IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

6 Pages V  « < 4 5 6  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Programs past 12
Yerameyahu
post Oct 16 2010, 05:18 AM
Post #126


Advocatus Diaboli
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 13,994
Joined: 20-November 07
From: USA
Member No.: 14,282



You should read back through this (and other) threads, as part of your research. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) You're not quite right on how System and Response limit things, for one.

The Errata only says that self-coded programs don't degrade from 'planned obsolescence'. They should certainly still degrade from actual obsolescence.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Wraith235
post Oct 16 2010, 05:39 AM
Post #127


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 182
Joined: 22-January 07
Member No.: 10,736



actually I am correct on system and response

pg. 222 SR4A
System measures the power of the device’s operating system (OS)
sofware. Tis includes its stability, multitasking properties, ability to
control hardware, resources, and the general quality of its code. If the
System sofware ever crashes, the entire device crashes. System limits
the rating of programs running on the device, and sets the limit on most
devices for the number of programs that can be run without a Response
drop. The System program is limited by the base Response rating of the
device it is on: if the base Response rating of the device is lower than the
System rating, then the System rating is set to equal the Response rating.

System also sets the size of the Matrix Condition Monitor of persona
programs running on the device (Cybercombat, p. 236).

pg. 232 SR4A
In order to use a program, it must be running. A running program
is executed by the device on which your persona is running and
belongs to your persona; only you may use the program. The System
rating of the device limits the rating of the program. A program operates
at its own rating or the System of the device, whichever is lower.


if theres a page referance that shows how Response--> system ---> Programs is not the case please point it out .... and no I am not talking Techno's as they by default break 85% of the hacking rules ... Im talking Code and programs

I assume your talking about the reality filter and I'll admit Im wrong there after the quotes as the word "Base" is used

and yes I scoured through the thread before yo replied and it was a few replies later that I saw that
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Yerameyahu
post Oct 16 2010, 05:42 AM
Post #128


Advocatus Diaboli
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 13,994
Joined: 20-November 07
From: USA
Member No.: 14,282



Yup. "Base" is a pretty important distinction. In addition, and as mentioned dozens of times in this thread: Optimization.

I'm not trying to rag on you, but it's important to read back to avoid the repetition. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Wraith235
post Oct 16 2010, 05:44 AM
Post #129


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 182
Joined: 22-January 07
Member No.: 10,736



I admit I have not Read that one in depth ...... but I will ....

I was talking base rules w/o optimization since thats what things looked like in the begining
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Yerameyahu
post Oct 16 2010, 05:45 AM
Post #130


Advocatus Diaboli
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 13,994
Joined: 20-November 07
From: USA
Member No.: 14,282



Yeah, it's a pretty major change, and it throws the System limit out the window. :/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Wraith235
post Oct 16 2010, 06:05 AM
Post #131


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 182
Joined: 22-January 07
Member No.: 10,736



ok .... ya .... thats relativly sick

tho the wording is signifigantly different between the 2 editions of the core book ... unwired was linked to SR4 ... not SR4A

but ya .... it definatly changes the program/comlink hacker

but at the same time I see why it was done .... it puts them on par with the techno allbeit for MUCH less effort and cost (1275 for a Erg / opt 6 program pirated in roughly 10-12 hrs) with a week on the patch

tho a techno w/ a reso 12 (6 submersion grades) can still outclass them through threading (CF12 max thread to a 24)

and IMHO the clasic cyber hacker needed something .... with technos in 4th there was no reason to run any hacker other than a techno due to the pure superiority they held for a long time
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
sabs
post Oct 16 2010, 12:28 PM
Post #132


Prime Runner
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,996
Joined: 1-June 10
Member No.: 18,649



24? with a 20 max die pool, what the hell.
Why do technos need that much /stuff/

noone gets to have a 'skill' over 7.. except mages with Magic.. but a 24?
That's ridiculous.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SleepIncarnate
post Oct 16 2010, 01:14 PM
Post #133


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 956
Joined: 16-June 07
From: Like a coyote, always on the move
Member No.: 11,931



Mages are the same way though sabs, at Magic 12 they can overcast to force 24 (without the sustaining penalty). And think about trolls with good armor on their damage soak rolls, or full blown elf social adepts, or a human or pixie with a high edge, or any other example. There's lots of ways to get ridiculously high dice pools, and most people don't need to soak physical damage for them.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Karoline
post Oct 16 2010, 02:20 PM
Post #134


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,679
Joined: 19-September 09
Member No.: 17,652



Indeed, getting a 24 CF (Ignoring the 285 karma for resonance, 123 karma for submersion, and 57 karma per CF) would require getting 12 hits on a software + resonance test. Even assuming 12 resonance, 7 software, and a paragon, you only have 21 dice to get 12 hits, and then you have to resist 12P fading with a (stat) + resonance test which is going to max out around 19. Even if you burn edge on both tests you're not very likely to get enough hits.

People really need to stop going "Holy crap, look at these things that could happen" with no consideration for it being possible but not probable. As I've said from the beginning, yes, a starting TM can get a 12 program in theory but it is exceptionally difficult and requires sacrifices. Comparing it to just coding up a rating 12 program is, frankly, stupid.

And once again, people have ignored the 6 points worth of bonuses that Hackers can easily get to all their matrix stuff, which evens out the bonus that TMs can get through threading, except the hacker doesn't have to worry about rolling good for the bonus, or taking damage for the bonus.

People who complain about TMs have obviously never played both a TM and a hacker, or they've made their hacker wrong.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Wraith235
post Oct 16 2010, 04:01 PM
Post #135


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 182
Joined: 22-January 07
Member No.: 10,736



hey I said Max ... as in absolute max ....

and yes I have played a techno

ans while theoretical and improbable.... Dice cap would be 24 + 6(7 with aptitude) x2 .... not 20 .... keep in mind Dicepool cap says skill + attribute (or in this case skill + program)x2 or 20 whichever is higher
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Yerameyahu
post Oct 16 2010, 04:07 PM
Post #136


Advocatus Diaboli
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 13,994
Joined: 20-November 07
From: USA
Member No.: 14,282



I haven't actually heard 'skill + program' in the context of the dice cap.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tymeaus Jalynsfe...
post Oct 16 2010, 04:47 PM
Post #137


Prime Runner Ascendant
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 17,568
Joined: 26-March 09
From: Aurora, Colorado
Member No.: 17,022



QUOTE (tagz @ Oct 15 2010, 06:13 PM) *
I use the "Trying Again" modifier, a -2 per retry. The wording is "may attempt a task she has previously failed, but each successive attempt incurs a -2 dice pool modifier", I interpret "failed" as the TM did not get the result they intended to and are retrying the test. Well within RAW and using it on something like "re-threading to maximum" is exactly the RAI of this rule in the first place.


I like this as well... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wobble.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Wraith235
post Oct 20 2010, 08:55 AM
Post #138


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 182
Joined: 22-January 07
Member No.: 10,736



QUOTE (Yerameyahu @ Oct 16 2010, 12:07 PM) *
I haven't actually heard 'skill + program' in the context of the dice cap.



Took me a while to get back here .... but here is the quote for you

pg 226 SR4A Last paragraph

In Matrix tests, the attribute portion of the test is replaced with a
program or Matrix attribute. For example, rather than using Gunnery
+ Agility to fre from an assault drone, you would use Gunnery +
Command if you were fring a mounted medium machine. All rules
that apply to attributes apply to programs or Matrix attributes instead.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
KarmaInferno
post Oct 20 2010, 02:09 PM
Post #139


Old Man Jones
********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 4,415
Joined: 26-February 02
From: New York
Member No.: 1,699



Yeah, but that's still basically attribute + skill.

Skills for Autonomous Mode are Autosofts and of course the driver's skill for AR and VR.

Vehicle attribute is mostly Pilot. AR attribute is mostly Command. VR Attribute is mostly Response.




-k
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
sabs
post Oct 20 2010, 02:11 PM
Post #140


Prime Runner
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,996
Joined: 1-June 10
Member No.: 18,649



It says Matrix tests.
so really, Hacking+Exploit should work the same way.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Wraith235
post Oct 20 2010, 02:48 PM
Post #141


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 182
Joined: 22-January 07
Member No.: 10,736



the example is ... Gunnery (skill) + Command (program)
so by defaultt ... Hacking (skill) + Exploit (program)

forgive me for the next statment I just woke up and brain isnt in 100% Function mode yet

a Drone Firing a weapon uses Pilot + Clearsight I think ?

Gunnery + Command assumes your jumped into the drone thereby making it a matrix test
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
sabs
post Oct 20 2010, 03:19 PM
Post #142


Prime Runner
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,996
Joined: 1-June 10
Member No.: 18,649



Gunnery+command is not jumped into, it is 'remote control'
jumped into would be sensors+gunnery

Just to make your life more hellish (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
A drone firing would use Pilot+targetting

Which is dumb.

Rigger with Gunnery: 5, Command 6
A Drone with response 3, sensors 2, Pilot 3, targetting 3

When shooting it's mounted weapon
Jumped in: 9 DP (includes +2 for VR)
remote controlled: 11 DP
Pilot: 6 DP

Those numbers seem very weird to me.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Wraith235
post Oct 20 2010, 04:20 PM
Post #143


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 182
Joined: 22-January 07
Member No.: 10,736



hey I dont claim to know Riggers very Well ....BUT ....Either way

Skill + Program (nod)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
KarmaInferno
post Oct 20 2010, 06:07 PM
Post #144


Old Man Jones
********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 4,415
Joined: 26-February 02
From: New York
Member No.: 1,699



It's clearer to say Skill + Attribute.

Autosofts are programs, Pilot is a program, Command is a program. Some programs are Skill equivalents, some are Attribute equivalents. It gets confusing.

And sometimes it's Skill + Hardware. Response, Sensor, etc. Which is still Skill + Attribute.



-k
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Yerameyahu
post Oct 20 2010, 06:08 PM
Post #145


Advocatus Diaboli
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 13,994
Joined: 20-November 07
From: USA
Member No.: 14,282



Yeah, that's why I asked. It really is messy. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tagz
post Oct 20 2010, 10:50 PM
Post #146


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 492
Joined: 28-July 09
Member No.: 17,440



Yeah, do a hack using skillwires and it's Program + Program.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

6 Pages V  « < 4 5 6
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 11th February 2026 - 10:02 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.