IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Vehicle Sensor Upgrade, Houserule Modification
NiL_FisK_Urd
post Mar 8 2012, 05:06 PM
Post #1


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 881
Joined: 13-November 11
From: Vienna, Austria
Member No.: 43,494



Vehicle Sensor Upgrade (All)
This modification improves the vehicle sensor rating by +1. The modification can be taken more than once, up to a maximum sensor value of 6.
(Note: use the new sensor value for calculating cost, threshold and aviability).
Slots: 0
Threshhold: Sensor Rating*5
Tools: Facility
Cost: Sensor Package Capacity*Sensor Rating*125
Aviability: Sensor Rating *4
Special Skill: Hardware

Any thoughts on this modification? I used "Sensor Package Capacity" for the calculating price to scale the sensor coasts a bit with the amount of the vehicle sensors.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
KarmaInferno
post Mar 8 2012, 05:13 PM
Post #2


Old Man Jones
********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 4,415
Joined: 26-February 02
From: New York
Member No.: 1,699



Um. Is this meant to replace the existing sensor upgrade rules entirely?

Because it's not actually all that hard to get Sensor 6 with the existing system.




-k
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
NiL_FisK_Urd
post Mar 8 2012, 05:17 PM
Post #3


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 881
Joined: 13-November 11
From: Vienna, Austria
Member No.: 43,494



yes, it is meant to replace it - way less micromanagement.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Yerameyahu
post Mar 8 2012, 06:11 PM
Post #4


Advocatus Diaboli
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 13,994
Joined: 20-November 07
From: USA
Member No.: 14,282



Does this make it too hard, though? Avail 24 isn't nothing, and it's way more than the subsidiary sensors are.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Froggie
post Mar 8 2012, 10:07 PM
Post #5


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 51
Joined: 8-December 08
From: Ottawa, Ontario
Member No.: 16,668



QUOTE (Yerameyahu @ Mar 8 2012, 01:11 PM) *
Does this make it too hard, though? Avail 24 isn't nothing, and it's way more than the subsidiary sensors are.


Maybe it was intended to be limiting factor? A 'cost' for getting a sensor package suited for your specific vehicle model?

What if you tied the availability to that of the vehicle? lower end vehicles would be easier to upgrade (more parts/upgrade kits are available on the market) and things like T-Birds, fighter jets and container ships would be much harder to upgrade (we had to steal these SOTA sensors from a Fed-boeing factory!).

Or maybe just limit it to Avail = Rating * 3
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
KarmaInferno
post Mar 9 2012, 03:19 PM
Post #6


Old Man Jones
********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 4,415
Joined: 26-February 02
From: New York
Member No.: 1,699



Sensor Rating * 4 isn't too bad.

You could then get Sensor upgrades to 3 at chargen, up to 5 with Restricted Gear.

You'd need a 21 dice pool in Negotiate (Bargaining) to get Sensor 6 in play, but that's not actually that hard considering you get to add up to Charisma in Street Cred as bonus dice, and up to 10 more dice on top of that by spending extra money.




-k
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Yerameyahu
post Mar 9 2012, 03:27 PM
Post #7


Advocatus Diaboli
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 13,994
Joined: 20-November 07
From: USA
Member No.: 14,282



My point is that it seems much harder than rating 6 sensors *currently* are, though. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) So I'm asking if that's intended, and how it jives with how easy it is to get the identical sensor in your handheld.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 25th April 2024 - 11:47 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.