accurate. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nyahnyah.gif) IIRC, a WWII British Commando in an interview once stated that while a body makes a bit of noise falling, it was the rifle that actually made the most racket. Unless the guy was REALLY kitted out. He also pointed out that he used his combat knife for spreading butter on his bread more than anything else, but he always kept it, and kept it sharp. I also remember hearing about one WWII Canadian Commando that BURIED his knife after the war, and absolutely refused to talk about it at all. Scary fellow, as well. Fell down the stairs once, dead drunk, without making a sound. |
|
|
|
Aug 19 2010, 12:46 PM
Post
#249
|
|
|
Advocatus Diaboli ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 13,994 Joined: 20-November 07 From: USA Member No.: 14,282 |
Well, yes, Max. We went over a rundown of the silenced gunfire numbers earlier in the thread; he asked about Threshold. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
|
|
|
|
Aug 19 2010, 12:59 PM
Post
#250
|
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 1,989 Joined: 28-July 09 From: Somewhere along the brazilian coast Member No.: 17,437 |
ANd a gun with internal silencer reduses the perception pool by 6 dice, so its much harder to notice (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wobble.gif) So, you could argue that a silenced gun is as noisier as a knife and give the backstab a -6 penalty to hear as well. |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 28th November 2025 - 11:28 AM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.