IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

3 Pages V  < 1 2 3  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Big, Heavy, Large, Insane Amounts of Armor, Is there a limit
hobgoblin
post Mar 30 2004, 08:13 PM
Post #51


panda!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,331
Joined: 8-March 02
From: north of central europe
Member No.: 2,242



err, about a similar topic:

did there every come a official explanation if one can mix and match parts from diffrent armor/fashion lines in CC?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
A Clockwork Lime
post Mar 30 2004, 08:16 PM
Post #52


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,616
Joined: 15-March 04
Member No.: 6,158



You're allowed to, but it counts as layering. Always has.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hobgoblin
post Mar 30 2004, 11:52 PM
Post #53


panda!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,331
Joined: 8-March 02
From: north of central europe
Member No.: 2,242



err, ok. thanks for reminding me :)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
The White Dwarf
post Mar 31 2004, 02:52 AM
Post #54


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 614
Joined: 17-June 03
From: A safehouse about to be compromised by ninjas
Member No.: 4,754



Theres no hard limit to armor via any specific game rule, only what you can fit onto a character or car.

As for personal armor, no ones had it quite right yet. Theres 2 penalties for armor exceeding quickness.

The first is reduced combat pool. This is determined by adding up the total ballistic ratings and subtracting the quickness, then the same with impact, and then adding the differences. For every 2 points leftover, you lose 1 combat pool. So with quickness 6, wearing an armor jacket (5/3) and a long coat (4/3) youd lose 1 combat pool (4+5-6=3, 3+3-6=0, 3+0=3, 3/2=1.5, lose 1 point).

The second is reduced movment / quickness TN penalties. This is determined by adding up the total ballistic ratings of all your armor. For each point over your quickness you lose 1 move and get +1 tn to quickness linked tests. So with quickness 6, wearing an armor jacket (5/3) and a long coat (4/3) youd lose 3 move and suffer +3 tn to quickness tests (4+5=9, 9-6=3, you get 3 pt penalty).

Form Fitting Body Armor comes in a max rating of 4/1. It also counts towards neither of the above as per the most current errate on the offical SR webpage.

Thus the most min/max you could get with armor is to have all your worn ballistic armor to add to your quickness, and your worn impact armor to add to 1 over your quickness; and then add form fitting. So something like Long Coat (4/2), Rapid Transit Jumpsuit (2/4), Form Fitting (4/1) gives you effective ratings of (7/5) plus whatever 'ware you have.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BitBasher
post Mar 31 2004, 03:09 AM
Post #55


Traumatizing players since 1992
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 3,282
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Las Vegas, NV
Member No.: 220



No, you missed the fact that stictly by the wording of toe book you can only stack 2 layers of armor, not three or more.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
John Campbell
post Mar 31 2004, 03:47 AM
Post #56


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,028
Joined: 9-November 02
From: The Republic of Vermont
Member No.: 3,581



Technically, you can stack as many as you want. However, only the two best in each category (Ballistic/Impact) affect your armor rating.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BitBasher
post Mar 31 2004, 05:00 AM
Post #57


Traumatizing players since 1992
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 3,282
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Las Vegas, NV
Member No.: 220



Yes, that's true, but they ALL count against your penalties for quickness and combat pool though, :D
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Voran
post Mar 31 2004, 06:28 AM
Post #58


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,403
Joined: 23-February 04
From: Honolulu, HI
Member No.: 6,099



A pity they didn't include rules for making armors in Cannon Comp. I would think, theoretically, you could come up with more combat oriented component based armor. The fuss in layering armor comes from trying to layer stuff that wasn't meant to be layered. It shouldn't be too hard to come up with component armor that gives a decent 6/5 or 7/6 and still has a decent conceal rating.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Limping Jacob
post Mar 31 2004, 06:36 AM
Post #59


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 94
Joined: 14-March 04
Member No.: 6,154



Sure it should be a problem. SR makes it kinda clear that once you get into 6/5 or 7/6 territory, you're talking security and heavy armors. That suggests that armor technology isn't compact/advanced enough to make concealable armors with ratings that high.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Modesitt
post Mar 31 2004, 07:14 AM
Post #60


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 316
Joined: 18-July 03
Member No.: 4,963



QUOTE
A pity they didn't include rules for making armors in Cannon Comp. I would think, theoretically, you could come up with more combat oriented component based armor. The fuss in layering armor comes from trying to layer stuff that wasn't meant to be layered. It shouldn't be too hard to come up with component armor that gives a decent 6/5 or 7/6 and still has a decent conceal rating.


To perform a shamless plug, I scratched up an armor creation system designed to mimic the BBB armors as closely as possible. Linkage HERE. Feel free to remove all of the Rules and Regulations except for the ones related to rounding and changing 12 to 13, all of the others there mainly to follow the random patterns the SR developers put into the BBB armors.

I might try to find a method to the madness of the clothing lines in SR. Who knows, maybe they built it off of a vague system of some kind.

...

Yeah.

Right.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
The White Dwarf
post Mar 31 2004, 02:00 PM
Post #61


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 614
Joined: 17-June 03
From: A safehouse about to be compromised by ninjas
Member No.: 4,754



Im not going into the stacking thing. You read it how you want to read it. But its obviously open to interpretation based on your impression of the grammar involved and the surrounding context. Until I see a FAQ clarifying the subject one way or the other I refuse to accept either interpretation as more legit than the other. Thus I left it out entirly as those are the rules for determining penalties, not for how much you can wear in total ever.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BitBasher
post Mar 31 2004, 04:56 PM
Post #62


Traumatizing players since 1992
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 3,282
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Las Vegas, NV
Member No.: 220



I can agree with that.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
The White Dwarf
post Apr 1 2004, 07:02 AM
Post #63


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 614
Joined: 17-June 03
From: A safehouse about to be compromised by ninjas
Member No.: 4,754



OMG a single sentence post about agreement... someone take photos!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Glyph
post Apr 1 2004, 07:52 AM
Post #64


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,116
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 1,449



The big thing to remember about both layered armor and the armored spell is that they are not hardened armor. In other words, they may only need to roll a 2 against anything ranging from a holdout pistol to a heavy pistol, but they still need 8 of them to stage down a Deadly wound.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Eyeless Blond
post Apr 1 2004, 12:03 PM
Post #65


Decker on the Threshold
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 2,922
Joined: 14-March 04
Member No.: 6,156



Yeah, well hardened armor and gel packs aren't for starting characters anyway. In fact gel packs kinda suck; very few things have a Power of less than 5-6, which is about as high as non-hardened armor gets.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tisoz
post Apr 4 2004, 09:44 AM
Post #66


Free Spirit
*******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 3,948
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Bloomington, IN UCAS
Member No.: 1,920



QUOTE (Modesitt)
If you're aiming for pointlessly high armor and your GM says only 2 layers, mosey on over to the cyberlimbs and armor section(Body plating). After the cost of the limb, 2.5 ECU and 12,500 equals +1 armor of your choice. An armored jacket, FFBA, and a synthetic cyberleg can get you up to 7/7. Go obvious and you can add 4 more points where you want it, taking you to 9/9 without breaking a sweat.

Cyberarmor ballistic bonuses count for the purposes of calculating quickness penalties, but cyberarmor is 'cumulative', meaning they just get added on top like shields. It's not impossible to get your impact to 30+ with the help of an excessive amount of impact cybearmor, although what you'd NEED that much impact for is something else entirely. Maybe if you're on a bomb squad.

I encourage people to point out flaws in my rules-fu. Pertinent pages are 35-36 M&M.

There's a limit of no more than 10 points of ballistic or 10 points of impact armor per limb, p.36 M&M.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

3 Pages V  < 1 2 3
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 2nd January 2025 - 11:57 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.