IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

5 Pages V  « < 3 4 5  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Requesting some build help...
Thanee
post Sep 30 2010, 03:58 PM
Post #101


jacked in
**********

Group: Admin
Posts: 9,737
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 463



The language in the Neo-EPO description isn't as crystal-clear as the Synthacardium (I suppose there is no argument about that one (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif) ).

But a "test made with a skill" is certainly not a test where you happen to add a skill as a modifier to the dice pool to me. It's a synonym for "skill test".

Bye
Thanee
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kruger
post Sep 30 2010, 04:03 PM
Post #102


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 542
Joined: 1-August 10
From: Occupied San Diego
Member No.: 18,877



QUOTE (KarmaInferno @ Sep 30 2010, 05:58 AM) *
Pot, kettle, black.
And in other news, KarmaInferno continues with his misusing words and terms campaign, lol. Maybe if you keep mixing your language it will bake you a nice cake. For now, though perhaps you should stop baiting. I hear that's against the ToS on this forum.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
sabs
post Sep 30 2010, 04:07 PM
Post #103


Prime Runner
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,996
Joined: 1-June 10
Member No.: 18,649



QUOTE
Full Dodge: Character on full defense may add their Dodge
skill to their dice pool when defending against incoming attacks.


QUOTE
Gymnastics Dodge: Characters skilled in Gymnastics can
spend their action flipping, rolling, cartwheeling, etc. out of danger,
and may add Gymnastics skill to their dice pool against either ranged
or melee attacks.


Those are worded the /exact/ same way.

If you then take a look at how Specialization is worded:

QUOTE
Specializations add 2 dice to any tests made for that skill when the specialization is applicable
to the test.


Full Defense is not a Dodge skill test according to the description
You're just adding your ranks in Dodge to your Defense Dice Pool.

If you follow the logic that implies you can't use Synthcardium or Neo-EPO, you can't use Specializations either.
When you clearly can.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
KarmaInferno
post Sep 30 2010, 04:10 PM
Post #104


Old Man Jones
********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 4,415
Joined: 26-February 02
From: New York
Member No.: 1,699



QUOTE (Kruger @ Sep 30 2010, 12:03 PM) *
And in other news, KarmaInferno continues with his misusing words and terms campaign, lol. Maybe if you keep mixing your language it will bake you a nice cake. For now, though perhaps you should stop baiting. I hear that's against the ToS on this forum.


You asked why another poster keeps posting to this thread.

I was saying the same could be asked of you.

Personal attacks are also against the TOS, but we've seen you do it a number of times. Or is it only okay if you do it?




-k
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
sabs
post Sep 30 2010, 04:11 PM
Post #105


Prime Runner
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,996
Joined: 1-June 10
Member No.: 18,649



QUOTE (KarmaInferno @ Sep 30 2010, 05:10 PM) *
You asked why another poster keeps posting to this thread.

I was saying the same could be asked of you.

Or is it only okay if you do it?




-k


So don't take this personally
But could the both of you take your pissing match to PM's or something.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Doc Chase
post Sep 30 2010, 04:14 PM
Post #106


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,179
Joined: 10-June 10
From: St. Louis, UCAS/CAS Border
Member No.: 18,688



QUOTE (sabs @ Sep 30 2010, 04:07 PM) *
If you follow the logic that implies you can't use Synthcardium or Neo-EPO, you can't use Specializations either.
When you clearly can.


I would agree. There's no reason that either of these modifications would stop working when you're using the related skill, no matter if it's a test or not. If you're using Gymnastics in any manner, be it to show off or get out of the way (or showing off while getting out of the way, natch), then they're gonna apply.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kruger
post Sep 30 2010, 04:16 PM
Post #107


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 542
Joined: 1-August 10
From: Occupied San Diego
Member No.: 18,877



QUOTE (KarmaInferno @ Sep 30 2010, 09:10 AM) *
You asked why another poster keeps posting to this thread.
The question was so obviously rhetorical that even small children should have recognized it, lol.

As far as it only being okay when I do it, I never did what I said he was doing (arguing a non-point), so, I guess that the answer you're looking for is "No".

I know you're desperately trying to one-up me again like you seem to vainly attempt in many threads (lol "I was a rules arbiter hur hur"), and I am truly touched by the childish display.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Thanee
post Sep 30 2010, 04:16 PM
Post #108


jacked in
**********

Group: Admin
Posts: 9,737
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 463



QUOTE (sabs @ Sep 30 2010, 06:07 PM) *
If you follow the logic that implies you can't use Synthcardium or Neo-EPO, you can't use Specializations either. When you clearly can.


That is, indeed, interesting.

From the wording I would clearly say, that you cannot use specializations here.

It is a bit different to the Neo-EPO wording ("made for that skill" instead of "made with that skill"), but it's not really much of a difference.

You are, however, right, that the Dodge specialization is clearly meant to work that way (otherwise they would be rather idiotic (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) ).

The question is... is this an ambiguity in the way specializations are worded (for this particular case only, because otherwise it is not a problem) or is it actually meant to work otherwise (but in that case poorly worded throughout the book)?

Bye
Thanee
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Doc Chase
post Sep 30 2010, 04:18 PM
Post #109


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,179
Joined: 10-June 10
From: St. Louis, UCAS/CAS Border
Member No.: 18,688



QUOTE (Kruger @ Sep 30 2010, 05:16 PM) *
The question was so obviously rhetorical that even small children should have recognized it, lol.

As far as it only being okay when I do it, I never did what I said he was doing (arguing a non-point), so, I guess that the answer you're looking for is "No".

I know you're desperately trying to one-up me again like you seem to vainly attempt in many threads (lol "I was a rules arbiter hur hur"), and I am truly touched by the childish display.


Dude, seriously. Take it on out of here.

@Thanee: Why would implants like Synthacardium not work when you're still using Gymnastics for an intended purpose? Would this be a non-issue if the text said it was an addition to Athletics skills, rather than tests?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
sabs
post Sep 30 2010, 04:19 PM
Post #110


Prime Runner
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,996
Joined: 1-June 10
Member No.: 18,649



I think it's bad wording of the Full Defense Rules.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Thanee
post Sep 30 2010, 04:25 PM
Post #111


jacked in
**********

Group: Admin
Posts: 9,737
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 463



QUOTE (Doc Chase @ Sep 30 2010, 06:18 PM) *
@Thanee: Why would implants like Synthacardium not work when you're still using Gymnastics for an intended purpose? Would this be a non-issue if the text said it was an addition to Athletics skills, rather than tests?


Logically... I cannot give you a good reason. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
Ruleswise... as I said, it is the difference between using the skill as a skill and using the skill as a dice pool modifier.

Bye
Thanee
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
sabs
post Sep 30 2010, 04:27 PM
Post #112


Prime Runner
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,996
Joined: 1-June 10
Member No.: 18,649



QUOTE (Thanee @ Sep 30 2010, 05:25 PM) *
Logically... I cannot give you a good reason. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
Ruleswise... as I said, it is the difference between using the skill as a skill and using the skill as a dice pool modifier.

Bye
Thanee


I think rule-wise you're reading a strict definition of the words used by Catalyst, who has been known to not consider their wording very well in the past.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Doc Chase
post Sep 30 2010, 04:27 PM
Post #113


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,179
Joined: 10-June 10
From: St. Louis, UCAS/CAS Border
Member No.: 18,688



QUOTE (Thanee @ Sep 30 2010, 05:25 PM) *
Logically... I cannot give you a good reason. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
Ruleswise... as I said, it is the difference between using the skill as a skill and using the skill as a dice pool modifier.

Bye
Thanee


(IMG:style_emoticons/default/nyahnyah.gif)

It's not something I have to deal with often - sometimes I can't quite get my runners to remember there's a Dodge skill - but were it my group, I'd just let those kinds of modifiers augment the skill in any situation.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Yerameyahu
post Sep 30 2010, 04:30 PM
Post #114


Advocatus Diaboli
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 13,994
Joined: 20-November 07
From: USA
Member No.: 14,282



*shrug* A Test involving skills is a Test involving skills.

Thanee, you've said 'Bye' about a dozen times now, but you're still here. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

5 Pages V  « < 3 4 5
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 14th May 2026 - 06:04 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.