IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Camera neutralizers and burners, what can and can't they do?
FuelDrop
post Oct 1 2012, 09:53 AM
Post #1


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,389
Joined: 20-August 12
From: Bunbury, western australia
Member No.: 53,300



I'm creating this thread to avoid derailing the cybereyes thread.

Camera neutralizers (Arsenal) and burners (spy games) are capable of temporarily or permanently disabling cameras they encounter, including microcameras and drone sensors. This makes me think: what other cameras might get hit by these devices?

These are some of the targets that are... interesting.
1) Cybereyes. The potential damage caused by flashing the most common cyberware in the world might be anything from someone having to blink and rub their eyes (the horror!), permanent blindness, car accidents, or anything else that suddenly going blind in public might cause. Oh, and irrisponsable use of a camera burner in a public place can quickly be very expensive.
2) Smartguns. Obviously, your enemy taking out your smartgun camera in the middle of a fight is at best annoying. However, as I'm yet to see any form of IFF system mentioned with these devices the odds are that your friend's camera burner is to blame for your smartgun going blind. Oops.
3) Contact lenses and glasses with built in cameras. A blast of light strong enough to take out a high end camera is not really something you want to have shooting at your eyes...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
The Jopp
post Oct 1 2012, 11:09 AM
Post #2


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,925
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 948



QUOTE (FuelDrop @ Oct 1 2012, 10:53 AM) *
I'm creating this thread to avoid derailing the cybereyes thread.

Camera neutralizers (Arsenal) and burners (spy games) are capable of temporarily or permanently disabling cameras they encounter, including microcameras and drone sensors. This makes me think: what other cameras might get hit by these devices?


I have a hard time seeing that they SHOULD affect cybereyes as they are:

A: Paid with Essence
B: Implanted INSIDE your body.
C: The amounts of lawsuits against corps for rendering peoples legal cyberware destroyed.
D: Secondary damages for becoming blind when:
-D1: Driving a fast moving vehicle
-D2: Handling hazardous material
-D3: Visiting a potential business partner...THAT BLINDS YOU

Now, obvious and concealed actual cameras like:
-Security Cameras
-Spy Cameras
-Drone Cameras
-Smartgun Cameras
-Hand held/External camera sensors
-Worn Goggles
-Contact Lenses [I have a hard time with putting them here as I cant see a camera inside a LENS]

They are most likely affected and probably what the rules INTEND for them to affect.

Otherwise my runner will start running around with such things against any and all opposition and flash them the first round of combat. Think about it.
-Cyberzombies
-Hackers
-Streetsams
-Cybered Adepts/Mages

Come one, almost EVERYONE has cybereyes that isn't a mage since the tech is so damn cheap unless they are technophobe luddites.

Used cybereyes is 250Y and 0,24 essence.

For 0,24 essence i can get cool glowing eyes with Pervert-O-Vision with recording ability and an image link so I can surf porn without anyone seeing. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/grinbig.gif)

AND THEN SOMEONE FLASHES ME BLIND BECAUSE I VISITED THEIR COMPANY??? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wacko.gif)


Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Thanee
post Oct 1 2012, 01:25 PM
Post #3


jacked in
**********

Group: Admin
Posts: 9,387
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 463



Since it mentions eratically moving cameras, cybereyes and guncams are not affected, probably, unless they are stationary.

Bye
Thanee
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
The Jopp
post Oct 1 2012, 01:54 PM
Post #4


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,925
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 948



QUOTE (Thanee @ Oct 1 2012, 02:25 PM) *
Since it mentions eratically moving cameras, cybereyes and guncams are not affected, probably, unless they are stationary.

Bye
Thanee


Hmm, but what constitutes an "eratically" moving camera? Drone cameras can be damn purposeful and still if they have to - not to mention INVISIBLE with ruhenium coating.

The entire tech seems damn far fetched unless you have someone aiming the device at a camera.

Not to mention a two way mirror cover in front of the camera - how will it even DETECT that a camera exist if you can cover it up.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Lantzer
post Oct 2 2012, 07:33 PM
Post #5


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 693
Joined: 26-March 03
Member No.: 4,335



My take:

The camera neutralizer (Arsenal) doesn't know or care if your paid essence for those cybereyes. If it detects a CCD device, it aims and shoots. The only way to protect your CCDs whether they be cybereyes, drone cameras, smartguns, goggles, steadycams, or your comlink camera, would be to conceal them behind a one-way filter (Mirror shades and visisbility mods for the win!).

Moving the camera erattically helps a little, as the system has to constantly redetect it. This tactic is obviously of more use against low-rated systems.

I wonder how many cameras a system can blind at once?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Halinn
post Oct 2 2012, 08:57 PM
Post #6


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,018
Joined: 3-July 10
Member No.: 18,786



If a Johnson takes out some device that shoots me in the eyes, you can bet your ass that I'm going to shoot him right back.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Christian Lafay
post Oct 3 2012, 12:42 AM
Post #7


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 673
Joined: 9-May 08
Member No.: 15,965



QUOTE (Halinn @ Oct 2 2012, 08:57 PM) *
If a Johnson takes out some device that shoots me in the eyes, you can bet your ass that I'm going to shoot him right back.

That is why a Johnson who has needs to shoot your eyes into an off position would pick a meeting spot with flashing lights, like a club, and hide the burner among the lights with it programmed to pay attention to him an an area around him alone.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
The Jopp
post Oct 3 2012, 07:26 AM
Post #8


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,925
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 948



Well, the system is rather limited if we look at neutralizers:

QUOTE
This system uses infrared lasers and
photo-detecting transistors to scan an area for the reflectivity
and shape of the image-producing sensors used in digital cameras
.


Cybereyes work differently from cameras

QUOTE
Eye Recording Unit: The eye recording unit connects
to the user’s optical nerves and records all data directly into
attached storage
(accessible by the user’s PAN). To prevent
data theft, the user can opt to make this storage only accessible
by special means (sim module, datajack, etc.).


This means that such tech is extremely limited as you CANNOT stop people from seeing and recording things unless you simply HIDE things.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Dolanar
post Oct 3 2012, 12:53 PM
Post #9


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 651
Joined: 20-July 12
From: Arizona
Member No.: 53,066



By that reading it wouldn't work on any of the cameras built into equipment such as goggles or contact lenses as most of the reflectivity is either from glasses or contacts which means anyone wearing contacts period would be blinded camera or no, & the same would go for glasses goggles.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mister__joshua
post Oct 3 2012, 01:10 PM
Post #10


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,229
Joined: 20-December 10
From: Land of the Oatcakes
Member No.: 19,241



QUOTE (Lantzer @ Oct 2 2012, 08:33 PM) *
My take:

The camera neutralizer (Arsenal) doesn't know or care if your paid essence for those cybereyes. If it detects a CCD device, it aims and shoots. The only way to protect your CCDs whether they be cybereyes, drone cameras, smartguns, goggles, steadycams, or your comlink camera, would be to conceal them behind a one-way filter (Mirror shades and visisbility mods for the win!).

Moving the camera erattically helps a little, as the system has to constantly redetect it. This tactic is obviously of more use against low-rated systems.

I wonder how many cameras a system can blind at once?


I reckon you'd need to use anti surveillance
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Yerameyahu
post Oct 3 2012, 01:13 PM
Post #11


Advocatus Diaboli
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 13,994
Joined: 20-November 07
From: USA
Member No.: 14,282



Exactly, The Jopp. I mentioned simrig earlier, but it's the same thing.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 29th January 2025 - 03:55 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.